In this PR, I'm solving several issues:
1) We were not checking if the currentWorkspaceMember was owning the
message in the thread. It kind of worked before because the case of
shared threads (with shared threads visibility restriction) was not
happening that often. It seems that the bug has always been there
2) Re-implement orphan messages and threads deletion on messageChannel
deletion. We used to brutally look for all orphans, we disabled it last
week because it was too heavy on db. I've re-implemented it more
carefully and "surgically"
3) Gmail sync was not handling folder synced correctly. It was
leveraging labelIds which it shouldn't do (this is a AND AND parameter)
in full sync
4) Added a command to clean orphan message threads manually if needed.
Usually this is done when you remove a messageChannel, or change
blocklist rules but it can be useful to have it to debug
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/10308.
The issue came from the fact that the pagination inside the
`findAndCount` wasn't working properly. The limit was applied on the
joint table. Adding a `groupBy` fixes this, but since it isn't available
on the `findAndCount` I had to modify the query using the query builder.
Fixes#9827
Also uncovered a conflict with `@objectType('Relation')` and
`@objectType('relation)`
I don't want to address it in this PR so I will create a followup issue
when we close this but I think there's a confusion between
Relation/RelationMetadata, it's unclear what is what
---------
Co-authored-by: Antoine Moreaux <moreaux.antoine@gmail.com>
In this PR:
1. Refactor guards to avoid duplicated queries: WorkspaceAuthGuard and
UserAuthGuard only check for existence of workspace and user in the
request without querying the database
- Remove raw queries and replace them by using `twentyORM`
- Refactor into services and utils
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
# Feature: Email thread members visibility
For this feature we implemented a chip and a dropdown menu that allows
users to check which workspace members can see an email thread, as
depicted on issue (#4199).
## Implementations
- create a new database table (messageThreadMember)
- relations between `messageThreadMembers` and the relevant existing
tables (`MessageThread` and `WorkspaceMembers`)
- added a new column to the `MessageThread table`: `everyone` - to
indicate that all workspace members can see the email thread
- create a new repository for the new table, including new queries
- edit the queries so that the new fields could be fetched from the
frontend
- created a component `MultiChip`, that shows a group of user avatars,
instead of just one
- created a component, `ShareDropdownMenu`, that shows up once the
`EmailThreadMembersChip` is clicked. On this menu you can see which
workspace members can view the email thread.
## Screenshots
Here are some screenshots of the frontend components that were created:
Chip with everyone in the workspace being part of the message thread:
Chip with just one member of the workspace (the owner) being part of the
message thread:
Chip with some members of the workspace being part of the message
thread:
How the chip looks in a message thread:
Dropdown that opens when you click on the chip:
## Testing and Mock data
We also added mock data (TypeORM seeds), focusing on adding mock data
related to message thread members.
## Conclusion
As some of the changes that we needed to do, regarding the change of
visibility of the message thread, were not covered by the existing
documentation, we were told to open a PR and ask for feedback on this
part of the implementation. Right now, our implementation is focused on
displaying who is part of an email thread.
Feel free to let us know which steps we should follow next :)
---------
Co-authored-by: Simão Sanguinho <simao.sanguinho@tecnico.ulisboa.pt>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
## Context
- Rename remaining V2 services.
- Delete messages in DB when gmail history tells us they've been
deleted. I removed the logic where we store those in a cache since it's
a bit overkill because we don't need to query gmail and can use those
ids directly. The strategy is to delete the message channel message
association of the current channel, not the message or the thread since
they can still be linked to other channels. However, we will need to
call the threadCleaner service on the workspace to remove orphan
threads/non-associated messages.
Note: deletion for full-sync is a bit tricky because we need the full
list of message ids to compare with the DB and make sure we don't
over-delete. Currently, to keep memory, we don't have a variable that
holds all ids as we flush it after each page. Easier solution would be
to wipe everything before each full sync but it's probably not great for
the user experience if they are currently manipulating messages since
full-sync can happen without a user intervention (if a partial sync
fails due to historyId being invalidated by google for some reason)
We have recently discovered that we were using ID type in place of UUID
type in many place in the code.
We have merged #4895 but this introduced bugs as we forgot to replace it
everywhere
