- Added `ImapFindSentMailboxService` to replace utility function it
fixes an edge case where special flag `Sent` folder may have zero
messages, we fall back to regex based approach to find other candidates
- Fixed edge case where some servers may not return text content for
body it parses the HTML in that case
- Some other enhancements with capability based detection
Tested with Stalwart server and Titan email
/closes #13884
# Implement Morph Frontend Settings
Possiblity to create a morh relation from the Settings !
## Overview
Morph object system with new frontend settings UI for configuring morph
relations.
## What Changed
- **New Components**: `SettingsDataModelFieldMorphRelationForm`,
`SettingsMorphRelationMultiSelect`
- **Form System**: React Hook Form + Zod validation for morph relation
configuration
- **Preview System**: Live preview of field configurations with
validation
- **State Management**: Enhanced component state handling for complex
form interactions
## Technical Details
- **Architecture**: Restructured field input/display components for
better maintainability
- **Types**: Added comprehensive TypeScript types for morph relations
(`isFieldMorphRelation`, etc.)
- **Validation**: Dynamic validation rules based on field types and
relation patterns
- **Performance**: Optimized rendering with proper state management
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
### The Issue
Every PR is currently failing the REST API breaking changes check with
errors like:
```
Could not find /components/schemas/ViewForResponse
Could not find /components/schemas/View
Could not find /components/schemas/ViewForUpdate
...
```
This is happening because the View REST endpoints were added to main `(/rest/metadata/views, /rest/metadata/viewFields, etc.)` but the corresponding OpenAPI schema definitions were missing from components.utils.ts.
### The Fix
Added the missing schema definitions for all View-related entities:
- view, viewField, viewFilter, viewSort, viewGroup, viewFilterGroup
- Each entity includes 3 schema variants: base, ForUpdate, and ForResponse
This ensures the OpenAPI spec properly documents what's already exposed.
### Note about CI
This PR will still show the error in CI since it's comparing against the current main branch. Once merged, this should
resolve the issue for future PRs.
### Open Question
Should the View REST endpoints be gated behind the IS_CORE_VIEW_ENABLED feature flag? Currently they're always exposed
while the GraphQL resolvers do check this flag. Happy to add that in a follow-up if needed.
# Introduction
- Decided to remove delete_field resulting from delete_object as ON
CASCADE will handle it
- Still ordering delete_field in first place in order to handle
relationTargetFieldMetadata deletion on passed delete_object that
contains relation field
## Context
- Adding ts-vector generatedType/asExpression as TS_VECTOR settings
- Using those settings to setup properly tsVector searchVector column
through the new migration runner
- Fix enum creation/suppression
Note: regarding the new tsVector, we should implement a command to
update existing fields
TODO:
- TS_VECTOR search vector column update (note: should be properly
updated whenever the object labelIdentifier is updated or a new TEXT
field is added to the object to follow the current logic)
- relation type fields and columns are not implemented yet
- index migrations
Issue: https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/13913
Motivation/Problem:
Bulk delete and query paths were composing filters differently, causing
mismatches. In some cases this led to invalid or empty GraphQL filters
(e.g. {"and":[{}]}), breaking delete operations.
Fix:
Unify filter composition (combinedFilter) across queries and bulk
delete, ensuring consistent handling of base filters + soft-deleted
clause. Also adjusted record filter grouping logic to avoid dropping
filters when no groups exist.
Result:
Filtered queries and bulk deletes now behave consistently and reliably
without producing broken filters.
---------
Co-authored-by: root <root@DESKTOP-E2VOJGE>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Quick fix : make workflow version available in runs.
This would global refactor. We should not have both version and run flow
here.
I will probably stop using the same component in both at some point and
rather duplicate. Versions and Workflow will use version. Runs will use
flow.
# Introduction
Moving validation directly in the builder that has the perfect
granularity to do it.
When importing we won't have to infer and dispatch on the operation
nature ( update delete create ) and validate accordingly
## Objects
Only migrated object validation for the moment even though create object
involves a validate flat field metadata creation call too
## TODO
- improve `otherFlatObjectMetadataMapsToValidate` naming too vague
## Next
- handle fields validation within fields actions build
- Unit test coverage validation issue on builder and validate
- integration test plugging with new feature flag
## Manual tested
- Update
- Delete
- Create TODO
This PR prepares and simplify option dropdown for using record fields.
I had a problem while trying to use currentRecordFields directly with
ordering so I stayed with the actual column definition system.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
This PR adds a new RecordField abstraction to mimick the behavior of
RecordFilter, RecordSort and other similar concepts that allow to have
something that is not related directly to views.
It is closely following the same pattern with an Effect component to
initialize it from views and CRUD hooks to modify it.
Although for this concept we save to view fields automatically for every
modification.
This PR does not implement saving to view fields, it is just a parallel
code path that is meant to be built to see if everything behaves the
same then we'll remove the old code path at the end by saving record
fields instead of the many states for columns, fields definitions, etc.
