# Introduction
Resolving each create|updated|deleted entities related entities
application through their universal foreingKey ( silently failing if not
found leaving the validator handling that )
In order to compute all the required application in the dependency flat
entity maps
## Tested
Creating a field on a custom local twenty-apps installed on the
workspace + view field
## Out of scope
- updated snapshot
- update graphql generated front
## Summary
Removes the `recoil` dependency entirely from `package.json` and
`twenty-front/package.json`, completing the migration to Jotai as the
sole state management library.
Removes all Recoil infrastructure: `RecoilRoot` wrapper from `App.tsx`
and test decorators, `RecoilDebugObserver`, Recoil-specific ESLint rules
(`use-getLoadable-and-getValue-to-get-atoms`,
`useRecoilCallback-has-dependency-array`), and legacy Recoil utility
hooks/types (`useRecoilComponentState`, `useRecoilComponentValue`,
`createComponentState`, `createFamilyState`, `getSnapshotValue`,
`cookieStorageEffect`, `localStorageEffect`, etc.).
Renames all `V2`-suffixed Jotai state files and types to their canonical
names (e.g., `ComponentStateV2` -> `ComponentState`,
`agentChatInputStateV2` -> `agentChatInputState`, `SelectorCallbacksV2`
-> `SelectorCallbacks`), and removes the now-redundant V1 counterparts.
Updates ~433 files across the codebase to use the renamed Jotai imports,
remove Recoil imports, and clean up test wrappers (`RecoilRootDecorator`
-> `JotaiRootDecorator`).
## Automated fix for [bug 5360](https://sonarly.com/issue/5360?type=bug)
**Severity:** `critical`
### Summary
When an existing user created via OAuth (with no password hash) attempts
to sign in through the signInUp password flow, their null passwordHash
is passed directly to bcrypt.compare, which throws an unhandled 'data
and hash arguments required' error instead of a user-friendly message.
### User Impact
Users who originally registered via Google or Microsoft OAuth and then
attempt to sign in using email/password through the signInUp flow cannot
authenticate. They see a server error instead of a helpful message like
'User was not created with email/password'. This blocks the user from
accessing the CRM entirely.
### Root Cause
Proximate cause: bcrypt.compare() at auth.util.ts:19 throws 'data and
hash arguments required' because the passwordHash argument is null.
1. Why did bcrypt throw? Because compareHash() was called with a null
passwordHash value. The compareHash function at auth.util.ts:19 passes
its arguments directly to bcrypt.compare without any null check.
2. Why was passwordHash null? Because SignInUpService.validatePassword()
at sign-in-up.service.ts:154 received a null passwordHash from
AuthService.validatePassword() at auth.service.ts:232. The value
userData.existingUser.passwordHash is null for users who were originally
created via an OAuth provider (Google, Microsoft) and never set a
password.
3. Why was there no null check before calling bcrypt? Because
AuthService.validatePassword() at line 229-233 does not check whether
userData.existingUser.passwordHash is null before passing it to
signInUpService.validatePassword(). The TypeScript type annotation says
passwordHash is string, but the UserEntity column is declared nullable:
true (user.entity.ts:73), so the runtime value can be null despite the
type system.
4. Why does this code path lack the null check when another path has it?
The validateLoginWithPassword() method at auth.service.ts:177 correctly
checks if (!user.passwordHash) and throws a user-friendly AuthException
'Incorrect login method'. This guard was added by Thomas Trompette on
2024-08-07 (commit 2abb6adb61). However, the signInUp flow's
validatePassword() method was introduced later by Antoine Moreaux on
2025-03-17 (commit bda835b9f8) without replicating this same defensive
check.
5. Why was this not caught? The signInUp validatePassword method was
written assuming the existingUser would always have a passwordHash when
the auth provider is Password. This assumption is incorrect because the
signInUp flow can match an existing OAuth-created user (who has no
passwordHash) when someone tries to sign up with email/password using an
email already registered via OAuth. No test covers this cross-provider
scenario in the signInUp path.
Root cause: The AuthService.validatePassword() method
(auth.service.ts:229-233) in the signInUp code path is missing a null
guard on userData.existingUser.passwordHash before passing it to
bcrypt.compare. The fix should check for null/undefined passwordHash and
throw a descriptive AuthException, mirroring the existing guard in
validateLoginWithPassword at line 177.
**Introduced by:** Antoine Moreaux on 2025-03-17 in commit
[`bda835b`](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/commit/bda835b9f82)
### Suggested Fix
Added a null check on userData.existingUser.passwordHash inside the
validatePassword private method of AuthService, immediately before
calling signInUpService.validatePassword. When passwordHash is null or
undefined (i.e. the user was created via OAuth and never set a
password), an AuthException with code INVALID_INPUT is thrown with the
user-friendly message 'User was not created with email/password'. This
mirrors the identical guard that already exists in
validateLoginWithPassword at line 177, preventing bcrypt.compare from
receiving a null argument and crashing with an unhandled error.
### Evidence
- **Code:**
[packages/twenty-server/src/engine/core-modules/auth/services/auth.service.ts:229
- if (userData.type === 'existingUser')
{](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/blob/main/packages/twenty-server/src/engine/core-modules/auth/services/auth.service.ts#L229)
---
*Generated by [Sonarly](https://sonarly.com)*
Co-authored-by: Sonarly Claude Code <[email protected]>
## Summary
- **Admin-level filtering**: New AI tab in admin panel with server-wide
model availability controls (whitelist/blacklist via
`AI_AUTO_ENABLE_NEW_MODELS`, `AI_DISABLED_MODEL_IDS`,
`AI_ENABLED_MODEL_IDS` config variables). Dedicated
`setAdminAiModelEnabled` mutation replaces frontend config-variable
manipulation. Filter dropdown to show/hide unconfigured and deprecated
models.
- **Workspace-level filtering**: Per-workspace controls with "Use best
models only" mode (curated list backed by `isRecommended` flag), or
custom whitelist/blacklist. Separate Smart/Fast model selectors with
"Best (...)" virtual options.
- **Security enforcement**: Both layers enforced at every backend
execution point — workspace update, agent create/update, chat execution.
Model ID validated against known models before config mutation. All
admin endpoints protected by `AdminPanelGuard`.
## Changes
### Backend (`twenty-server`)
- New config variables for admin-level model filtering
- `AiModelRegistryService`: `getAllModelsWithStatus()`,
`setModelAdminEnabled()` with model ID validation,
`isModelAdminAllowed()`
- `AdminPanelResolver`: `getAdminAiModels` query,
`setAdminAiModelEnabled` mutation
- `WorkspaceEntity`: new fields (`autoEnableNewAiModels`,
`disabledAiModelIds`, `enabledAiModelIds`, `useRecommendedModels`)
- `WorkspaceService`: model validation on `smartModel`/`fastModel`
updates
- `AgentResolver`: model availability checks on create/update
- `isModelAllowedByWorkspace` centralized utility
- `isRecommended` flag on model definitions
- Two TypeORM migrations
### Frontend (`twenty-front`)
- New `SettingsAdminAI` component with search, filter dropdown
(unconfigured/deprecated), and model toggle cards
- AI tab added to admin panel navigation
- `useWorkspaceAiModelAvailability` hook for workspace-level filtering
- `SettingsAIModelsTab` redesigned: merged sections, "Use best models
only" toggle, conditional available models list
- `getModelIcon`/`getModelProviderLabel` shared utilities with GraphQL
enum casing normalization
- Updated generated GraphQL types and mock data
## Test plan
- [ ] Toggle models on/off in admin panel AI tab and verify they
appear/disappear in workspace settings
- [ ] Enable "Use best models only" in workspace settings and verify
only recommended models are selectable
- [ ] Disable recommended mode and verify whitelist/blacklist toggles
work correctly
- [ ] Verify deprecated models hidden by default, shown greyed out when
filter enabled
- [ ] Verify unconfigured models hidden by default, shown disabled when
filter enabled
- [ ] Try setting a disabled model as Smart/Fast model — should be
rejected
- [ ] Try creating an agent with a disabled model — should be rejected
- [ ] Verify admin panel AI tab requires admin access
Made with [Cursor](https://cursor.com)
---------
Co-authored-by: Cursor <[email protected]>
## Summary
Fix file uploads in AI chat (Agent Chat) failing with "Failed to upload
file" for all file types.
## Root Cause
`useAIChatFileUpload.ts` was using `useApolloCoreClient()` which points
to the `/graphql` (workspace) endpoint. However, `FileUploadResolver` is
decorated with `@MetadataResolver()`, meaning `uploadFile` is only
registered on the `/metadata` endpoint.
## Fix
Replace `useApolloCoreClient()` with `useApolloClient()` from
`@apollo/client`, which is the default Apollo client pointing to the
`/metadata` endpoint. This is consistent with how
`useUploadAttachmentFile.tsx` handles file uploads.
## Changes
- Replaced `useApolloCoreClient` import with `useApolloClient` from
`@apollo/client`
- Updated the client variable to use the default Apollo client
- Removed unused `useApolloCoreClient` import
Fixes#18153
## Summary
- **Refactor frontend metadata loading architecture**: Split the
monolithic `EagerMetadataLoadEffect` into focused provider effects
(`UserMetadataProviderEffect`, `ObjectMetadataProviderEffect`,
`ViewMetadataProviderEffect`) orchestrated by `MetadataProviderEffects`.
Replaced `UserProvider` + `ObjectMetadataItemsProvider` with a single
`MetadataGater` that gates rendering on `isAppMetadataReadyState`. The
metadata store now validates view-object consistency before promoting
views, and `updateDraft` skips no-op updates via deep equality checks.
- **SDK CLI improvements**: Added `app:typecheck` command, improved
error handling in API sync (extracts GraphQL error messages), added
`serializeError` utility for human-readable error output, added `error`
file status to dev mode orchestrator with UI support, and fixed
ClickHouse migration/seed commands to use `transpile-only`.
The `useSaveFieldsWidgetGroups` hook was making multiple sequential API
calls per widget (create groups, delete groups, update groups, update
fields) — non-atomic, chatty, and with heavy diff computation on the
frontend.
## Backend
- **New input DTOs**: `UpsertFieldsWidgetInput` /
`UpsertFieldsWidgetGroupInput` / `UpsertFieldsWidgetFieldInput` — caller
passes the full desired state of groups + fields for a widget
- **`FieldsWidgetUpsertService`**: looks up widget → resolves `viewId`,
diffs against existing flat entity maps, builds optimistic group maps so
newly-created groups can be referenced by field updates in the same
pass, then runs creates/updates/deletes in a single
`validateBuildAndRunWorkspaceMigration` call
- **`upsertFieldsWidget` mutation** added to `ViewFieldGroupResolver`;
new `FIELDS_WIDGET_NOT_FOUND` exception code added and wired into the
GraphQL exception filter
## Frontend
- New `UPSERT_FIELDS_WIDGET` GQL document
- `useSaveFieldsWidgetGroups` replaces all per-operation calls with a
single mutation per widget, passing the full draft state — diff logic
moves entirely to the backend
```graphql
mutation UpsertFieldsWidget($input: UpsertFieldsWidgetInput!) {
upsertFieldsWidget(input: $input) {
id
name
position
isVisible
viewId
viewFields { id isVisible position ... }
}
}
```
Widget IDs are collected from both draft **and** persisted state so
widgets whose draft groups were cleared still trigger deletion of their
server-side groups.
<!-- START COPILOT ORIGINAL PROMPT -->
<details>
<summary>Original prompt</summary>
Start implementation
The user has attached the following file paths as relevant context:
- CLAUDE.md
<analysis>
[Chronological Review: The conversation began with the user requesting a
review of how updates on views are stored in the frontend of record page
layouts. The user expressed a desire to migrate heavy computations and
multiple requests from the frontend to the backend. They proposed
creating a custom upsertFieldsWidget mutation to handle updates
atomically. The conversation has focused on this migration strategy and
its implementation.]
[Intent Mapping: The user explicitly requested to "check how we store
updates on views in the frontend of record page layouts" and indicated a
need to "migrate this task to the backend" by creating a custom mutation
for atomic updates.]
[Technical Inventory: The conversation involves the following technical
concepts:
- Frontend and backend architecture for handling page layout updates.
- Custom GraphQL mutation (upsertFieldsWidget) for atomic updates.
- The file in focus is page-layout-update.service.ts, which is likely
responsible for handling updates related to page layouts in the
backend.]
[Code Archaeology: The specific file being worked on is
/Users/devessier/Web/twenty/packages/twenty-server/src/engine/metadata-modules/page-layout/services/page-layout-update.service.ts.
The user is likely looking to modify or enhance this service to
accommodate the new mutation for handling updates.]
[Progress Assessment: The user has identified the need for a backend
migration strategy but has not yet implemented any changes. The focus is
on planning the transition from frontend to backend processing.]
[Context Validation: All critical information for continuation is
captured, including the user's intent to migrate computations to the
backend and the specific file being modified.]
[Recent Commands Analysis: The last agent commands involved checking the
current file context and the user's request to summarize the
conversation. No specific tool results were generated as the focus was
on summarizing the conversation history. The agent was actively working
on summarizing the conversation when the token budget was exceeded,
which was triggered by the user's request for a summary.]
</analysis>
<summary>
1. Conversation Overview:
- Primary Objectives: The user requested to "check how we store updates
on views in the frontend of record page layouts" and expressed a desire
to "migrate this task to the backend" by creating a custom
upsertFieldsWidget mutation for atomic updates.
- Session Context: The conversation has focused on the need to shift
heavy computations from the frontend to the backend, with an emphasis on
implementing a new mutation to streamline updates.
- User Intent Evolution: The user's needs have remained consistent,
focusing on backend migration for efficiency and atomicity in updates.
2. Technical Foundation:
- Core Technology: The conversation involves a backend service likely
built with Node.js and TypeScript, as indicated by the file path.
- Framework/Library: The use of GraphQL for handling mutations is
implied through the mention of a custom mutation.
- Architectural Pattern: The user is looking to implement a
service-oriented architecture where the backend handles complex
computations instead of the frontend.
- Environment Detail: The current working file is located in a server
package of the twenty repository.
3. Codebase Status:
- File Name: page-layout-update.service.ts
- Purpose: This file is responsible for managing updates related to page
layouts in the backend.
- Current State: The user is considering modifications to implement a
new mutation for handling updates.
- Key Code Segments: Specific functions or classes have not been
detailed yet, as the focus is on planning changes.
- Dependencies: This service likely interacts with other components in
the metadata-modules related to page layouts.
4. Problem Resolution:
- Issues Encountered: The current challenge is the inefficiency of
handling updates in the frontend.
- Solutions Implemented: The proposed solution is to create a custom
mutation to handle updates atomically in the backend.
- Debugging Context: No ongoing troubleshooting efforts have been
mentioned yet.
- Lessons Learned: The need for backend processing to improve
performance has been highlighted.
5. Progress Tracking:
- Completed Tasks: No tasks have been completed yet; the user is in the
planning phase.
- Partially Complete Work: The user is preparing to implement a new
mutation for backend updates.
- Validated Outcomes: No features have been confirmed working through
testing at this stage.
6. Active Work State:
- Current Focus: The user is focused on modifying the
page-layout-update.service.ts to implement the new mutation.
- Recent Context: The last few exchanges involved discussing the
migration of update tasks from the frontend to the backend.
- Working Code: No specific code snippets have been modified yet, as the
co...
</details>
<!-- START COPILOT CODING AGENT SUFFIX -->
Created from [VS
Code](https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/copilot/copilot-coding-agent).
<!-- START COPILOT CODING AGENT TIPS -->
---
💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions,
customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context
Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more [Copilot coding agent
tips](https://gh.io/copilot-coding-agent-tips) in the docs.
---------
Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Devessier <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Baptiste Devessier <[email protected]>
## PR description
- Adds `enqueueSnackbar` to the front component host communication API,
allowing front components to display snack bar notifications (success,
error, info, warning) to the user.
- Introduces `frontComponentId` to the `FrontComponentExecutionContext`
and a `useFrontComponentId` hook, enabling front components to identify
themselves (used for dedupe keys).
- Wires error/success notifications into the `Action`, `ActionLink`, and
`ActionOpenSidePanelPage` SDK components -> actions now catch errors and
display them as snack bars, and `Action` supports an optional
`notifyOnEnd` prop for success feedback.
## Video QA
### Success example
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8cc53d31-d9eb-49a8-9220-f7866ec1b415
### Error example
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a37d65b8-0b5f-4adb-bcdb-571bb2b997c3
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <[email protected]>
## Summary
- **Model pricing overhaul**: All model constants updated with accurate
pricing in dollars per 1M tokens, including cached input rates, cache
creation rates, and tiered >200k context pricing
- **New providers**: Added Google (Gemini 3.x), Mistral, and AWS Bedrock
as inference providers. Bedrock serves Claude Opus 4.6 and Sonnet 4.6
via AWS, with proper credential handling following the existing S3/SES
pattern
- **InferenceProvider/ModelFamily split**: Refactored `ModelProvider`
into two orthogonal enums — `InferenceProvider` (who serves the model:
auth, SDK, metadata format) and `ModelFamily` (who created it: token
counting semantics). This eliminates growing `||` chains for token
normalization checks like `excludesCachedTokens`
- **Billing improvements**: Reasoning tokens charged at output rate,
cache token discounts applied accurately, real errors thrown to Sentry
on billing failures
## Test plan
- [x] All existing unit tests updated and passing (23 tests across 3
test files)
- [x] Lint passes for both twenty-server and twenty-front
- [ ] CI checks pass
Made with [Cursor](https://cursor.com)
---------
Co-authored-by: Cursor <[email protected]>
## Summary
- Add E2B logo to the Thanks section (after Crowdin, same height)
- Rename section heading from "Does the world need another CRM?" to "Why
Twenty" for a more confident, direct tone
## Test plan
- [ ] Verify E2B logo renders correctly on GitHub README
- [ ] Confirm all other logos still display properly
Made with [Cursor](https://cursor.com)
Co-authored-by: Cursor <[email protected]>
