Commit Graph
117 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Paul RastoinandGitHub 8dd43be9a2 Create many view groups (#15591)
# Introduction
Same as https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15576 but for view
groups creation

When creating a kanban view with v2 flag activated in production result
in race condition due to request being slow and //.
That's why we're introducing a batch create on view group here
closing https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1847

## In v2
- batch create view group endpoint is available
- frontend will target the new endpoint

## In v1
- batch create view group endpoint is not available
- frontend will stick to old fake batch view group creation loop


## Gallery
### v2
<img width="1796" height="486" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/932cfe9f-85f1-41cc-a1c4-72a4b5d5a256"
/>

### v1
<img width="1852" height="966" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8aa9df11-cdea-4b12-ae60-118cdf5e257b"
/>
2025-11-04 15:17:55 +01:00
Paul RastoinandGitHub a3dc6e5c59 View field create many mutation (#15576)
# Introduction
When creating a view with v2 flag activated in production result in race
condition due to request being slow and //.
That's why we're introducing a batch create on view field here
closing https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1836

## In v2
- batch create view field endpoint is available
- frontend will target the new endpoint

## In v1
- batch create view field endpoint is not available
- frontend will stick to old fake batch view field creation loop

## Polish
- use persist view field is quite verbose as contains two data model we
could aim to create an update many view fields in order to standardize
new pattern
2025-11-04 11:36:08 +01:00
Thomas TrompetteandGitHub 71e7063fc4 Move http node to backend (#15424)
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/14491

Also adding an url validator.
2025-10-31 17:46:58 +01:00
Abdul RahmanandGitHub 2c39fc04c2 feat: Migrate documentation to Mintlify and implement Helper Agent with search functionality (#15443) 2025-10-31 10:17:54 +01:00
Paul RastoinandGitHub 1bf40d9dca Fix v2 self relation field creation (#15382)
# Introduction
Fixing self relation field creation in v2
- When computing related flat field to delete on object metadata
deletion that has self relation fields
- On self relation creation validation name availability not searching
for the relation target field of the current object field if it's the
field being validated

## Coverage
- added CUD integration testing on self relation fields

close https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/15153
2025-10-27 16:07:58 +01:00
Paul RastoinandGitHub 267af42412 Centralize v2 errors types in twenty-shared (#15358)
# Introduction
Followup of https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15331 ( Reducing
size by concerns )
This PR centralizes v2 format error types in `twenty-shared` and
consuming them in the existing v2 error format logic in `twenty-server`

## Next
This https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15360 handles the frontend
v2 format error refactor

## Conclusion
Related to https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1776
2025-10-27 09:44:41 +01:00
Paul RastoinandGitHub 7edfe4bc7a [Followup] Fix defaultValue with enum options update in migration v2 integration test + polish (#15300)
# Introduction
Followup of https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15286

- Polish replacing sorting by conditional filter and push
- Integration test
2025-10-23 17:57:41 +02:00
Paul RastoinandGitHub 0780380fe5 Fix composite field update v2 (#15290)
# Introduction
Fixing composite field update by computing field column type for each of
its properties instead of globally

## Coverage
Added integration tests for each composite field on both successful
`create` and `update`
```ts
Test Suites: 17 passed, 17 total
Tests:       104 passed, 104 total
Snapshots:   14 passed, 14 total
Time:        135.431 s, estimated 143 s
```

## Conlusion
Related to https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1753
2025-10-23 16:26:46 +02:00
Paul RastoinandGitHub 2e84c11eae [v2_FIX] Update standard object/field (#15233)
# Introduction
Refactoring the standard overrides dispatcher to only pass over fields
to has to be dispatched in the standardOverrides entry and let the other
side effects resulting from out of standard overrides mutation trigger

Related to https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1753

## This allows
- standard field settings, options etc updates and so on

## Remark
- Determine what we should do on object deactivation ( right now in
production we can still access deactivated object relation properties
and so on e.g deactivate opportunities still accessible from a view
field on company ( still have to re-create it as it has been deleted )
=> decided to leave as it is right now, `isActive` could be considered
as uiDeactivated in the end
- We should also add forbidden standard field mutations validation
inside the builder itself ( here we want to early return in the api
input transpiler too as we don't want to spread invalid side effects )
=> or in the end we could just centralize both but it will generate
several errors

## Coverage
```ts
 PASS  test/integration/metadata/suites/object-metadata/successful-update-one-standard-object-metadata.integration-spec.ts
 PASS  test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/successful-update-one-standard-field-metadata.integration-spec.ts
 PASS  test/integration/metadata/suites/object-metadata/failing-update-one-standard-object-metadata.integration-spec.ts
 PASS  test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/failing-update-one-standard-field-metadata.integration-spec.ts

Test Suites: 4 passed, 4 total
Tests:       18 passed, 18 total
Snapshots:   16 passed, 16 total
Time:        8.721 s, estimated 10 s
```

## Update post review
Faced a behavior where updating back the company label to its original
value would result in storing this value in the standard overrides
Refactored both field and object transpilation behavior to rather remove
the standard override value instead and let fallback on original value

Yes it's quite duplicated will factorize once we move this inside the
builder
2025-10-23 11:02:18 +02:00
32558673c6 feat: Implement AI Router for Dynamic Agent Selection (#15227)
Adds intelligent routing system that automatically selects the best
agent for user queries based on conversation context.

### Changes:
- Added `routerModel` column to workspace table for configurable router
LLM selection
- Implemented `RouterService` with conversation history analysis and
agent matching logic
- Created router settings UI in AI Settings page with model dropdown
- Removed agent-specific thread associations - threads are now
agent-agnostic
- Added real-time routing status notification in chat UI with shimmer
effect
- Removed automatic default assistant agent creation
- Renamed GraphQL operations from agent-specific to generic (e.g.,
`agentChatThreads` → `chatThreads`)

---------

Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
2025-10-22 15:02:41 +02:00
c5564d9bd0 [BREAKING CHANGE] refactor: Add Entity suffix to TypeORM entity classes (#15239)
## Summary

This PR refactors all TypeORM entity classes in the Twenty codebase to
include an 'Entity' suffix (e.g., User → UserEntity, Workspace →
WorkspaceEntity) to improve code clarity and follow TypeORM naming
conventions.

## Changes

### Entity Renaming
-  Renamed **57 core TypeORM entities** with 'Entity' suffix
-  Updated all related imports, decorators, and type references
-  Fixed Repository<T>, @InjectRepository(), and
TypeOrmModule.forFeature() patterns
-  Fixed @ManyToOne/@OneToMany/@OneToOne decorator references

### Backward Compatibility
-  Preserved GraphQL schema names using @ObjectType('OriginalName')
decorators
-  **No breaking changes** to GraphQL API
-  **No database migrations** required
-  File names unchanged (user.entity.ts remains as-is)

### Code Quality
-  Fixed **497 TypeScript errors** (82% reduction from 606 to 109)
-  **All linter checks passing**
-  Improved type safety across the codebase

## Entities Renamed

```
User → UserEntity
Workspace → WorkspaceEntity
ApiKey → ApiKeyEntity
AppToken → AppTokenEntity
UserWorkspace → UserWorkspaceEntity
Webhook → WebhookEntity
FeatureFlag → FeatureFlagEntity
ApprovedAccessDomain → ApprovedAccessDomainEntity
TwoFactorAuthenticationMethod → TwoFactorAuthenticationMethodEntity
WorkspaceSSOIdentityProvider → WorkspaceSSOIdentityProviderEntity
EmailingDomain → EmailingDomainEntity
KeyValuePair → KeyValuePairEntity
PublicDomain → PublicDomainEntity
PostgresCredentials → PostgresCredentialsEntity
...and 43 more entities
```

## Impact

### Files Changed
- **400 files** modified
- **2,575 insertions**, **2,191 deletions**

### Progress
-  **82% complete** (497/606 errors fixed)
- ⚠️ **109 TypeScript errors** remain (18% of original)

## Remaining Work

The 109 remaining TypeScript errors are primarily:

1. **Function signature mismatches** (~15 errors) - Test mocks with
incorrect parameter counts
2. **Entity type mismatches** (~25 errors) - UserEntity vs
UserWorkspaceEntity confusion
3. **Pre-existing issues** (~50 errors) - Null safety and DTO
compatibility (unrelated to refactoring)
4. **Import type issues** (~10 errors) - Entities imported with 'import
type' but used as values
5. **Minor decorator issues** (~9 errors) - onDelete property
configurations

These can be addressed in follow-up PRs without blocking this
refactoring.

## Testing Checklist

- [x] Linter passing
- [ ] Unit tests should be run (CI will verify)
- [ ] Integration tests should be run (CI will verify)
- [ ] Manual testing recommended for critical user flows

## Breaking Changes

**None** - This is a pure refactoring with full backward compatibility:
- GraphQL API unchanged (uses original entity names)
- Database schema unchanged
- External APIs unchanged

## Notes

- Created comprehensive `REFACTORING_STATUS.md` documenting the entire
process
- All temporary scripts have been cleaned up
- Branch: `refactor/add-entity-suffix-to-typeorm-entities`

## Reviewers

Please review especially:
- Entity renaming patterns
- GraphQL backward compatibility
- Any areas where entity types are confused (UserEntity vs
UserWorkspaceEntity)

---------

Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
2025-10-22 09:55:20 +02:00
Paul RastoinandGitHub 45473218d3 Field deactivation side effect views calendar kanban viewFields (#15180)
# Introduction
Handling both:
- field deactivation side effect on view fields, view filters and views
- field deactivation side effect on view that targets it as
`kanbanAggregateFieldMetadataId`
- field deactivation side effect on view that targets it as
`calendarFieldMetadataId`

## Coverage
added coverage
```ts
 PASS  test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/kanban-aggregate-field-deactivation-deletes-views.integration-spec.ts (13.132 s)
  kanban-aggregate-field-deactivation-nullifies-kanban-properties
    ✓ should nullify kanban properties when field used as kanbanAggregateOperationFieldMetadataId is deactivated (3923 ms)
    ✓ should not modify views when field not used as kanbanAggregateOperationFieldMetadataId is deactivated (2958 ms)
    ✓ should nullify kanban properties on multiple views when they all use the same field as kanbanAggregateOperationFieldMetadataId (2542 ms)
    ✓ should nullify kanban properties when views have different aggregate operations on same field (3380 ms)

Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests:       4 passed, 4 total
Snapshots:   0 total
Time:        13.154 s
```

```ts
 PASS  test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/view-group-field-deactivation-deletes-views.integration-spec.ts (12.639 s)
  view-group-field-deactivation-deletes-views
    ✓ should delete view when field used in view group is deactivated (3469 ms)
    ✓ should not delete view when field not used in view group is deactivated (3109 ms)
    ✓ should delete multiple views when they all use the same field in view groups (2741 ms)
    ✓ should handle deactivation when view has multiple view groups with different fields (3008 ms)

Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests:       4 passed, 4 total
Snapshots:   0 total
Time:        12.664 s
```

```ts
 PASS  test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/calendar-field-deactivation-deletes-views.integration-spec.ts (14.579 s)
  calendar-field-deactivation-deletes-views
    ✓ should delete view when field used as calendarFieldMetadataId is deactivated (3388 ms)
    ✓ should not delete view when field not used as calendarFieldMetadataId is deactivated (2438 ms)
    ✓ should delete multiple views when they all use the same field as calendarFieldMetadataId (2635 ms)
    ✓ should handle deactivation when views have different calendar layouts on same field (3195 ms)
    ✓ should delete calendar view but not other view types when calendar field is deactivated (2682 ms)

Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests:       5 passed, 5 total
Snapshots:   0 total
Time:        14.601 s, estimated 15 s
```

## View soft deletion
We decided to remove the soft deletion grain on all the views, in this
PR context we've only removed soft deleted validation requirement on any
view entities

## Conclusion

close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1754
2025-10-21 16:12:03 +02:00
3bec43696f feat: multi role permission intersection (#15150)
Implements permission intersection (AND logic) to prevent permission
escalation when agents act on behalf of users.

### Changes:
- **Permission Intersection**: Operations requiring both user AND agent
permissions
- **RoleContext Type**: Unified type supporting single `roleId` or
multiple `roleIds` for intersection
- **CRUD Services**: Updated to accept `roleContext` for granular
permission control
- **Agent Integration**: Chat agents now use user + agent role
intersection for all operations
- **ORM Layer**: Enhanced `getRepository` to support multi-role
permission checks

### Related:
- Part 2 of ["Acting on behalf of user" concept
PR](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15103)

[Closes #1661](https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1661)

---------

Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
2025-10-19 09:30:05 +02:00
WeikoandGitHub cceeb6ed4d Add applicationId to syncableEntity and fix syncApp deletion (#15170)
## Context
- All flatEntity should extend SyncableEntity
- SyncableEntity should now have applicationId and application relation
- Fix syncApp deletion, should now properly use migration v2 to delete
syncable entities
2025-10-17 17:23:00 +00:00
Paul RastoinandGitHub 3462a2e288 ViewGroup and ViewFilters side effect in v2 (#15096)
# Introduction

### Summary
Implements side effect handling for `ViewGroup` and `ViewFilters` when
field metadata is updated in the v2 architecture. This ensures that
view-related records are properly maintained when enum field options are
modified, deleted, or created.

### Side effects
- **Side Effect System**: Added side effect handling for field metadata
updates that manages related view groups and view filters
- **Enum Field Updates**: When enum field options are modified, the
system now:
- **View Groups**: Creates new groups for added options, updates
existing groups for modified options, and deletes groups for removed
options
- **View Filters**: Updates filter values to reflect option changes and
removes filters that reference deleted options

### Enum runner fix
Update now works for both atomic enum and array enum ( multi select for
instance )

### Compute flat entity maps from to
Standardized this method usage across v2 services
Next step is to require dependencies dynamically

## Conclusion
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1649
2025-10-17 17:09:26 +02:00
9cd957844e Log invalid uuids (#15099)
I had an issue with invalid UUIDs, and I think it would be easier to
find the offending one if the UUID were included in the error message.

This way a database dump can be easily searched.

---------

Co-authored-by: prastoin <paul@twenty.com>
2025-10-17 14:33:33 +02:00
WeikoandGitHub c0ed246a03 Add is unique in migration v2 + refactor inferDeletionFromMissingEntities (#15070)
## Goal
- inferDeletionFromMissingEntities is now a map instead of a single
bool, allowing us to parameterise it based on the entity we want to
compare
- Adding index creation/update when field isUnique is set to true and
index deletion when isUnique is false (for now)

close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1346
2025-10-15 16:08:13 +02:00
Paul RastoinandGitHub 7d747c9876 [REQUIRES_CACHE_FLUSH][GQL_VIEW_GROUP_API_BREAKING_CHANGE] ViewGroup in v2 (#15052)
# Introduction
Adding view-group to core engine v2
Following https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15010 ( same pattern )

## What's done
- Created flat-view-group
- flat view group runner
- flat view group builder
- create view group service v2 and input transpilers
- refactor the existing view group resolver to fix standard (
BREAKING_CHANGE on graphql api update especially ) REST stays the same
- refactored the front to consume the mutations autogenerated

close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1665
2025-10-14 15:55:50 +02:00
Paul RastoinandGitHub 651ab184a7 [GQL_VIEW_FILTER_API_BREAKING_CHANGE][WHEN_RELEASED_REQUIRES_CACHE_FLUSH] ViewFilter migration to workspace migration v2 (#15010)
# Introduction
Migrating `viewFilter` to v2 in order to migrate later the field update
side effect on view to v2 too

## What's done
- Created flat-view-filter
- flat view filter runner
- flat view filter builder
- create view filter service v2 and input transpilers
- refactor the existing view filter resolver to fix standard (
BREAKING_CHANGE on graphql api update especially ) REST stays the same
- refactored the front to consume the mutations autogenerated

## New generic tools
### Compare two flat entity
Introducing a new util to compare two flat entity, it's strictly typed
and will be added to the generic builder in a following PR
This will ease flat entity addition as won't required to create a
specific abstraction for comparison
Generic builder will expect specific constant: properties to compare and
properties to stringify

### Transform flat entity for comparison
Forked and refactor the initial existing method for flat entity business
scope and type safety

## Coverage
Migrated existing integration tests to fit new contract API
This PR does not add strong coverage on validation exceptions
Deadlines are too short

close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1666
2025-10-10 15:02:14 +02:00
Abdul RahmanandGitHub 5adc9fe9b2 feat: mutualize CRUD tools between workflows and AI (#14996)
Closes [#1662](https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1662)
2025-10-10 00:55:34 +05:30
Félix MalfaitandGitHub e577c2d746 Update user friendly errors for translations (#15000)
Force msg typing instead of string for user friendly errors
2025-10-09 18:17:32 +02:00
Paul RastoinandGitHub 59fbe35a8c Move view in metadata-modules/ and create atomic folder + module for each view entity (#14990)
# Introduction
Preparing view-filter and view-group introduction in v2 core engine
Moving view from `core-modules` to `metadata-modules`

## What happened

### Created dedicated modules for each view entity:
- ViewFieldModule
- ViewFilterModule
- ViewFilterGroupModule
- ViewGroupModule
- ViewSortModule

### Each module is now completely independent with its own:
- Controller
- Resolver
- Service
- Entity

### Created dedicated abstraction metadata module folder for:
- flat-view-field
- flat-view

### Dependencies 
- Eleminated circular dep on ViewModule to all others ones
- Granular import not importing the whole viewModule anymore everywhere


close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1703
2025-10-09 15:18:15 +02:00
Paul RastoinandGitHub 4ecc9c622d [WHEN_RELEASED_REQUIRES_CACHE_FLUSH] Object related record logic in v2 (#14937)
# Introduction
Initial motivation here was to migrate the object related records logic
from v1 to v2, please note that now in v2 views aren't records anymore
but core engine entities

## What's done
- Added specific label identifier targeting view field logic
- Handled side effects on viewField creation with lowest position on
object label identifier mutation
- Added viewField relations in field metadate entity + handled
optimistic in builder v2
- Added view relations in object metadata entity + handled optimistic in
builder v2
- Added integration tests covering the side effects and new validation
exceptions
- Sandardized cache computation
- Coverage on object metadata creation side effect on views and view
fields

## Coverage
```ts
 PASS  test/integration/graphql/suites/view/view-field/object-identifier-update-side-effect-on-view-field.integration-spec.ts
  View Field Resolver - Successful object metadata identifier update side effect on view field
    ✓ should create a view field on label identifier object metadata update if it does not exist on view (7 ms)
    ✓ Should not allow deleting a label identifier view field (17 ms)
    ✓ Should not allow destroying a label identifier view field (6 ms)
    ✓ Should not allow updating a label identifier view field visibility to false (8 ms)
    ✓ Should not allow creating a view field with a position lower than the label idenfitier view field (180 ms)
    ✓ Should not allow updated labelIdentifier view field with a position higher than existing other view field (346 ms)
    ✓ Should allow updated labelIdentifier view field with a position higher than existing other view field (434 ms)

Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests:       7 passed, 7 total
Snapshots:   5 passed, 5 total
Time:        4.571 s, estimated 5 s
```

close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1664
2025-10-08 16:23:37 +02:00
f60817a1e1 Morph many to one picker (#14155)
This PR follows the multiSelect PR merged previously. It will enable
morph relation Many to One to be handled from the table, using a
singleSelect picker

Main point : I decided to change the singleSelect API to take an array
of **objectMetadataName** instead of only one to deal with both our
usecases.

---------

Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
2025-10-07 17:25:11 +02:00
Paul RastoinandGitHub 23e21cbeea Label identifier validation v2 (#14867)
# Introduction
Adding a hacky way to validate object against fields before fields
validation ( bi-directional validation process )
If you encounter an identical setup we will add a specific devXp as
cleanup validation but for the moment this seems enough

close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1639
2025-10-07 13:27:21 +02:00
WeikoandGitHub 0b60aa4249 Add custom routes to migration v2 (#14846)
## Context
Add routes to migration V2
- Resolvers
- Service v2
- Builder
- Validator
- Action runner

Next PR: Add to twenty-cli to sync routes with serverless
2025-10-03 00:20:21 +02:00
Paul RastoinandGitHub 170f6d27c5 Extract field metadata build out of object metadata build (#14763)
# Introduction

Extracting the legacy fields build and dispatch out of the object one to
follow the generic flat entity build, also update caches entries for
object

## Main tasks
- flat field map cache
- flat field builder
- refactored the dispatch matrix to return flat entity maps instead of
flat entity arrays
- orchestrator aggregator
- removing legacy code
- making universal identifier aka standardId of standard field for
custom object deterministically dynamic
- perfs debug logs for v2

## TODO
- [x] Refactor the generic entity builder to be dependency flat maps in
order to main foreign keys list in flat parent
- [x] Refactor the flat object metadata to contain the array of related
fields and avoid costy find object fields
- [ ] Improve the create field handler to handle multiple field at once
- [ ] Refactor the dispatch to embbed the comparison
- [ ] Improve perf by extracting from elements out of existing
- [ ] Fix the labelIdentifierId validators on object before field
creation ( integ tests are in failing mode )

## Debug logs snippet

```ts
[EntityBuilder fieldMetadata] matrix computation: 0.027ms
[EntityBuilder fieldMetadata] creation validation: 0.001ms
[EntityBuilder fieldMetadata] deletion validation: 0.293ms
[EntityBuilder fieldMetadata] update validation: 0.006ms
[EntityBuilder fieldMetadata] entity processing: 0.363ms
[EntityBuilder fieldMetadata] validateAndBuild: 0.455ms
[EntityBuilder index] matrix computation: 0.005ms
[EntityBuilder index] creation validation: 0.001ms
[EntityBuilder index] deletion validation: 0.146ms
[EntityBuilder index] update validation: 0.004ms
[EntityBuilder index] entity processing: 0.199ms
[EntityBuilder index] validateAndBuild: 0.228ms
[Runner] Initial cache retrieval: 0.549ms
[BaseWorkspaceMigrationRunnerActionHandlerService] delete_index executeForWorkspaceSchema: 11.665ms
[BaseWorkspaceMigrationRunnerActionHandlerService] delete_index executeForMetadata: 12.864ms
[BaseWorkspaceMigrationRunnerActionHandlerService] delete_field executeForWorkspaceSchema: 1.476ms
[BaseWorkspaceMigrationRunnerActionHandlerService] delete_field executeForMetadata: 6.816ms
[BaseWorkspaceMigrationRunnerActionHandlerService] delete_field executeForWorkspaceSchema: 0.062ms
[BaseWorkspaceMigrationRunnerActionHandlerService] delete_field executeForMetadata: 0.889ms
[Runner] Transaction execution: 23.434ms
[Runner] Cache invalidation: 316.662ms
[Runner] Total execution: 340.767ms
```
As you can see cache invalidation is way to long, we could replace the
cache by the optimistic in the end
2025-10-02 16:07:34 +00:00
Abdul RahmanandGitHub 20403664e3 Feat: native model capabilities (#14787) 2025-10-01 18:37:21 +02:00
MarieandGitHub 3927b36406 [View migration] Clean ViewFilterOperand (#14785)
In the BE we have stored filter operand as IS_EMPTY, IS_NOT_EMPTY, etc. 
For some reason in the FE we were manipulating IsEmpty, IsNotEmpty, etc.
(maybe because they were used before in Views before they were moved to
core)

So we were converting the operands in the FE from IS to Is
(convertViewFilterOperandFromCore) to read and manipulate viewFilters,
and then back to BE version to send mutations etc., from Is to IS
(convertViewFilterOperandToCore).
The migration is now over, so we can remove and simplify that code. 
(In the 1-5:migrate-views-to-core command we still do the migration from
Is format to IS format.)
2025-09-30 17:12:03 +02:00
WeikoandGitHub 68b21d2942 Add db event trigger and cron trigger to migration v2 (#14772)
## Context
Add DB events triggers and Cron triggers to migration v2 builder/runner
(and adding corresponding services/resolvers)
2025-09-30 11:14:18 +02:00
MarieandGitHub da3c3d2b9d [GroupBy] Add views filters to groupBy query (#14762)
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1560

If viewId is defined in a groupBy query, we want to apply all filters of
the view to the query.
This required to move a lot of code from twenty-front to twenty-shared
to convert the filters as stored in the db into graphql filters,
applying the right combinations between filters etc., which was
previously only done in the FE.

This PR does not handle any field filters, it will be done in a later pr
2025-09-30 09:58:55 +02:00
Paul RastoinandGitHub 4fbdfb6abc Activate v2 default seed (#14660)
## Introduction
After enabling flag by default got following errors:
```ts
Test Suites: 48 failed, 1 skipped, 97 passed, 145 of 146 total
Tests:       499 failed, 1 skipped, 644 passed, 1144 total
Snapshots:   61 failed, 133 passed, 194 total
Time:        363.226 s
Ran all test suites.
```

## From
<img width="2952" height="1510" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7e3b20c6-2552-40a7-90bb-2d7b3002c895"
/>

## To
<img width="3134" height="1510" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4fc9ada4-3c14-4333-a1db-11daf87db8d6"
/>

There's a huge test bundle in the latest shard that we could split up

## Notes
- Set as failing morph relation field rename as for the moment we do not
handle relation field mutation
- fixed the object update and creation validation adding label
identifier field metadata id checks
- and more

Some integrations tests are still on the v1 ( they have before and after
all disabling and re-enabling the flat ) but mainly we now have more
coverage on the v2 than the v1.
Mainly related records, uniqueness have to be migrated the v2 and so
tests too
2025-09-26 16:05:09 +02:00
WeikoandGitHub 188d66909d Add ServerlessFunction to migration v2 (#14698) 2025-09-25 14:05:01 +02:00
Paul RastoinandGitHub fbd3286792 Index v2 side effects (#14567)
# Introduction
Honestly this implem is a mess, discussing a potential side effect
handler with @weiko before the build and run that would handle each side
effect per entity and operation

Handling:
- [ ] unique index is generated when a field is updated with the
`isUnique`
- [x] an index is generated when a relation is created
- [x] search vector index creation on custom object creation
- [x] renaming a field metadata or an object should re-create all
related indexes which are composed by their namings
- [x] delete object should remove any related indexes
- [x] delete field should update related indexes ( if index ends up
empty it should be removed )
- [ ] on object renaming that contains morph fields -> triggers update
field -> trigger index recompute
- [x] on update name renaming should recompute all related indexes

## TODO
- [x] Integration testing
- [ ] Refactor the index maps cache to be storing a
`idsByObjectMetadataId`
- [x] Refactor deterministic name to use order sorting
- [x] Remove flat index from flat object

## What's next

Will handle morph indexes in a new dedicated PR for the moment will
stick to this
Same for the cache improvement and uniqueness
2025-09-23 10:57:11 +02:00
216d72b5d7 AI SDK v5 migration (#14549)
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
2025-09-22 22:13:43 +02:00
WeikoandGitHub 40240ce514 Add view viewField favorite creation after object creation in migration v2 (#14644)
## Context
We are not exactly sure how we want to handle side effects with
workspace migration v2, in the meantime I'm re-introducing this part in
the caller (object v2 service)
2025-09-22 16:19:38 +02:00
Paul RastoinandGitHub 2d8669ae71 Index v2 runner (#14537)
## Introduction
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/14363
In this PR we're creating builder and runner for index metadata
Removing its previous integration within object builder

## Next:
- implem index impact on field and object metadata api
- Add integration testing coverage add integration test on index
- Implement uniqueness toggle in field metadata api
- add integration test on uniqueness

related to https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1344
2025-09-17 13:02:43 +00:00
8d9617131c Feat: Add reasoning summary and tool details display for AI responses (#14414)
Closes [#1405](https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1405)

### Implemented Features
- Reasoning Summary: Collapsible display of AI thinking process with
real-time streaming
- Tool Execution: Detailed tool call rendering with expandable results
and loading states
- Error Handling: Clean error stream event display with proper
formatting


### Demo



https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/76ad29b7-d831-4bc8-a115-ad25f7ace6e2

<img width="504" height="819" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-12 at 3 23 39 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/82dc177d-f009-4e8a-8901-ee1a49201984"
/>

---------

Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
2025-09-17 11:30:24 +02:00
Paul RastoinandGitHub 579f704baa Plugging + improving the new orchestrator (#14430)
# Introduction
Initially this PR was about introducing integration coverage for view
field v2 tests
But feature itself wasn't finished, so ended up in a TDD style
devlopment

## The new orchestrator
Orchestrator will organize each flat entity diffing inferring either
validation errors or actions sequentially.
A new builder has been introduced when extended requires to define flat
entity validation utils and action generation for `delete` `update`
`create` operations. It's highly typed using generics

## View field integration testing
Introduce coverage on failing basic tests cases for view field
operations, successfull create is also covered. We could still add more
coverage, will be done later in following PRs

## Remaining tasks for upcoming PRs:
- [ ] rename builder methods names to add generate action in their names
- [x] refactor view validation to handle field and view uniqueness index
combination
- [ ] implem strict update validator on view and view field
- [ ] dynamic cache invalidation post run
- [ ] Add coverage to successful and failing view field operations
- [ ] error formatting summary computation
- [ ] extract types out of the workspace entity builder

## Some vision
Currently flat field metadata maps is nested in the flat object metadata
maps, making its build nested too. ( not extending the new generic
builder )
We will refactor this part for both to be stored extra flat such as the
other existing flat entities.
It will require a small refactor to the generic builder that will not
only have impact on the currently built flat entity optimistic cache but
to an other one ( for example when building a create object action it
will also have an impact flat field maps )
2025-09-15 14:32:57 +02:00
Félix MalfaitandGitHub 30a2164980 First Application POC (#14382)
Quick proof of concept for twenty-apps + twenty-cli, with local
development / hot reload

Let's discuss it!



https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c6789936-cd5f-4110-a265-863a6ac1af2d
2025-09-10 15:12:38 +02:00
Paul RastoinandGitHub 9e81618773 Refactor morph field name and morph data loader (#14299)
# Introduction
Storing morph relation field names directly in database, using morphId
to aggregate them
Removing dynamic morph field metadata computation in schemas and data
loader

Will add integration tests on morph data loader entry

closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1425 
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1424 
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1423
2025-09-08 17:20:18 +02:00
Charles BochetandGitHub 286682c197 DevXP improvements on new views (#14330) 2025-09-05 18:49:20 +02:00
Paul RastoinandGitHub 17c646f9d8 Fix views integration tests (#14317)
Following https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/14202
2025-09-05 10:16:40 +00:00
5824637d1a fix - newly added object not visible in left menu (#14202)
resolves #14190 

added refreshCoreViews() call after object creation to immediately
update core views state, ensuring new objects appear in the navigation
drawer without requiring a refresh

---------

Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: prastoin <paul@twenty.com>
2025-09-05 10:43:03 +02:00
MarieandGitHub 40251d34ec [permissions] Deprecate ObjectsPermissionsDeprecated (1/3) (#14306)
We want to update UserWorkspacePermissions from 
```
export type UserWorkspacePermissions = {
  permissionFlags: Record<PermissionFlagType, boolean>;
  objectRecordsPermissions: Record<PermissionsOnAllObjectRecords, boolean>;
  objectPermissions: ObjectsPermissionsDeprecated;
};
```

to
```
export type UserWorkspacePermissions = {
  permissionFlags: Record<PermissionFlagType, boolean>;
  objectsPermissions: ObjectsPermissions;
};
```

`ObjectsPermissionsDeprecated` and `ObjectsPermissions` are actually
very similar, they only have different key names (`canRead` vs
`canReadObjectRecords`)

To avoid brutal breaking changes, we will proceed in multiple steps: 

1. This PR: adapt FE so it does not call objectRecordsPermissions
anymore + add the new objectsPermissions to UserWorkspacePermissions
without calling it yet in the FE
2. Remove objectRecordsPermissions in BE + use objectsPermissions in FE
instead of objectPermissions
3. Remove objectPermissions
2025-09-04 14:03:33 +00:00
Paul RastoinandGitHub 6522498df0 Failing morph relation creation v2 integration testing & fixes (#14253)
# Introduction
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1408
2025-09-03 12:14:43 +02:00
Paul RastoinandGitHub 6d6ee939cf Morph relation field v2 fixes (#14216)
Fixes, depending on the contextual current operation in order to
retrieve relation target and all morph related fields to be delete:
- DELETE Field,
- DELETE Object, 
- UPDATE Field, that affects all others related fields
2025-09-02 12:17:20 +00:00
Paul RastoinandGitHub da288b1998 V2 integ test sequential operations testing (#14228)
Wil need to add a morph relation field in a new test suite
Especially searching for enum collision
2025-09-02 10:15:01 +02:00
MarieandGitHub 0d5fedfb0a Fix user friendly message for non available object name (#14210)
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/13577.

When naming or renaming an object, we are already checking that the name
was available compared to other existing objects.
But we also need to check that the relation fields that will be created
or updated are available as well: we create relation fields on
Attachment, Note, Favorite, Task and TimelineActivites, that bear the
name of the object. Thus, it is not possible to create an object that
has the same name as one of the fields on Attachment, Note etc: name,
createdAt, ... are not valid names.
2025-09-01 16:35:40 +00:00
Paul RastoinandGitHub 59d90bedaa Integration testing v2 enum field types fail and success path (#14010)
# Introduction
Migrating and improving performances of field enum integrations tests
success and failing tests cases to be using the new v2 api

## Discovered issue
When deleting an object in v1 it will leave related enums until the
object is re-created
Something not done anymore within the create in v2 but in the delete
operation
We should implem an upgrade command to remove such relicas

## Bugs
- Update/create default value multi select runner wrong sql query -> FIX
- Update default value multi select regression, we should allow option
without an id to be inserted -> FIX
- default value compare dynamic json stringify convertion or not in
compare tools for object and fields
2025-08-28 10:23:04 +00:00