# Introduction
Initially wanted to reactive the test introduced in
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15393, that was failing because
of direct data source access removing all views ( even seeded one )
which was making the test fail
While doing so discovered a lot of issue with the rest API:
- Rest api wasn't consuming the v2 at all
- Rest api wasn't prepared to handle v2 exceptions
- Rest api did not handled unknown exceptions ( timeout )
Refactored the cleanup of each test to follow black box pattern and
avoid test leakage
To be done in an other PR, move graphql-query-runner handlers in
common-api-query-runner folder (+ renaming + typing improvments)
Fixes :
- totalCount on findMany (Rest)
- getAllSelectedFields did not handle composite field (Rest)
- issue with endCursor (Rest)
- args processing for updateOne and createOne (Rest + Gql)
- fix findDuplicates (Gql)
# Introduction
A while ago we migrated view from workspace to metadata
Their standard objects workspace entities declaration remained we can
now remove them
## Deprecating commands before 1.5
The view migration command from workspace to metadata was introduced in
`1.5.0`. Removing the `baseWorkspaceEntity` make this command obsolete.
If tomorrow twenty handles auto upgrade in latest and a user having an
instance in `1.3.0` starts auto-upgrading he won't be able to migrate
his views ( that's why we should not support upgrade before 1.5 anymore
here )
We will have the same use case with FavoritesFolders
# Introduction
Fixing self relation field creation in v2
- When computing related flat field to delete on object metadata
deletion that has self relation fields
- On self relation creation validation name availability not searching
for the relation target field of the current object field if it's the
field being validated
## Coverage
- added CUD integration testing on self relation fields
close https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/15153
# Introduction
Fixing composite field update by computing field column type for each of
its properties instead of globally
## Coverage
Added integration tests for each composite field on both successful
`create` and `update`
```ts
Test Suites: 17 passed, 17 total
Tests: 104 passed, 104 total
Snapshots: 14 passed, 14 total
Time: 135.431 s, estimated 143 s
```
## Conlusion
Related to https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1753
# Introduction
Refactoring the standard overrides dispatcher to only pass over fields
to has to be dispatched in the standardOverrides entry and let the other
side effects resulting from out of standard overrides mutation trigger
Related to https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1753
## This allows
- standard field settings, options etc updates and so on
## Remark
- Determine what we should do on object deactivation ( right now in
production we can still access deactivated object relation properties
and so on e.g deactivate opportunities still accessible from a view
field on company ( still have to re-create it as it has been deleted )
=> decided to leave as it is right now, `isActive` could be considered
as uiDeactivated in the end
- We should also add forbidden standard field mutations validation
inside the builder itself ( here we want to early return in the api
input transpiler too as we don't want to spread invalid side effects )
=> or in the end we could just centralize both but it will generate
several errors
## Coverage
```ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/object-metadata/successful-update-one-standard-object-metadata.integration-spec.ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/successful-update-one-standard-field-metadata.integration-spec.ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/object-metadata/failing-update-one-standard-object-metadata.integration-spec.ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/failing-update-one-standard-field-metadata.integration-spec.ts
Test Suites: 4 passed, 4 total
Tests: 18 passed, 18 total
Snapshots: 16 passed, 16 total
Time: 8.721 s, estimated 10 s
```
## Update post review
Faced a behavior where updating back the company label to its original
value would result in storing this value in the standard overrides
Refactored both field and object transpilation behavior to rather remove
the standard override value instead and let fallback on original value
Yes it's quite duplicated will factorize once we move this inside the
builder
Adds intelligent routing system that automatically selects the best
agent for user queries based on conversation context.
### Changes:
- Added `routerModel` column to workspace table for configurable router
LLM selection
- Implemented `RouterService` with conversation history analysis and
agent matching logic
- Created router settings UI in AI Settings page with model dropdown
- Removed agent-specific thread associations - threads are now
agent-agnostic
- Added real-time routing status notification in chat UI with shimmer
effect
- Removed automatic default assistant agent creation
- Renamed GraphQL operations from agent-specific to generic (e.g.,
`agentChatThreads` → `chatThreads`)
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
# Introduction
Handling both:
- field deactivation side effect on view fields, view filters and views
- field deactivation side effect on view that targets it as
`kanbanAggregateFieldMetadataId`
- field deactivation side effect on view that targets it as
`calendarFieldMetadataId`
## Coverage
added coverage
```ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/kanban-aggregate-field-deactivation-deletes-views.integration-spec.ts (13.132 s)
kanban-aggregate-field-deactivation-nullifies-kanban-properties
✓ should nullify kanban properties when field used as kanbanAggregateOperationFieldMetadataId is deactivated (3923 ms)
✓ should not modify views when field not used as kanbanAggregateOperationFieldMetadataId is deactivated (2958 ms)
✓ should nullify kanban properties on multiple views when they all use the same field as kanbanAggregateOperationFieldMetadataId (2542 ms)
✓ should nullify kanban properties when views have different aggregate operations on same field (3380 ms)
Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests: 4 passed, 4 total
Snapshots: 0 total
Time: 13.154 s
```
```ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/view-group-field-deactivation-deletes-views.integration-spec.ts (12.639 s)
view-group-field-deactivation-deletes-views
✓ should delete view when field used in view group is deactivated (3469 ms)
✓ should not delete view when field not used in view group is deactivated (3109 ms)
✓ should delete multiple views when they all use the same field in view groups (2741 ms)
✓ should handle deactivation when view has multiple view groups with different fields (3008 ms)
Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests: 4 passed, 4 total
Snapshots: 0 total
Time: 12.664 s
```
```ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/calendar-field-deactivation-deletes-views.integration-spec.ts (14.579 s)
calendar-field-deactivation-deletes-views
✓ should delete view when field used as calendarFieldMetadataId is deactivated (3388 ms)
✓ should not delete view when field not used as calendarFieldMetadataId is deactivated (2438 ms)
✓ should delete multiple views when they all use the same field as calendarFieldMetadataId (2635 ms)
✓ should handle deactivation when views have different calendar layouts on same field (3195 ms)
✓ should delete calendar view but not other view types when calendar field is deactivated (2682 ms)
Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests: 5 passed, 5 total
Snapshots: 0 total
Time: 14.601 s, estimated 15 s
```
## View soft deletion
We decided to remove the soft deletion grain on all the views, in this
PR context we've only removed soft deleted validation requirement on any
view entities
## Conclusion
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1754
# Migrate Attachment Author to CreatedBy Field
**Twill Task**: https://twill.ai/twentyhq/ENG/tasks/7
## Summary
This PR implements a migration to transition the `Attachment` object
from using an `author` relation field to using the standard `createdBy`
field, addressing issue
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1594.
## Changes
- **Added migration command**
(`1-8-migrate-attachment-author-to-created-by.command.ts`):
- Migrates existing attachment data to use `createdBy` instead of
`author`
- Ensures data integrity during the transition to the standard field
pattern
- **Updated Attachment workspace entity**:
- Added `createdBy` relation field to the `Attachment` standard object
- Registered new field ID in `standard-field-ids.ts` constants
- **Integrated migration into upgrade pipeline**:
- Added migration module for version 1.8
- Registered in the main upgrade version command module
This change aligns the `Attachment` object with Twenty's standard field
conventions by using the built-in `createdBy` field instead of a custom
`author` field.
---
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1594
---------
Co-authored-by: Twill <agent@twill.ai>
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
Implements permission intersection (AND logic) to prevent permission
escalation when agents act on behalf of users.
### Changes:
- **Permission Intersection**: Operations requiring both user AND agent
permissions
- **RoleContext Type**: Unified type supporting single `roleId` or
multiple `roleIds` for intersection
- **CRUD Services**: Updated to accept `roleContext` for granular
permission control
- **Agent Integration**: Chat agents now use user + agent role
intersection for all operations
- **ORM Layer**: Enhanced `getRepository` to support multi-role
permission checks
### Related:
- Part 2 of ["Acting on behalf of user" concept
PR](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15103)
[Closes#1661](https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1661)
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
## Context
- All flatEntity should extend SyncableEntity
- SyncableEntity should now have applicationId and application relation
- Fix syncApp deletion, should now properly use migration v2 to delete
syncable entities
# Introduction
### Summary
Implements side effect handling for `ViewGroup` and `ViewFilters` when
field metadata is updated in the v2 architecture. This ensures that
view-related records are properly maintained when enum field options are
modified, deleted, or created.
### Side effects
- **Side Effect System**: Added side effect handling for field metadata
updates that manages related view groups and view filters
- **Enum Field Updates**: When enum field options are modified, the
system now:
- **View Groups**: Creates new groups for added options, updates
existing groups for modified options, and deletes groups for removed
options
- **View Filters**: Updates filter values to reflect option changes and
removes filters that reference deleted options
### Enum runner fix
Update now works for both atomic enum and array enum ( multi select for
instance )
### Compute flat entity maps from to
Standardized this method usage across v2 services
Next step is to require dependencies dynamically
## Conclusion
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1649
I had an issue with invalid UUIDs, and I think it would be easier to
find the offending one if the UUID were included in the error message.
This way a database dump can be easily searched.
---------
Co-authored-by: prastoin <paul@twenty.com>
## Goal
- inferDeletionFromMissingEntities is now a map instead of a single
bool, allowing us to parameterise it based on the entity we want to
compare
- Adding index creation/update when field isUnique is set to true and
index deletion when isUnique is false (for now)
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1346
### Summary
Split BAR into VERTICAL_BAR and HORIZONTAL_BAR as separate chart types.
### The Problem
Initially wanted a simple vertical/horizontal toggle for bar charts, but
ran into a GraphQL union type
constraint: union types can't have the same field name with different
nullability.
- Vertical bars need groupByFieldMetadataIdX as required (categories on
X)
- Horizontal bars need groupByFieldMetadataIdY as required (categories
on Y)
- GraphQL schema generation fails with this setup
### The Solution
Use semantic primaryAxis and secondaryAxis naming that's
orientation-agnostic:
- primaryAxisGroupByFieldMetadataId = main grouping field (e.g.,
"Company Name")
- secondaryAxisGroupByFieldMetadataId = optional secondary grouping
(e.g., "Stage")
These fields have consistent meaning regardless of orientation. The
visual mapping happens at the UI layer:
- Vertical bars: primary data renders on X-axis, secondary on Y-axis
- Horizontal bars: primary data renders on Y-axis, secondary on X-axis
Both chart types share the same DTO structure with consistent
nullability.
### What Changed
- Split GraphType.BAR → VERTICAL_BAR | HORIZONTAL_BAR
- Renamed fields: primaryAxisGroupByFieldMetadataId,
secondaryAxisGroupByFieldMetadataId (+ subfield
variants)
- useChartSettingsValues(): Maps semantic fields to setting values (no
swapping)
- getBarChartSettings(): Dynamically arranges settings panel based on
orientation
- transformGroupByDataToBarChartData(): Maps semantic fields to Nivo's
layout prop
video QA
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/479061b5-712e-4ca6-9858-95273d1f16c1
# Introduction
Adding view-group to core engine v2
Following https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15010 ( same pattern )
## What's done
- Created flat-view-group
- flat view group runner
- flat view group builder
- create view group service v2 and input transpilers
- refactor the existing view group resolver to fix standard (
BREAKING_CHANGE on graphql api update especially ) REST stays the same
- refactored the front to consume the mutations autogenerated
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1665
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1563.
We now have two inter-group orderBy criteria: one on the aggregate
values, the other on the dimension values.
Ex: I am grouping companies by city and querying the average number of
employees for each group. I can either order the groups by the city
name, or by the average number of employees, or by one then the other.
I could actually also order groups by an aggregated value that I did not
ask for (ex: average ARR), but I cannot order groups by a field value I
did not group records by (ex: country).
[See discord
discussion](https://discord.com/channels/1130383047699738754/1425438213555753050/1425438223097921659)
An example of query variables:
```
{
"groupBy": [
{
"createdAt": {
"granularity": "QUARTER_OF_THE_YEAR"
}
},
{"city": true}
],
"orderBy": [
{
"aggregate": {
"avgEmployees": "DescNullsLast"
}
},
{
"aggregate": {
"percentyEmptyEmployees": "DescNullsLast"
}
},
{
"city": "AscNullsLast"
},
{
"createdAt": {
"orderBy": "AscNullsLast",
"granularity": "QUARTER_OF_THE_YEAR",
}
}
]
}
```
The aggregate orderBy criteria had already been implemented, but I
updated the implementation to add an "aggregate" key to prefix them, in
order to avoid confusion between the two + for the schema generation not
to break (otherwise we would have an issue when generating
OrderByWithGroupByInput if a user has created a field that has the same
name as an aggregate field, such as avgEmployees).
# Introduction
Migrating `viewFilter` to v2 in order to migrate later the field update
side effect on view to v2 too
## What's done
- Created flat-view-filter
- flat view filter runner
- flat view filter builder
- create view filter service v2 and input transpilers
- refactor the existing view filter resolver to fix standard (
BREAKING_CHANGE on graphql api update especially ) REST stays the same
- refactored the front to consume the mutations autogenerated
## New generic tools
### Compare two flat entity
Introducing a new util to compare two flat entity, it's strictly typed
and will be added to the generic builder in a following PR
This will ease flat entity addition as won't required to create a
specific abstraction for comparison
Generic builder will expect specific constant: properties to compare and
properties to stringify
### Transform flat entity for comparison
Forked and refactor the initial existing method for flat entity business
scope and type safety
## Coverage
Migrated existing integration tests to fit new contract API
This PR does not add strong coverage on validation exceptions
Deadlines are too short
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1666
# Introduction
Preparing view-filter and view-group introduction in v2 core engine
Moving view from `core-modules` to `metadata-modules`
## What happened
### Created dedicated modules for each view entity:
- ViewFieldModule
- ViewFilterModule
- ViewFilterGroupModule
- ViewGroupModule
- ViewSortModule
### Each module is now completely independent with its own:
- Controller
- Resolver
- Service
- Entity
### Created dedicated abstraction metadata module folder for:
- flat-view-field
- flat-view
### Dependencies
- Eleminated circular dep on ViewModule to all others ones
- Granular import not importing the whole viewModule anymore everywhere
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1703
# Introduction
Initial motivation here was to migrate the object related records logic
from v1 to v2, please note that now in v2 views aren't records anymore
but core engine entities
## What's done
- Added specific label identifier targeting view field logic
- Handled side effects on viewField creation with lowest position on
object label identifier mutation
- Added viewField relations in field metadate entity + handled
optimistic in builder v2
- Added view relations in object metadata entity + handled optimistic in
builder v2
- Added integration tests covering the side effects and new validation
exceptions
- Sandardized cache computation
- Coverage on object metadata creation side effect on views and view
fields
## Coverage
```ts
PASS test/integration/graphql/suites/view/view-field/object-identifier-update-side-effect-on-view-field.integration-spec.ts
View Field Resolver - Successful object metadata identifier update side effect on view field
✓ should create a view field on label identifier object metadata update if it does not exist on view (7 ms)
✓ Should not allow deleting a label identifier view field (17 ms)
✓ Should not allow destroying a label identifier view field (6 ms)
✓ Should not allow updating a label identifier view field visibility to false (8 ms)
✓ Should not allow creating a view field with a position lower than the label idenfitier view field (180 ms)
✓ Should not allow updated labelIdentifier view field with a position higher than existing other view field (346 ms)
✓ Should allow updated labelIdentifier view field with a position higher than existing other view field (434 ms)
Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests: 7 passed, 7 total
Snapshots: 5 passed, 5 total
Time: 4.571 s, estimated 5 s
```
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1664
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1418
Tested :
- findOne on Rest and Gql
### Vision
#### Common
- Common is kind of renamed Gql base resolver
- Common handles args (filter, values, ...) validation
- Common accepts depth or raw gql selected fields to compute
selectedFields
- Common is directly called by each CommonQueries (findOne, ...)
service, which extend CommonBaseQuery service
- Common sequence :
| - Parse & Validate args (args-handlers, to create)
| - Build query (query-parsers : currently in gql-query-parsers, to
move)
| - Execute query
| - Fetch relation + format
#### Rest
- Simple parsing (without metadata validation)
- Calling Common API
- Simple rest response formatting
#### Gql
- Calling Common API
This PR follows the multiSelect PR merged previously. It will enable
morph relation Many to One to be handled from the table, using a
singleSelect picker
Main point : I decided to change the singleSelect API to take an array
of **objectMetadataName** instead of only one to deal with both our
usecases.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
# Introduction
Adding a hacky way to validate object against fields before fields
validation ( bi-directional validation process )
If you encounter an identical setup we will add a specific devXp as
cleanup validation but for the moment this seems enough
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1639
Following https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/14869
Dynamically clearing the cache, as one entry was forgotten
It seems like a permission test deletes a role that's expected to be
existing in following tests, as now cache is getting invalidated tests
are failing
Seems to be related to
https://discord.com/channels/1130383047699738754/1423768505911869460
## Singleton local cache key collision
When set for the first time caches local keys looks like
`workspaceId:undefined", singleton is shared between several cache
instances
If the given key is undefined it will read on other entity cache entry.
This PR is the first part of the creation of the Chart editor.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8b0af8ea-be41-4506-84cb-e40f5521cbf0
Done:
- Bar chart settings (except filters)
- Line chart settings (except filters)
In progress:
- Pie chart settings
- Number chart settings
- Gauge chart settings
Left to do:
- Loosen the backend validation to allow the user to save a partial
configuration, validate the graph configuration in the frontend and
display a error friendly message in the graph if the config is not
completed yet
- Implement the filter edition
- Finish the other graph types settings
## Context
Add routes to migration V2
- Resolvers
- Service v2
- Builder
- Validator
- Action runner
Next PR: Add to twenty-cli to sync routes with serverless
