Following https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/14869
Dynamically clearing the cache, as one entry was forgotten
It seems like a permission test deletes a role that's expected to be
existing in following tests, as now cache is getting invalidated tests
are failing
Seems to be related to
https://discord.com/channels/1130383047699738754/1423768505911869460
## Singleton local cache key collision
When set for the first time caches local keys looks like
`workspaceId:undefined", singleton is shared between several cache
instances
If the given key is undefined it will read on other entity cache entry.
## Context
Add routes to migration V2
- Resolvers
- Service v2
- Builder
- Validator
- Action runner
Next PR: Add to twenty-cli to sync routes with serverless
# Introduction
Extracting the legacy fields build and dispatch out of the object one to
follow the generic flat entity build, also update caches entries for
object
## Main tasks
- flat field map cache
- flat field builder
- refactored the dispatch matrix to return flat entity maps instead of
flat entity arrays
- orchestrator aggregator
- removing legacy code
- making universal identifier aka standardId of standard field for
custom object deterministically dynamic
- perfs debug logs for v2
## TODO
- [x] Refactor the generic entity builder to be dependency flat maps in
order to main foreign keys list in flat parent
- [x] Refactor the flat object metadata to contain the array of related
fields and avoid costy find object fields
- [ ] Improve the create field handler to handle multiple field at once
- [ ] Refactor the dispatch to embbed the comparison
- [ ] Improve perf by extracting from elements out of existing
- [ ] Fix the labelIdentifierId validators on object before field
creation ( integ tests are in failing mode )
## Debug logs snippet
```ts
[EntityBuilder fieldMetadata] matrix computation: 0.027ms
[EntityBuilder fieldMetadata] creation validation: 0.001ms
[EntityBuilder fieldMetadata] deletion validation: 0.293ms
[EntityBuilder fieldMetadata] update validation: 0.006ms
[EntityBuilder fieldMetadata] entity processing: 0.363ms
[EntityBuilder fieldMetadata] validateAndBuild: 0.455ms
[EntityBuilder index] matrix computation: 0.005ms
[EntityBuilder index] creation validation: 0.001ms
[EntityBuilder index] deletion validation: 0.146ms
[EntityBuilder index] update validation: 0.004ms
[EntityBuilder index] entity processing: 0.199ms
[EntityBuilder index] validateAndBuild: 0.228ms
[Runner] Initial cache retrieval: 0.549ms
[BaseWorkspaceMigrationRunnerActionHandlerService] delete_index executeForWorkspaceSchema: 11.665ms
[BaseWorkspaceMigrationRunnerActionHandlerService] delete_index executeForMetadata: 12.864ms
[BaseWorkspaceMigrationRunnerActionHandlerService] delete_field executeForWorkspaceSchema: 1.476ms
[BaseWorkspaceMigrationRunnerActionHandlerService] delete_field executeForMetadata: 6.816ms
[BaseWorkspaceMigrationRunnerActionHandlerService] delete_field executeForWorkspaceSchema: 0.062ms
[BaseWorkspaceMigrationRunnerActionHandlerService] delete_field executeForMetadata: 0.889ms
[Runner] Transaction execution: 23.434ms
[Runner] Cache invalidation: 316.662ms
[Runner] Total execution: 340.767ms
```
As you can see cache invalidation is way to long, we could replace the
cache by the optimistic in the end
Following https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/14762
In this PR
- moved logic around any field filter formatting to twenty-shared
- added any field filter to the filters applied to groupBy when viewId
is defined
- added integration test
In the BE we have stored filter operand as IS_EMPTY, IS_NOT_EMPTY, etc.
For some reason in the FE we were manipulating IsEmpty, IsNotEmpty, etc.
(maybe because they were used before in Views before they were moved to
core)
So we were converting the operands in the FE from IS to Is
(convertViewFilterOperandFromCore) to read and manipulate viewFilters,
and then back to BE version to send mutations etc., from Is to IS
(convertViewFilterOperandToCore).
The migration is now over, so we can remove and simplify that code.
(In the 1-5:migrate-views-to-core command we still do the migration from
Is format to IS format.)
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1560
If viewId is defined in a groupBy query, we want to apply all filters of
the view to the query.
This required to move a lot of code from twenty-front to twenty-shared
to convert the filters as stored in the db into graphql filters,
applying the right combinations between filters etc., which was
previously only done in the FE.
This PR does not handle any field filters, it will be done in a later pr
## Introduction
After enabling flag by default got following errors:
```ts
Test Suites: 48 failed, 1 skipped, 97 passed, 145 of 146 total
Tests: 499 failed, 1 skipped, 644 passed, 1144 total
Snapshots: 61 failed, 133 passed, 194 total
Time: 363.226 s
Ran all test suites.
```
## From
<img width="2952" height="1510" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7e3b20c6-2552-40a7-90bb-2d7b3002c895"
/>
## To
<img width="3134" height="1510" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4fc9ada4-3c14-4333-a1db-11daf87db8d6"
/>
There's a huge test bundle in the latest shard that we could split up
## Notes
- Set as failing morph relation field rename as for the moment we do not
handle relation field mutation
- fixed the object update and creation validation adding label
identifier field metadata id checks
- and more
Some integrations tests are still on the v1 ( they have before and after
all disabling and re-enabling the flat ) but mainly we now have more
coverage on the v2 than the v1.
Mainly related records, uniqueness have to be migrated the v2 and so
tests too
## Changes Made
- Added phone fields to search indexing: Extended searchable field types
to include `FieldMetadataType.PHONES`
- Updated person entity search configuration: Added `phones` to the
fields indexed for person records
- Enhanced search format support: Phone numbers are now indexed in
multiple formats:
- Raw number: `2071234567`
- International with plus: `+442071234567`
- International without plus: `442071234567`
- Optimized for phone data: Removed unnecessary text processing (e.g.
unaccenting) for numeric phone fields
- Created workspace migration: New command to regenerate search vectors
for existing workspaces
## Technical Details
The implementation modifies PostgreSQL `tsvector` generation to index
both `primaryPhoneNumber` and `primaryPhoneCallingCode` fields,
combining them into international formats. This enables users to search
phone numbers using the formats they naturally type.
### Modified Files
- `is-searchable-field.util.ts` – Added `PHONES` to searchable types
- `person.workspace-entity.ts` – Included `phones` in person search
fields
- `get-ts-vector-column-expression.util.ts` – Enhanced expression
generation to support multiple phone number formats
- `is-searchable-subfield.util.ts` – Added subfield filtering logic for
phone fields
## Testing
- **Unit tests**: Validated `tsvector` expression generation and
phone-specific logic
- **Integration tests**: Covered phone search scenarios across multiple
formats
## Migration
Includes the `upgrade:1-7:regenerate-person-search-vector-with-phones`
command, which safely updates existing workspaces by dropping and
recreating search vectors with phone indexing support.
## Note
Frontend and Backend are both storing normalized phone numbers, as they
should. The issue turned out to be with the seed file instead, which
contained outdated records.
I relied on the database as the source of truth without testing via the
creation of a new record and it was an incorrect evaluation on my part.
Note taken, I will be more comprehensive with my analysis from here on
since I now understand I must check comprehensively before reaching a
conclusion.
Add a new graphql mutation in the pageLayout resolver to handle page
layout update with tabs and widgets.
Later we will add validation inside the service to check if the page
layout tab structure is correct (for instance check widgets don't
overlap or aren't out of the grid, or to check that they have a correct
configuration ...).
This mutation will be plugged to the save action of the dashboards in
the frontend.
## Summary
Enhanced the search resolver integration tests to comprehensively
validate bidirectional accent-insensitive search functionality. Users
can now search with or without accents and find all relevant records
regardless of how the data was originally stored.
## Changes Made
### Test Data Enhancements
- Added 2 new person IDs: `TEST_PERSON_6_ID`, `TEST_PERSON_7_ID`
- Expanded corpus from 5 to 13 records:
- 7 persons
- 2 companies
- 4 pets
- Refactored test data into single arrays with content-driven variable
naming for better maintainability
### Test Coverage Improvements
- Added 6 comprehensive bidirectional tests covering French, Spanish,
and German characters
- Validated multiple fields:
- `firstName`, `lastName`, `jobTitle`, `email`, `company name`, `pet
name`
- Cross-object search testing across Person, Company, and Pet
- Updated all ranking values to account for the enlarged test corpus (5
→ 13 records)
## Test Cases Added/Updated
- [x] should find both **"José"** and **"Jose"** when searching for
`"jose"` (bidirectional accent-insensitive)
- [x] should find both **"García"** and **"Garcia"** when searching for
`"garcia"` (bidirectional accent-insensitive)
- [x] should find both accented and non-accented **"Café"** / **"Cafe"**
records when searching for `"cafe"` (bidirectional accent-insensitive)
- [x] should find both accented and non-accented **"Naïve"** /
**"Naive"** records when searching for `"naive"` (bidirectional
accent-insensitive)
- [x] should find both **"Müller"** and **"Muller"** when searching for
`"muller"` (bidirectional accent-insensitive)
- [x] should find both **"François"** and **"Francois"** when searching
for `"francois"` (bidirectional accent-insensitive)
## Introduction
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/14363
In this PR we're creating builder and runner for index metadata
Removing its previous integration within object builder
## Next:
- implem index impact on field and object metadata api
- Add integration testing coverage add integration test on index
- Implement uniqueness toggle in field metadata api
- add integration test on uniqueness
related to https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1344
# Introduction
Initially this PR was about introducing integration coverage for view
field v2 tests
But feature itself wasn't finished, so ended up in a TDD style
devlopment
## The new orchestrator
Orchestrator will organize each flat entity diffing inferring either
validation errors or actions sequentially.
A new builder has been introduced when extended requires to define flat
entity validation utils and action generation for `delete` `update`
`create` operations. It's highly typed using generics
## View field integration testing
Introduce coverage on failing basic tests cases for view field
operations, successfull create is also covered. We could still add more
coverage, will be done later in following PRs
## Remaining tasks for upcoming PRs:
- [ ] rename builder methods names to add generate action in their names
- [x] refactor view validation to handle field and view uniqueness index
combination
- [ ] implem strict update validator on view and view field
- [ ] dynamic cache invalidation post run
- [ ] Add coverage to successful and failing view field operations
- [ ] error formatting summary computation
- [ ] extract types out of the workspace entity builder
## Some vision
Currently flat field metadata maps is nested in the flat object metadata
maps, making its build nested too. ( not extending the new generic
builder )
We will refactor this part for both to be stored extra flat such as the
other existing flat entities.
It will require a small refactor to the generic builder that will not
only have impact on the currently built flat entity optimistic cache but
to an other one ( for example when building a create object action it
will also have an impact flat field maps )
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/14445
## What
In the current `MenuItemWithOptionDropdown` component (which is a
MenuItem with the 3 dots dropdown), we used to have a position: static
on the 3 dots hovered.
This enabled the dropdown to not move when we scroll the MenuItems.
However, this is not playing well with the dropdown autoplacement.
I'm removing it as I think the right solution would actually to prevent
the scroll when the dropdown is open but this is non straight forward
and not really a big issue. I'm fine with the dropdown being "fixed" to
the scrollable content, it also makes sense
Before:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8efec8fa-430a-408e-b549-fd7433b7a38d
After:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b8ee4375-0944-4008-9ab6-f7f9f1d67e9c
## Testing
I was considering adding a story here but this is hard to test: hover +
scroll behavior are not well supported, I don't think it worth the
investment especially as I think the vision is to block the scroll
This componenent is used in ViewPicker and MultiItemsInput (ex.
PhonesFieldInput). I have check that both were still working well
## Introduction
### Twenty-sever
Standardizing resolver input and transpilation models + return type on
destroy and delete
~~Finally~~ Did plug everything under a feature flag and add coverage
Next will do same for the view resolver and service v2
### Twenty-front
Refactored view field service in order to use codegenerated strictly
typed mutations and adapt to new api contract
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1417
- The pre-hook creates a page-layout and links it to the dashboard
- Added `position`, `createdBy`, `attachments`, `searchVector`,
`favorites` to the dashboard entity
- Updated the view seed
- Updated the page layout services to work within a transaction
The goal of this PR is to test if Twenty can support a large number of
members, a question which was raised by a large company that is
considering moving away from Salesforce.
I was expecting the currentWorkspaceMembersState to cause a lot more
issue. It would be very hard to get rid of it in the context of actors,
I think that would require a big refactoring. I thought we'd have to do
it but it turns out the perf are pretty good. One thing we need to
improve is the pagination on the roles page, we'll wait for @Bonapara to
update that
resolves#14190
added refreshCoreViews() call after object creation to immediately
update core views state, ensuring new objects appear in the navigation
drawer without requiring a refresh
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: prastoin <paul@twenty.com>
# Introduction
Migrating and improving performances of field enum integrations tests
success and failing tests cases to be using the new v2 api
## Discovered issue
When deleting an object in v1 it will leave related enums until the
object is re-created
Something not done anymore within the create in v2 but in the delete
operation
We should implem an upgrade command to remove such relicas
## Bugs
- Update/create default value multi select runner wrong sql query -> FIX
- Update default value multi select regression, we should allow option
without an id to be inserted -> FIX
- default value compare dynamic json stringify convertion or not in
compare tools for object and fields
## Context
View tables were missing some FK, we are also introducing delete cascade
on those tables when needed to leverage pg cascade deletion instead of
having to implement it.
Also renaming those classes with Entity suffix to follow repo
guidelines.
Parallel code path to read and write core views when
IS_CORE_VIEW_ENABLED.
Migrated view key to an enum.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
# Introduction
- Implementing the delete one for the new object metadata service v2.
- Handling relation fields and fields in the first place to finally
remove the object
- puting back updatedAt and createdAt in flat metadatas
- duplicate criteria addition for flat object
- removing datasource id from object metadata dto
Created:
- Services
- Resolvers
- Controllers
- Tests for services
- Integration tests for GraphQL and Rest
Updated the Rest API playground
Added new feature flag `IS_CORE_VIEW_ENABLED`
Updated `viewFilter` `operand` and `view` `type` to be enums rather than
strings and generated migration file.
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1259
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1262
In this PR we add the update permission check layer by
- for the graphql api: extracting columns to update from the
expressionMap
- for rest api: .save() is used so we need to add the permission layer
to .save directly. We also take advantage of this PR to filter out
non-readable fields from save response (other save returns the whole
entity) - this was planned in
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1216
The current solution does not work with rest api depth 2 queries, but
this seem to already not work on main (for timeout reasons though, so
different). I offer to create a ticket to fix it altogether later.
- Replaced `getAuthTokensFromLoginToken` with
`getAccessTokensFromLoginToken` for clarity.
- Introduced `getWorkspaceAgnosticTokenFromEmailVerificationToken`.
- Extended mutation inputs to include `locale` and
`verifyEmailNextPath`.
- Added email verification check and sending to various handlers.
- Updated GraphQL types and hooks to reflect these changes.
Fix#13412
---------
Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
