After moving a section on the frontend, this broke the path that was
sent by email on the backend.
This kind of error comes back every ~2-3 month under different forms so
we need a more robust solution: I moved routes to the shared folder,
that way we will share one common source of truth between the frontend
and the backend.
Fixes#14343
This PR refactors what is remaining of HTML table API to divs.
It is mainly about the body and aggregate footer.
Because a `position: sticky` creates a stacking context, and because a
div wrapping other divs prevents those children divs from being sticky,
it has been found that removing the wrapping container of both header
and footer allows us to have all z-index in the same stacking context
and create the right experience.
Though the fine-tuning of z-index will be done in another PR.
There are many fixes left that will be addressed very soon in subsequent
PRs.
This PR focuses on bringing a functional table both with and without
RecordGroups. (Check Task views for that)
In this PR, I'm solving several issues:
1) We were not checking if the currentWorkspaceMember was owning the
message in the thread. It kind of worked before because the case of
shared threads (with shared threads visibility restriction) was not
happening that often. It seems that the bug has always been there
2) Re-implement orphan messages and threads deletion on messageChannel
deletion. We used to brutally look for all orphans, we disabled it last
week because it was too heavy on db. I've re-implemented it more
carefully and "surgically"
3) Gmail sync was not handling folder synced correctly. It was
leveraging labelIds which it shouldn't do (this is a AND AND parameter)
in full sync
4) Added a command to clean orphan message threads manually if needed.
Usually this is done when you remove a messageChannel, or change
blocklist rules but it can be useful to have it to debug
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1432
We still have some follow-up issues here, I only took care of making the
essential of the table work, but the follow-up issues will be better
tackled after everything has been switched to div, otherwise we might
fix them multiple times.
A first round of refactoring of z-index has been made in a common
constant, where it is easier to understand, for which case, what should
be the order of the different layers.
Though we still need to have another round of refactor because of the
stacking contexts, mainly because of the header row that is creating a
stacking context that makes it hard to have all scrolling cases work.
In this PR:
- refactor the upgrade command / upgrade command runner to keep upgrade
command as light as possible (all wrapping logic should go to upgrade
command runner)
- prevent any upgrade if there is at least one workspace.version <
previsousVersion ==> this leads to corrupted state where only core
migrations are run if the self-hoster is skipping a version
The goal of this PR is to test if Twenty can support a large number of
members, a question which was raised by a large company that is
considering moving away from Salesforce.
I was expecting the currentWorkspaceMembersState to cause a lot more
issue. It would be very hard to get rid of it in the context of actors,
I think that would require a big refactoring. I thought we'd have to do
it but it turns out the perf are pretty good. One thing we need to
improve is the pagination on the roles page, we'll wait for @Bonapara to
update that
resolves#14190
added refreshCoreViews() call after object creation to immediately
update core views state, ensuring new objects appear in the navigation
drawer without requiring a refresh
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: prastoin <paul@twenty.com>
We want to update UserWorkspacePermissions from
```
export type UserWorkspacePermissions = {
permissionFlags: Record<PermissionFlagType, boolean>;
objectRecordsPermissions: Record<PermissionsOnAllObjectRecords, boolean>;
objectPermissions: ObjectsPermissionsDeprecated;
};
```
to
```
export type UserWorkspacePermissions = {
permissionFlags: Record<PermissionFlagType, boolean>;
objectsPermissions: ObjectsPermissions;
};
```
`ObjectsPermissionsDeprecated` and `ObjectsPermissions` are actually
very similar, they only have different key names (`canRead` vs
`canReadObjectRecords`)
To avoid brutal breaking changes, we will proceed in multiple steps:
1. This PR: adapt FE so it does not call objectRecordsPermissions
anymore + add the new objectsPermissions to UserWorkspacePermissions
without calling it yet in the FE
2. Remove objectRecordsPermissions in BE + use objectsPermissions in FE
instead of objectPermissions
3. Remove objectPermissions
- reorganized folders
- corrected typos
- added file to give advices regarding the data model creation
---------
Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1316
As discussed with @Bonapara, the behaviour is the following:
1 if there is a read restriction on a field that is or becomes the label
identifier, this restriction is actually overriden to allow any user who
has read rights on the object to also be able to read the values on the
label identifier field. This restriction is overriden in the values
stored in the cache but not in the db.
2 in the UI it is not possible to add a field permission to restrict
read rights on the field that is the label identifier. It is still
possible to update the label identifier for it to be a field that
previously had a restrictive field permission on a role though, but then
1. has our back.
- replace save by insert
- if the insert output is needed, cast the generatedMaps
- remove transactions from trigger services. Doing it manually would be
complex and not reliable
Enable unique constraint creation on name standard field.
Null values are handled in front with 'Untitled'.
Need to migrate fieldMetadata default value on all custom objects ?
Tested :
- Toggle on/off uniqueness on standard name field of standard/custom
object
- Create new custom text field and toggle on/off uniqueness
labelIdentifier fields display throw error in settings data model (field
settings and object settings)
To reproduce, go to /settings/objects/companies/name or
/settings/objects/companies#settings
