Implements a new syncable `navigationMenuItem` entity in the core schema
to replace the workspace `favorite` entity.
## Next Steps
- Frontend integration ([separate
PR](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/17268))
- Data migration (separate PR)
Summary
- Serverless functions are now built when created/updated instead of at
execution time
- Added builtHandlerPath field to track pre-built function artifacts
- Renamed base-typescript-project to seed-project with pre-built ESM
output included
- Renamed file folder enums for consistency (Functions → BuiltFunction,
SourceCode → Source)
- supports backwards compatibility with existing serverless functions
Tested with all combinations
- storage : local driver and S3 driver
- serverless : local driver and lambda driver
Gmail emails often have multiple labels - an email in "XYZ" label
typically also has "INBOX". The previous negative filter approach
(-label:inbox -label:sent...) excluded these emails entirely, even when
they had a selected label.
Switched to positive OR filtering: (label:cyz OR label:xyz-visible)
-label:spam... which correctly fetches emails with any of the selected
labels regardless of other labels they have.
This edge case wasn't caught earlier because manual testing with INBOX
selected worked fine - it only surfaced when selecting custom labels
without INBOX.
# Introduction
Created a task that allow spawning a term that will run the opened file
and run its integration tests
## Motivation
Jest extension is quite buggy lately, this might just be a tmp
workaround but we can't get `run test` within the test file directly.
Also passing by task allows giving inputs
## Usage
`cmd+shift+P`-> `run task` -> `twenty server - run integration test
file` -> fill inputs prompts:
- watch: will rerun on every related files updates
- updateSnapshot
Note: you can add a custom shortcut to the task too, also it will appear
in task history
Watch mode won't re-create the server instance on each run, meaning that
nest won't hit the `createServer` making very fast to iterate with
Down side of this is that any module injection won't get hydrated
Refactor manifest build and remove src folder assumptions
- Unified entity builder interface: All entity builders now return
EntityBuildResult<T> with both manifests and filePaths
- Always return build result: runManifestBuild now always returns {
manifest, filePaths } instead of null on failure
- Return all entity paths: EntityFilePaths includes paths for all entity
types (application, objects, functions, etc.)
- Remove src folder assumptions: Applications can now have entities at
root level - removed hasSrcFolder checks
- Simplify watchers: Removed entries caching, compute lazily with map()
- Stabilize tests: Replaced flaky console output snapshots with key
message assertions; replaced inline snapshots with array comparisons
-
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1956
**Problem**
Within an app, the `.yarn/releases/` folder contains executable Yarn
binaries that run when executing any yarn command (`.yarnrc` file
indicates yarn path to be `.yarn/releases/yarn-4.9.2.cjs `.)
This is a supply chain attack vector: a malicious actor could submit a
PR with a compromised `yarn-4.9.2.cjs binary`, which would execute
arbitrary code on developers' machines or CI systems.
**Fix**
Actually, thanks to Corepack, we don't need to store and execute this
binary.
Corepack can be seen as the manager of a package manager: in
`package.json` we indicate a packageManager version like
`"packageManager": "yarn@4.9.2"`, and when executing `yarn` Corepack
will securely fetch the verified version from npm, avoiding the risk of
executing a compromised binary committed to the repository. This was
already in our app's package.json template but we were not using it!
We can now
- remove the folder containing the binary from our app template
base-application (that is scaffolded when creating an app through cli),
`.yarn/releases/`, and remove `yarnPath: .yarn/releases/yarn-4.9.2.cjs`
from its .yarnrc
- remove them from the community apps that were already published in the
repo
- add .yarn to gitignore
**Tested**
This has been tested and works for app created in the repo, outside the
repo, and existing apps in the repo
# Introduction
following https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/17279
As we've finally identified all the syncable metadata entities, which
means they're expected to have non nullable applicationId and
universalIdentifier at pg_level we can remove previous retro comp
universalIdentifier fallbacking and update the dto too
~~This needs IdentifyRemainingEntitiesMetadataCommand and
MakeRemainingEntitiesUniversalIdentifierAndApplicationIdNotNullableMigrationCommand
to be run~~
```ts
[Nest] 197 - 01/21/2026, 3:08:35 PM LOG [MakeRemainingEntitiesUniversalIdentifierAndApplicationIdNotNullableMigrationCommand] Successfully run MakeRemainingEntitiesUniversalIdentifierAndApplicationIdNotNullableMigrationCommand
```
Fixes#17253
When clicking 'No {Field}' in a polymorphic relation picker, the
relation was not being cleared. This commit implements the missing
detach logic:
- RecordDetailMorphRelationSectionDropdownManyToOne: Call onSubmit with
newValue: null when no item is selected
- MorphRelationManyToOneFieldInput: Call persistMorphManyToOne with
valueToPersist: null for detach case
- useMorphPersistManyToOne: Implement actual detach logic that sets all
morph relation ID fields to null via updateOneRecord
Also adds unit tests for the useMorphPersistManyToOne hook.
# Improve cross-entity duplicate detection in manifest validation
- Refactored findDuplicates to receive the full manifest, enabling
cross-entity duplicate checks
-ObjectExtensionEntityBuilder now validates that extension field IDs
don't conflict with object field IDs
- Renamed DuplicateId type to EntityIdWithLocation for clarity
- Updated all entity builders to use the new signature
Gmail sync was importing messages from folders users had explicitly
disabled because the folder filtering logic lived in the parent service
but the Gmail driver wasn't aware of the import policy when building its
API queries.
Moved messageFolderImportPolicy down to the driver level so Gmail can
- Build proper -label: exclusions during initial sync
- Added `buildGmailLabelSearchName` as our syntax for nested folders was
wrong
- Filter out messages from disabled folders during incremental sync via
history API
This PR handles SSE create event.
It also fixes a regression on board, which was making it flash with
skeletons on any update / create.
This PR was a good test case to experience how each main components of
the app : table, board, calendar, reacts to a create event.
It is not straightforward for now, because each component handles
records with its own state management to turn those records into a
coherent display of rows or cards.
The requests for each component are also different : fetch more, group
by, multiple requests in parallel, so the cleanest way to handle
optimistic effect requires to create one small optimistic engine per
component tuned for its internal data logic.
For now we've decided to implement what's doable in a reasonable amount
of time and that includes not handling table with groups for now.
Creating a clean optimistic logic for each component will be done later.
# QA
## Importing 100 records via the API (could be a script, a workflow, an
AI calling tools, a CSV import, etc.)
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d38a3770-8b0a-4f83-8275-5e7d1be0a5c6
## Creating from different components and seeing the SSE event being
processed by other components
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/106b2f49-19cb-4190-92b7-0653c8373366
# Introduction
As we've been identifying both standard and custom entities for all the
metadata that had standard
We now still need to identify all custom entities enforcing them to have
an `applicationId` and `universalIdentifier`
In this PR we've removed the `SyncableEntityRequired` in favor requiring
props directly in the `SyncableEntity`
Which means that all metadata in db will now expect non nullable
applicationId and universalIdentifier across the whole application
Will add some type cleanup later in
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/17277
> [!NOTE]
> This code is temporary. It will be dropped once Record Page Layouts
can be fully configured.
## Before
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3f6aed00-2fd5-47d4-bd74-002a68030627
## After
<img width="3456" height="2160" alt="CleanShot 2026-01-20 at 15 17
15@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2f9baf0a-e003-4cb6-a023-6e104b097df3"
/>
The `usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets` hook was appending relation
widgets to the end of the widget list. This resulted in incorrect
ordering where relation widgets appeared after Notes and other widgets
instead of immediately following the FIELDS widget.
## Changes
- **Widget injection logic**: Modified `injectRelationWidgetsIntoLayout`
to find the first FIELDS widget and insert relation widgets immediately
after it, rather than appending to end
- **Notes positioning**: Extract and reposition NOTES widget to appear
after all relation widgets, maintaining correct semantic order: `FIELDS
→ Relations → Notes → Other widgets`
- **Fallback behavior**: When no FIELDS widget exists, append relation
widgets to end as before
- **Test coverage**: Added 6 test cases covering injection order, Notes
positioning, and edge cases (missing widgets, empty relations,
non-record pages)
## Example
Before:
```
[FIELDS, NOTES, GRAPH] → [FIELDS, NOTES, GRAPH, Relation1, Relation2]
```
After:
```
[FIELDS, NOTES, GRAPH] → [FIELDS, Relation1, Relation2, NOTES, GRAPH]
```
> [!WARNING]
>
> <details>
> <summary>Firewall rules blocked me from connecting to one or more
addresses (expand for details)</summary>
>
> #### I tried to connect to the following addresses, but was blocked by
firewall rules:
>
> - `googlechromelabs.github.io`
> - Triggering command: `/usr/local/bin/node /usr/local/bin/node
install.mjs` (dns block)
> -
`https://storage.googleapis.com/chrome-for-testing-public/127.0.6533.88/linux64/chrome-headless-shell-linux64.zip`
> - Triggering command: `/usr/local/bin/node /usr/local/bin/node
install.mjs` (http block)
> -
`https://storage.googleapis.com/chrome-for-testing-public/127.0.6533.88/linux64/chrome-linux64.zip`
> - Triggering command: `/usr/local/bin/node /usr/local/bin/node
install.mjs` (http block)
>
> If you need me to access, download, or install something from one of
these locations, you can either:
>
> - Configure [Actions setup
steps](https://gh.io/copilot/actions-setup-steps) to set up my
environment, which run before the firewall is enabled
> - Add the appropriate URLs or hosts to the custom allowlist in this
repository's [Copilot coding agent
settings](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/settings/copilot/coding_agent)
(admins only)
>
> </details>
<!-- START COPILOT ORIGINAL PROMPT -->
<details>
<summary>Original prompt</summary>
Start implementation
<analysis>
[Chronological Review: The conversation began with the user requesting
an update to the `usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets` function to inject
relation widgets after the first FIELDS widget and to position a Note
widget after all relation widgets. The user then asked for a plan
without comments, followed by a request to start the implementation of
the plan.]
[Intent Mapping:
1. "Update #sym:usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets. We should inject the
relation widgets directly after the first FIELDS widget."
2. "We want the Note widget to be after all the relation widgets we
inject."
3. "Prepare a plan. Don't write any comment."
4. "Start implementation."]
[Technical Inventory:
- Function: `usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets`
- Context: This function is part of a page layout management system,
likely dealing with dynamic widget placement based on certain
conditions.]
[Code Archaeology:
- File:
`/Users/devessier/Web/twenty/packages/twenty-front/src/modules/page-layout/hooks/usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets.ts`
- Function Purpose: To manage the layout of widgets on a page,
specifically handling relation widgets and their placement relative to
other widgets.]
[Progress Assessment:
- Completed: User has defined the requirements for widget placement.
- Pending: Implementation of the specified changes to the
`usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets` function.]
[Context Validation: All necessary context for continuing the
implementation of the widget placement logic is captured, including the
specific order of widget injection.]
[Recent Commands Analysis:
- Last Agent Commands: The user requested to "Start implementation."
- Tool Results Summary: No specific tool results were generated as the
conversation focused on planning and implementation requests.
- Pre-Summary State: The agent was actively preparing to implement the
changes to the `usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets` function when the
token budget was exceeded.
- Operation Context: The commands executed were directly related to the
user's goal of modifying the widget layout in the application.]
</analysis>
<summary>
1. Conversation Overview:
- Primary Objectives:
- "Update #sym:usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets. We should inject the
relation widgets directly after the first FIELDS widget."
- "We want the Note widget to be after all the relation widgets we
inject."
- "Prepare a plan. Don't write any comment."
- "Start implementation."
- Session Context: The user is focused on modifying the widget layout in
a page layout management system, specifically the order of relation and
Note widgets.
- User Intent Evolution: The user transitioned from defining
requirements to requesting a plan and then moving directly to
implementation.
2. Technical Foundation:
- Function: `usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets`
- Purpose: To manage the layout of widgets on a page, particularly the
placement of relation widgets.
3. Codebase Status:
- File Name: `usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets.ts`
- Purpose: To handle the layout of widgets dynamically based on
specified rules.
- Current State: Awaiting implementation of the user-defined widget
placement logic.
- Key Code Segments: The function signature is defined, but the
implementation details are yet to be added.
4. Problem Resolution:
- Issues Encountered: No specific technical problems were reported; the
focus was on planning and implementation.
- Solutions Implemented: None yet, as the implementation phase has just
begun.
- Debugging Context: No ongoing troubleshooting efforts were mentioned.
- Lessons Learned: The importance of clear widget placement requirements
was emphasized.
5. Progress Tracking:
- Completed Tasks: User has articulated the requirements for widget
placement.
- Partially Complete Work: Implementation of the specified changes is
pending.
- Validated Outcomes: No features have been confirmed working yet as
implementation has not started.
6. Active Work State:
- Current Focus: The user is preparing to implement the changes to the
`usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets` function.
- Recent Context: The user has defined the order of widget placement and
is ready to start coding.
- Working Code: The function is currently defined but lacks the
implementation logic.
- Immediate Context: The user is focused on implementing the logic for
injecting relation widgets and positioning the Note widget.
7. Recent Operations:
- Last Agent Commands: "Start implementation."
- Tool Results Summary: No specific results were generated; the focus
was on user requests.
- Pre-Summary State: The agent was preparing to implement the changes to
the `usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets` function.
- Operation Context: The commands executed were directly related to the
user's goal of modifying the widget layout.
8. Continuation Plan:
- Pending Task 1: Implement the logic to inject relation widgets after
the first FIELDS widget.
- Pending Task 2: Ensure the Note widget is positioned after all
relation widgets...
</details>
<!-- START COPILOT CODING AGENT SUFFIX -->
Created from [VS
Code](https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/copilot/copilot-coding-agent).
<!-- START COPILOT CODING AGENT TIPS -->
---
💬 We'd love your input! Share your thoughts on Copilot coding agent in
our [2 minute survey](https://gh.io/copilot-coding-agent-survey).
---------
Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Devessier <29370468+Devessier@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Devessier <baptiste@devessier.fr>
## Overview
This PR implements **generic many-to-many relation support** through
junction tables (also known as associative entities or join tables).
This replaces the need for hardcoded taskTarget/noteTarget logic and
provides a flexible foundation for modeling complex entity
relationships.
## Architecture
### Data Model
Many-to-many relationships are implemented using a **junction object
pattern**:
```
┌─────────┐ ┌──────────────────┐ ┌─────────┐
│ Pet │──────>│ PetRocket │<──────│ Rocket │
│ │ 1:N │ (junction) │ N:1 │ │
│ rockets ├───────┤ pet : Pet ├───────┤ │
└─────────┘ │ rocket : Rocket │ └─────────┘
└──────────────────┘
```
The junction object (PetRocket) has:
- A `MANY_TO_ONE` relation to **Pet** (the source)
- A `MANY_TO_ONE` relation to **Rocket** (the target)
The source object (Pet) has a `ONE_TO_MANY` relation pointing to the
junction, with **field settings** that specify which target field to
follow.
### Field Settings Schema
Junction configuration is stored in `FieldMetadataRelationSettings`:
```typescript
{
relationType: "ONE_TO_MANY",
// Points to the target field on the junction object
junctionTargetFieldId?: string; // For regular relations
junctionTargetMorphId?: string; // For polymorphic relations
}
```
**Two configuration modes:**
1. **`junctionTargetFieldId`** - References a specific `RELATION` field
on the junction
2. **`junctionTargetMorphId`** - References a `morphId` group for
polymorphic targets (e.g., link to Person OR Company)
### GraphQL Query Generation
When a junction relation is detected, the GraphQL fields are generated
to fetch the nested target:
```graphql
query GetPetWithRockets {
pet(id: "...") {
rockets { # ONE_TO_MANY to junction
id
rocket { # Target field on junction
id
name
__typename
}
}
}
}
```
For polymorphic junction targets:
```graphql
caretakerPerson { id, name }
caretakerCompany { id, name }
```
## Frontend Architecture
### Display Flow
1. **Detection**: `hasJunctionConfig()` checks if field has junction
settings
2. **Config Resolution**: `getJunctionConfig()` resolves junction object
metadata and target fields
3. **Record Extraction**: `extractTargetRecordsFromJunction()` extracts
target records from junction records
4. **Rendering**: Target records displayed as chips (not junction
records)
### Edit Flow
1. **Picker Opening**: Initializes the multi-record picker with:
- Searchable object types (derived from junction target fields)
- Pre-selected items (extracted from existing junction records)
2. **Selection Handling**: Manages create/delete of junction records:
- **Select**: Creates new junction record with source + target IDs
- **Deselect**: Finds and deletes the junction record
- **Optimistic Updates**: Manually updates Recoil store before API call
### Key Trade-offs
| Decision | Trade-off |
|----------|-----------|
| Junction records managed manually | More control over optimistic
updates, but requires manual cache management |
| Settings stored per-field | Flexible (same junction can power
different views), but requires UI to configure |
| Polymorphic via morphId groups | Supports N target types, but adds
query complexity |
| Feature flag gated | Safe rollout, but requires flag management |
## Backend Changes
- **Validation**: Junction target field must exist and be a valid
`MANY_TO_ONE` relation
- **Settings**: Extended `FieldMetadataRelationSettings` type with
junction fields
- **Dev Seeder**: Added sample junction objects (PetRocket,
EmploymentHistory, PetCareAgreement) for testing
## How to Test
1. Enable the `IS_JUNCTION_RELATIONS_ENABLED` feature flag
2. Create objects with junction pattern (Pet → PetRocket → Rocket)
3. Configure the junction target in field settings (advanced mode)
4. Verify:
- Display shows target objects (Rockets), not junction records
(PetRockets)
- Picker allows selecting/deselecting targets
- Changes persist correctly
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d04f057a-228c-4de8-af48-76bb2d72cac1
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
# Introduction
In this PR we're migrating the serverless function service that was
using the SF repo directly to the v2 build and runner.
The whole serverless engine now deals with flat entities only
## Resolvers
Refactored the resolvers ( serverlessFunction, route, database and cron
trigger) :
- return types to `dto`
- Standardized the flat to dto transpilation within the resolvers
- Find and findMany passing by the cached data
## Services
Refactored the services ( serverlessFunction, route, database and cron
trigger) :
- return type to be `flat`
- always calling v2 and computing cache
## New additional caches
- application variables ( cf
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/2116 )
- serverless function layer
## What to test:
- CRUD ( database trigger ✅ , route trigger, cron trigger, serverless
function through workflows ✅ )
- Duplicating a workflow with a serverless function code node ✅
## Concerns
We need to implement the cron that will hard delete soft deleted s3
serverless functions, not in this PR though ( cf
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/17285#discussion_r2709168570 and
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/2118 )
In this PR :
- New field type FieldMetadataType.FILES added (as jsonb in DB)
- Backend: GraphQL types, validation, REST API schema, data processor
handling
- Frontend: field configuration in settings
- Feature flag IS_FILES_FIELD_ENABLED to gate the feature
- Integration tests for create/filter validation
- Dev seed: Feature flag enabled + FILES field on survey result object
To do in next PRs :
- Backend :
-- new workspaceFile controller (for download) & new workspaceFile
upload resolver (for upload)
-- pre-hook/post-hook to ensure fileId existence + listener to ensure
cleaning
- Frontend : FILES field display/edit in table view, record, ...
Workflows can now be cancelled when not started or enqueued.
Also displaying the stop option when selecting all.
We got the case of a client that did an infinite loop. So he had a lot
of workflows to stop. Supporting select all would have avoid him to wait
for 4 hours so we process the runs throttled. This is not something that
is supposed to happen often so I did not see the point of refactoring
the endpoint. But I wanted the users to have this option just in case
Heavy Refactoring of the watcher, sorry about this one, I'll keep
iterating on it.
In a nutshell:
- app-dev.ts is maintaining 3 watchers in parallel: manifest, function
and frontComponent
## Context
- Add RLS entitlement to billing
- Check value in the backend (for RLS predicate entity
queries/mutations)
- Expose billingEntitlements to the API inside currentWorkspace to check
available features to the workspace and display the role components
accordingly
- Cleanup RLS when plan changes back to one without RLS.
This should cover almost everything, imho we don't need to check in the
ORM because => We can't create RLS without the correct PLAN and
switching back to a PLAN without RLS deletes existing RLS through
stripes webhooks
