## Summary
This PR fixes the `tsconfig` setup in `twenty-front` so that `tsgo -p
tsconfig.json` properly type-checks all files.
### Root Cause
The previous setup used TypeScript project references with `files: []`
in the main `tsconfig.json`. When running `tsgo -p tsconfig.json`, this
checks nothing because `tsgo` requires the `-b` (build) flag for project
references, but the configs weren't set up for composite mode.
### Changes
**Simplified tsconfig architecture (4 files → 2):**
- `tsconfig.json` - All files (dev, tests, stories) for
typecheck/IDE/lint
- `tsconfig.build.json` - Production files only (excludes tests/stories)
**Removed redundant configs:**
- `tsconfig.dev.json`
- `tsconfig.spec.json`
- `tsconfig.storybook.json`
**Updated references:**
- `jest.config.mjs` → uses `tsconfig.json`
- `eslint.config.mjs` → uses `tsconfig.json`
- `vite.config.ts` → uses `tsconfig.json` for dev
**Type fixes (pre-existing errors revealed by proper typechecking):**
- Made `applicationId` optional in `FieldMetadataItem` and
`ObjectMetadataItem`
- Added missing `navigationMenuItem` translation
- Added `objectLabelSingular` to Search GraphQL query
- Fixed `sortMorphItems.test.ts` mock data
## Test plan
- [ ] Run `npx nx typecheck twenty-front` - should pass
- [ ] Run `npx nx lint twenty-front` - should work
- [ ] Run `npx nx test twenty-front` - should work
- [ ] Run `npx nx build twenty-front` - should work
- [ ] Verify IDE type checking works correctly
Until now, it wasn’t possible to navigate between page layouts.
Dashboards don’t contain links to other dashboards. With record page
layouts, however, a page layout can now contain a link to another page
layout. If the user opens a record in the side panel and then clicks a
link to another record, the current page layout is replaced with the
page layout for the clicked record.
In this scenario, the `PageLayoutRenderer` component is not remounted.
As a result, the `isInitialized` state was not reset to `false`, and the
corresponding initialization `useEffect` was not triggered again.
All page layout states are component states bound to
`PageLayoutComponentInstanceContext`. For example, after navigating to
another record, `pageLayoutPersistedComponentState` was actually
`undefined` because the context's `instanceId` had changed.
Replacing the `isInitialized` state with a component state fixes the bug
and is consistent with the existing pattern of using component states to
store everything related to page layouts.
## Before
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/24217145-51e5-49ef-8180-de62a6acfe10
## After
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e0ffe107-8fae-4f3a-9016-72c85bc735f4
Previously we introduced useUpdateOneRecordV2 to handle morph relations.
In this PR we are removing it to only use useUpdateOneRecord which has
been adapted not to requires objectMetadataNameSingular in its props.
Fixes
https://github.com/twentyhq/private-issues/issues/410#issuecomment-3781085655
Currently, JSON keys with spaces like { "toto toto": 123 } are rejected
with "JSON keys cannot contain spaces" error. This is problematic for
HTTP requests and webhook triggers where users cannot control the
response structure.
We use Handlebars to eval variables, segment-literal bracket notation to
escape keys with special characters:
Normal: {{step.normalKey}}
With spaces: `{{step.[key with space]}}`
So we simply need to wrap segments with spaces with brackets.
This PR:
- Create shared path utilities to wrap the variable segments when needed
- Use it in all variable generation places
- Remove the restrictions
This body is now supported:
<img width="609" height="457" alt="Capture d’écran 2026-01-22 à 16 10
13"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e7653c0a-df1e-49af-9c9a-4b7d59a99726"
/>
## Context
Removing full CRUD to RLS since we are actually using an upsert only
over the role resolver, this removes a lot of unused code (could be
re-added later but unlikely). Simplified the folder arch at the same
time
Add simple integration tests to RLS
**Summary**
Issue #16963: When an object is renamed, the morph relation picker still
shows the old name.
**Root cause**
The picker used searchRecord.objectNameSingular from the GraphQL search
response, which can be stale after a rename.
The search record stores the object name at query time, not the current
metadata.
**Solution**
- Updated SingleRecordPickerMenuItem:
- Added useObjectMetadataItems to access current object metadata.
- Look up the current object metadata by morphItem.objectMetadataId.
- Use labelSingular (or nameSingular as fallback) instead of
searchRecord.objectNameSingular for display.
- Updated MultipleRecordPickerMenuItemContent:
- Use objectMetadataItem.labelSingular (already available as a prop)
instead of searchRecord.objectNameSingular.
---------
Co-authored-by: Marie Stoppa <marie.stoppa@essec.edu>
# Introduction
In this PR we catch all the runner errors coming from a single workspace
migration action execution.
**1. `WorkspaceMigrationActionExecutionException`** (low-level,
action-specific)
- Thrown from action handlers, utils, and helper functions
- Contains specific error codes: `FIELD_METADATA_NOT_FOUND`,
`OBJECT_METADATA_NOT_FOUND`, `ENUM_OPERATION_FAILED`, `NOT_SUPPORTED`,
etc.
- Simple structure: `message`, `code`, `userFriendlyMessage`
- No action context - just describes what went wrong
**2. `WorkspaceMigrationRunnerException`** (high-level, runner-scoped)
- Only two codes: `INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR` and `EXECUTION_FAILED`
- `EXECUTION_FAILED` **requires** `action` + `errors` (contains the
action context)
- `INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR` **requires** `message` (no action context)
## Refactor
- Removed the `relatedFlatEntityMapsKeys` from the `WorkspaceMigration`
type as they're directly inferred from passed actions
- Swallowing actions rollbacks errors in order to iterate over all of
them
## Testing
Created a very straigthforward install application from workspace
migration endpoint in order to start testing the introduced
`WorkspaceMigrationActionExecutionException`
Introduced a feature flag that stop the access to the endpoint if not
enabled
Whole taken direction are totally subjective and highly prone to
mutations ( endpoint location, naming and input schema see
`ts-expect-error` comment )
cc @martmull
## Response error
```ts
{
"eventId": "evt_a1b2c3d4-5678-90ab-cdef-1234567890ab",
"extensions": {
"action": {
"metadataName": "fieldMetadata",
"type": "delete",
"universalIdentifier": "20202020-6110-4547-9fd0-2525257a2c3f"
},
"code": "APPLICATION_INSTALLATION_FAILED",
"errors": {
"metadata": {
"code": "ENTITY_NOT_FOUND",
"message": "Could not find flat entity with universal identifier 20202020-6110-4547-9fd0-2525257a2c3f"
},
"workspaceSchema": {
"code": "ENTITY_NOT_FOUND",
"message": "Could not find flat entity in maps"
}
},
"exceptionEventId": "exc_f9e8d7c6-5432-10ba-fedc-ba0987654321",
"userFriendlyMessage": "Migration execution failed."
},
"message": "Migration action 'delete' for 'fieldMetadata' failed",
"name": "GraphQLError"
}
```
## Summary
Adds `app:build` command as a one-shot version of `app:dev` - builds
manifest, functions, and front components once then exits (no watching).
**Changes:**
- Added `watch` option to `FunctionsWatcher` and
`FrontComponentsWatcher` to support both watch and one-shot modes
- Created `AppBuildCommand` reusing the same build logic as `app:dev`
with `watch: false`
- Added integration tests for `app:build` on both `rich-app` and
`root-app`
- Updated manifest types: `handlerPath` → `sourceHandlerPath` +
`builtHandlerPath`, `componentPath` → `sourceComponentPath` +
`builtComponentPath`
- Updated test app `package.json` scripts to match `create-twenty-app`
template
Implements a new syncable `navigationMenuItem` entity in the core schema
to replace the workspace `favorite` entity.
## Next Steps
- Frontend integration ([separate
PR](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/17268))
- Data migration (separate PR)
Summary
- Serverless functions are now built when created/updated instead of at
execution time
- Added builtHandlerPath field to track pre-built function artifacts
- Renamed base-typescript-project to seed-project with pre-built ESM
output included
- Renamed file folder enums for consistency (Functions → BuiltFunction,
SourceCode → Source)
- supports backwards compatibility with existing serverless functions
Tested with all combinations
- storage : local driver and S3 driver
- serverless : local driver and lambda driver
# Introduction
following https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/17279
As we've finally identified all the syncable metadata entities, which
means they're expected to have non nullable applicationId and
universalIdentifier at pg_level we can remove previous retro comp
universalIdentifier fallbacking and update the dto too
~~This needs IdentifyRemainingEntitiesMetadataCommand and
MakeRemainingEntitiesUniversalIdentifierAndApplicationIdNotNullableMigrationCommand
to be run~~
```ts
[Nest] 197 - 01/21/2026, 3:08:35 PM LOG [MakeRemainingEntitiesUniversalIdentifierAndApplicationIdNotNullableMigrationCommand] Successfully run MakeRemainingEntitiesUniversalIdentifierAndApplicationIdNotNullableMigrationCommand
```
Fixes#17253
When clicking 'No {Field}' in a polymorphic relation picker, the
relation was not being cleared. This commit implements the missing
detach logic:
- RecordDetailMorphRelationSectionDropdownManyToOne: Call onSubmit with
newValue: null when no item is selected
- MorphRelationManyToOneFieldInput: Call persistMorphManyToOne with
valueToPersist: null for detach case
- useMorphPersistManyToOne: Implement actual detach logic that sets all
morph relation ID fields to null via updateOneRecord
Also adds unit tests for the useMorphPersistManyToOne hook.
This PR handles SSE create event.
It also fixes a regression on board, which was making it flash with
skeletons on any update / create.
This PR was a good test case to experience how each main components of
the app : table, board, calendar, reacts to a create event.
It is not straightforward for now, because each component handles
records with its own state management to turn those records into a
coherent display of rows or cards.
The requests for each component are also different : fetch more, group
by, multiple requests in parallel, so the cleanest way to handle
optimistic effect requires to create one small optimistic engine per
component tuned for its internal data logic.
For now we've decided to implement what's doable in a reasonable amount
of time and that includes not handling table with groups for now.
Creating a clean optimistic logic for each component will be done later.
# QA
## Importing 100 records via the API (could be a script, a workflow, an
AI calling tools, a CSV import, etc.)
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d38a3770-8b0a-4f83-8275-5e7d1be0a5c6
## Creating from different components and seeing the SSE event being
processed by other components
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/106b2f49-19cb-4190-92b7-0653c8373366
> [!NOTE]
> This code is temporary. It will be dropped once Record Page Layouts
can be fully configured.
## Before
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3f6aed00-2fd5-47d4-bd74-002a68030627
## After
<img width="3456" height="2160" alt="CleanShot 2026-01-20 at 15 17
15@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2f9baf0a-e003-4cb6-a023-6e104b097df3"
/>
The `usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets` hook was appending relation
widgets to the end of the widget list. This resulted in incorrect
ordering where relation widgets appeared after Notes and other widgets
instead of immediately following the FIELDS widget.
## Changes
- **Widget injection logic**: Modified `injectRelationWidgetsIntoLayout`
to find the first FIELDS widget and insert relation widgets immediately
after it, rather than appending to end
- **Notes positioning**: Extract and reposition NOTES widget to appear
after all relation widgets, maintaining correct semantic order: `FIELDS
→ Relations → Notes → Other widgets`
- **Fallback behavior**: When no FIELDS widget exists, append relation
widgets to end as before
- **Test coverage**: Added 6 test cases covering injection order, Notes
positioning, and edge cases (missing widgets, empty relations,
non-record pages)
## Example
Before:
```
[FIELDS, NOTES, GRAPH] → [FIELDS, NOTES, GRAPH, Relation1, Relation2]
```
After:
```
[FIELDS, NOTES, GRAPH] → [FIELDS, Relation1, Relation2, NOTES, GRAPH]
```
> [!WARNING]
>
> <details>
> <summary>Firewall rules blocked me from connecting to one or more
addresses (expand for details)</summary>
>
> #### I tried to connect to the following addresses, but was blocked by
firewall rules:
>
> - `googlechromelabs.github.io`
> - Triggering command: `/usr/local/bin/node /usr/local/bin/node
install.mjs` (dns block)
> -
`https://storage.googleapis.com/chrome-for-testing-public/127.0.6533.88/linux64/chrome-headless-shell-linux64.zip`
> - Triggering command: `/usr/local/bin/node /usr/local/bin/node
install.mjs` (http block)
> -
`https://storage.googleapis.com/chrome-for-testing-public/127.0.6533.88/linux64/chrome-linux64.zip`
> - Triggering command: `/usr/local/bin/node /usr/local/bin/node
install.mjs` (http block)
>
> If you need me to access, download, or install something from one of
these locations, you can either:
>
> - Configure [Actions setup
steps](https://gh.io/copilot/actions-setup-steps) to set up my
environment, which run before the firewall is enabled
> - Add the appropriate URLs or hosts to the custom allowlist in this
repository's [Copilot coding agent
settings](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/settings/copilot/coding_agent)
(admins only)
>
> </details>
<!-- START COPILOT ORIGINAL PROMPT -->
<details>
<summary>Original prompt</summary>
Start implementation
<analysis>
[Chronological Review: The conversation began with the user requesting
an update to the `usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets` function to inject
relation widgets after the first FIELDS widget and to position a Note
widget after all relation widgets. The user then asked for a plan
without comments, followed by a request to start the implementation of
the plan.]
[Intent Mapping:
1. "Update #sym:usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets. We should inject the
relation widgets directly after the first FIELDS widget."
2. "We want the Note widget to be after all the relation widgets we
inject."
3. "Prepare a plan. Don't write any comment."
4. "Start implementation."]
[Technical Inventory:
- Function: `usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets`
- Context: This function is part of a page layout management system,
likely dealing with dynamic widget placement based on certain
conditions.]
[Code Archaeology:
- File:
`/Users/devessier/Web/twenty/packages/twenty-front/src/modules/page-layout/hooks/usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets.ts`
- Function Purpose: To manage the layout of widgets on a page,
specifically handling relation widgets and their placement relative to
other widgets.]
[Progress Assessment:
- Completed: User has defined the requirements for widget placement.
- Pending: Implementation of the specified changes to the
`usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets` function.]
[Context Validation: All necessary context for continuing the
implementation of the widget placement logic is captured, including the
specific order of widget injection.]
[Recent Commands Analysis:
- Last Agent Commands: The user requested to "Start implementation."
- Tool Results Summary: No specific tool results were generated as the
conversation focused on planning and implementation requests.
- Pre-Summary State: The agent was actively preparing to implement the
changes to the `usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets` function when the
token budget was exceeded.
- Operation Context: The commands executed were directly related to the
user's goal of modifying the widget layout in the application.]
</analysis>
<summary>
1. Conversation Overview:
- Primary Objectives:
- "Update #sym:usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets. We should inject the
relation widgets directly after the first FIELDS widget."
- "We want the Note widget to be after all the relation widgets we
inject."
- "Prepare a plan. Don't write any comment."
- "Start implementation."
- Session Context: The user is focused on modifying the widget layout in
a page layout management system, specifically the order of relation and
Note widgets.
- User Intent Evolution: The user transitioned from defining
requirements to requesting a plan and then moving directly to
implementation.
2. Technical Foundation:
- Function: `usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets`
- Purpose: To manage the layout of widgets on a page, particularly the
placement of relation widgets.
3. Codebase Status:
- File Name: `usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets.ts`
- Purpose: To handle the layout of widgets dynamically based on
specified rules.
- Current State: Awaiting implementation of the user-defined widget
placement logic.
- Key Code Segments: The function signature is defined, but the
implementation details are yet to be added.
4. Problem Resolution:
- Issues Encountered: No specific technical problems were reported; the
focus was on planning and implementation.
- Solutions Implemented: None yet, as the implementation phase has just
begun.
- Debugging Context: No ongoing troubleshooting efforts were mentioned.
- Lessons Learned: The importance of clear widget placement requirements
was emphasized.
5. Progress Tracking:
- Completed Tasks: User has articulated the requirements for widget
placement.
- Partially Complete Work: Implementation of the specified changes is
pending.
- Validated Outcomes: No features have been confirmed working yet as
implementation has not started.
6. Active Work State:
- Current Focus: The user is preparing to implement the changes to the
`usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets` function.
- Recent Context: The user has defined the order of widget placement and
is ready to start coding.
- Working Code: The function is currently defined but lacks the
implementation logic.
- Immediate Context: The user is focused on implementing the logic for
injecting relation widgets and positioning the Note widget.
7. Recent Operations:
- Last Agent Commands: "Start implementation."
- Tool Results Summary: No specific results were generated; the focus
was on user requests.
- Pre-Summary State: The agent was preparing to implement the changes to
the `usePageLayoutWithRelationWidgets` function.
- Operation Context: The commands executed were directly related to the
user's goal of modifying the widget layout.
8. Continuation Plan:
- Pending Task 1: Implement the logic to inject relation widgets after
the first FIELDS widget.
- Pending Task 2: Ensure the Note widget is positioned after all
relation widgets...
</details>
<!-- START COPILOT CODING AGENT SUFFIX -->
Created from [VS
Code](https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/copilot/copilot-coding-agent).
<!-- START COPILOT CODING AGENT TIPS -->
---
💬 We'd love your input! Share your thoughts on Copilot coding agent in
our [2 minute survey](https://gh.io/copilot-coding-agent-survey).
---------
Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Devessier <29370468+Devessier@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Devessier <baptiste@devessier.fr>
## Overview
This PR implements **generic many-to-many relation support** through
junction tables (also known as associative entities or join tables).
This replaces the need for hardcoded taskTarget/noteTarget logic and
provides a flexible foundation for modeling complex entity
relationships.
## Architecture
### Data Model
Many-to-many relationships are implemented using a **junction object
pattern**:
```
┌─────────┐ ┌──────────────────┐ ┌─────────┐
│ Pet │──────>│ PetRocket │<──────│ Rocket │
│ │ 1:N │ (junction) │ N:1 │ │
│ rockets ├───────┤ pet : Pet ├───────┤ │
└─────────┘ │ rocket : Rocket │ └─────────┘
└──────────────────┘
```
The junction object (PetRocket) has:
- A `MANY_TO_ONE` relation to **Pet** (the source)
- A `MANY_TO_ONE` relation to **Rocket** (the target)
The source object (Pet) has a `ONE_TO_MANY` relation pointing to the
junction, with **field settings** that specify which target field to
follow.
### Field Settings Schema
Junction configuration is stored in `FieldMetadataRelationSettings`:
```typescript
{
relationType: "ONE_TO_MANY",
// Points to the target field on the junction object
junctionTargetFieldId?: string; // For regular relations
junctionTargetMorphId?: string; // For polymorphic relations
}
```
**Two configuration modes:**
1. **`junctionTargetFieldId`** - References a specific `RELATION` field
on the junction
2. **`junctionTargetMorphId`** - References a `morphId` group for
polymorphic targets (e.g., link to Person OR Company)
### GraphQL Query Generation
When a junction relation is detected, the GraphQL fields are generated
to fetch the nested target:
```graphql
query GetPetWithRockets {
pet(id: "...") {
rockets { # ONE_TO_MANY to junction
id
rocket { # Target field on junction
id
name
__typename
}
}
}
}
```
For polymorphic junction targets:
```graphql
caretakerPerson { id, name }
caretakerCompany { id, name }
```
## Frontend Architecture
### Display Flow
1. **Detection**: `hasJunctionConfig()` checks if field has junction
settings
2. **Config Resolution**: `getJunctionConfig()` resolves junction object
metadata and target fields
3. **Record Extraction**: `extractTargetRecordsFromJunction()` extracts
target records from junction records
4. **Rendering**: Target records displayed as chips (not junction
records)
### Edit Flow
1. **Picker Opening**: Initializes the multi-record picker with:
- Searchable object types (derived from junction target fields)
- Pre-selected items (extracted from existing junction records)
2. **Selection Handling**: Manages create/delete of junction records:
- **Select**: Creates new junction record with source + target IDs
- **Deselect**: Finds and deletes the junction record
- **Optimistic Updates**: Manually updates Recoil store before API call
### Key Trade-offs
| Decision | Trade-off |
|----------|-----------|
| Junction records managed manually | More control over optimistic
updates, but requires manual cache management |
| Settings stored per-field | Flexible (same junction can power
different views), but requires UI to configure |
| Polymorphic via morphId groups | Supports N target types, but adds
query complexity |
| Feature flag gated | Safe rollout, but requires flag management |
## Backend Changes
- **Validation**: Junction target field must exist and be a valid
`MANY_TO_ONE` relation
- **Settings**: Extended `FieldMetadataRelationSettings` type with
junction fields
- **Dev Seeder**: Added sample junction objects (PetRocket,
EmploymentHistory, PetCareAgreement) for testing
## How to Test
1. Enable the `IS_JUNCTION_RELATIONS_ENABLED` feature flag
2. Create objects with junction pattern (Pet → PetRocket → Rocket)
3. Configure the junction target in field settings (advanced mode)
4. Verify:
- Display shows target objects (Rockets), not junction records
(PetRockets)
- Picker allows selecting/deselecting targets
- Changes persist correctly
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d04f057a-228c-4de8-af48-76bb2d72cac1
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
In this PR :
- New field type FieldMetadataType.FILES added (as jsonb in DB)
- Backend: GraphQL types, validation, REST API schema, data processor
handling
- Frontend: field configuration in settings
- Feature flag IS_FILES_FIELD_ENABLED to gate the feature
- Integration tests for create/filter validation
- Dev seed: Feature flag enabled + FILES field on survey result object
To do in next PRs :
- Backend :
-- new workspaceFile controller (for download) & new workspaceFile
upload resolver (for upload)
-- pre-hook/post-hook to ensure fileId existence + listener to ensure
cleaning
- Frontend : FILES field display/edit in table view, record, ...
Workflows can now be cancelled when not started or enqueued.
Also displaying the stop option when selecting all.
We got the case of a client that did an infinite loop. So he had a lot
of workflows to stop. Supporting select all would have avoid him to wait
for 4 hours so we process the runs throttled. This is not something that
is supposed to happen often so I did not see the point of refactoring
the endpoint. But I wanted the users to have this option just in case
## Context
- Add RLS entitlement to billing
- Check value in the backend (for RLS predicate entity
queries/mutations)
- Expose billingEntitlements to the API inside currentWorkspace to check
available features to the workspace and display the role components
accordingly
- Cleanup RLS when plan changes back to one without RLS.
This should cover almost everything, imho we don't need to check in the
ORM because => We can't create RLS without the correct PLAN and
switching back to a PLAN without RLS deletes existing RLS through
stripes webhooks
