Threads with no FROM participants have no entry in the participants map,
causing extractParticipantSummary to receive undefined and crash
Fixes TWENTY-SERVER-FB8
# Introduction
Previously the auth jwt stragegy would lod the whole user entity in the
auth user context
On an exception it would completely get logged on the pods
## Security layer
- 0/ Updating the type system ( devxp only though )
- 1/ The jwt auth stragegy only load a specific sub set of the user
entity
- 2/ Sanitizing at the exception log level directly in case of a user
context
- 3/ Sanitizing at the console driver
The last two sanitization could sound a bit redundant though they're
still good fallback to keep in case new path occurs in the cb
## Fix resolver schema leaking between `/metadata` and `/graphql`
endpoints
### Summary
- Patch `@nestjs/graphql` to support a `resolverSchemaScope` option that
filters resolvers at both schema generation and runtime, preventing
cross-endpoint leaking
- Introduce `@CoreResolver()` and `@MetadataResolver()` decorators to
explicitly scope each resolver to its endpoint
- Move most resolvers (auth, billing, workspace, user, etc.) to the
metadata schema where the frontend expects them; only workflow and
timeline calendar/messaging resolvers remain on `/graphql`
- Fix frontend `SSEQuerySubscribeEffect` to use the default (metadata)
Apollo client instead of the core client
### Problem
NestJS GraphQL's module-based resolver discovery traverses transitive
imports, causing resolvers from `/metadata` modules to leak into the
`/graphql` schema and vice versa. This made the schemas unpredictable
and tightly coupled to module import order.
### Approach
- Added `resolverSchemaScope` to `GqlModuleOptions` via a patch on
`@nestjs/graphql`, filtering in both `filterResolvers()` (runtime
binding) and `getAllCtors()` (schema generation)
- Each resolver is explicitly decorated with `@CoreResolver()` or
`@MetadataResolver()`
- Organized decorator, constant, and type files under `graphql-config/`
following project conventions
Core GQL Schema: (see: no more fields!)
<img width="827" height="894" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/668f3f0f-485e-43f0-92be-4345aeccacb6"
/>
Metadata GQL Schema (see no more getTimelineCalendarEventsFromCompany)
<img width="827" height="894" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/443913db-e5fe-4161-b0e7-4a971cc80a71"
/>
## Context
Introduces a middleware that automatically sets the workspace auth
context in AsyncLocalStorage for HTTP requests, making it available
throughout the request lifecycle without explicit parameter passing.
The motivation behind this change is to reduce boilerplate and simplify
the developer experience when working with workspace data in HTTP
request handlers.
The Problem (Before)
Every HTTP request handler that needed to access workspace data had to:
- Extract auth-related info from decorators (@AuthWorkspace(),
@AuthUserWorkspaceId(), etc.) in controller/resolver and pass down to
services
- Build or pass the authContext explicitly (sometimes with type
assertion which was flaky)
Then call executeInWorkspaceContext(authContext, async () => { ... })
## Changes
- Add WorkspaceAuthContextMiddleware that extracts auth context from the
request and stores it in AsyncLocalStorage
- Register middleware for GraphQL, metadata, and REST routes (runs after
hydration middlewares)
- Simplify executeInWorkspaceContext signature: fn is now the first
parameter, authContext is optional second
- If authContext is not provided, it's automatically retrieved from the
storage (set by middleware)
- Update all callers (~120 files) to use the new parameter order
- Fixes a bug in search where system auth context was used, bypassing
RLS feature.
The current repository implementation require the caller to pass the
permissionConfig which is not the case in messaging and calendar custom
resolver. We are bypassing the permission as fetching the role in the
caller will likely not be needed anymore in the new datasource / orm
implementation
## Context
Following https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/16399
Now using the new global orm manager everywhere and returning a
GlobalDatasource/WorkspaceDatasource based on a feature flag.
This means we now need to wrap all our ORM calls within
executeInWorkspaceContext callback (at least for now) so the global
datasource can dynamically hydrate its context via the new store (the
global datasource does not store anything related to workspaces as it is
now a unique singleton). If feature flag is off it still uses local data
stored in the workspace datasource.
## Context
Deprecating TwentyORMManager in favor of TwentyORMGlobalManager
(temporarily, as this will simplify the ultimate goal to later replace
all usages with the new TwentyORMGlobalManagerV2 which will have a
similar signature)
This means this PR had to refactor a bit of code to pass down the
workspaceId when not available directly as it is now a requirement,
meaning we also deprecated scopedWorkspaceContextFactory to have a less
obscure way to fetch the workspaceId and have something more
declarative.
Step 3 will be to update TwentyORMGlobalManager to use a featureFlag
toggling and use the new GlobalWorkspaceOrmManager internally using the
new cache service
Step 4 will be to remove the feature flag and pg_pool patch
In this PR, I'm solving several issues:
1) We were not checking if the currentWorkspaceMember was owning the
message in the thread. It kind of worked before because the case of
shared threads (with shared threads visibility restriction) was not
happening that often. It seems that the bug has always been there
2) Re-implement orphan messages and threads deletion on messageChannel
deletion. We used to brutally look for all orphans, we disabled it last
week because it was too heavy on db. I've re-implemented it more
carefully and "surgically"
3) Gmail sync was not handling folder synced correctly. It was
leveraging labelIds which it shouldn't do (this is a AND AND parameter)
in full sync
4) Added a command to clean orphan message threads manually if needed.
Usually this is done when you remove a messageChannel, or change
blocklist rules but it can be useful to have it to debug
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/10308.
The issue came from the fact that the pagination inside the
`findAndCount` wasn't working properly. The limit was applied on the
joint table. Adding a `groupBy` fixes this, but since it isn't available
on the `findAndCount` I had to modify the query using the query builder.
Fixes#9827
Also uncovered a conflict with `@objectType('Relation')` and
`@objectType('relation)`
I don't want to address it in this PR so I will create a followup issue
when we close this but I think there's a confusion between
Relation/RelationMetadata, it's unclear what is what
---------
Co-authored-by: Antoine Moreaux <moreaux.antoine@gmail.com>
In this PR:
1. Refactor guards to avoid duplicated queries: WorkspaceAuthGuard and
UserAuthGuard only check for existence of workspace and user in the
request without querying the database
- Remove raw queries and replace them by using `twentyORM`
- Refactor into services and utils
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
# Feature: Email thread members visibility
For this feature we implemented a chip and a dropdown menu that allows
users to check which workspace members can see an email thread, as
depicted on issue (#4199).
## Implementations
- create a new database table (messageThreadMember)
- relations between `messageThreadMembers` and the relevant existing
tables (`MessageThread` and `WorkspaceMembers`)
- added a new column to the `MessageThread table`: `everyone` - to
indicate that all workspace members can see the email thread
- create a new repository for the new table, including new queries
- edit the queries so that the new fields could be fetched from the
frontend
- created a component `MultiChip`, that shows a group of user avatars,
instead of just one
- created a component, `ShareDropdownMenu`, that shows up once the
`EmailThreadMembersChip` is clicked. On this menu you can see which
workspace members can view the email thread.
## Screenshots
Here are some screenshots of the frontend components that were created:
Chip with everyone in the workspace being part of the message thread:
Chip with just one member of the workspace (the owner) being part of the
message thread:
Chip with some members of the workspace being part of the message
thread:
How the chip looks in a message thread:
Dropdown that opens when you click on the chip:
## Testing and Mock data
We also added mock data (TypeORM seeds), focusing on adding mock data
related to message thread members.
## Conclusion
As some of the changes that we needed to do, regarding the change of
visibility of the message thread, were not covered by the existing
documentation, we were told to open a PR and ask for feedback on this
part of the implementation. Right now, our implementation is focused on
displaying who is part of an email thread.
Feel free to let us know which steps we should follow next :)
---------
Co-authored-by: Simão Sanguinho <simao.sanguinho@tecnico.ulisboa.pt>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
## Context
- Rename remaining V2 services.
- Delete messages in DB when gmail history tells us they've been
deleted. I removed the logic where we store those in a cache since it's
a bit overkill because we don't need to query gmail and can use those
ids directly. The strategy is to delete the message channel message
association of the current channel, not the message or the thread since
they can still be linked to other channels. However, we will need to
call the threadCleaner service on the workspace to remove orphan
threads/non-associated messages.
Note: deletion for full-sync is a bit tricky because we need the full
list of message ids to compare with the DB and make sure we don't
over-delete. Currently, to keep memory, we don't have a variable that
holds all ids as we flush it after each page. Easier solution would be
to wipe everything before each full sync but it's probably not great for
the user experience if they are currently manipulating messages since
full-sync can happen without a user intervention (if a partial sync
fails due to historyId being invalidated by google for some reason)
We have recently discovered that we were using ID type in place of UUID
type in many place in the code.
We have merged #4895 but this introduced bugs as we forgot to replace it
everywhere
