Today WorkflowVariablesDropdownAllItems is used for variable picker in
all workflow steps, and for step field picker in filters.
Using that component in filters prevent us from knowing if a full record
or only the id has been selected.
This PR:
- creates a new component WorkflowDropdownStepOutputItems, mostly
copying the logic of WorkflowVariablesDropdownAllItems
- call it WorkflowStepFilterFieldSelect, removing the display logic from
that parent component
- store isFullRecord in filter. So we now know if we should display a
record picker or a uuid picker
Before - selecting id makes picker behaves like when we select an object
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/bde34dc5-8011-4983-8d0f-d8cb0cb3c045
After - selecting object and id are two different things
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/49289990-3e6d-4ad7-abc1-e3ade2a821bb
The code to search variables became too complex. This is mainly because
it tries to handle all use cases at once:
- steps returning records (MANUAL TRIGGER, CREATE RECORD...)
- steps returning record events
- primitive types (code, webhook...)
- forms
To make the code maintainable, let's make a few updates:
- clear schema output types for each steps
- group the output types that are similar and implement a search schema
function for each
- once this is implemented on frontend, let's remove the logic on
backend side. Schema should be recompute and not stored
This PR implement the refacto for steps returning records and events.
Parallel code path to read and write core views when
IS_CORE_VIEW_ENABLED.
Migrated view key to an enum.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
On field selection, we need to retrieve the fieldMetadata to set the
filter type. Current code was using the current step filter
fieldMetdataId instead of the new one.
Also adding a special behaviour for Select filter: it behaves as
arrays/multiselect but the opearands are not the same.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Quick fix : make workflow version available in runs.
This would global refactor. We should not have both version and run flow
here.
I will probably stop using the same component in both at some point and
rather duplicate. Versions and Workflow will use version. Runs will use
flow.
Fixes#13333
This PR adds the ability to pin a manual trigger in the navbar. As
suggested, the following changes have been made:
**Changes Made**
- **Schema updates**
- Updated the `workflowSchema.ts` and added `isPinned` to the
`workflowManualTriggerSchema` as an optional boolean.
- **Defaults**
- Updated the `getManualTriggerDefaultSettings.ts` to add `isPinned` to
the `WorkflowManualTriggerSettings`, defaulting to false.
- **UI updates**
- Updated the `ManualTriggerAvailabilityOptions.ts` to improve the
Availability labels as suggested in the figma files.
- Created a new file `ManualTriggerIsPinnedOptions.ts` that contains the
options (label, value and icon) for the `isPinned` select component.
- Updated the `WorkflowEditTriggerManualForm.tsx` to incorporate the
added `isPinned` select component.
- **Action handling**
- Modified `useRunWorkflowRecordActions.tsx` to add `isPinned:
activeWorkflowVersion.trigger?.settings?.isPinned` to the returned
action config.
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Raphaël Bosi <71827178+bosiraphael@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: bosiraphael <raphael.bosi@gmail.com>
Workflow, workflow version and workflow runs should not be passed
through props or context. These are set in recoil component states and
that's where all hooks should look for these.
This PR stop propagating workflow with version through all components.
This PR prepares the refactor of record field definition and column
definition.
We need to separate the two concepts of FieldInput and FieldContext at
the cell level, and the new RecordField concept that will replace
FieldDefinition at the metadata and state level.
So we create a new ui sub-folder in the already existing record-field
folder, in order to separate those two concepts that are still very
close.
When the target is not in the direct next step ids of the source (step
or trigger), check if there is a filter between both. If yes, delete the
filter and remove it from source next step ids.
Also refactored the existing.
In this PR
- Introduction of readableFields and updatableFields in
objectMetadataItem selector to ease filtering from a developer
experience perspective ( + to help developers think to do it). In
discussion @lucasbordeau @charlesBochet
- Remove non-updatable field from CSV import process (@etiennejouan)
- QA fix / Non-readable fields should not show on show page
- QA fix / It should not be offered to create a kanban view on a
non-readable field
- QA fix / It should not be offered to create view groups on a
non-readable field
- QA fix / Rating field should have a readonly mode
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
## Before
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5f89e2c5-af59-46eb-a0af-6eb0ab103291
## After
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/11accdc5-a49c-4479-8686-b01f44519d81
## The issue
`getStepDefinitionOrThrow` throws if the provided `steps` aren't
defined. With my recent refactor, the side panel is opened immediately,
as we no longer open it in the `useOnSelectionChange` hook. We use a
`useEffect` to set the `flowState` whenever the workflow version
definition changes. As the side panel is now opened faster,
`getStepDefinitionOrThrow` throws before the `flowState` could have been
set.
In this PR, I only fixed the bug I encountered. We might want to replace
the synchronization `useEffect` with explicit `setFlow` calls whenever
we change the workflow version.
