Fix https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/17524
Recent update meant to support variable with spaces and dots broken the
database event variables. Inserting a variable `My Name` will be
inserted as `{{trigger.[My Name]}}`
For example, for a database event, we send `trigger.properties.after.id`
instead of `id`.
With the new code, we will consider `properties.after.id` as a variable
to wrap in `[]`, giving `trigger.[properties.after.id]` which cannot be
resolve.
Let's only support variable with spaces. Removing the logic to wrap
variable with dots.
Fixes
https://github.com/twentyhq/private-issues/issues/410#issuecomment-3781085655
Currently, JSON keys with spaces like { "toto toto": 123 } are rejected
with "JSON keys cannot contain spaces" error. This is problematic for
HTTP requests and webhook triggers where users cannot control the
response structure.
We use Handlebars to eval variables, segment-literal bracket notation to
escape keys with special characters:
Normal: {{step.normalKey}}
With spaces: `{{step.[key with space]}}`
So we simply need to wrap segments with spaces with brackets.
This PR:
- Create shared path utilities to wrap the variable segments when needed
- Use it in all variable generation places
- Remove the restrictions
This body is now supported:
<img width="609" height="457" alt="Capture d’écran 2026-01-22 à 16 10
13"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e7653c0a-df1e-49af-9c9a-4b7d59a99726"
/>
This PR does not produce any functional changes for our users. It
prepares the branches for workflows by:
- decommissioning `output` and `context` fields or `workflowRun` records
and use newly created `state` field from front-end and back-end
- use `stepStatus` computed by `back-end` in `front-end`
- add utils and types in `twenty-shared/workflow` (not completed, a
follow-up is scheduled
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1211)
- add concurrency to `workflowQueue` message queue to avoid weird branch
execution when using forms in workflow branches
- add a WithLock decorator for better dev experience of
`CacheLockService.withLock` usage
Here is an example of such a workflow running (front branch display is
not yet done that's why it looks ugly) ->
https://discord.com/channels/1130383047699738754/1258024460238192691/1392897615171158098
