## Summary
- Replaces all `depot-ubuntu-24.04` runners with `ubuntu-latest`
- Replaces all `depot-ubuntu-24.04-8` runners with
`ubuntu-latest-8-cores`
- Updates storybook build cache keys in ci-front.yaml to reflect the
runner name change
Reverts the temporary Depot migration introduced in #18163 / #18179
across all 23 workflow files.
## Summary
- Fix expression injection vulnerabilities in composite actions
(`restore-cache`, `nx-affected`) and workflow files (`claude.yml`)
- Reduce overly broad permissions in `ci-utils.yaml` (Danger.js) and
`ci-breaking-changes.yaml`
- Restructure `preview-env-dispatch.yaml`: auto-trigger for members,
opt-in for contributor PRs via `preview-app` label (safe because
keepalive has no write tokens)
- Isolate all write-access operations (PR comments, cross-repo posting)
to a new dedicated
[`twentyhq/ci-privileged`](https://github.com/twentyhq/ci-privileged)
repo via `repository_dispatch`, so that workflows in twenty that execute
contributor code never have write tokens
- Create `post-ci-comments.yaml` (`workflow_run` bridge) to dispatch
breaking changes results to ci-privileged, solving the [fork PR comment
issue](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/13713#issuecomment-3168999083)
- Delete 5 unused secrets and broken `i18n-qa-report` workflow
- Remove `TWENTY_DISPATCH_TOKEN` from twenty (moved to ci-privileged as
`CORE_TEAM_ISSUES_COMMENT_TOKEN`)
- Use `toJSON()` for all `client-payload` values to prevent JSON
injection
## Security model after this PR
| Workflow | Executes fork code? | Write tokens available? |
|----------|---------------------|------------------------|
| preview-env-keepalive | Yes | None (contents: read only) |
| preview-env-dispatch | No (base branch) | CI_PRIVILEGED_DISPATCH_TOKEN
only |
| ci-breaking-changes | Yes | None (contents: read only) |
| post-ci-comments (workflow_run) | No (default branch) |
CI_PRIVILEGED_DISPATCH_TOKEN only |
| claude.yml | No (base branch) | CI_PRIVILEGED_DISPATCH_TOKEN,
CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN |
| ci-utils (Danger.js) | No (base branch) | GITHUB_TOKEN (scoped) |
All actual write tokens (`TWENTY_PR_COMMENT_TOKEN`,
`CORE_TEAM_ISSUES_COMMENT_TOKEN`) live in `twentyhq/ci-privileged` with
strict CODEOWNERS review and branch protection.
## Test plan
- [ ] Verify preview environment comments still appear on member PRs
- [ ] Verify adding `preview-app` label triggers preview for contributor
PRs
- [ ] Verify breaking changes reports still post on PRs (including fork
PRs)
- [ ] Verify Claude cross-repo responses still post on core-team-issues
- [ ] Confirm ci-privileged branch protection is enforced
## Summary
- Fixes a script injection vulnerability in the `claude-cross-repo`
job's `actions/github-script` step where `${{ steps.prompt.outputs.repo
}}` and `${{ steps.prompt.outputs.issue_number }}` were interpolated
directly into JavaScript string literals. A crafted dispatch payload
could inject arbitrary JavaScript with access to
`secrets.TWENTY_DISPATCH_TOKEN`.
- Values are now passed via `env:` and accessed through `process.env`,
which treats them as data rather than code.
## Context
Motivated by the [hackerbot-claw
campaign](https://www.stepsecurity.io/blog/hackerbot-claw-github-actions-exploitation)
which exploited similar `${{ }}` expression injection patterns in
workflows at Microsoft, DataDog, and CNCF projects.
The broader analysis found that our workflow is **not vulnerable** to
the primary attack vector (Pwn Request via `pull_request_target` +
untrusted checkout), and `claude-code-action` already gates on write
access internally. This expression injection in the cross-repo dispatch
job was the only concrete vulnerability identified.
## Test plan
- [ ] Verify the `claude-cross-repo` job still posts comments back to
the source issue after a dispatch run
- [ ] Confirm `TARGET_REPO` and `TARGET_ISSUE` env vars are correctly
resolved from step outputs
Made with [Cursor](https://cursor.com)
## Summary
- **Increase `--max-turns` from 50 to 200** — Claude was hitting the
turn limit before getting to `gh pr create`, resulting in branches with
no PR
- **Add common bash commands to `--allowedTools`** — `rm`, `find`,
`grep`, `cat`, `ls`, `head`, `tail`, `wc`, `sort`, `uniq`, `mkdir`,
`cp`, `mv`, `touch`, `chmod`, `echo`, `curl`, `cd`, `pwd`, `diff`,
`xargs`, `awk`, `cut`, `tee`, `tr` — denied commands were wasting turns
on retries
## Context
Both [run
21594509983](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/actions/runs/21594509983)
and [run
21595364188](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/actions/runs/21595364188)
failed with `error_max_turns` after exhausting 50 turns. Permission
denials on `rm` and `find` contributed to wasted turns.
## Test plan
- [ ] Tag `@claude` on an issue with a code change request — verify it
completes and creates a PR
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
## Summary
- **Set `cancel-in-progress: false`** — Claude's own comments (e.g.
error reports) were triggering new workflow runs via `issue_comment`,
which cancelled the in-progress Claude run before the new run's `if`
condition could skip it. Disabling cancel-in-progress prevents this.
- **Filter out Bot users in `if` conditions** — Added
`github.event.comment.user.type != 'Bot'` so Claude's own comments don't
start job evaluation at all.
- **Add back `additional_permissions: actions: read`** — Lets Claude
read CI failure logs to help debug broken builds.
- **Remove `discussion_comment` trigger and job** — `claude-code-action`
doesn't support this event type yet (throws `Unsupported event type:
discussion_comment`). Listed as planned in their security.md.
## Context
Claude runs were consistently failing with `The operation was canceled`
because:
1. Claude posts an error/status comment back to the issue
2. That comment triggers a new `issue_comment` workflow run on the same
issue number
3. The concurrency group cancels the in-progress run before the new run
evaluates its `if` and skips
## Test plan
- [ ] Tag `@claude` on an issue — should run to completion without being
cancelled
- [ ] Verify Claude's own reply comments don't trigger new workflow runs
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
## Summary
- `allowed_tools` is not a valid input for `claude-code-action@v1` — it
was silently ignored (visible as a warning in CI logs)
- This caused Claude to lack file write permissions, preventing it from
making actual code changes
- Move the tools list into `claude_args` as `--allowedTools` where it's
actually parsed
## Test plan
- [ ] Trigger `@claude` on a cross-repo issue requesting a code change —
verify it can edit files and create a PR
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude was blocked from writing files, using git/gh, and fetching
web content because only a few Bash patterns were pre-approved.
Add Edit, Write, WebFetch, git, gh, sed, and python3 to the
allowed_tools list.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The claude-code-action needs id-token: write to fetch an OIDC token.
The claude-cross-repo job was missing its permissions block entirely,
causing it to fail with "Could not fetch an OIDC token".
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
## Summary
- Move build/env/DB setup out of the GitHub Actions workflow into an
on-demand script (`packages/twenty-utils/setup-dev-env.sh`) that Claude
invokes only when needed
- Add Nx/build cache restore/save steps to speed up repeated runs
- Add `allowed_tools` so Claude can run the setup script and common dev
commands (nx, jest, yarn)
- Add `PG_DATABASE_URL` env var via `settings` for the postgres MCP
server
- Remove unnecessary `actions: read` permission grant
- Document the lazy setup pattern in CLAUDE.md
This makes read-only tasks (code review, architecture questions, docs)
fast by skipping the ~2min build/setup overhead, while still letting
Claude run tests and builds when it needs to.
## Test plan
- [ ] Comment `@claude what is the architecture of the backend?` —
should answer fast without running setup
- [ ] Comment `@claude run the twenty-server unit tests` — should call
setup script first, then run tests
- [ ] Verify cross-repo dispatch still works
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
## Summary
- Add `--model opus` to `claude_args` in both the direct and cross-repo
Claude jobs
## Test plan
- [ ] Merge and trigger @claude — verify it reports running Opus 4.5
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
## Summary
- Add `repository_dispatch` trigger to `claude.yml` so `@claude`
mentions in `twentyhq/core-team-issues` get forwarded here
- New `claude-cross-repo` job: builds a prompt from the dispatch
payload, runs Claude Code against the twenty codebase, and posts a link
back to the source issue
- Switch both jobs to use `claude_code_oauth_token` instead of
`anthropic_api_key`
A companion workflow (`claude-dispatch.yml`) was pushed to
`twentyhq/core-team-issues` to send the dispatches.
## Test plan
- [x] Dispatch workflow in core-team-issues triggers successfully
(tested via issue #2194)
- [ ] After merge, verify `repository_dispatch` triggers the
`claude-cross-repo` job in twenty
- [ ] Verify Claude responds and posts a link back to the source issue
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
## 🤖 Installing Claude Code GitHub App
This PR adds a GitHub Actions workflow that enables Claude Code
integration in our repository.
### What is Claude Code?
[Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) is an AI coding agent that
can help with:
- Bug fixes and improvements
- Documentation updates
- Implementing new features
- Code reviews and suggestions
- Writing tests
- And more!
### How it works
Once this PR is merged, we'll be able to interact with Claude by
mentioning @claude in a pull request or issue comment.
Once the workflow is triggered, Claude will analyze the comment and
surrounding context, and execute on the request in a GitHub action.
### Important Notes
- **This workflow won't take effect until this PR is merged**
- **@claude mentions won't work until after the merge is complete**
- The workflow runs automatically whenever Claude is mentioned in PR or
issue comments
- Claude gets access to the entire PR or issue context including files,
diffs, and previous comments
### Security
- Our Anthropic API key is securely stored as a GitHub Actions secret
- Only users with write access to the repository can trigger the
workflow
- All Claude runs are stored in the GitHub Actions run history
- Claude's default tools are limited to reading/writing files and
interacting with our repo by creating comments, branches, and commits.
- We can add more allowed tools by adding them to the workflow file
like:
```
allowed_tools: Bash(npm install),Bash(npm run build),Bash(npm run lint),Bash(npm run test)
```
There's more information in the [Claude Code action
repo](https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code-action).
After merging this PR, let's try mentioning @claude in a comment on any
PR to get started!
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
