Introduce a server-level AppRegistration entity for managing application
identity, OAuth client credentials, and server-scoped encrypted variables.
- AppRegistration entity with clientId, clientSecretHash, redirectUris, scopes
- AppRegistrationVariable entity with AES-256-GCM encryption for secrets
- Full CRUD resolver secured with SettingsPermissionGuard
- Universal identifier guard service for collision detection
- Variable resolution service for runtime secret access
- Database migration creating both tables with proper indexes/FKs
- ApplicationEntity gains appRegistrationId FK (ON DELETE SET NULL)
- Shared types: ServerVariables, updated ApplicationManifest
- Unit tests for encryption, identifier guard, and service logic
Made-with: Cursor
## Remove all Recoil references and replace with Jotai
### Summary
- Removed every occurrence of Recoil from the entire codebase, replacing
with Jotai equivalents where applicable
- Updated `README.md` tech stack: `Recoil` → `Jotai`
- Rewrote documentation code examples to use
`createAtomState`/`useAtomState` instead of `atom`/`useRecoilState`, and
removed `RecoilRoot` wrappers
- Cleaned up source code comment and Cursor rules that referenced Recoil
- Applied changes across all 13 locale translations (ar, cs, de, es, fr,
it, ja, ko, pt, ro, ru, tr, zh)
## Summary
The global `jotaiStore` singleton was shared across all tests without
reset, leaking state between test suites and causing unbounded heap
growth within each Jest worker.
- `getJestMetadataAndApolloMocksWrapper` now creates a **fresh Jotai
store per wrapper** (equivalent of RecoilRoot isolation), so each test
gets clean state
- Added `workerIdleMemoryLimit: '512MB'` to recycle workers that still
accumulate memory
- Set `maxWorkers: 3` for CI
## Performance
Measured on 48 test suites (command-menu + views + object-record hooks),
single worker:
| Metric | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Peak heap | **1519 MB** | **~530 MB** (-65%) |
| Final heap | **1519 MB** | **437 MB** (-71%) |
| Growth pattern | Monotonic (never freed) | Bounded sawtooth (recycled
at 512MB) |
## Fix SDK first-run build failure when generated API client is missing
### Problem
When running `twenty app:dev` for the first time, the build pipeline
crashes because:
1. The esbuild front-component watcher tries to resolve
`twenty-sdk/generated`, but the generated API client doesn't exist yet —
it's only created later in the pipeline after syncing with the server.
2. The typecheck plugin (`tsc --noEmit`) runs as a blocking esbuild
`onStart` hook, so even with stub files, type errors on the empty client
classes (e.g. `Property 'query' does not exist on type 'CoreApiClient'`)
cause the build to fail before the real client can be generated.
This creates a chicken-and-egg problem: the watchers need the generated
client to build, but the client is generated after the watchers produce
their output.
### Solution
**1. Stub generated client on startup**
Added `ensureGeneratedClientStub` to `ClientService` that writes minimal
placeholder files (`CoreApiClient`, `MetadataApiClient`) into
`node_modules/twenty-sdk/generated/` if the directory doesn't already
exist. This is called in `DevModeOrchestrator.start()` before any
watchers are created, so the `twenty-sdk/generated` import always
resolves.
**2. Skip typecheck on first sync round**
Made the esbuild typecheck plugin accept a `shouldSkipTypecheck`
callback. The orchestrator starts with `skipTypecheck = true` and passes
`() => this.skipTypecheck` through the watcher chain. After the real API
client is generated, the flag is flipped to `false`, so subsequent
rebuilds enforce full type checking with the real generated types.
This PR allows to handle ObjectMetadataItem, FieldMetadataItem and
NavigationMenuItem SSE events.
---------
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
## Add codegen script for frontend test mock data
### Summary
- Adds a new `npx nx mock:generate twenty-front` and
`generate-mock-data.ts` script that fetches object metadata from a
running server's `/metadata` endpoint, authenticates with default seeds,
and writes the result to a generated TypeScript file
(`src/testing/mock-data/generated/mock-metadata-query-result.ts`). This
replaces hand-maintained mock metadata with server-sourced data,
ensuring tests always reflect the real schema.
- Updates all frontend tests to be compatible with the newly generated
metadata, fixing hard-coded GraphQL queries, Zod validation schemas,
snapshot expectations, and Apollo mock mismatches.
### What changed
**New files**
- `scripts/generate-mock-data.ts` — codegen script that authenticates
against the server, queries `/metadata` for all object metadata (with
explicit `__typename` at every level), and writes a typed `.ts` file.
- `project.json` — added `mock:generate` Nx target (`dotenv npx tsx
scripts/generate-mock-data.ts`).
**Schema validation updates**
- `objectMetadataItemSchema.ts` — added `universalIdentifier`, made
`duplicateCriteria` nullable.
- `fieldMetadataItemSchema.ts` — added `universalIdentifier`, `morphId`,
`morphRelations`, restructured relation schema.
- `indexMetadataItemSchema.ts` — added optional `isCustom` field.
# Introduction
Resolving each create|updated|deleted entities related entities
application through their universal foreingKey ( silently failing if not
found leaving the validator handling that )
In order to compute all the required application in the dependency flat
entity maps
## Tested
Creating a field on a custom local twenty-apps installed on the
workspace + view field
## Out of scope
- updated snapshot
- update graphql generated front
## Summary
Removes the `recoil` dependency entirely from `package.json` and
`twenty-front/package.json`, completing the migration to Jotai as the
sole state management library.
Removes all Recoil infrastructure: `RecoilRoot` wrapper from `App.tsx`
and test decorators, `RecoilDebugObserver`, Recoil-specific ESLint rules
(`use-getLoadable-and-getValue-to-get-atoms`,
`useRecoilCallback-has-dependency-array`), and legacy Recoil utility
hooks/types (`useRecoilComponentState`, `useRecoilComponentValue`,
`createComponentState`, `createFamilyState`, `getSnapshotValue`,
`cookieStorageEffect`, `localStorageEffect`, etc.).
Renames all `V2`-suffixed Jotai state files and types to their canonical
names (e.g., `ComponentStateV2` -> `ComponentState`,
`agentChatInputStateV2` -> `agentChatInputState`, `SelectorCallbacksV2`
-> `SelectorCallbacks`), and removes the now-redundant V1 counterparts.
Updates ~433 files across the codebase to use the renamed Jotai imports,
remove Recoil imports, and clean up test wrappers (`RecoilRootDecorator`
-> `JotaiRootDecorator`).
## Automated fix for [bug 5360](https://sonarly.com/issue/5360?type=bug)
**Severity:** `critical`
### Summary
When an existing user created via OAuth (with no password hash) attempts
to sign in through the signInUp password flow, their null passwordHash
is passed directly to bcrypt.compare, which throws an unhandled 'data
and hash arguments required' error instead of a user-friendly message.
### User Impact
Users who originally registered via Google or Microsoft OAuth and then
attempt to sign in using email/password through the signInUp flow cannot
authenticate. They see a server error instead of a helpful message like
'User was not created with email/password'. This blocks the user from
accessing the CRM entirely.
### Root Cause
Proximate cause: bcrypt.compare() at auth.util.ts:19 throws 'data and
hash arguments required' because the passwordHash argument is null.
1. Why did bcrypt throw? Because compareHash() was called with a null
passwordHash value. The compareHash function at auth.util.ts:19 passes
its arguments directly to bcrypt.compare without any null check.
2. Why was passwordHash null? Because SignInUpService.validatePassword()
at sign-in-up.service.ts:154 received a null passwordHash from
AuthService.validatePassword() at auth.service.ts:232. The value
userData.existingUser.passwordHash is null for users who were originally
created via an OAuth provider (Google, Microsoft) and never set a
password.
3. Why was there no null check before calling bcrypt? Because
AuthService.validatePassword() at line 229-233 does not check whether
userData.existingUser.passwordHash is null before passing it to
signInUpService.validatePassword(). The TypeScript type annotation says
passwordHash is string, but the UserEntity column is declared nullable:
true (user.entity.ts:73), so the runtime value can be null despite the
type system.
4. Why does this code path lack the null check when another path has it?
The validateLoginWithPassword() method at auth.service.ts:177 correctly
checks if (!user.passwordHash) and throws a user-friendly AuthException
'Incorrect login method'. This guard was added by Thomas Trompette on
2024-08-07 (commit 2abb6adb61). However, the signInUp flow's
validatePassword() method was introduced later by Antoine Moreaux on
2025-03-17 (commit bda835b9f8) without replicating this same defensive
check.
5. Why was this not caught? The signInUp validatePassword method was
written assuming the existingUser would always have a passwordHash when
the auth provider is Password. This assumption is incorrect because the
signInUp flow can match an existing OAuth-created user (who has no
passwordHash) when someone tries to sign up with email/password using an
email already registered via OAuth. No test covers this cross-provider
scenario in the signInUp path.
Root cause: The AuthService.validatePassword() method
(auth.service.ts:229-233) in the signInUp code path is missing a null
guard on userData.existingUser.passwordHash before passing it to
bcrypt.compare. The fix should check for null/undefined passwordHash and
throw a descriptive AuthException, mirroring the existing guard in
validateLoginWithPassword at line 177.
**Introduced by:** Antoine Moreaux on 2025-03-17 in commit
[`bda835b`](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/commit/bda835b9f82)
### Suggested Fix
Added a null check on userData.existingUser.passwordHash inside the
validatePassword private method of AuthService, immediately before
calling signInUpService.validatePassword. When passwordHash is null or
undefined (i.e. the user was created via OAuth and never set a
password), an AuthException with code INVALID_INPUT is thrown with the
user-friendly message 'User was not created with email/password'. This
mirrors the identical guard that already exists in
validateLoginWithPassword at line 177, preventing bcrypt.compare from
receiving a null argument and crashing with an unhandled error.
### Evidence
- **Code:**
[packages/twenty-server/src/engine/core-modules/auth/services/auth.service.ts:229
- if (userData.type === 'existingUser')
{](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/blob/main/packages/twenty-server/src/engine/core-modules/auth/services/auth.service.ts#L229)
---
*Generated by [Sonarly](https://sonarly.com)*
Co-authored-by: Sonarly Claude Code <claude-code@sonarly.com>
## Summary
- **Admin-level filtering**: New AI tab in admin panel with server-wide
model availability controls (whitelist/blacklist via
`AI_AUTO_ENABLE_NEW_MODELS`, `AI_DISABLED_MODEL_IDS`,
`AI_ENABLED_MODEL_IDS` config variables). Dedicated
`setAdminAiModelEnabled` mutation replaces frontend config-variable
manipulation. Filter dropdown to show/hide unconfigured and deprecated
models.
- **Workspace-level filtering**: Per-workspace controls with "Use best
models only" mode (curated list backed by `isRecommended` flag), or
custom whitelist/blacklist. Separate Smart/Fast model selectors with
"Best (...)" virtual options.
- **Security enforcement**: Both layers enforced at every backend
execution point — workspace update, agent create/update, chat execution.
Model ID validated against known models before config mutation. All
admin endpoints protected by `AdminPanelGuard`.
## Changes
### Backend (`twenty-server`)
- New config variables for admin-level model filtering
- `AiModelRegistryService`: `getAllModelsWithStatus()`,
`setModelAdminEnabled()` with model ID validation,
`isModelAdminAllowed()`
- `AdminPanelResolver`: `getAdminAiModels` query,
`setAdminAiModelEnabled` mutation
- `WorkspaceEntity`: new fields (`autoEnableNewAiModels`,
`disabledAiModelIds`, `enabledAiModelIds`, `useRecommendedModels`)
- `WorkspaceService`: model validation on `smartModel`/`fastModel`
updates
- `AgentResolver`: model availability checks on create/update
- `isModelAllowedByWorkspace` centralized utility
- `isRecommended` flag on model definitions
- Two TypeORM migrations
### Frontend (`twenty-front`)
- New `SettingsAdminAI` component with search, filter dropdown
(unconfigured/deprecated), and model toggle cards
- AI tab added to admin panel navigation
- `useWorkspaceAiModelAvailability` hook for workspace-level filtering
- `SettingsAIModelsTab` redesigned: merged sections, "Use best models
only" toggle, conditional available models list
- `getModelIcon`/`getModelProviderLabel` shared utilities with GraphQL
enum casing normalization
- Updated generated GraphQL types and mock data
## Test plan
- [ ] Toggle models on/off in admin panel AI tab and verify they
appear/disappear in workspace settings
- [ ] Enable "Use best models only" in workspace settings and verify
only recommended models are selectable
- [ ] Disable recommended mode and verify whitelist/blacklist toggles
work correctly
- [ ] Verify deprecated models hidden by default, shown greyed out when
filter enabled
- [ ] Verify unconfigured models hidden by default, shown disabled when
filter enabled
- [ ] Try setting a disabled model as Smart/Fast model — should be
rejected
- [ ] Try creating an agent with a disabled model — should be rejected
- [ ] Verify admin panel AI tab requires admin access
Made with [Cursor](https://cursor.com)
---------
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Félix Malfait
