Implements permission intersection (AND logic) to prevent permission
escalation when agents act on behalf of users.
### Changes:
- **Permission Intersection**: Operations requiring both user AND agent
permissions
- **RoleContext Type**: Unified type supporting single `roleId` or
multiple `roleIds` for intersection
- **CRUD Services**: Updated to accept `roleContext` for granular
permission control
- **Agent Integration**: Chat agents now use user + agent role
intersection for all operations
- **ORM Layer**: Enhanced `getRepository` to support multi-role
permission checks
### Related:
- Part 2 of ["Acting on behalf of user" concept
PR](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15103)
[Closes#1661](https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1661)
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
## Summary
**Step 1 of 2:** Implements the "acting on behalf of user" concept for
workflows and agents to prevent permission escalation and maintain
proper audit trails.
## Problem
Previously, workflows and agents would bypass permissions regardless of
who initiated them, allowing users to escalate their privileges by
triggering workflows that performed actions they couldn't do directly.
## Solution
### For Workflows
Introduced `WorkflowExecutionContext` service that determines execution
mode:
- **Manual triggers/test button**: Uses user's roleId for permissions,
user's identity for `createdBy`
- **Automated triggers** (cron, database events, webhooks): Bypasses
permissions, uses workflow identity
### For Agents
**In Chat:**
- Always act on behalf of the user
- Use user's roleId for permission checks
- Use user's identity for `createdBy`
# Step 1 vs Step 2
### ✅ Step 1 (This PR): Acting on Behalf Concept
- Introduced `isActingOnBehalfOfUser` boolean concept
- Single roleId used for permission checks (user's OR system bypass)
- `createdBy` field properly attributes actions to initiator
- Prevents permission escalation in user-initiated flows
### 🔜 Step 2 (Future): Multi-Role Permission Support
- Support role intersection: `{ intersection: ['roleA', 'roleB'] }`
- Support role union: `{ union: ['roleA', 'roleB', 'roleC'] }`
- Enable user+agent collaboration scenarios
- Update `WorkspaceEntityManager` and `WorkspaceDatasource` to handle
multiple roleIds
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
## Context
- All flatEntity should extend SyncableEntity
- SyncableEntity should now have applicationId and application relation
- Fix syncApp deletion, should now properly use migration v2 to delete
syncable entities
# Introduction
### Summary
Implements side effect handling for `ViewGroup` and `ViewFilters` when
field metadata is updated in the v2 architecture. This ensures that
view-related records are properly maintained when enum field options are
modified, deleted, or created.
### Side effects
- **Side Effect System**: Added side effect handling for field metadata
updates that manages related view groups and view filters
- **Enum Field Updates**: When enum field options are modified, the
system now:
- **View Groups**: Creates new groups for added options, updates
existing groups for modified options, and deletes groups for removed
options
- **View Filters**: Updates filter values to reflect option changes and
removes filters that reference deleted options
### Enum runner fix
Update now works for both atomic enum and array enum ( multi select for
instance )
### Compute flat entity maps from to
Standardized this method usage across v2 services
Next step is to require dependencies dynamically
## Conclusion
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1649
## Goal
- inferDeletionFromMissingEntities is now a map instead of a single
bool, allowing us to parameterise it based on the entity we want to
compare
- Adding index creation/update when field isUnique is set to true and
index deletion when isUnique is false (for now)
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1346
# Introduction
Adding view-group to core engine v2
Following https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15010 ( same pattern )
## What's done
- Created flat-view-group
- flat view group runner
- flat view group builder
- create view group service v2 and input transpilers
- refactor the existing view group resolver to fix standard (
BREAKING_CHANGE on graphql api update especially ) REST stays the same
- refactored the front to consume the mutations autogenerated
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1665
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1563.
We now have two inter-group orderBy criteria: one on the aggregate
values, the other on the dimension values.
Ex: I am grouping companies by city and querying the average number of
employees for each group. I can either order the groups by the city
name, or by the average number of employees, or by one then the other.
I could actually also order groups by an aggregated value that I did not
ask for (ex: average ARR), but I cannot order groups by a field value I
did not group records by (ex: country).
[See discord
discussion](https://discord.com/channels/1130383047699738754/1425438213555753050/1425438223097921659)
An example of query variables:
```
{
"groupBy": [
{
"createdAt": {
"granularity": "QUARTER_OF_THE_YEAR"
}
},
{"city": true}
],
"orderBy": [
{
"aggregate": {
"avgEmployees": "DescNullsLast"
}
},
{
"aggregate": {
"percentyEmptyEmployees": "DescNullsLast"
}
},
{
"city": "AscNullsLast"
},
{
"createdAt": {
"orderBy": "AscNullsLast",
"granularity": "QUARTER_OF_THE_YEAR",
}
}
]
}
```
The aggregate orderBy criteria had already been implemented, but I
updated the implementation to add an "aggregate" key to prefix them, in
order to avoid confusion between the two + for the schema generation not
to break (otherwise we would have an issue when generating
OrderByWithGroupByInput if a user has created a field that has the same
name as an aggregate field, such as avgEmployees).
# Introduction
This PR introduces a huge type refactor that will leverage dynamic intra
entity optimistic flat maps update in the future and also a more
granular cache invalidation enhancing performances
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1717
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1716
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1643
## What's done
### Comparators centralization
Comparator is now done through global configuration as const for each
metadata names
Thanks to
Note:
Definition of standard is evolving, standard is now scoped to an app.
Meaning that a manifest should be able to update its own standards
objects but on other app standards ones ? Each synchronizable entities
will have a standardOverrides ?
## Typing refactor
### `AllFlatEntityTypesByMetadataName`
**Single source of truth for the complete type ecosystem**, mapping each
metadata name to its entity types, flat entities, and migration actions:
```typescript
export type AllFlatEntityTypesByMetadataName = {
fieldMetadata: {
actions: { created: CreateFieldAction; updated: UpdateFieldAction; deleted: DeleteFieldAction; };
flatEntity: FlatFieldMetadata;
entity: FieldMetadataEntity;
};
objectMetadata: { /* ... */ };
// ... all 10 metadata types
};
```
### `ALL_METADATA_NAME_MANY_TO_ONE_RELATIONS`
**Explicitly declares database relationships** between entities with
compile-time validation:
```typescript
export const ALL_METADATA_NAME_MANY_TO_ONE_RELATIONS = {
viewField: {
view: 'viewId',
fieldMetadata: 'fieldMetadataId',
},
cronTrigger: {
serverlessFunction: 'serverlessFunctionId',
},
// ... all relations
} as const satisfies MetadataNameAndRelations;
```
### `ALL_FLAT_ENTITY_CONFIGURATION`
**Centralizes comparison and serialization logic** for each metadata
type:
```typescript
export const ALL_FLAT_ENTITY_CONFIGURATION = {
fieldMetadata: {
propertiesToCompare: ['name', 'type', 'label', 'defaultValue', /* ... */],
propertiesToStringify: ['options', 'settings', 'defaultValue'],
},
objectMetadata: {
propertiesToCompare: ['nameSingular', 'namePlural', 'isActive', /* ... */],
propertiesToStringify: [],
},
// ... all metadata types
} as const satisfies AllFlatEntityConfiguration;
```
## Combined Impact
These three configurations work together to create a **strongly-typed,
centrally-managed metadata system**:
1. **`AllFlatEntityTypesByMetadataName`** defines *what exists*
2. **`ALL_METADATA_NAME_MANY_TO_ONE_RELATIONS`** defines *how they
relate*
3. **`ALL_FLAT_ENTITY_CONFIGURATION`** defines *how to compare and
serialize them*
**Result:** Builders and validators become thin wrappers around
type-safe, configuration-driven logic instead of containing scattered,
error-prone manual implementations.
## What's next
### StandardOverrides standardization
Every metadata entity can be a standard one for a workspace if it's an
installed app, which means it might not expose the whole entity api to
be editable through an import dynamically
The standard overrides logic should not be applied to Fields and Objects
but to every entities
At the moment we have a logic of `EDITABLE_PROPERTIES` through the api,
and also `STANDARD_OVERRIDEDABLE_PROPERTIES`
This should be configuration centered like `propertiesToCompare` and
`propertiesToStringify`.
Scoping this PR to two last for the moment. As update dispatch to
standardOverrides could be considered as a side effect prefer waiting to
start the side effect refactor
### Granular Optimistic deprecation
With this new grain at runtime we will be able to add a flat entity and
dispatch its addition to related flat maps, so we don't have to describe
an optimistic method for each flat entity operations
See `addFlatEntityToFlatEntityAndRelatedEntityMapsOrThrow`
Note: Still in wip and included in this PR but about to create a new one
to integrate these utils and remove existing methods
### ValidateBuildAndRun dynamic args typed defintion
We should restrain the devxp to send expected flat maps entity as at
least from to or dependency as we now have the grain both a type lvl and
runtime to do so
It should not be possible in the devxp to forgot adding the views to the
v2 builder when passing the view field anymore ( that would lead to
permanent validation error in view field integrity checks )
## Conclusion
Thanks for reading and reviewing !
Any suggestions are more than welcomed ! ( same as for questions too ! )
# Introduction
Migrating `viewFilter` to v2 in order to migrate later the field update
side effect on view to v2 too
## What's done
- Created flat-view-filter
- flat view filter runner
- flat view filter builder
- create view filter service v2 and input transpilers
- refactor the existing view filter resolver to fix standard (
BREAKING_CHANGE on graphql api update especially ) REST stays the same
- refactored the front to consume the mutations autogenerated
## New generic tools
### Compare two flat entity
Introducing a new util to compare two flat entity, it's strictly typed
and will be added to the generic builder in a following PR
This will ease flat entity addition as won't required to create a
specific abstraction for comparison
Generic builder will expect specific constant: properties to compare and
properties to stringify
### Transform flat entity for comparison
Forked and refactor the initial existing method for flat entity business
scope and type safety
## Coverage
Migrated existing integration tests to fit new contract API
This PR does not add strong coverage on validation exceptions
Deadlines are too short
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1666
# Introduction
Preparing view-filter and view-group introduction in v2 core engine
Moving view from `core-modules` to `metadata-modules`
## What happened
### Created dedicated modules for each view entity:
- ViewFieldModule
- ViewFilterModule
- ViewFilterGroupModule
- ViewGroupModule
- ViewSortModule
### Each module is now completely independent with its own:
- Controller
- Resolver
- Service
- Entity
### Created dedicated abstraction metadata module folder for:
- flat-view-field
- flat-view
### Dependencies
- Eleminated circular dep on ViewModule to all others ones
- Granular import not importing the whole viewModule anymore everywhere
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1703
# Introduction
Initial motivation here was to migrate the object related records logic
from v1 to v2, please note that now in v2 views aren't records anymore
but core engine entities
## What's done
- Added specific label identifier targeting view field logic
- Handled side effects on viewField creation with lowest position on
object label identifier mutation
- Added viewField relations in field metadate entity + handled
optimistic in builder v2
- Added view relations in object metadata entity + handled optimistic in
builder v2
- Added integration tests covering the side effects and new validation
exceptions
- Sandardized cache computation
- Coverage on object metadata creation side effect on views and view
fields
## Coverage
```ts
PASS test/integration/graphql/suites/view/view-field/object-identifier-update-side-effect-on-view-field.integration-spec.ts
View Field Resolver - Successful object metadata identifier update side effect on view field
✓ should create a view field on label identifier object metadata update if it does not exist on view (7 ms)
✓ Should not allow deleting a label identifier view field (17 ms)
✓ Should not allow destroying a label identifier view field (6 ms)
✓ Should not allow updating a label identifier view field visibility to false (8 ms)
✓ Should not allow creating a view field with a position lower than the label idenfitier view field (180 ms)
✓ Should not allow updated labelIdentifier view field with a position higher than existing other view field (346 ms)
✓ Should allow updated labelIdentifier view field with a position higher than existing other view field (434 ms)
Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests: 7 passed, 7 total
Snapshots: 5 passed, 5 total
Time: 4.571 s, estimated 5 s
```
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1664
## Summary
1. This change introduces the ability to limit how many values a
multi-value field can contain (for example: maximum number of emails,
phone numbers, links, or array items).
2. It centralizes the limit as a shared constant and type, validates
settings on the server, updates front-end types and components to
consume the setting, and adds a small settings UI so workspace admins
can change the limit per field.
3. Default behavior is preserved: if no max is configured, the existing
default (10) is used.
## **Fixes Issue:** [#14740
](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/14740)
## Manual Test Screenshot
<img width="383" height="451" alt="Screenshot 2025-10-08 002413"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a7704af6-10ef-4d10-b8c9-a9eeca03bfd9"
/>
### Values in fields
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7f59c4f7-3aca-4f83-8c04-3d44988316e3
Let me know if any changes are needed
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
This PR follows the multiSelect PR merged previously. It will enable
morph relation Many to One to be handled from the table, using a
singleSelect picker
Main point : I decided to change the singleSelect API to take an array
of **objectMetadataName** instead of only one to deal with both our
usecases.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
# Introduction
Adding a hacky way to validate object against fields before fields
validation ( bi-directional validation process )
If you encounter an identical setup we will add a specific devXp as
cleanup validation but for the moment this seems enough
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1639
Following https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/14869
Dynamically clearing the cache, as one entry was forgotten
It seems like a permission test deletes a role that's expected to be
existing in following tests, as now cache is getting invalidated tests
are failing
Seems to be related to
https://discord.com/channels/1130383047699738754/1423768505911869460
## Singleton local cache key collision
When set for the first time caches local keys looks like
`workspaceId:undefined", singleton is shared between several cache
instances
If the given key is undefined it will read on other entity cache entry.
When starting the app on a fresh database reset the cache would be
filled with empty flat field metadata maps
Because the reset command hack through the repository directly in order
to create views and stuff
implemented an iso flush as the one existing initially
added it to a workspace deletion tambien
```
{
byId: {],
universalIdById: {}
}
```
## Improvements
- Add logs to all gql operations and rest calls to help debug CPU issues
on the backend. These are temporary and should be removed
- Remove nested relations from workflowVersions load (used to add manual
triggers in the side bar). On some workspaces this call result in a
response of 4MB which is heavy on CPU
- Investigated Redis Usage ==> made a few improvements, we are should
still migrate to the new cache service once available
- investigated db calls in messaging / calendar fetch list + workflow
enqueue run cron jobs. Everything seems to be properly batched
Closes [#1583](https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1583)
- Removed `messageId` column from `File` table and its references in
code (unrelated to this PR)
- Updated AI chat to use React Context API with persistent provider in
`CommandMenuContainer`
- Converted all AI chat component states to regular Recoil atoms (no
instance context needed)
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
## Context
Add routes to migration V2
- Resolvers
- Service v2
- Builder
- Validator
- Action runner
Next PR: Add to twenty-cli to sync routes with serverless
## Context
We are experiencing bad performance on Twenty. One of the root cause
hypothesis is that computing `currentUser.currentWorkspace.views` is CPU
consuming. Without views, the GetCurrentUser response is ~1000 lines.
With its ~10000 lines.
As graphql is going through all fields recursively this can be quite
heavy on CPU. We had a similar issues on ObjectMetadataItems 2 years ago
and came with storing the response in redis.
Note: I thought there was also a cache in RAM but this is not the case,
so to invalidate the cache we can just empty redis.
## How
- Extract getting all views from GetCurrentUser and update frontend to
perform both queries
- Add views to cached graphql operations
- invalidate the cache manually on view or related core entities update
/ create / delete / destroy
## Tests
I have tested a lot on v1
# Introduction
Extracting the legacy fields build and dispatch out of the object one to
follow the generic flat entity build, also update caches entries for
object
## Main tasks
- flat field map cache
- flat field builder
- refactored the dispatch matrix to return flat entity maps instead of
flat entity arrays
- orchestrator aggregator
- removing legacy code
- making universal identifier aka standardId of standard field for
custom object deterministically dynamic
- perfs debug logs for v2
## TODO
- [x] Refactor the generic entity builder to be dependency flat maps in
order to main foreign keys list in flat parent
- [x] Refactor the flat object metadata to contain the array of related
fields and avoid costy find object fields
- [ ] Improve the create field handler to handle multiple field at once
- [ ] Refactor the dispatch to embbed the comparison
- [ ] Improve perf by extracting from elements out of existing
- [ ] Fix the labelIdentifierId validators on object before field
creation ( integ tests are in failing mode )
## Debug logs snippet
```ts
[EntityBuilder fieldMetadata] matrix computation: 0.027ms
[EntityBuilder fieldMetadata] creation validation: 0.001ms
[EntityBuilder fieldMetadata] deletion validation: 0.293ms
[EntityBuilder fieldMetadata] update validation: 0.006ms
[EntityBuilder fieldMetadata] entity processing: 0.363ms
[EntityBuilder fieldMetadata] validateAndBuild: 0.455ms
[EntityBuilder index] matrix computation: 0.005ms
[EntityBuilder index] creation validation: 0.001ms
[EntityBuilder index] deletion validation: 0.146ms
[EntityBuilder index] update validation: 0.004ms
[EntityBuilder index] entity processing: 0.199ms
[EntityBuilder index] validateAndBuild: 0.228ms
[Runner] Initial cache retrieval: 0.549ms
[BaseWorkspaceMigrationRunnerActionHandlerService] delete_index executeForWorkspaceSchema: 11.665ms
[BaseWorkspaceMigrationRunnerActionHandlerService] delete_index executeForMetadata: 12.864ms
[BaseWorkspaceMigrationRunnerActionHandlerService] delete_field executeForWorkspaceSchema: 1.476ms
[BaseWorkspaceMigrationRunnerActionHandlerService] delete_field executeForMetadata: 6.816ms
[BaseWorkspaceMigrationRunnerActionHandlerService] delete_field executeForWorkspaceSchema: 0.062ms
[BaseWorkspaceMigrationRunnerActionHandlerService] delete_field executeForMetadata: 0.889ms
[Runner] Transaction execution: 23.434ms
[Runner] Cache invalidation: 316.662ms
[Runner] Total execution: 340.767ms
```
As you can see cache invalidation is way to long, we could replace the
cache by the optimistic in the end
twenty-cli serverless triggers follow up. Fixes:
- eventName don't support wildcard
- universalIdentifier not used to create or update trigger : update does
not work properly (does deletion then creation)
- add a base project in twenty-cli that is copied when creating a new
app
- add serverlessFunction schema in twenty-cli
- add trigger schema in twenty-cli
- update serverless function code save and get
- sync serverless function
## Introduction
After enabling flag by default got following errors:
```ts
Test Suites: 48 failed, 1 skipped, 97 passed, 145 of 146 total
Tests: 499 failed, 1 skipped, 644 passed, 1144 total
Snapshots: 61 failed, 133 passed, 194 total
Time: 363.226 s
Ran all test suites.
```
## From
<img width="2952" height="1510" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7e3b20c6-2552-40a7-90bb-2d7b3002c895"
/>
## To
<img width="3134" height="1510" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4fc9ada4-3c14-4333-a1db-11daf87db8d6"
/>
There's a huge test bundle in the latest shard that we could split up
## Notes
- Set as failing morph relation field rename as for the moment we do not
handle relation field mutation
- fixed the object update and creation validation adding label
identifier field metadata id checks
- and more
Some integrations tests are still on the v1 ( they have before and after
all disabling and re-enabling the flat ) but mainly we now have more
coverage on the v2 than the v1.
Mainly related records, uniqueness have to be migrated the v2 and so
tests too
## Context
Now adding serverless code sync within the migration v2 logic itself. To
do that we need to follow the
- Prepare flat input
- Build migration
- Run migration
steps where now the serverless function entity will store in DB and
cache a checksum of its code and the flat input will contain the code
with the checksum. Build will compare checksum and create an update
action containing the code if it has changed and the migration will now
run the corresponding services (instead of calling those in the parent
serverless service exposed in the API) allowing us to keep that logic
functional for other use cases such as import/export, twenty-cli and
twenty upgrades.
Workspace cleaning jobs slow down the db each hours when running. We
suspect the object metadata deleting query with all cascade/depending
entities (field, index, ..) to be the cause.
