fix: handle relative date filter values without amount for THIS direction

https://sonarly.com/issue/22312?type=bug

The relative date filter stringified parser fails on the value "THIS_QUARTER" because the regex requires a `DIRECTION_DIGITS_UNIT` three-segment format (e.g., `THIS_1_QUARTER`), but the stored filter value lacks the amount segment. This crashes the opportunities table view for the affected user.

packages/twenty-shared/src/utils/filter/dates/utils/relativeDateFilterStringifiedSchema.ts

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ import { isNonEmptyArray } from '@sniptt/guards';
 import z from 'zod';
 
 const REGEX_FOR_RELATIVE_DATE_FILTER_STRINGIFIED_PARSING =
-  /((?:THIS)|(?:PAST)|(?:NEXT))_(\d*)_(DAY|MONTH|YEAR|WEEK|QUARTER|HOUR|MINUTE|SECOND)(?:(?:;;([^;;]*);;)?(?:(MONDAY|SUNDAY|SATURDAY);;)?)?/;
+  /((?:THIS)|(?:PAST)|(?:NEXT))_(?:(\d+)_)?(DAY|MONTH|YEAR|WEEK|QUARTER|HOUR|MINUTE|SECOND)(?:(?:;;([^;;]*);;)?(?:(MONDAY|SUNDAY|SATURDAY);;)?)?/;
 
 export const relativeDateFilterStringifiedSchema = z
   .string()

packages/twenty-shared/src/utils/filter/turnRecordFilterIntoGqlOperationFilter.ts

@@ -305,12 +305,6 @@ export const turnRecordFilterIntoRecordGqlOperationFilter = ({
             ? resolvedFilterValue
             : null;
 
-        if (!isDefined(parsedRelativeDateFilterValue)) {
-          throw new Error(
-            `Cannot parse relative date filter : "${recordFilter.value}"`,
-          );
-        }
-
         const defaultDateRange = resolveDateTimeFilter({
           value: `PAST_1_DAY;;${filterValueDependencies.timeZone}`,
           operand: RecordFilterOperand.IS_RELATIVE,
@@ -323,6 +317,12 @@ export const turnRecordFilterIntoRecordGqlOperationFilter = ({
           throw new Error('Failed to resolve default date range');
         }
 
+        if (!isDefined(parsedRelativeDateFilterValue)) {
+          console.warn(
+            `Cannot parse relative date filter : "${recordFilter.value}", falling back to default range`,
+          );
+        }
+
         const start =
           parsedRelativeDateFilterValue?.start ?? defaultDateRange.start;