# Introduction
When creating a view with v2 flag activated in production result in race
condition due to request being slow and //.
That's why we're introducing a batch create on view field here
closing https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1836
## In v2
- batch create view field endpoint is available
- frontend will target the new endpoint
## In v1
- batch create view field endpoint is not available
- frontend will stick to old fake batch view field creation loop
## Polish
- use persist view field is quite verbose as contains two data model we
could aim to create an update many view fields in order to standardize
new pattern
changes -
- make iframe side panel to match others -- ie use SidePanelHeader for
title
- make url optional in configuration to match that of the other widgets
(allow partial saves) - render No data status when error or no url
- split widget sizes into two -- graph widget sizes and widget sizes
(graph widgets are a subset of chart widgets)
This PR implements the necessary tools to have `react-datepicker`
calendar and our date picker components work reliably no matter the
timezone difference between the user execution environment and the user
application timezone.
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1781
This PR won't cover everything needed to have Twenty handle timezone
properly, here is the follow-up issue :
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1807
# Features in this PR
This PR brings a lot of features that have to be merged together.
- DATE field type is now handled as string only, because it shouldn't
involve timezone nor the JS Date object at all, since it is a day like a
birthday date, and not an absolute point in time.
- DATE_TIME field wasn't properly handled when the user settings
timezone was different from the system one
- A timezone abbreviation suffix has been added to most DATE_TIME
display component, only when the timezone is different from the system
one in the settings.
- A lot of bugs, small features and improvements have been made here :
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1781
# Handling of timezones
## Essential concepts
This topic is so complex and easy to misunderstand that it is necessary
to define the precise terms and concepts first. It resembles character
encoding and should be treated with the same care.
- Wall-clock time : the time expressed in the timezone of a user, it is
distinct from the absolute point in time it points to, much like a
pointer being a different value than the value that it points to.
- Absolute time : a point in time, regardless of the timezone, it is an
objective point in time, of course it has to be expressed in a given
timezone, because we have to talk about when it is located in time
between humans, but it is in fact distinct from any wall clock time, it
exists in itself without any clock running on earth. However, by
convention the low-level way to store an absolute point in time is in
UTC, which is a timezone, because there is no way to store an absolute
point in time without a referential, much like a point in space cannot
be stored without a referential.
- DST : Daylight Save Time, makes the timezone shift in a specific
period every year in a given timezone, to make better use of longer days
for various reasons, not all timezones have DST. DST can be 1 hour or 30
min, 45 min, which makes computation difficult.
- UTC : It is NOT an “absolute timezone”, it is the wall-clock time at
0° longitude without DST, which is an arbitrary and shared human
convention. UTC is often used as the standard reference wall-clock time
for talking about absolute point in time without having to do timezone
and DST arithmetic. PostgreSQL stores everything in UTC by convention,
but outputs everything in the server’s SESSION TIMEZONE.
## How should an absolute point in time be stored ?
Since an absolute point in time is essentially distinct from its
timezone it could be stored in an absolute way, but in practice it is
impossible to store an absolute point in time without a referential. We
have to say that a rocket launched at X given time, in UTC, EST, CET,
etc. And of course, someone in China will say that it launched at 10:30,
while in San Francisco it will have launched at 19:30, but it is THE
SAME absolute point in time.
Let’s take a related example in computer science with character
encoding. If a text is stored without the associated encoding table, the
correct meaning associated to the bits stored in memory can be lost
forever. It can become impossible for a program to guess what encoding
table should be used for a given text stored as bits, thus the glitches
that appeared a lot back in the early days of internet and document
processing.
The same can happen with date time storing, if we don’t have the
timezone associated with the absolute point in time, the information of
when it absolutely happened is lost.
It is NOT necessary to store an absolute point in time in UTC, it is
more of a standard and practical wall-clock time to be associated with
an absolute point in time. But an absolute point in time MUST be store
with a timezone, with its time referential, otherwise the information of
when it absolutely happened is lost.
For example, it is easier to pass around a date as a string in UTC, like
`2024-01-02T00:00:00Z` because it allows front-end and back-end code to
“talk” in the same standard and DST-free wall-clock time, BUT it is not
necessary. Because we have date libraries that operate on the standard
ISO timezone tables, we can talk in different timezone and let the
libraries handle the conversion internally.
It is false to say that UTC is an absolute timezone or an absolute point
in time, it is just the standard, conventional time referential, because
one can perfectly store every absolute points in time in UTC+10 with a
complex DST table and have the exactly correct absolute points in time,
without any loss of information, without having any UTC+0 dates
involved.
Thus storing an absolute point in time without a timezone associated,
for example with `timestamp` PostgreSQL data type, is equivalent to
storing a wall-clock time and then throwing away voluntarily the
information that allows to know when it absolutely happened, which is a
voluntary data-loss if the code that stores and retrieves those
wall-clock points in time don’t store the associated timezone somewhere.
This is why we use `timestamptz` type in PostgreSQL, so that we make
sure that the correct absolute point in time is stored at the exact time
we send it to PostgreSQL server, no matter the front-end, back-end and
SQL server's timezone differences.
## The JavaScript Date object
The native JavaScript Date object is now officially considered legacy
([source](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Date)),
the Date object stores an absolute point in time BUT it forces the
storage to use its execution environment timezone, and one CANNOT modify
this timezone, this is a legacy behavior.
To obtain the desired result and store an absolute point in time with an
arbitrary timezone there are several options :
- The new Temporal API that is the successor of the legacy Date object.
- Moment / Luxon / @date-fns/tz that expose objects that allow to use
any timezone to store an absolute point in time.
## How PostgreSQL stores absolute point in times
PostgreSQL stores absolute points in time internally in UTC
([source](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/datatype-datetime.html#DATATYPE-DATETIME-INPUT-TIME-STAMPS)),
but the output date is expressed in the server’s session timezone
([source](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-set.html)) which
can be different from UTC.
Example with the object companies in Twenty seed database, on a local
instance, with a new “datetime” custom column :
<img width="374" height="554" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4394cb43-d97e-4479-801d-ca068f800e39"
/>
<img width="516" height="524" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b652f36a-d2e2-47a4-8950-647ca688cbbd"
/>
## Why can’t I just use the JavaScript native Date object with some
manual logic ?
Because the JavaScript Date object does not allow to change its internal
timezone, the libraries that are based on it will behave on the
execution environment timezone, thus leading to bugs that appear only on
the computers of users in a timezone but not for other in another
timezone.
In our case the `react-datepicker` library forces to use the `Date`
object, thus forcing the calendar to behave in the execution environment
system timezone, which causes a lot of problems when we decide to
display the Twenty application DATE_TIME values in another timezone than
the user system one, the bugs that appear will be of the off-by-one date
class, for example clicking on 23 will select 24, thus creating an
unreliable feature for some system / application timezone combinations.
A solution could be to manually compute the difference of minutes
between the application user and the system timezones, but that’s not
reliable because of DST which makes this computation unreliable when DST
are applied at different period of the year for the two timezones.
## Why can’t I compute the timezone difference manually ?
Because of DST, the work to compute the timezone difference reliably,
not just for the usual happy path, is equivalent to developing the
internal mechanism of a date timezone library, which is equivalent to
use a library that handles timezones.
## Using `@date-fns/tz` to solve this problem
We could have used `luxon` but it has a heavy bundle size, so instead we
rely here on `@date-fns/tz` (~1kB) which gives us a `TZDate` object that
allows to use any given timezone to store an absolute point-in-time.
The solution here is to trick `react-datepicker` by shifting a Date
object by the difference of timezone between the user application
timezone and the system timezone.
Let’s take a concerte example.
System timezone : Midway, ⇒ UTC-11:00, has no DST.
User application timezone : Auckland, NZ ⇒ UTC+13:00, has a DST.
We’ll take the NZ daylight time, so that will make a timezone difference
of 24 hours !
Let’s take an error-prone date : `2025-01-01T00:00:00` . This date is
usually a good test-case because it can generate three classes of bugs :
off-by-one day bugs, off-by-one month bugs and off-by-one year bugs, at
the same time.
Here is the absolute point in time we take expressed in the different
wall-clock time points we manipulate
Case | In system timezone ⇒ UTC-11 | In UTC | In user application
timezone ⇒ UTC+13
-- | -- | -- | --
Original date | `2024-12-31T00:00:00-11:00` | `2024-12-31T11:00:00Z` |
`2025-01-01T00:00:00+13:00`
Date shifted for react-datepicker | `2025-01-01T00:00:00-11:00` |
`2025-01-01T11:00:00Z` | `2025-01-02T00:00:00+13:00`
We can see with this table that we have the number part of the date that
is the same (`2025-01-01T00:00:00`) but with a different timezone to
“trick” `react-datepicker` and have it display the correct day in its
calendar.
You can find the code in the hooks
`useTurnPointInTimeIntoReactDatePickerShiftedDate` and
`useTurnReactDatePickerShiftedDateBackIntoPointInTime` that contain the
logic that produces the above table internally.
## Miscellaneous
Removed FormDateFieldInput and FormDateTimeFieldInput stories as they do
not behave the same depending of the execution environment and it would
be easier to put them back after having refactored FormDateFieldInput
and FormDateTimeFieldInput
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
groupBy fix: when a group's dimension value is NULL, we need to adapt
the raw sql (stage: NULL -> stage IS NULL)
typeMapper fix: a graphql type should be made non-nullable if was
indicated so + does not have a default value. our check on not having a
default value was limited to having a null defaultValue instead of
having a null or undefined defaultValue. This is a breaking change, but
all the queries that were providing a null value for these args were not
functioning anyway, and luckily in the FE we declared all queries adding
a `!` already.
# Introduction
Initially wanted to reactive the test introduced in
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15393, that was failing because
of direct data source access removing all views ( even seeded one )
which was making the test fail
While doing so discovered a lot of issue with the rest API:
- Rest api wasn't consuming the v2 at all
- Rest api wasn't prepared to handle v2 exceptions
- Rest api did not handled unknown exceptions ( timeout )
Refactored the cleanup of each test to follow black box pattern and
avoid test leakage
To be done in an other PR, move graphql-query-runner handlers in
common-api-query-runner folder (+ renaming + typing improvments)
Fixes :
- totalCount on findMany (Rest)
- getAllSelectedFields did not handle composite field (Rest)
- issue with endCursor (Rest)
- args processing for updateOne and createOne (Rest + Gql)
- fix findDuplicates (Gql)
# Introduction
A while ago we migrated view from workspace to metadata
Their standard objects workspace entities declaration remained we can
now remove them
## Deprecating commands before 1.5
The view migration command from workspace to metadata was introduced in
`1.5.0`. Removing the `baseWorkspaceEntity` make this command obsolete.
If tomorrow twenty handles auto upgrade in latest and a user having an
instance in `1.3.0` starts auto-upgrading he won't be able to migrate
his views ( that's why we should not support upgrade before 1.5 anymore
here )
We will have the same use case with FavoritesFolders
# Introduction
Fixing self relation field creation in v2
- When computing related flat field to delete on object metadata
deletion that has self relation fields
- On self relation creation validation name availability not searching
for the relation target field of the current object field if it's the
field being validated
## Coverage
- added CUD integration testing on self relation fields
close https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/15153
# Introduction
Fixing composite field update by computing field column type for each of
its properties instead of globally
## Coverage
Added integration tests for each composite field on both successful
`create` and `update`
```ts
Test Suites: 17 passed, 17 total
Tests: 104 passed, 104 total
Snapshots: 14 passed, 14 total
Time: 135.431 s, estimated 143 s
```
## Conlusion
Related to https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1753
# Introduction
Refactoring the standard overrides dispatcher to only pass over fields
to has to be dispatched in the standardOverrides entry and let the other
side effects resulting from out of standard overrides mutation trigger
Related to https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1753
## This allows
- standard field settings, options etc updates and so on
## Remark
- Determine what we should do on object deactivation ( right now in
production we can still access deactivated object relation properties
and so on e.g deactivate opportunities still accessible from a view
field on company ( still have to re-create it as it has been deleted )
=> decided to leave as it is right now, `isActive` could be considered
as uiDeactivated in the end
- We should also add forbidden standard field mutations validation
inside the builder itself ( here we want to early return in the api
input transpiler too as we don't want to spread invalid side effects )
=> or in the end we could just centralize both but it will generate
several errors
## Coverage
```ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/object-metadata/successful-update-one-standard-object-metadata.integration-spec.ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/successful-update-one-standard-field-metadata.integration-spec.ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/object-metadata/failing-update-one-standard-object-metadata.integration-spec.ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/failing-update-one-standard-field-metadata.integration-spec.ts
Test Suites: 4 passed, 4 total
Tests: 18 passed, 18 total
Snapshots: 16 passed, 16 total
Time: 8.721 s, estimated 10 s
```
## Update post review
Faced a behavior where updating back the company label to its original
value would result in storing this value in the standard overrides
Refactored both field and object transpilation behavior to rather remove
the standard override value instead and let fallback on original value
Yes it's quite duplicated will factorize once we move this inside the
builder
Adds intelligent routing system that automatically selects the best
agent for user queries based on conversation context.
### Changes:
- Added `routerModel` column to workspace table for configurable router
LLM selection
- Implemented `RouterService` with conversation history analysis and
agent matching logic
- Created router settings UI in AI Settings page with model dropdown
- Removed agent-specific thread associations - threads are now
agent-agnostic
- Added real-time routing status notification in chat UI with shimmer
effect
- Removed automatic default assistant agent creation
- Renamed GraphQL operations from agent-specific to generic (e.g.,
`agentChatThreads` → `chatThreads`)
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
# Introduction
Handling both:
- field deactivation side effect on view fields, view filters and views
- field deactivation side effect on view that targets it as
`kanbanAggregateFieldMetadataId`
- field deactivation side effect on view that targets it as
`calendarFieldMetadataId`
## Coverage
added coverage
```ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/kanban-aggregate-field-deactivation-deletes-views.integration-spec.ts (13.132 s)
kanban-aggregate-field-deactivation-nullifies-kanban-properties
✓ should nullify kanban properties when field used as kanbanAggregateOperationFieldMetadataId is deactivated (3923 ms)
✓ should not modify views when field not used as kanbanAggregateOperationFieldMetadataId is deactivated (2958 ms)
✓ should nullify kanban properties on multiple views when they all use the same field as kanbanAggregateOperationFieldMetadataId (2542 ms)
✓ should nullify kanban properties when views have different aggregate operations on same field (3380 ms)
Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests: 4 passed, 4 total
Snapshots: 0 total
Time: 13.154 s
```
```ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/view-group-field-deactivation-deletes-views.integration-spec.ts (12.639 s)
view-group-field-deactivation-deletes-views
✓ should delete view when field used in view group is deactivated (3469 ms)
✓ should not delete view when field not used in view group is deactivated (3109 ms)
✓ should delete multiple views when they all use the same field in view groups (2741 ms)
✓ should handle deactivation when view has multiple view groups with different fields (3008 ms)
Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests: 4 passed, 4 total
Snapshots: 0 total
Time: 12.664 s
```
```ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/calendar-field-deactivation-deletes-views.integration-spec.ts (14.579 s)
calendar-field-deactivation-deletes-views
✓ should delete view when field used as calendarFieldMetadataId is deactivated (3388 ms)
✓ should not delete view when field not used as calendarFieldMetadataId is deactivated (2438 ms)
✓ should delete multiple views when they all use the same field as calendarFieldMetadataId (2635 ms)
✓ should handle deactivation when views have different calendar layouts on same field (3195 ms)
✓ should delete calendar view but not other view types when calendar field is deactivated (2682 ms)
Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests: 5 passed, 5 total
Snapshots: 0 total
Time: 14.601 s, estimated 15 s
```
## View soft deletion
We decided to remove the soft deletion grain on all the views, in this
PR context we've only removed soft deleted validation requirement on any
view entities
## Conclusion
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1754
# Migrate Attachment Author to CreatedBy Field
**Twill Task**: https://twill.ai/twentyhq/ENG/tasks/7
## Summary
This PR implements a migration to transition the `Attachment` object
from using an `author` relation field to using the standard `createdBy`
field, addressing issue
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1594.
## Changes
- **Added migration command**
(`1-8-migrate-attachment-author-to-created-by.command.ts`):
- Migrates existing attachment data to use `createdBy` instead of
`author`
- Ensures data integrity during the transition to the standard field
pattern
- **Updated Attachment workspace entity**:
- Added `createdBy` relation field to the `Attachment` standard object
- Registered new field ID in `standard-field-ids.ts` constants
- **Integrated migration into upgrade pipeline**:
- Added migration module for version 1.8
- Registered in the main upgrade version command module
This change aligns the `Attachment` object with Twenty's standard field
conventions by using the built-in `createdBy` field instead of a custom
`author` field.
---
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1594
---------
Co-authored-by: Twill <agent@twill.ai>
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
Implements permission intersection (AND logic) to prevent permission
escalation when agents act on behalf of users.
### Changes:
- **Permission Intersection**: Operations requiring both user AND agent
permissions
- **RoleContext Type**: Unified type supporting single `roleId` or
multiple `roleIds` for intersection
- **CRUD Services**: Updated to accept `roleContext` for granular
permission control
- **Agent Integration**: Chat agents now use user + agent role
intersection for all operations
- **ORM Layer**: Enhanced `getRepository` to support multi-role
permission checks
### Related:
- Part 2 of ["Acting on behalf of user" concept
PR](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15103)
[Closes#1661](https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1661)
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
## Context
- All flatEntity should extend SyncableEntity
- SyncableEntity should now have applicationId and application relation
- Fix syncApp deletion, should now properly use migration v2 to delete
syncable entities
# Introduction
### Summary
Implements side effect handling for `ViewGroup` and `ViewFilters` when
field metadata is updated in the v2 architecture. This ensures that
view-related records are properly maintained when enum field options are
modified, deleted, or created.
### Side effects
- **Side Effect System**: Added side effect handling for field metadata
updates that manages related view groups and view filters
- **Enum Field Updates**: When enum field options are modified, the
system now:
- **View Groups**: Creates new groups for added options, updates
existing groups for modified options, and deletes groups for removed
options
- **View Filters**: Updates filter values to reflect option changes and
removes filters that reference deleted options
### Enum runner fix
Update now works for both atomic enum and array enum ( multi select for
instance )
### Compute flat entity maps from to
Standardized this method usage across v2 services
Next step is to require dependencies dynamically
## Conclusion
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1649
I had an issue with invalid UUIDs, and I think it would be easier to
find the offending one if the UUID were included in the error message.
This way a database dump can be easily searched.
---------
Co-authored-by: prastoin <paul@twenty.com>
## Goal
- inferDeletionFromMissingEntities is now a map instead of a single
bool, allowing us to parameterise it based on the entity we want to
compare
- Adding index creation/update when field isUnique is set to true and
index deletion when isUnique is false (for now)
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1346
### Summary
Split BAR into VERTICAL_BAR and HORIZONTAL_BAR as separate chart types.
### The Problem
Initially wanted a simple vertical/horizontal toggle for bar charts, but
ran into a GraphQL union type
constraint: union types can't have the same field name with different
nullability.
- Vertical bars need groupByFieldMetadataIdX as required (categories on
X)
- Horizontal bars need groupByFieldMetadataIdY as required (categories
on Y)
- GraphQL schema generation fails with this setup
### The Solution
Use semantic primaryAxis and secondaryAxis naming that's
orientation-agnostic:
- primaryAxisGroupByFieldMetadataId = main grouping field (e.g.,
"Company Name")
- secondaryAxisGroupByFieldMetadataId = optional secondary grouping
(e.g., "Stage")
These fields have consistent meaning regardless of orientation. The
visual mapping happens at the UI layer:
- Vertical bars: primary data renders on X-axis, secondary on Y-axis
- Horizontal bars: primary data renders on Y-axis, secondary on X-axis
Both chart types share the same DTO structure with consistent
nullability.
### What Changed
- Split GraphType.BAR → VERTICAL_BAR | HORIZONTAL_BAR
- Renamed fields: primaryAxisGroupByFieldMetadataId,
secondaryAxisGroupByFieldMetadataId (+ subfield
variants)
- useChartSettingsValues(): Maps semantic fields to setting values (no
swapping)
- getBarChartSettings(): Dynamically arranges settings panel based on
orientation
- transformGroupByDataToBarChartData(): Maps semantic fields to Nivo's
layout prop
video QA
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/479061b5-712e-4ca6-9858-95273d1f16c1
# Introduction
Adding view-group to core engine v2
Following https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15010 ( same pattern )
## What's done
- Created flat-view-group
- flat view group runner
- flat view group builder
- create view group service v2 and input transpilers
- refactor the existing view group resolver to fix standard (
BREAKING_CHANGE on graphql api update especially ) REST stays the same
- refactored the front to consume the mutations autogenerated
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1665
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1563.
We now have two inter-group orderBy criteria: one on the aggregate
values, the other on the dimension values.
Ex: I am grouping companies by city and querying the average number of
employees for each group. I can either order the groups by the city
name, or by the average number of employees, or by one then the other.
I could actually also order groups by an aggregated value that I did not
ask for (ex: average ARR), but I cannot order groups by a field value I
did not group records by (ex: country).
[See discord
discussion](https://discord.com/channels/1130383047699738754/1425438213555753050/1425438223097921659)
An example of query variables:
```
{
"groupBy": [
{
"createdAt": {
"granularity": "QUARTER_OF_THE_YEAR"
}
},
{"city": true}
],
"orderBy": [
{
"aggregate": {
"avgEmployees": "DescNullsLast"
}
},
{
"aggregate": {
"percentyEmptyEmployees": "DescNullsLast"
}
},
{
"city": "AscNullsLast"
},
{
"createdAt": {
"orderBy": "AscNullsLast",
"granularity": "QUARTER_OF_THE_YEAR",
}
}
]
}
```
The aggregate orderBy criteria had already been implemented, but I
updated the implementation to add an "aggregate" key to prefix them, in
order to avoid confusion between the two + for the schema generation not
to break (otherwise we would have an issue when generating
OrderByWithGroupByInput if a user has created a field that has the same
name as an aggregate field, such as avgEmployees).
# Introduction
Migrating `viewFilter` to v2 in order to migrate later the field update
side effect on view to v2 too
## What's done
- Created flat-view-filter
- flat view filter runner
- flat view filter builder
- create view filter service v2 and input transpilers
- refactor the existing view filter resolver to fix standard (
BREAKING_CHANGE on graphql api update especially ) REST stays the same
- refactored the front to consume the mutations autogenerated
## New generic tools
### Compare two flat entity
Introducing a new util to compare two flat entity, it's strictly typed
and will be added to the generic builder in a following PR
This will ease flat entity addition as won't required to create a
specific abstraction for comparison
Generic builder will expect specific constant: properties to compare and
properties to stringify
### Transform flat entity for comparison
Forked and refactor the initial existing method for flat entity business
scope and type safety
## Coverage
Migrated existing integration tests to fit new contract API
This PR does not add strong coverage on validation exceptions
Deadlines are too short
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1666
# Introduction
Preparing view-filter and view-group introduction in v2 core engine
Moving view from `core-modules` to `metadata-modules`
## What happened
### Created dedicated modules for each view entity:
- ViewFieldModule
- ViewFilterModule
- ViewFilterGroupModule
- ViewGroupModule
- ViewSortModule
### Each module is now completely independent with its own:
- Controller
- Resolver
- Service
- Entity
### Created dedicated abstraction metadata module folder for:
- flat-view-field
- flat-view
### Dependencies
- Eleminated circular dep on ViewModule to all others ones
- Granular import not importing the whole viewModule anymore everywhere
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1703
# Introduction
Initial motivation here was to migrate the object related records logic
from v1 to v2, please note that now in v2 views aren't records anymore
but core engine entities
## What's done
- Added specific label identifier targeting view field logic
- Handled side effects on viewField creation with lowest position on
object label identifier mutation
- Added viewField relations in field metadate entity + handled
optimistic in builder v2
- Added view relations in object metadata entity + handled optimistic in
builder v2
- Added integration tests covering the side effects and new validation
exceptions
- Sandardized cache computation
- Coverage on object metadata creation side effect on views and view
fields
## Coverage
```ts
PASS test/integration/graphql/suites/view/view-field/object-identifier-update-side-effect-on-view-field.integration-spec.ts
View Field Resolver - Successful object metadata identifier update side effect on view field
✓ should create a view field on label identifier object metadata update if it does not exist on view (7 ms)
✓ Should not allow deleting a label identifier view field (17 ms)
✓ Should not allow destroying a label identifier view field (6 ms)
✓ Should not allow updating a label identifier view field visibility to false (8 ms)
✓ Should not allow creating a view field with a position lower than the label idenfitier view field (180 ms)
✓ Should not allow updated labelIdentifier view field with a position higher than existing other view field (346 ms)
✓ Should allow updated labelIdentifier view field with a position higher than existing other view field (434 ms)
Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests: 7 passed, 7 total
Snapshots: 5 passed, 5 total
Time: 4.571 s, estimated 5 s
```
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1664
