We want to update UserWorkspacePermissions from
```
export type UserWorkspacePermissions = {
permissionFlags: Record<PermissionFlagType, boolean>;
objectRecordsPermissions: Record<PermissionsOnAllObjectRecords, boolean>;
objectPermissions: ObjectsPermissionsDeprecated;
};
```
to
```
export type UserWorkspacePermissions = {
permissionFlags: Record<PermissionFlagType, boolean>;
objectsPermissions: ObjectsPermissions;
};
```
`ObjectsPermissionsDeprecated` and `ObjectsPermissions` are actually
very similar, they only have different key names (`canRead` vs
`canReadObjectRecords`)
To avoid brutal breaking changes, we will proceed in multiple steps:
1. This PR: adapt FE so it does not call objectRecordsPermissions
anymore + add the new objectsPermissions to UserWorkspacePermissions
without calling it yet in the FE
2. Remove objectRecordsPermissions in BE + use objectsPermissions in FE
instead of objectPermissions
3. Remove objectPermissions
- Enable lingui/no-single-variables-to-translate and all other
recommended Lingui rules
- Fix single variable translation patterns (t`${variable}` → variable)
- Fix expression-in-message violations by extracting variables
- Fix t-call-in-function violations by moving translations inside
functions
- Update ESLint configs to use linguiPlugin.configs['flat/recommended']
- Clean up unused imports and improve translation patterns
Today WorkflowVariablesDropdownAllItems is used for variable picker in
all workflow steps, and for step field picker in filters.
Using that component in filters prevent us from knowing if a full record
or only the id has been selected.
This PR:
- creates a new component WorkflowDropdownStepOutputItems, mostly
copying the logic of WorkflowVariablesDropdownAllItems
- call it WorkflowStepFilterFieldSelect, removing the display logic from
that parent component
- store isFullRecord in filter. So we now know if we should display a
record picker or a uuid picker
Before - selecting id makes picker behaves like when we select an object
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/bde34dc5-8011-4983-8d0f-d8cb0cb3c045
After - selecting object and id are two different things
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/49289990-3e6d-4ad7-abc1-e3ade2a821bb
## Add Morph Relation Field Display Support for Tables (one to many &
many to one)
**Features:**
- Display morph relation fields (one-to-many, many-to-one) in table
cells
- Multi-field record retrieval for improved performance
- Enhanced table cell rendering with morph relation support
**Components Added:**
- `MorphRelationManyToOneFieldDisplay` - Shows many-to-one morph
relations
- `MorphRelationOneToManyFieldDisplay` - Shows one-to-many morph
relations
TODO :
handle notes and tasks case if we choose these kind of objects as
targets/source for a morph relation
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Parallel code path to read and write core views when
IS_CORE_VIEW_ENABLED.
Migrated view key to an enum.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
This PR introduces the usage of record fields in the manipulation of
table columns and board fields.
Since all of the actual system relies on states like tableColumns,
recordIndexFieldDefinitions and the likes, it was required to implement
temporary utils that modifies those states in parallel of the new
generic currentRecordFields, to keep a working product.
With this PR though, currentRecordFields becomes the single source of
truth that gets saved to DB, and the remaining work is just to make the
switch with this new state on all components that are plugged to
tableColumns and the like.
This will be done in another PR.
# Implement Morph Frontend Settings
Possiblity to create a morh relation from the Settings !
## Overview
Morph object system with new frontend settings UI for configuring morph
relations.
## What Changed
- **New Components**: `SettingsDataModelFieldMorphRelationForm`,
`SettingsMorphRelationMultiSelect`
- **Form System**: React Hook Form + Zod validation for morph relation
configuration
- **Preview System**: Live preview of field configurations with
validation
- **State Management**: Enhanced component state handling for complex
form interactions
## Technical Details
- **Architecture**: Restructured field input/display components for
better maintainability
- **Types**: Added comprehensive TypeScript types for morph relations
(`isFieldMorphRelation`, etc.)
- **Validation**: Dynamic validation rules based on field types and
relation patterns
- **Performance**: Optimized rendering with proper state management
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
When the target is not in the direct next step ids of the source (step
or trigger), check if there is a filter between both. If yes, delete the
filter and remove it from source next step ids.
Also refactored the existing.
Unless I'm mistaken the project does not run with node `24.0.0`
Switching to node `24.5.0` ( as defined in vscode node runtime
requirements in https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/13730 ) seems to
fix the issue
```ts
Successfully compiled: 2897 files with swc (188.32ms)
(node:77006) [DEP0190] DeprecationWarning: Passing args to a child process with shell option true can lead to security vulnerabilities, as the arguments are not escaped, only concatenated.
(Use `node --trace-deprecation ...` to show where the warning was created)
Watching for file changes.
/Users/paulrastoin/ws/twenty/node_modules/buffer-equal-constant-time/index.js:37
var origSlowBufEqual = SlowBuffer.prototype.equal;
^
TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'prototype')
```
Updating engines so local constraint suggest a functional node version
In this PR
- Introduction of readableFields and updatableFields in
objectMetadataItem selector to ease filtering from a developer
experience perspective ( + to help developers think to do it). In
discussion @lucasbordeau @charlesBochet
- Remove non-updatable field from CSV import process (@etiennejouan)
- QA fix / Non-readable fields should not show on show page
- QA fix / It should not be offered to create a kanban view on a
non-readable field
- QA fix / It should not be offered to create view groups on a
non-readable field
- QA fix / Rating field should have a readonly mode
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
# Introduction
The workspace migration runner v2 now computes the next
flatObjectMetadataMaps post current ws migration action has been run
So the following one have an up to date informations
## Still TODO
~~Remove any contextual information from workspace migration v2 and
consume the optimistic cache to retrieve them~~
## Next steps
- Create flat-object-metadata-maps testing toolbox and flat-object/field
testing toolbox
- Implement strong coverage on every created utils/transpiler and
applyWorkspaceMigrationAction method
# Introduction
- Retrieveing flat-object-metadata-maps for input transpilation, we
decided not to introduce map merge for remaining validation operation
for the moment
- Refactored the field metadata service v2 to sequentially
optimistically render on each iteration
# Introduction
The cache is not accurately typed regarding the `fieldMetadataMaps` they
do not contain relations
In this way we:
- Created dedicated transpilation tools for cache manipulation
- Avoided recursivity in transpilation tools
- Fix and finalized the createMany fields metadata service v2
- Refactor the validator to handle validation :)
## What's next:
- Implem integration tests to make things run 🙃
- migrate existing settings valdiation
- Finish the create object metadata service
- Handle update input transpilation and validation
# Introduction
- FlatFieldMetadataType validators hashmap
- Do not fail fast on validation but aggregate errors
- Implemented `enum` validation
- Plugged the new v2 dynamic call in the field metadata service v2
## What's next:
- Implem integration tests to make things run 🙃
- migrate existing settings valdiation
- Finish the create object metadata service
- Handle update input transpilation and validation
## Open question
Should we implement, not covered validation ?, adding strictness now or
never.
This will be required by the import anw
## Discovered issue with cache
Currently the cache is not accurately typed, `fieldsById` map are not
storing any relations.
Which means the current transpilation tools are hitting undefined at
runtime
In the best of the world we will refactor the cache to be storing
`FlatObjectMetadata` and `FlatFieldMetadata` so we don't even have to
transpile them for validation and so on
But it would require to refactor the loaders that returns the cache to
the front on hit as FieldMetadataEntity, so we might land on a lighter
solution to rather add a new `getExistingFlatCache` that handles the
transpilation itself
About to do that in an other PR to be discussed with Coco
# Introduction
Following https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/13420
What has been done:
- `CreateFieldInput` transpilation to `FlatFieldMetadata`
- `FlatFieldMetadata` validator service
- A lof of transpilation utils from `input` to `flatObject` or
`flatField`
- Created dedicated v2 api metadata services
- Introducing `inferDeletionFromMissingObjectFieldIndex` in the builder,
to avoid diffing every object and field of the current workspace we
allow only generating create/update migration operations, usefull when
passing by the api metadata
## We still need to in another PR:
- Implement a strong unit test coverage and critical functions and
services
- Finalize flat field metadata validation exception for `options`
`defaultValue` `settings` and `relations`
- Finalize `flatObjectMetadata` validation and v2 service refactor
- Plug the new service when feature flag is enabled
# Introduction
In this PR we create basic transpilation methods and utils to handle
input to flat, entity to flat, object maps to flat. In order to
transpile everything into a common validation that will be implemented
in another PR
## FieldMetadataEntity typing
Added `never | null` to fields that should never be in order to ease
general abstracted method to pass null, as anw it's what is in the
database
## Todo
- ~~Create a feature flag~~
- Integration test for object creation through metadata api + pg col
introspection and snapshoting
- add to step output schema the information that field is a composite
sub field
- from output schema, when selecting the variable, copy all info
required to stepFilter
- from stepFilter, when selecting a value, display a special component
for composites
Context :
Large PR with 600+ test files. Enable connect and disconnect logic in
createMany (upsert true) / updateOne / updateMany resolvers
- Add disconnect logic
- Gather disconnect and connect logic -> called relation nested queries
- Move logic to query builder (insert and update one) with a preparation
step in .set/.values and an execution step in .execute
- Add integration tests
Test :
- Test API call on updateMany, updateOne, createMany (upsert:true) with
connect/disconnect
Implementation is very simple
Established authentication dynamic is intercepted at
getAuthTokensFromLoginToken. If 2FA is required, a pattern similar to
EmailVerification is executed. That is, getAuthTokensFromLoginToken
mutation fails with either of the following errors:
1. TWO_FACTOR_AUTHENTICATION_VERIFICATION_REQUIRED
2. TWO_FACTOR_AUTHENTICATION_PROVISION_REQUIRED
UI knows how to respond accordingly.
2FA provisioning occurs at the 2FA resolver.
2FA verification, currently only OTP, is handled by auth.resolver's
getAuthTokensFromOTP
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charlesBochet@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Jean-Baptiste Ronssin <65334819+jbronssin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
- add fieldMetadataId to step output schema
- use it to display FormFieldInput in Filter input
- few fixes for a few fields
Next step:
- Handle composite fields
- Design review
# Introduction
Following https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/13264, this PR
introduces several `fieldMetadataEntity` typing enhancement suggestions.
Mainly any nullable field metadata entity properties are now either
nullable or defined.
Or never if field is dynamically required or not depending on the field
metadata type
This enhance DevX
## Standards
- field enum ( `MULTI_SELECT`, `SELECT`, `RATING` ) will never have
`options` set to `NULL` in db
- field `RELATION` or `MORH_RELATION` won't ever have its relation
fields set to `NULL` in db
- field of any type `settings`, even if possibly defined, can still be
`NULL` in db
- field of any type `defaultValue`, even if possibly defined, can still
be `NULL` in db
It coud be interesting to guard these standards by adding dedicated pg
constraints on each field
## TypesScript type tests
added coverage for each `settings`, `defaultValue`, and `options`
depending on the current `fieldMetadata`
Honestly I don' know if this typescript assertions test file is not
overkill, but regarding metadata staticness it might be very interesting
to have this guard
## Possible improvements
- We could type as `unknown` instead of "all" on `FieldMetadataType`
inferrance
- We still need to deprecate remaining duplicated entities such as
`Index/Field/MetadataInterface` etc not a huge refactor neither urgent
# Introduction
From the moment replaced the FieldMetadataInterface definition to:
```ts
import { FieldMetadataType } from 'twenty-shared/types';
import { FieldMetadataEntity } from 'src/engine/metadata-modules/field-metadata/field-metadata.entity';
export type FieldMetadataInterface<
T extends FieldMetadataType = FieldMetadataType,
> = FieldMetadataEntity<T>;
```
After this PR merge will create a new one removing the type and
replacing it to `FieldMetadataEntity`.
Did not renamed it here to avoid conflicts on naming + type issues fixs
within the same PR
## Field metadata entity RELATION or MORPH
Relations fields cannot be null for those field metadata entity instance
anymore, but are never for the others see
`packages/twenty-server/src/engine/metadata-modules/field-metadata/types/field-metadata-entity-test.type.ts`
( introduced TypeScript tests )
## Concerns
- TS_VECTOR is the most at risk with the `generatedType` and
`asExpression` removal from interface
## What's next
- `FielMetadataInterface` removal and rename ( see introduction )
- Depcrecating `ObjectMetadataInterface`
- Refactor `FieldMetadataEntity` optional fiels to be nullable only
- TO DIG `never` occurences on settings, defaultValue etc
- Some interfaces will be replaced by the `FlatFieldMetadata` when
deprecating the current sync and comparators tools
This PR does not produce any functional changes for our users. It
prepares the branches for workflows by:
- decommissioning `output` and `context` fields or `workflowRun` records
and use newly created `state` field from front-end and back-end
- use `stepStatus` computed by `back-end` in `front-end`
- add utils and types in `twenty-shared/workflow` (not completed, a
follow-up is scheduled
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1211)
- add concurrency to `workflowQueue` message queue to avoid weird branch
execution when using forms in workflow branches
- add a WithLock decorator for better dev experience of
`CacheLockService.withLock` usage
Here is an example of such a workflow running (front branch display is
not yet done that's why it looks ugly) ->
https://discord.com/channels/1130383047699738754/1258024460238192691/1392897615171158098
