Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/14445
## What
In the current `MenuItemWithOptionDropdown` component (which is a
MenuItem with the 3 dots dropdown), we used to have a position: static
on the 3 dots hovered.
This enabled the dropdown to not move when we scroll the MenuItems.
However, this is not playing well with the dropdown autoplacement.
I'm removing it as I think the right solution would actually to prevent
the scroll when the dropdown is open but this is non straight forward
and not really a big issue. I'm fine with the dropdown being "fixed" to
the scrollable content, it also makes sense
Before:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8efec8fa-430a-408e-b549-fd7433b7a38d
After:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b8ee4375-0944-4008-9ab6-f7f9f1d67e9c
## Testing
I was considering adding a story here but this is hard to test: hover +
scroll behavior are not well supported, I don't think it worth the
investment especially as I think the vision is to block the scroll
This componenent is used in ViewPicker and MultiItemsInput (ex.
PhonesFieldInput). I have check that both were still working well
Following https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/14306 , working on the
deprecation of objectRecordsPermissions + renaming of objectPermissions
-> objectsPermissions
In this PR
- Removal of objectRecordsPermissions (was not used in the FE any
longer)
- Addition of objectsPermissions, same as objectPermission but renamed.
objectPermission is no longer used in the FE.
Next step
- Remove unused objectPermissions
This PR refactors table resize with the new layout using flex-wrap to
manage all the table with divs.
Due to flex-wrap, we have to manually compute some filling divs like the
last column filler div or the empty table container, otherwise the
header can wrap and display on two lines, which is the only real issue
with this implementation with wrap.
Remember that **using flex-wrap is necessary** to handle z-index as we
want for the scrolling and hovered portal cell interaction UX. Otherwise
we lose the capacity to have z-index fine-tuning on very specific edge
cases.
To handle the resize, the most performant solution was to create CSS
variables for each column width on the table, creating a class for each
column, then assigning each class to all divs that are in the same
column, using the index of the array or the fixed known position index
for that.
This PR also refactors a lot of small details around the resizing, the
naming of the component and the DX.
It notably introduces a new hook : `useHTMLElementByIdWhenAvailable`,
that is very relies on MutationObserver API to get a native HTML element
as soon as it is rendered.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
## Introduction
### Twenty-sever
Standardizing resolver input and transpilation models + return type on
destroy and delete
~~Finally~~ Did plug everything under a feature flag and add coverage
Next will do same for the view resolver and service v2
### Twenty-front
Refactored view field service in order to use codegenerated strictly
typed mutations and adapt to new api contract
This PR fixes the main resize bugs in
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1453
Changes :
- A new `RecordTableResizeEffect` has been created to modify the last
column width to compensate for the resize width dynamically, because of
flew-wrap on the table elements, we cannot use width: 100% everywhere
and we have to set the width of everything.
- CSS transitions have been removed because they were degrading both the
performance and the UX when resizing
- Created a common `RecordTableHeaderCellContainer`, this was needed to
factorize the various table header components
- Created a `RecordTableHeaderLabelIdentifierCellPlusButton` component
to ease the reading of `RecordTableHeaderLabelIdentifierCell`
- Put the CSS of the blue line while resizing in the
`RecordTableHeaderResizeHandler` component to avoid duplicating it
everywhere.
- Extracted `COLUMN_MIN_WIDTH` in a constant file
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1453
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/13854
In this PR
- When evaluating whether there was a soft delete filter enabled, we
were only taking into account the filter that shows all deleted records,
that can be enabled from the side panel ("See deleted records"). Now we
are also taking into account any filter on deletedAt.
- We lacked some places where we should not offer to add a new record if
a soft delete filter is on, ex on the empty page + in the kanban headers
- I decided not to add a constraint on api-side because I think there
could be use cases when importing data where we would want to be able to
create soft deleted records
# Context
We have recently migrated from workspace.views to core.views. While
doing it, we've lost the optimistic rendering on views in frontend. This
is an issue for viewField and viewGroups that are persisted without
having an intermediate storing layer (viewFilters, viewSorts,
viewFilterGroups are not directly persisted when we do the changes,
therefore we have an underlying layer to keep them and the optimistic
was implemented there already).
ViewFields have been treated in a previous PR, this PR focus on
ViewGroups
## What
Optimistic on ViewGroups
## Other
+ fix a bug in the sequencing to persist viewFilter + viewFilterGroups
This PR closes the first step of
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1451, about z-index
fine-tuning on the table.
The core part was to succeed in having the hovered portal and the
surrounding cells switch their z-index to have the borders overlap
nicely in all scrolling cases.
See associated video for the new behavior.
This PR fixes two majors UX issues we had :
- The sticky column and row were sliding a bit on the beginning of the
scroll
- Too many components were re-rendering while we only needed to isolate
those who presented a complex use case
In the end, we isolated some very specific components like the cell 0-0
and the first scrollable header cell, which were giving the most
problems with the hovered portal.
This allows to leave the rest of the cells and header cells alone with
those concerns because they weren't involved at all in z-index update,
once we isolated those components.
## Demo
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/cbe630ed-63c3-4e86-a22e-a11662c6082chttps://github.com/user-attachments/assets/36e6947d-9f89-4ed2-ba6c-cbb13016d7d1
We decided to send 4xx errors to sentry from the FE, except for
ForbiddenErrors.
In some cases, we also need not to send to sentry some 4xx errors, like
user input error, because the error stemming from the user input is
unpredictable (ex: duplicate entry for a record with unicity
constraints) and thus acceptable.
Let's add a isExpected extension on UserInputErrors to introduce a
specific behaviour for them (do not send to sentry).
## Context
View system used to rely on workspaceSchema views and was loaded in what
we called the "prefetch". We have recently migrated views to
core.coreViews and the states should now be named after coreViews
Fixes: https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/14349
Previous refacto was creating output schema V2 which has more specific
schemas based on the step type. Before we were using one common schema,
which was too complex when searching for variable informations.
This PR migrate the deprecated schemas and remove the old code:
- mark previous `BaseOutputSchema` as deprecated
- remove other previous schemas
- use V2 everywhere
- icon should not be stored in schema. Instead it should be generated
based on the fieldmetadata or the item type
## Problem
**CRITICAL:** Two PRs were accidentally reverted when PR #14347 "Prevent
csv export injections" was merged:
1. **PR #14348** "[Page Layout] - Review Refactor" - ✅ **RESTORED**
2. **PR #14352** "Fix wrong path used by backend" - ✅ **RESTORED**
## Root Cause Analysis
During the merge of PR #14347, there was a complex merge conflict with
PR #14352 "Fix wrong path used by backend". The merge commit
`324d7204bb` in the PR #14347 branch brought in changes from PR #14352,
but during the conflict resolution, **BOTH PR #14348 and PR #14352's
changes were accidentally overwritten**.
## What This PR Restores
This PR restores **BOTH** PRs by cherry-picking their commits:
### ✅ PR #14348 Changes Restored:
- `GraphWidgetRenderer.tsx` - was deleted, now restored
- `WidgetRenderer.tsx` - was missing, now restored
- `SettingsPageLayoutTabsInstanceId.ts` - was deleted, now restored
- `useUpdatePageLayoutWidget.ts` - was renamed back, now restored with
correct name
- Multiple test files that were deleted
- Several hook files that were renamed/reverted
- File renames: `usePageLayoutWidgetUpdate.ts` →
`useUpdatePageLayoutWidget.ts`
- Hook refactoring and test file organization
- Page layout component improvements
### ✅ PR #14352 Changes Restored:
- **Types moved to twenty-shared:**
- `packages/twenty-shared/src/types/AppBasePath.ts` ✅ RESTORED
- `packages/twenty-shared/src/types/AppPath.ts` ✅ RESTORED
- `packages/twenty-shared/src/types/SettingsPath.ts` ✅ RESTORED
- **Navigation utilities moved to twenty-shared:**
- `packages/twenty-shared/src/utils/navigation/getAppPath.ts` ✅ RESTORED
- `packages/twenty-shared/src/utils/navigation/getSettingsPath.ts` ✅
RESTORED
- **200+ import statements updated** across the codebase to use
twenty-shared
- **Old type files deleted** from twenty-front/src/modules/types/
## Evidence of Complete Restoration
**Before (reverted state):**
- ❌ Types were in `packages/twenty-front/src/modules/types/`
- ❌ Page layout files missing
- ❌ Hook files incorrectly named
**After (this PR):**
- ✅ Types correctly in `packages/twenty-shared/src/types/`
- ✅ All page layout files restored
- ✅ Hook files correctly named
- ✅ All import statements updated
## Verification
**Total changes:**
- PR #14348: 36 files changed, 863 insertions(+), 442 deletions(-)
- PR #14352: 243 files changed, 492 insertions(+), 461 deletions(-)
- **Combined: 279 files changed, 1355 insertions(+), 903 deletions(-)**
## Impact
This completely restores both PRs that were accidentally lost, ensuring:
1. Page layout refactoring work is back
2. Type organization and path utilities are correctly in twenty-shared
3. Backend email paths work correctly again
4. No functionality is lost
Fixes the reversion caused by the merge conflict in PR #14347.
---------
Co-authored-by: nitin <142569587+ehconitin@users.noreply.github.com>
**Small Security Issue:** CSV exports were vulnerable to formula
injection attacks when users entered values starting with =, +, -, or @.
(only happens if a logged-in user injects corrupted data)
Solution:
- Added ZWJ (Zero-Width Joiner) protection that prefixes dangerous
values with invisible Unicode character
- This is the best way to preserve original data while preventing Excel
from executing formulas
- Added import cleanup to restore original values when re-importing
Changes:
- New sanitizeValueForCSVExport() function for security
- Updated all CSV export paths to use both security + formatting
functions
- Added comprehensive tests covering attack vectors and international
characters
- Also added cursor rules for better code consistency
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charlesBochet@users.noreply.github.com>
After moving a section on the frontend, this broke the path that was
sent by email on the backend.
This kind of error comes back every ~2-3 month under different forms so
we need a more robust solution: I moved routes to the shared folder,
that way we will share one common source of truth between the frontend
and the backend.
Fixes#14343
This PR refactors what is remaining of HTML table API to divs.
It is mainly about the body and aggregate footer.
Because a `position: sticky` creates a stacking context, and because a
div wrapping other divs prevents those children divs from being sticky,
it has been found that removing the wrapping container of both header
and footer allows us to have all z-index in the same stacking context
and create the right experience.
Though the fine-tuning of z-index will be done in another PR.
There are many fixes left that will be addressed very soon in subsequent
PRs.
This PR focuses on bringing a functional table both with and without
RecordGroups. (Check Task views for that)
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1432
We still have some follow-up issues here, I only took care of making the
essential of the table work, but the follow-up issues will be better
tackled after everything has been switched to div, otherwise we might
fix them multiple times.
A first round of refactoring of z-index has been made in a common
constant, where it is easier to understand, for which case, what should
be the order of the different layers.
Though we still need to have another round of refactor because of the
stacking contexts, mainly because of the header row that is creating a
stacking context that makes it hard to have all scrolling cases work.
The goal of this PR is to test if Twenty can support a large number of
members, a question which was raised by a large company that is
considering moving away from Salesforce.
I was expecting the currentWorkspaceMembersState to cause a lot more
issue. It would be very hard to get rid of it in the context of actors,
I think that would require a big refactoring. I thought we'd have to do
it but it turns out the perf are pretty good. One thing we need to
improve is the pagination on the roles page, we'll wait for @Bonapara to
update that
