## Problem
The concurrency rules in CI workflows were cancelling in-progress test
runs even on the main branch. This caused inconsistent check counts when
multiple commits were pushed in quick succession.
## Solution
Updated `cancel-in-progress` in all CI workflows to be conditional:
- **On main branch**: Tests run to completion (no cancellation)
- **On feature branches**: Tests are cancelled when new commits are
pushed (saves CI resources)
## Changes
Modified 11 workflow files to use:
```yaml
cancel-in-progress: ${{ github.ref != 'refs/heads/main' }}
```
This ensures every commit to main gets fully tested while maintaining
efficiency on feature branches.
# Introduction
Fixed the build dependency leading to twenty-server start failing before
building,
Removed redundant steps
Make everything run on test db
# Introduction
Defining very first basis of the twenty-cli e2e testing env.
Dynamically generating tests cases based on a list of applications names
that will be matched to stored twenty-apps and run install delete and
reinstall with their configuration on the same instance
We could use a glob pattern with a specific e2e configuration in every
apps but right now overkill
## Notes
- We should define typescript path aliasing to ease import devxp
- parse the config using a zod object
## Some vision on test granularity
Right now we only check that the server sent back success or failure on
below operation. In the future the synchronize will return a report of
what has been installed per entity exactly. We will be able to snapshot
everything in order to detect regressions
We should also be testing the cli directly for init and other stuff in
the end, we could get some inspiration from what's done in preconstruct
e2e tests with an on heap virtual file system
## Conclusion
Any suggestions are more than welcomed !
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1721
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1418
Tested :
- findOne on Rest and Gql
### Vision
#### Common
- Common is kind of renamed Gql base resolver
- Common handles args (filter, values, ...) validation
- Common accepts depth or raw gql selected fields to compute
selectedFields
- Common is directly called by each CommonQueries (findOne, ...)
service, which extend CommonBaseQuery service
- Common sequence :
| - Parse & Validate args (args-handlers, to create)
| - Build query (query-parsers : currently in gql-query-parsers, to
move)
| - Execute query
| - Fetch relation + format
#### Rest
- Simple parsing (without metadata validation)
- Calling Common API
- Simple rest response formatting
#### Gql
- Calling Common API
Translations weren't pulled because --strict does not fail since we've
set english as a fallback locale (since english is set as a fallback it
considers translations have been found and therefore the command does
not fail as expected).
Temporary hotfix but we should do something smarter in the future
@ehconitin fyi
## Context
This PR fixes a REST API metadata schema mismatch that occurred after
the webhook and apiKey migration from workspace entities to metadata
level.
## The Issue
After PR #13576 deleted the webhook and apiKey workspace entities, the
metadata OpenAPI specification ended up in a broken state:
- The `/metadata` endpoints still had paths for `/webhooks` and
`/apiKeys`
- But the schema definitions were missing (they were previously pulled
from workspace entities)
- This created dangling references in the OpenAPI document
## The Fix
Added proper schema definitions for webhook and apiKey directly in
`computeMetadataSchemaComponents`:
- `Webhook`, `WebhookForUpdate`, `WebhookForResponse`
- `ApiKey`, `ApiKeyForUpdate`, `ApiKeyForResponse`
## Why the CI is Failing
The CI breaking changes detection is comparing:
- **Main branch**: Has a broken OpenAPI document with endpoints that
reference non-existent schemas
- **This branch**: Has the fixed OpenAPI document with proper schemas
The OpenAPI diff tool can't even parse the main branch's document due to
the missing schema references, hence the error -- tested locally
Updates yarn to the latest version 4.9.2 (from 4.4.0).
Also removes the explicit `enableHardenedMode` from yarnrc as it
significantly slows down installation.
This is already enabled automatically for pull requests on Github, thus
preventing lockfile poisoning where it's relevant.
See <https://yarnpkg.com/features/security#hardened-mode>:
> in most cases you won't even have to think about it - the hardened
mode is enabled by default when Yarn detects it runs in a pull request
from a public GitHub repository.
It can additionally be enabled explicitly for specific CI jobs by using
an environment variable, if desired:
> The hardened mode can be set (or disabled) [...] by defining
`YARN_ENABLE_HARDENED_MODE=1|0` in your environment variables
If this is the case, yarn still recommends **not** enabling it
everywhere:
> **DANGER**
>
> The hardened mode makes installs significantly slower as Yarn has to
query the registry to make sure the information contained in the
lockfile are accurate. If your CI pipeline runs multiple jobs, we
recommend disabling the hardened mode in all but one of them so as to
limit the performance impact.
---------
Co-authored-by: prastoin <[email protected]>
It used to post a comment if the API schema changed, even if there's no
breaking change. I thought this could be OK as an FYI. But it is not
since now we generate the examples dynamically with Faker the OpenAPI
schema is always different
# Introduction
Introducing jest sharding along github actions matrix in order to
fluidify the process
Note in case we will compute and guard coverage metrics we will need to
merge coverages reports such as we do for the frontend storybooks
integrations tests, from now this is overkill as unused
Related successful run
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/actions/runs/15585113583/job/43889477889
# What
Fully deprecate old relations because we have one bug tied to it and it
make the codebase complex
# How I've made this PR:
1. remove metadata datasource (we only keep 'core') => this was causing
extra complexity in the refactor + flaky reset
2. merge dev and demo datasets => as I needed to update the tests which
is very painful, I don't want to do it twice
3. remove all code tied to RELATION_METADATA /
relation-metadata.resolver, or anything tied to the old relation system
4. Remove ONE_TO_ONE and MANY_TO_MANY that are not supported
5. fix impacts on the different areas : see functional testing below
# Functional testing
## Functional testing from the front-end:
1. Database Reset ✅
2. Sign In ✅
3. Workspace sign-up ✅
5. Browsing table / kanban / show ✅
6. Assigning a record in a one to many / in a many to one ✅
7. Deleting a record involved in a relation ✅ => broken but not tied to
this PR
8. "Add new" from relation picker ✅ => broken but not tied to this PR
9. Creating a Task / Note, Updating a Task / Note relations, Deleting a
Task / Note (from table, show page, right drawer) ✅ => broken but not
tied to this PR
10. creating a relation from settings (custom / standard x oneToMany /
manyToOne) ✅
11. updating a relation from settings should not be possible ✅
12. deleting a relation from settings (custom / standard x oneToMany /
manyToOne) ✅
13. Make sure timeline activity still work (relation were involved
there), espacially with Task / Note => to be double checked ✅ => Cannot
convert undefined or null to object
14. Workspace deletion / User deletion ✅
15. CSV Import should keep working ✅
16. Permissions: I have tested without permissions V2 as it's still hard
to test v2 work and it's not in prod yet ✅
17. Workflows global test ✅
## From the API:
1. Review open-api documentation (REST) ✅
2. Make sure REST Api are still able to fetch relations ==> won't do, we
have a coupling Get/Update/Create there, this requires refactoring
3. Make sure REST Api is still able to update / remove relation => won't
do same
## Automated tests
1. lint + typescript ✅
2. front unit tests: ✅
3. server unit tests 2 ✅
4. front stories: ✅
5. server integration: ✅
6. chromatic check : expected 0
7. e2e check : expected no more that current failures
## Remove // Todos
1. All are captured by functional tests above, nothing additional to do
## (Un)related regressions
1. Table loading state is not working anymore, we see the empty state
before table content
2. Filtering by Creator Tim Ap return empty results
3. Not possible to add Tasks / Notes / Files from show page
# Result
## New seeds that can be easily extended
<img width="1920" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d290d130-2a5f-44e6-b419-7e42a89eec4b"
/>
## -5k lines of code
## No more 'metadata' dataSource (we only have 'core)
## No more relationMetadata (I haven't drop the table yet it's not
referenced in the code anymore)
## We are ready to fix the 6 months lag between current API results and
our mocked tests
## No more bug on relation creation / deletion
---------
Co-authored-by: Weiko <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <[email protected]>
BlocknoteJS requires an ESM module where our server is CJS, this forced
us to pin the server-util version, which led us to force the resolution
of several packages, leading to bugs downstream.
From Node 22.12 Node supports requiring ESM modules (available from Node
22.0 with a flag). So I upgrade the module.
I picked Node 22 and not Node 23 or Node 24 because 22 is the LTS and we
don't plan to change node versions frequently.
If you remain on Node 18, things should still mostly work, except if you
edit a Rich Text field.
I also starting changing the default runtime for Serverless Functions
which isn't directly related. This means new serverless functions will
be created on Node 22, but we will still need another PR to migrate
existing serverless functions before September (end of support by AWS).
(In this PR I also remove the upgrade commands from 0.43 since they rely
on Blocknote and I didn't want to have to deal with this)
---------
Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This is hard to test without merging PRs unfortunately
Goal of this PR is to replace the action I had introduced since there
was already a similar one in the codebase
# Introduction
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/591
Same than for `twenty-shared` made in
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11083.
## TODO
- [x] Manual migrate twenty-website twenty-ui imports
## What's next:
- Generate barrel and migration script factorization within own package
+ tests
- Refactoring using preconstruct ? TimeBox
- Lint circular dependencies
- Lint import from barrel and forbid them
### Preconstruct
We need custom rollup plugins addition, but preconstruct does not expose
its rollup configuration. It might be possible to handle this using the
babel overrides. But was a big tunnel.
We could give it a try afterwards ! ( allowing cjs interop and stuff
like that )
Stuck to vite lib app
Closed related PRs:
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11294
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11203
Increased the timeout for the Danger JS job from 3 to 5 minutes to
prevent premature failures on slower runs. This ensures more reliable
execution of the workflow.
To unlock https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11339
# Introduction
In this PR we've migrated `twenty-shared` from a `vite` app
[libary-mode](https://vite.dev/guide/build#library-mode) to a
[preconstruct](https://preconstruct.tools/) "atomic" application ( in
the future would like to introduce preconstruct to handle of all our
atomic dependencies such as `twenty-emails` `twenty-ui` etc it will be
integrated at the monorepo's root directly, would be to invasive in the
first, starting incremental via `twenty-shared`)
For more information regarding the motivations please refer to nor:
- https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/587
-
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/281#issuecomment-2630949682
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/589
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/590
## How to test
In order to ease the review this PR will ship all the codegen at the
very end, the actual meaning full diff is `+2,411 −114`
In order to migrate existing dependent packages to `twenty-shared` multi
barrel new arch you need to run in local:
```sh
yarn tsx packages/twenty-shared/scripts/migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport.ts && \
npx nx run-many -t lint --fix -p twenty-front twenty-ui twenty-server twenty-emails twenty-shared twenty-zapier
```
Note that `migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport` is idempotent, it's atm
included in the PR but should not be merged. ( such as codegen will be
added before merging this script will be removed )
## Misc
- related opened issue preconstruct
https://github.com/preconstruct/preconstruct/issues/617
## Closed related PR
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11028
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10993
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10960
## Upcoming enhancement: ( in others dedicated PRs )
- 1/ refactor generate barrel to export atomic module instead of `*`
- 2/ generate barrel own package with several files and tests
- 3/ Migration twenty-ui the same way
- 4/ Use `preconstruct` at monorepo global level
## Conclusion
As always any suggestions are welcomed !
Added a new job to check for changed files before executing the CI
workflow. Integrated Tinybird local service, updated environment
variables, and refined the CI steps for better functionality and
clarity.
## Context
- Removing search* integration tests instead of fixing them because they
will be replaced by global search very soon
- Fixed billing + add missing seeds to make them work
- Fixed integration tests not using consistently the correct "test" db
- Fixed ci not running the with-db-reset configuration due to nx
configuration being used twice for different level of the command
- Enriched .env.test
- Fixed parts where exceptions were not thrown properly and not caught
by exception handler to convert to 400 when needed
- Refactored feature flag service that had 2 different implementations
in lab and admin panel + added tests
- Fixed race condition when migrations are created at the same timestamp
and doing the same type of operation, in this case object deletion could
break because table could be deleted earlier than its relations
- Fixed many integration tests that were not up to date since the CI has
been broken for a while
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <[email protected]>
