This PR follows the multiSelect PR merged previously. It will enable
morph relation Many to One to be handled from the table, using a
singleSelect picker
Main point : I decided to change the singleSelect API to take an array
of **objectMetadataName** instead of only one to deal with both our
usecases.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
## 📝 Summary
Added **infinite scroll support** in the **IconPicker** dropdown by
extending `DropdownMenuItemsContainer` with an optional `onScroll`
handler.
Fixes#14419
---
## 🔄 Changes
- Updated `DropdownMenuItemsContainer` to accept an optional `onScroll`
prop.
- Implemented lazy-loading of icons in `IconPicker` (loads 50 more icons
when the user scrolls).
- **Note**: Infinite scroll is **disabled** if a `maxIconsVisible` prop
is passed — in that case the list is static.
- No new UI elements were added
---
## ✅ How it Works
- Scroll event is captured via `onScroll`.
- When the user scrolls near the bottom:
```ts
target.scrollTop + target.clientHeight >= target.scrollHeight - 10
---
## Demo ->
[Screencast from 2025-09-30
20-47-03.webm](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d8906ebd-3cf1-4a89-a10d-a049b098c94f)
Attached screen recording of infinite scroll in action.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
fix:Ability to add a new option for a multi-select on the fly
Issues:#13877
---------
Co-authored-by: ehconitin <nitinkoche03@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
## Performance short term fix
Done in this PR:
workflowVersions and workflowRuns are heavy object. I'm preventing
loading their data when they are loaded as relations. This will reduce
the work on backend
## Long term fix
Todo:
We should make sure workflow data is ligher
Related issue: https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1585
## Summary
Added a new "Add a node" button to the command menu that enables users
to insert workflow nodes through the command interface. This enhancement
improves the workflow creation experience by providing an additional,
accessible way to add nodes to workflows.
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
**Issue**: https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1587
### Changes Made
- Modified scroll event handling to detect and limit two-finger scroll
gestures to the workflow canvas component
- Improved user experience by preventing accidental navigation or
zooming outside the intended canvas area
---------
Co-authored-by: Twill <agent@twill.ai>
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
## What
In this PR, we are fixing two issues:
- while deleting an object, the views are not properly refreshed leading
to FE bug. This is due to the fact that we were refetching **views
associated to the object** which has been deleted. As views are properly
deleted in the BE, the FE gets no views from this call and cannot
optimistically react. In this case, I'm triggering a complete view
refetch
- messaging error handling had a hole
## Improvements
- Add logs to all gql operations and rest calls to help debug CPU issues
on the backend. These are temporary and should be removed
- Remove nested relations from workflowVersions load (used to add manual
triggers in the side bar). On some workspaces this call result in a
response of 4MB which is heavy on CPU
- Investigated Redis Usage ==> made a few improvements, we are should
still migrate to the new cache service once available
- investigated db calls in messaging / calendar fetch list + workflow
enqueue run cron jobs. Everything seems to be properly batched
Closes [#1583](https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1583)
- Removed `messageId` column from `File` table and its references in
code (unrelated to this PR)
- Updated AI chat to use React Context API with persistent provider in
`CommandMenuContainer`
- Converted all AI chat component states to regular Recoil atoms (no
instance context needed)
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
This PR is the first part of the creation of the Chart editor.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8b0af8ea-be41-4506-84cb-e40f5521cbf0
Done:
- Bar chart settings (except filters)
- Line chart settings (except filters)
In progress:
- Pie chart settings
- Number chart settings
- Gauge chart settings
Left to do:
- Loosen the backend validation to allow the user to save a partial
configuration, validate the graph configuration in the frontend and
display a error friendly message in the graph if the config is not
completed yet
- Implement the filter edition
- Finish the other graph types settings
## Context
Add routes to migration V2
- Resolvers
- Service v2
- Builder
- Validator
- Action runner
Next PR: Add to twenty-cli to sync routes with serverless
## Context
We are experiencing bad performance on Twenty. One of the root cause
hypothesis is that computing `currentUser.currentWorkspace.views` is CPU
consuming. Without views, the GetCurrentUser response is ~1000 lines.
With its ~10000 lines.
As graphql is going through all fields recursively this can be quite
heavy on CPU. We had a similar issues on ObjectMetadataItems 2 years ago
and came with storing the response in redis.
Note: I thought there was also a cache in RAM but this is not the case,
so to invalidate the cache we can just empty redis.
## How
- Extract getting all views from GetCurrentUser and update frontend to
perform both queries
- Add views to cached graphql operations
- invalidate the cache manually on view or related core entities update
/ create / delete / destroy
## Tests
I have tested a lot on v1
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/14766
To reproduce
1. create a view with a any field filter and save it. After, remove any
field filter clicking on the X on the chip. No "Update view" shows.
2. now add another regular filter to the view and save it. Now remove
any field filter clicking on the X on the chip and remove the regular
filter you just added. Now "Update view" shows, click it and refresh the
page. Any field filter still shows
There were two problems
1. UpdateViewButtonGroup is in charge of showing "Update View" button.
But is never mounted if shouldExpandViewBar is falsy.
shouldExpandViewBar was not considering
viewAnyFieldFilterDifferentFromCurrentAnyFieldFilter so even if any
field filter had changed, UpdateViewButtonGroup still wasn't going to
show "Update view" button because it wasn't mounted
2. At save time, we added anyFieldFilterValue to the mutation payload if
```
...(view.anyFieldFilterValue && {
anyFieldFilterValue: view.anyFieldFilterValue,
}),
```,
but in JS an empty string evaluates to falsy.
In this PR https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/14785 we deprecated
viewFilterOperand (from camelCase to capital snakeCase values), but we
had not migrated the existing workflow steps values. Hence they cannot
be executed!
Let's fix that by dealing with both operands, new and deprecated, to
mitigate the issue. Then we will add a command to migrate the values.
- add serverlessFunction schema in twenty-cli
- add trigger schema in twenty-cli
- update serverless function code save and get
- sync serverless function
# Calendar View: Add "+" Button to Calendar Day Cards
## Description
This PR implements the "+" button on calendar day cards in the Month
view, allowing users to create new records directly from the calendar.
- The "+" button appears **on hover** only.
- Newly created records include the **day representing the card** in the
payload (UTC, with only the date part).
- Respects **object permissions** and **soft delete filters**.
- Automatically integrates with **active filters** used in Table and
Kanban views.
## Implementation Notes
- `RecordCalendarAddNew` component handles button visibility and record
creation.
- UTC date is passed to the create function to ensure proper timezone
handling.
- No unit tests added yet (need senior guidance).
---
[Screencast from 2025-09-24
20-10-18.webm](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/bd117b43-6c1b-4267-874f-b36844733d9e)
### Video ->
## Related Issues
Fixes: https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1552
---------
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
Following https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/14762
In this PR
- moved logic around any field filter formatting to twenty-shared
- added any field filter to the filters applied to groupBy when viewId
is defined
- added integration test
In the BE we have stored filter operand as IS_EMPTY, IS_NOT_EMPTY, etc.
For some reason in the FE we were manipulating IsEmpty, IsNotEmpty, etc.
(maybe because they were used before in Views before they were moved to
core)
So we were converting the operands in the FE from IS to Is
(convertViewFilterOperandFromCore) to read and manipulate viewFilters,
and then back to BE version to send mutations etc., from Is to IS
(convertViewFilterOperandToCore).
The migration is now over, so we can remove and simplify that code.
(In the 1-5:migrate-views-to-core command we still do the migration from
Is format to IS format.)
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/14569
Some extensions, such as SimilarWeb, are incompatible with twenty: they
trigger intempestive "AbortErrors" converted into error snackbar. While
twenty remains usable it is very annoying.
I did not take time to deeply investigate which requests are
problematic. According to ClaudeAI it may be because twenty makes a lot
of queries to the same endpoint /graphql, a pattern that SimilarWeb may
interpret as tracking which they try to intercept.
In this PR, we finish the work started in [this
PR](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/13080) to silent harmless
AbortErrors.
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1560
If viewId is defined in a groupBy query, we want to apply all filters of
the view to the query.
This required to move a lot of code from twenty-front to twenty-shared
to convert the filters as stored in the db into graphql filters,
applying the right combinations between filters etc., which was
previously only done in the FE.
This PR does not handle any field filters, it will be done in a later pr
