Parallel code path to read and write core views when
IS_CORE_VIEW_ENABLED.
Migrated view key to an enum.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <[email protected]>
In our Graphql schema, ids are typed as UUID.
Our FE codegen is typing it as 'any', unless we say otherwise. Fixing it
and fixing the impacts in the codebase
Moves system-level operations (auth, billing, admin) to use the
/metadata endpoint instead of /graphql.
This cleans up the endpoint separation so /graphql is purely for core
objects (Company, People, etc.) and /metadata handles all system
operations.
Part of prep work for webhook/API key core migration.
# Content
- Introduce the `workspaceUrls` property. It contains two
sub-properties: `customUrl, subdomainUrl`. These endpoints are used to
access the workspace. Even if the `workspaceUrls` is invalid for
multiple reasons, the `subdomainUrl` remains valid.
- Introduce `ResolveField` workspaceEndpoints to avoid unnecessary URL
computation on the frontend part.
- Add a `forceSubdomainUrl` to avoid custom URL using a query parameter
## Summary
- [x] Remove defaultWorkspace in user
- [x] Remove all occurrence of defaultWorkspace and defaultWorkspaceId
- [x] Improve activate workspace flow
- [x] Improve security on social login
- [x] Add `ImpersonateGuard`
- [x] Allow to use impersonation with couple `User/Workspace`
- [x] Prevent unexpected reload on activate workspace
- [x] Scope login token with workspaceId
Fix https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/9033#event-15714863042
This PR introduces an `upsert` parameter (along the existing `data`
param) for `createOne` and `createMany` mutations.
When upsert is set to `true`, the function will look for records with
the same id if an id was passed. If not id was passed, it will leverage
the existing duplicate check mechanism to find a duplicate. If a record
is found, then the function will perform an update instead of a create.
Unfortunately I had to remove some nice tests that existing on the args
factory. Those tests where mostly testing the duplication rule
generation logic but through a GraphQL angle. Since I moved the
duplication rule logic to a dedicated service, if I kept the tests but
mocked the service we wouldn't really be testing anything useful. The
right path would be to create new tests for this service that compare
the JSON output and not the GraphQL output but I chose not to work on
this as it's equivalent to rewriting the tests from scratch and I have
other competing priorities.
