Fixes multiple issues with CRON schedule input validation and execution
time display.
### Issues Fixed
1. **UTC label placement** - Added "UTC" suffix to specific times (e.g.,
"at 09:30 UTC") but not to interval descriptions (e.g., "every hour")
2. **Upcoming execution time calculation** - Fixed incorrect execution
times for malformed CRON expressions by implementing auto-correction
### Changes
- Created `normalizeCronExpression` utility to standardize cron
expressions before parsing
- Updated `formatTime` to support optional UTC suffix
- Enhanced `getHoursDescription` to append UTC to specific times
- Added comprehensive test coverage (102 tests passing)
### Before
- `"1 /3 * * *"` showed daily executions at same time (incorrect)
- `"9 * * *"` showed same time repeated 3 times (incorrect)
- No UTC labels on schedule descriptions (confusing)
### After
- All malformed expressions auto-corrected and show correct execution
times
- UTC labels clearly indicate timezone for specific times
- User-friendly error messages for truly invalid patterns
Closes#15870
- on draft creation, do not fetch the full version. Avoid the fetch of
steps and trigger
- on activation, we were performing 8 queries/mutations synchronously +
2 additional for automated triggers. I refacto the call it it gets
reduced to 4 queries/mutations + 2 additional for automated triggers
- Added 'Cron will be triggered at UTC time' notice below trigger
interval dropdown
- Positioned correctly between dropdown and expression field to match
design
- Only shows when Custom CRON option is selected
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Today WorkflowVariablesDropdownAllItems is used for variable picker in
all workflow steps, and for step field picker in filters.
Using that component in filters prevent us from knowing if a full record
or only the id has been selected.
This PR:
- creates a new component WorkflowDropdownStepOutputItems, mostly
copying the logic of WorkflowVariablesDropdownAllItems
- call it WorkflowStepFilterFieldSelect, removing the display logic from
that parent component
- store isFullRecord in filter. So we now know if we should display a
record picker or a uuid picker
Before - selecting id makes picker behaves like when we select an object
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/bde34dc5-8011-4983-8d0f-d8cb0cb3c045
After - selecting object and id are two different things
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/49289990-3e6d-4ad7-abc1-e3ade2a821bb
- add fieldMetadataId to step output schema
- use it to display FormFieldInput in Filter input
- few fixes for a few fields
Next step:
- Handle composite fields
- Design review
Currently, when a server query or mutation from the front-end fails, the
error message defined server-side is displayed in a snackbar in the
front-end.
These error messages usually contain technical details that don't belong
to the user interface, such as "ObjectMetadataCollection not found" or
"invalid ENUM value for ...".
**BE**
In addition to the original error message that is still needed (for the
request response, debugging, sentry monitoring etc.), we add a
`displayedErrorMessage` that will be used in the snackbars. It's only
relevant to add it for the messages that will reach the FE (ie. not in
jobs or in rest api for instance) and if it can help the user sort out /
fix things (ie. we do add displayedErrorMessage for "Cannot create
multiple draft versions for the same workflow" or "Cannot delete
[field], please update the label identifier field first", but not
"Object metadata does not exist"), even if in practice in the FE users
should not be able to perform an action that will not work (ie should
not be able to save creation of multiple draft versions of the same
workflows).
**FE**
To ease the usage we replaced enqueueSnackBar with enqueueErrorSnackBar
and enqueueSuccessSnackBar with an api that only requires to pass on the
error.
If no displayedErrorMessage is specified then the default error message
is `An error occured.`
# Introduction
Added a no-explicit-any rule to the twenty-server, not applicable to
tests and integration tests folder
Related to https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/975
Discussed with Charles
## In case of conflicts
Until this is approved I won't rebased and handle conflict, just need to
drop two latest commits and re run the scripts etc
## Legacy
We decided not to handle the existing lint error occurrences and
programmatically ignored them through a disable next line rule comment
## Open question
We might wanna activate the
[no-explicit-any](https://typescript-eslint.io/rules/no-explicit-any/)
`ignoreRestArgs` for our use case ?
```
ignoreRestArgs?: boolean;
```
---------
Co-authored-by: etiennejouan <jouan.etienne@gmail.com>
- create a form filler component
- send the response on submit
- put back a field name. We need it for the step output
- validate a form is well set before activation
TODO:
- we need to refresh to see the form submitted. We need to discuss about
a strategy
- the response is not saved in the step settings. We need a new endpoint
to update workflow run step
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0f34a6cd-ed8c-4d9a-a1d4-51455cc83443
In this PR:
- Add support for manual triggers in the backend
- Add a right drawer to let users select the type of trigger they want
- Create a specific right drawer for database event triggers
- Create a right drawer for manual triggers; let the user select where
the manual trigger should be made available
- Create a default trigger as soon as the user selects the type of
trigger they want. It prevents the user to see empty selects for record
type and event type. By default, the database event trigger will be set
to "company.created". It should be visible enough for users to
understand what happens and choose another record type or event type.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/29a21985-1823-4890-9eb3-e4f876459c7a
- Create a workflow version when the user visits an empty workflow.
- If the trigger is not defined yet and the user selects either the
standard object type or the event type first, we automatically select
the first option of the other value. Indeed, every state update is
automatically saved on the backend and we need both standard object and
event types to save the event name.
- Introduces a change in the backend. I removed the assertions that
throw when a workflow version is not complete, that is, when it doesn't
have a defined trigger, which is the case when scaffolding a new
workflow with a first empty workflow version.
- We should keep validating the workflow versions, at least when we
publish them. That should be done in a second step.
Following figma updates
https://www.figma.com/design/PNBfTgOVraw557OXChYagk/Explo?node-id=21872-7929&t=DOUzd6rzwr6lprcs-0
- No activity targets for workflow entities for now
- Adding a direct relation between workflow run et workflow
- Adding a status on the version (draft, active, deactivated)
- Adding a list of statuses on workflow
- publishedVersionId => lastPublishedVersionId
Also adding:
- the endpoint to deactivate a version
We want to avoid the nested structure of active pieces. Steps to execute
will now be separated from the trigger. It will be an array executed
sequentially.
For now a step can only be an action. But at some point it will also be
a branch or a loop
