The current Japanese translations are severely lacking. My company
(based in Tokyo) uses Japanese as its main language. I've gone through
and corrected/standardized everything. This is good enough to merge as a
starting point.
Includes `lingui compile` for the changes.
<!-- CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---
> [!NOTE]
> Major localization refresh focused on Japanese.
>
> - Rewrites and standardizes `ja-JP` message strings (clearer phrasing,
consistent terminology, corrected placeholders/punctuation)
> - Regenerates compiled Lingui locale bundles; updates `ja-JP.ts` and
`ko-KR.ts` outputs
> - No runtime logic changes; scope limited to generated i18n resources
>
> <sup>Written by [Cursor
Bugbot](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot) for commit
3365dcdac6. This will update automatically
on new commits. Configure
[here](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot).</sup>
<!-- /CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
Upgraded to Storybook 10. We still use `@storybook/test-runner` for
testing since it appears it'd require more work to move from Jest to
Vitest than I initially anticipated, but I completed this PR to fix
`storybook:serve:dev` - it takes time to load, but it works the way it
used to with Storybook 8.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7afc32c6-4bcf-4b37-b83b-8d00d28dda15
## Summary
- Update all illustration icons to use `theme.accent.accent3` for fill
and `theme.accent.accent8` for border
- Replaces hardcoded `IllustrationIcon.blue` values with
theme-responsive accent colors
- Icons will now adapt correctly to theme changes
## Test plan
- [ ] Navigate to Settings > Data model > select any object
- [ ] Verify the Relations "Type" column icons use the accent colors
- [ ] Verify the Fields "Data type" column icons use the accent colors
- [ ] Switch themes (if available) and verify icons adapt accordingly
# Introduction
Followup https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/16981
1/ Migration, applicationId and universalIdentifier are required on
entity ( save point migration + upgrade command fallback pattern )
2/ Backfill using previous standard ids
This PR is a follow-up of https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/16966
and implements a new mechanism to handle SSE events.
It creates only one event stream per browser tab, then use mutations to
tell the backend which query to listen to, without re-mounting the event
stream connexion.
Then each event that comes from this unique subscription is then
dispatched in a new JavaScript CustomEvent, per queryId, on which
specific hooks add an event listener.
This PR introduces the generic tooling as well as the handling of update
events on table.
## Summary
- Updated Relations and Fields tables in the object detail settings page
to use flexible width (`1fr`) for the Name column instead of fixed
pixels
- Aligned column widths between both tables (`1fr 148px 148px 36px`) so
the App and Type/Data type columns line up
## Test plan
- [ ] Navigate to Settings > Data model > select any object (e.g.,
Companies)
- [ ] Verify the Relations table rows take the full available width
- [ ] Verify the Fields table rows take the full available width
- [ ] Verify the App and Type/Data type columns are aligned between both
tables
## Summary
- Fixed the billing credits progress bar background color in dark mode
- The background was hardcoded to `BACKGROUND_LIGHT.tertiary`, causing
it to always display a light color regardless of the current theme
- Changed to use `theme.background.tertiary` to properly respect
dark/light mode
## Test plan
- [x] Navigate to Settings > Billing in dark mode
- [x] Verify the credits progress bar background matches the tertiary
background color (dark in dark mode)
- [x] Verify it still looks correct in light mode
Figma reference:
https://www.figma.com/design/xt8O9mFeLl46C5InWwoMrN/Twenty?node-id=64812-242606&m=dev
## Summary
This PR introduces row-level security (RLS) permissions for roles in the
frontend, allowing fine-grained access control at the record level.
Users can now define permission rules that determine which specific
records a role can access based on dynamic conditions and filters.
## What's Changed
Implemented UI for configuring record-level permissions on object
permissions screens
Added support for defining permission predicates using filter conditions
(similar to advanced filters)
Introduced variable picker for dynamic permission rules (e.g., "me"
context for user-specific access)
Built predicate conversion layer to sync UI state with backend
permission structure
Extended GraphQL schema with mutations for upserting row-level
permission predicates
Fixed handling of orphaned RLS groups to prevent data inconsistencies
Added enterprise key validation for RLS features
The implementation enables scenarios like "users can only see their own
records" or "users can access records associated with their team."
<img width="687" height="702" alt="Screenshot 2026-01-09 at 23 07 02"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/33fe736e-6cbf-40bd-b2eb-c8a90c8d21bc"
/>
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
This PR introduces a few changes:
- Add three actions: see deleted dashboards, destroy dashboard and
restore dashboard
- Remove the soft delete and restore on all the page layout entities
- Cascade the destruction of a dashboard to a page layout
Video QA:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ab993b11-dd9c-4e88-880c-92691a521cc2
This PR refactors the table virtualization real index main state that
was creating performance problems.
The problem was that we kept track of all the real rows even if we only
print 200 at a time in the application.
This caused a crash when some users with 10k+ rows on a table tried to
iterate over this state 10.000 times or more.
The trade-off is that now we keep all real indices in a Map, and each
virtual row uses a selector to go to this Map.
This way if we want to reset the full Map, we just have to overwrite the
base state that contains the map, and the 200 selectors will recompute.
This happens for example when we delete a row. This now has a limited
and negligible performance impact.
## Summary
- Enable editing for custom calendar event fields while keeping standard
fields read-only
- Load calendar event fields dynamically so custom field values are
editable everywhere they appear
- Preserve calendar event participants rendering
## Testing
- npx nx run twenty-front:lint:diff-with-main --skip-nx-cache
--output-style=stream
- npx jest --config packages/twenty-front/jest.config.mjs
--runTestsByPath
packages/twenty-front/src/modules/activities/calendar/hooks/__tests__/useCalendarEvents.test.tsx
## Notes
- Full nx lint/test are very slow locally after barrel generation; CI
should run the full suite
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
# Introduction
fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/16905
Do not merge until `IS_WORKSPACE_CREATION_V2_ENABLED` has been activated
by default, and so sync metadata has been deprecated by doing so. As the
sync metadata will attempt to insert `null` `applicationId` and
`universalIdentifier` values while creating a workspace
In this PR we're introducing a new `SyncableEntityRequired` which
enforces the non nullable `applicationId` and `universalIdentifier` on
extending entity
In this PR we also migrate the field metadata entity to extend the
required
## Identification upgrade command
This command will search for workspace field metadata entities that
aren't associated to an applicationId, dispatch them to either the
workspace-custom `applicationId` or the twenty-standard `applicationId`.
For the standard entities it will also set their universal identifier
based on the `STANDARD_OBJECTS` const hashmap
## Typeorm migration
As the non nullable `applicationId` and `universalIdentifier`migration
won't pass in the first we've been using the save point and upgrade
command migration fallback pattern
## Tests
Tested the command on a prod extract locally
Both `twenty-eng` and `twenty-for-twenty` have unexpected standard
objects
Please note that we will deprecate the `isCustom` and `standardId` col
later in the future
### Twenty-eng
```ts
[Nest] 98971 - 01/01/2026, 3:18:00 PM LOG [IdentifyStandardEntitiesCommand] Successfully validated 600/600 field metadata update(s) for workspace 9870323e-22c3-4d14-9b7f-5bdc84f7d6ee (309 custom, 291 standard)
[Nest] 98971 - 01/01/2026, 3:18:00 PM WARN [IdentifyStandardEntitiesCommand] Found 35 warning(s) while processing field metadata for workspace 9870323e-22c3-4d14-9b7f-5bdc84f7d6ee. These fields will become custom.
```
### Twenty for twenty
### Just created workspace
# Introduction
In this pull request we're introducing new standard page layout, tabs
and widget ( 1 page layout, 1 tab and 8 widgets ) and also a new
opportunity field
Also now prefilling new records, 6 opportunities and a dashboard.
## Standard declaration
### New workspace creation
Relies on existing standard declaration builder
### Backfill command
We've been hacking through the standard builder in order to extract only
the standard page layout entities, updated their entity dependencies to
match the workspace ids so the validation passes
## Remark
- Refactored the `PageLayoutWidget` configuration type to be dynamically
typed through a generic discriminated union
---------
Co-authored-by: prastoin <paul@twenty.com>
**Description**
Fixes the "Add new" button appearing in relation picker dropdowns for
workspace member relations (e.g., Account Owner on companies). Workspace
members cannot be created from relation pickers, so this button should
not appear.
**Changes Made**
- Modified RelationManyToOneFieldInput.tsx to conditionally pass the
onCreate prop to SingleRecordPicker only when
createNewRecordAndOpenRightDrawer is defined.
- Moved the conditional check to the JSX level for clarity.
**Technical Details**
The useAddNewRecordAndOpenRightDrawer hook already returns undefined for
workspace member relations, but the component was still passing a
handler function to SingleRecordPicker, causing the "Add new" button to
appear. The fix ensures that when createNewRecordAndOpenRightDrawer is
undefined, onCreate is also undefined, which prevents
SingleRecordPickerMenuItemsWithSearch from rendering the button.
Testing
- Verified that the "Add new" button no longer appears in the Account
Owner dropdown for companies.
- Confirmed that the "Add new" button still appears for other relation
fields where it's appropriate (e.g., People, Opportunities).
- Tested that existing functionality for selecting workspace members
from the dropdown still works correctly.
Fixes#17060
Created by Github action
<!-- CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---
> [!NOTE]
> Enhances Apps documentation across multiple locales by clarifying
object base fields behavior.
>
> - Adds a `Note` in localized `apps.mdx` pages (ar, cs, de, it, ro, ru,
tr) stating that standard base fields (e.g., `name`, `createdAt`,
`updatedAt`, `createdBy`, `position`, `deletedAt`) are created
automatically and should not be included in `fields` when using
`defineObject()`.
>
> <sup>Written by [Cursor
Bugbot](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot) for commit
87a5ecd0b6. This will update automatically
on new commits. Configure
[here](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot).</sup>
<!-- /CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Upgraded from 8.6.15 to 9.1.17 in two steps:
- 8.6.15 -> 9.0.0
- 9.0.0 -> 9.1.17
I had to disable `storybook-addon-cookie` since it is not supported for
Storybook 9. However, I do intend to upgrade to Storybook 10 when this
is merged, so we can replace the aforementioned add-on with this fork
specifically created to support Storybook 10 and above:
https://www.npmjs.com/package/@storybook-community/storybook-addon-cookie.
Additionally, once we upgrade to Version 10 successfully, I will start
looking into integrating the official Vitest add-on.
## Description
Fixes a bug where queries with relation field + scalar field ordering
would fail with:
```
column distinctAlias.person_position does not exist
```
## Root Cause
When a GraphQL query orders by columns that are **not in the selected
fields**, TypeORM's DISTINCT subquery fails because it expects those
columns in the inner SELECT with alias format (e.g., `person_position`).
The issue only manifests when:
1. A filter is applied (triggers DISTINCT path in TypeORM)
2. OrderBy includes columns NOT in the GraphQL selection
3. Example: query selects only `id`, but orders by `position`
## The Fix
`addRelationOrderColumnsToBuilder` now accepts `columnsToSelect` and
adds orderBy columns via `addSelect()` only if they're **NOT** already
in the selected columns:
- **Relation orderBy columns**: Always added (never in columnsToSelect)
- **Main entity orderBy columns**: Added only when not already selected
This ensures all orderBy columns are present in TypeORM's inner SELECT
for the DISTINCT subquery.
## Test Plan
Added integration test for the exact failing scenario:
- Filter with `neq` (triggers DISTINCT path)
- Multiple orderBy: relation field + scalar field
- Minimal field selection (only `id`, not `position`)
## Related
Regression introduced in #17021 which added nested sort support.
## Summary
- Add `additionalEmails` (EMAILS type) to tsvector search expression
- Add `additionalPhones` (PHONES type) to tsvector search expression
- Add `secondaryLinks` (LINKS type) to tsvector search expression
This enables searching for people/companies by their secondary contact
information, not just primary values.
## Test plan
- [x] Unit tests for all three composite field types (16 tests passing)
- [x] Integration tests for searching by secondary email, work email,
partial domain
- [x] Integration tests for searching by additional phone numbers
- [x] Integration test for searching by secondary link URL
- [x] Lint passes
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
- moved a few gql types to twenty shared to re-use in server
- added a new endpoint, onEventSubscription that expect a streamId to
create a connection
- two new endpoints to store queries in Redis
- updated the existing batch channel to directly use object record type
Closes#17032
Summary
When a sort is already applied to a column, clicking "Sort" from the
column header dropdown now toggles the sort direction (ASC → DESC or
DESC → ASC) instead of doing nothing.
Problem
Previously, clicking "Sort" on a column that already had a sort applied
would always try to create a new sort with ASC direction. Since the
upsertRecordSort function updates an existing sort with the same field,
this effectively did nothing when the sort was already ASC—which felt
unintuitive.
Solution
Modified useHandleToggleColumnSort to:
- Check if a sort already exists for the clicked field
- If it exists, toggle the direction
- If it doesn't exist, create a new sort with ASC direction (existing
behavior)
---
Contribution by Gittensor, see my contribution statistics at
https://gittensor.io/miners/details?githubId=132382032
## Context
Text fields were being sorted case-sensitively on the backend (e.g.,
'Apple', 'apple', 'Banana' would sort as 'Apple', 'Banana', 'apple').
This resulted in unexpected sorting behavior that differed between the
frontend Apollo cache sorting and backend database sorting.
## Changes
### Backend (packages/twenty-server)
- **`graphql-query-order.parser.ts`**:
- Added `shouldUseCaseInsensitiveOrder()` helper that returns `true` for
TEXT, SELECT, and MULTI_SELECT fields
- Added `buildOrderByColumnExpression()` method that wraps column
expressions with `LOWER()` for case-insensitive sorting
- Updated `parse()` and `parseObjectRecordOrderByForScalarField()` to
use the new helpers
- Updated `parseObjectRecordOrderByForRelationField()` to apply LOWER()
to nested text fields
- **`parse-composite-field-for-order.util.ts`**:
- Added `shouldUseCaseInsensitiveOrder()` helper for composite subfields
- Updated composite field parsing to apply `LOWER()` to subfields of
type TEXT (e.g., `name.firstName`, `name.lastName`)
### Frontend (packages/twenty-front)
- **`sort.ts`**:
- Updated `sortAsc()` to use case-insensitive comparison
(`toLowerCase()`) for string values
- `sortDesc()` automatically benefits from this since it delegates to
`sortAsc()`
- Ensures Apollo cache sorting matches backend behavior
## Example
Before:
```sql
ORDER BY "person"."name" ASC
```
Result: ['Apple', 'Banana', 'apple', 'cherry']
After:
```sql
ORDER BY LOWER("person"."name") ASC
```
Result: ['apple', 'Apple', 'Banana', 'cherry']
## Testing
- Manual testing of sorting on People and Companies views
- Verified frontend cache sorting matches backend results
## Summary
This PR enables sorting records by fields of related objects. For
example, sorting **People by their Company's name**.
### Before
Only scalar and composite fields could be sorted. Relation fields showed
in the sort dropdown but produced errors.
### After
Many-to-One relation fields can now be sorted using the related object's
**label identifier field** (e.g., Company's `name`).
---
## Changes
### Frontend
- Added `RELATION` to sortable field types (restricted to `MANY_TO_ONE`
relations)
- New `getOrderByForRelationField()` generates nested orderBy structures
using the related object's label identifier
- Updated `turnSortsIntoOrderBy()` to handle relation fields by looking
up related object metadata
### Backend
- Extended `GraphqlQueryOrderFieldParser.parse()` to detect nested
relation ordering like `{ company: { name: 'AscNullsLast' } }`
- Returns `ParseOrderByResult` containing both `orderBy` conditions and
`relationJoins` info
- Added LEFT JOINs for relation ordering in `applyOrderToBuilder()`
- Added `addRelationOrderColumnsToBuilder()` for TypeORM DISTINCT
compatibility
### Tests
- Added unit tests for `filterSortableFieldMetadataItems`,
`getOrderByForRelationField`, and `turnSortsIntoOrderBy`
- Added integration tests covering ascending/descending order and
composite label identifiers
---
## TypeORM Bug Workaround
We encountered a significant TypeORM limitation when implementing this
feature. When using `getMany()` with `ORDER BY` on joined relation
columns, TypeORM generates a DISTINCT subquery that has specific
requirements:
### Issue 1: Alias Parsing
TypeORM's `orderBy()` method fails with **"alias not found"** when using
quoted SQL identifiers like `"company"."name"`. TypeORM internally
expects unquoted property paths (e.g., `company.name`) for its alias
resolution mechanism.
### Issue 2: setFindOptions Clears addSelect
`setFindOptions({ select })` **clears any previously added `addSelect()`
columns**. This caused `"column distinctAlias.company_name does not
exist"` errors because the relation columns needed for ORDER BY were
being removed.
### Solution
We split the logic into two methods:
1. `applyOrderToBuilder()` - adds JOINs and ORDER BY (before
`setFindOptions`)
2. `addRelationOrderColumnsToBuilder()` - adds relation columns for
SELECT (AFTER `setFindOptions`)
This ensures the relation columns are present in the final SQL query's
SELECT clause with the proper underscore aliases (`company_name`) that
TypeORM's DISTINCT subquery expects.
**Related TypeORM issue**:
https://github.com/typeorm/typeorm/issues/9921
---
## Screenshots/Demo
_Add screenshots if applicable_
Previous behavior:
Used billingSubscription.updatedAt (when the subscription record was
last modified)
Problem: updatedAt changes for ANY update, not just status changes,
making it unreliable for tracking when payment problems started
Current behavior:
Uses currentPeriodStart when subscription status is Unpaid or Canceled
Why it works: WORKSPACE_INACTIVE_DAYS_BEFORE_SOFT_DELETION is shorter
than the minimum billing interval (1 month). Then if a workspace is
unpaid for the entire current billing period, it will always exceed the
deletion threshold before the next period starts
Ideal fix:
Track workspace.suspendedAt explicitly, giving you the exact timestamp
of when payment problems began, regardless of billing periods.
`MessageImportExceptionHandlerService.handleSyncCursorErrorException()`
was calling `messageChannelSyncStatusService.markAsFailed()`
instead of
`messageChannelSyncStatusService.resetAndMarkAsMessagesListFetchPending()`
Also adds a new command `MessagingTriggerMessageListFetchCommand` for
faster local development speed
