## What
In this PR, we are fixing two issues:
- while deleting an object, the views are not properly refreshed leading
to FE bug. This is due to the fact that we were refetching **views
associated to the object** which has been deleted. As views are properly
deleted in the BE, the FE gets no views from this call and cannot
optimistically react. In this case, I'm triggering a complete view
refetch
- messaging error handling had a hole
## Context
We are experiencing bad performance on Twenty. One of the root cause
hypothesis is that computing `currentUser.currentWorkspace.views` is CPU
consuming. Without views, the GetCurrentUser response is ~1000 lines.
With its ~10000 lines.
As graphql is going through all fields recursively this can be quite
heavy on CPU. We had a similar issues on ObjectMetadataItems 2 years ago
and came with storing the response in redis.
Note: I thought there was also a cache in RAM but this is not the case,
so to invalidate the cache we can just empty redis.
## How
- Extract getting all views from GetCurrentUser and update frontend to
perform both queries
- Add views to cached graphql operations
- invalidate the cache manually on view or related core entities update
/ create / delete / destroy
## Tests
I have tested a lot on v1
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/14766
To reproduce
1. create a view with a any field filter and save it. After, remove any
field filter clicking on the X on the chip. No "Update view" shows.
2. now add another regular filter to the view and save it. Now remove
any field filter clicking on the X on the chip and remove the regular
filter you just added. Now "Update view" shows, click it and refresh the
page. Any field filter still shows
There were two problems
1. UpdateViewButtonGroup is in charge of showing "Update View" button.
But is never mounted if shouldExpandViewBar is falsy.
shouldExpandViewBar was not considering
viewAnyFieldFilterDifferentFromCurrentAnyFieldFilter so even if any
field filter had changed, UpdateViewButtonGroup still wasn't going to
show "Update view" button because it wasn't mounted
2. At save time, we added anyFieldFilterValue to the mutation payload if
```
...(view.anyFieldFilterValue && {
anyFieldFilterValue: view.anyFieldFilterValue,
}),
```,
but in JS an empty string evaluates to falsy.
Following https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/14762
In this PR
- moved logic around any field filter formatting to twenty-shared
- added any field filter to the filters applied to groupBy when viewId
is defined
- added integration test
In the BE we have stored filter operand as IS_EMPTY, IS_NOT_EMPTY, etc.
For some reason in the FE we were manipulating IsEmpty, IsNotEmpty, etc.
(maybe because they were used before in Views before they were moved to
core)
So we were converting the operands in the FE from IS to Is
(convertViewFilterOperandFromCore) to read and manipulate viewFilters,
and then back to BE version to send mutations etc., from Is to IS
(convertViewFilterOperandToCore).
The migration is now over, so we can remove and simplify that code.
(In the 1-5:migrate-views-to-core command we still do the migration from
Is format to IS format.)
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1560
If viewId is defined in a groupBy query, we want to apply all filters of
the view to the query.
This required to move a lot of code from twenty-front to twenty-shared
to convert the filters as stored in the db into graphql filters,
applying the right combinations between filters etc., which was
previously only done in the FE.
This PR does not handle any field filters, it will be done in a later pr
This PR essentially refactors some hard-coded values for width and
height in the table.
It also fixes a few differences from the Figma design, on the checkbox
column width and the top bar and view bar left alignment with the table.
The blue color has been set like before the refactor of the focus portal
(`theme.adaptiveColors.blue4`)
Fixes in https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1490 :
- Fix first drag and drop column width that has changed from main (see
Figma)
- Unify all widths, heights, z-index, etc. with constants
- Put same blue as before for focused portal
Also removed `focus-active` class because we now use a portal for the
focus.
This PR brings more UX fixes for table.
Fixes in https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1490 :
- Fix any field filter chip formatting
- Empty placeholder should be centered on screenwidth and not scrollable
width on table
- First cell is automatically active on table but we can't move => We
now allow focus position to be null as it is a portal
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/14573
### Summary
This PR removes an unused `view` import from **framer-motion** in
`useUpdateView.ts`.
---
### Context
- The unused import was introduced in the recent commit to `main`.
- It causes ESLint to fail, which blocks all new PRs from passing CI.
### Changes
- Removed unused `view` import from `framer-motion`.
### Impact
- Lint and CI should now pass again.
- No runtime behavior is affected.
## Introduction
### Twenty-sever
Standardizing resolver input and transpilation models + return type on
destroy and delete
~~Finally~~ Did plug everything under a feature flag and add coverage
Next will do same for the view resolver and service v2
### Twenty-front
Refactored view field service in order to use codegenerated strictly
typed mutations and adapt to new api contract
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/13854
In this PR
- When evaluating whether there was a soft delete filter enabled, we
were only taking into account the filter that shows all deleted records,
that can be enabled from the side panel ("See deleted records"). Now we
are also taking into account any filter on deletedAt.
- We lacked some places where we should not offer to add a new record if
a soft delete filter is on, ex on the empty page + in the kanban headers
- I decided not to add a constraint on api-side because I think there
could be use cases when importing data where we would want to be able to
create soft deleted records
# Context
We have recently migrated from workspace.views to core.views. While
doing it, we've lost the optimistic rendering on views in frontend. This
is an issue for viewField and viewGroups that are persisted without
having an intermediate storing layer (viewFilters, viewSorts,
viewFilterGroups are not directly persisted when we do the changes,
therefore we have an underlying layer to keep them and the optimistic
was implemented there already).
ViewFields have been treated in a previous PR, this PR focus on
ViewGroups
## What
Optimistic on ViewGroups
## Other
+ fix a bug in the sequencing to persist viewFilter + viewFilterGroups
## Context
View system used to rely on workspaceSchema views and was loaded in what
we called the "prefetch". We have recently migrated views to
core.coreViews and the states should now be named after coreViews
Fixes: https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/14349
## Problem
**CRITICAL:** Two PRs were accidentally reverted when PR #14347 "Prevent
csv export injections" was merged:
1. **PR #14348** "[Page Layout] - Review Refactor" - ✅ **RESTORED**
2. **PR #14352** "Fix wrong path used by backend" - ✅ **RESTORED**
## Root Cause Analysis
During the merge of PR #14347, there was a complex merge conflict with
PR #14352 "Fix wrong path used by backend". The merge commit
`324d7204bb` in the PR #14347 branch brought in changes from PR #14352,
but during the conflict resolution, **BOTH PR #14348 and PR #14352's
changes were accidentally overwritten**.
## What This PR Restores
This PR restores **BOTH** PRs by cherry-picking their commits:
### ✅ PR #14348 Changes Restored:
- `GraphWidgetRenderer.tsx` - was deleted, now restored
- `WidgetRenderer.tsx` - was missing, now restored
- `SettingsPageLayoutTabsInstanceId.ts` - was deleted, now restored
- `useUpdatePageLayoutWidget.ts` - was renamed back, now restored with
correct name
- Multiple test files that were deleted
- Several hook files that were renamed/reverted
- File renames: `usePageLayoutWidgetUpdate.ts` →
`useUpdatePageLayoutWidget.ts`
- Hook refactoring and test file organization
- Page layout component improvements
### ✅ PR #14352 Changes Restored:
- **Types moved to twenty-shared:**
- `packages/twenty-shared/src/types/AppBasePath.ts` ✅ RESTORED
- `packages/twenty-shared/src/types/AppPath.ts` ✅ RESTORED
- `packages/twenty-shared/src/types/SettingsPath.ts` ✅ RESTORED
- **Navigation utilities moved to twenty-shared:**
- `packages/twenty-shared/src/utils/navigation/getAppPath.ts` ✅ RESTORED
- `packages/twenty-shared/src/utils/navigation/getSettingsPath.ts` ✅
RESTORED
- **200+ import statements updated** across the codebase to use
twenty-shared
- **Old type files deleted** from twenty-front/src/modules/types/
## Evidence of Complete Restoration
**Before (reverted state):**
- ❌ Types were in `packages/twenty-front/src/modules/types/`
- ❌ Page layout files missing
- ❌ Hook files incorrectly named
**After (this PR):**
- ✅ Types correctly in `packages/twenty-shared/src/types/`
- ✅ All page layout files restored
- ✅ Hook files correctly named
- ✅ All import statements updated
## Verification
**Total changes:**
- PR #14348: 36 files changed, 863 insertions(+), 442 deletions(-)
- PR #14352: 243 files changed, 492 insertions(+), 461 deletions(-)
- **Combined: 279 files changed, 1355 insertions(+), 903 deletions(-)**
## Impact
This completely restores both PRs that were accidentally lost, ensuring:
1. Page layout refactoring work is back
2. Type organization and path utilities are correctly in twenty-shared
3. Backend email paths work correctly again
4. No functionality is lost
Fixes the reversion caused by the merge conflict in PR #14347.
---------
Co-authored-by: nitin <142569587+ehconitin@users.noreply.github.com>
**Small Security Issue:** CSV exports were vulnerable to formula
injection attacks when users entered values starting with =, +, -, or @.
(only happens if a logged-in user injects corrupted data)
Solution:
- Added ZWJ (Zero-Width Joiner) protection that prefixes dangerous
values with invisible Unicode character
- This is the best way to preserve original data while preventing Excel
from executing formulas
- Added import cleanup to restore original values when re-importing
Changes:
- New sanitizeValueForCSVExport() function for security
- Updated all CSV export paths to use both security + formatting
functions
- Added comprehensive tests covering attack vectors and international
characters
- Also added cursor rules for better code consistency
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charlesBochet@users.noreply.github.com>
After moving a section on the frontend, this broke the path that was
sent by email on the backend.
This kind of error comes back every ~2-3 month under different forms so
we need a more robust solution: I moved routes to the shared folder,
that way we will share one common source of truth between the frontend
and the backend.
Fixes#14343
The goal of this PR is to test if Twenty can support a large number of
members, a question which was raised by a large company that is
considering moving away from Salesforce.
I was expecting the currentWorkspaceMembersState to cause a lot more
issue. It would be very hard to get rid of it in the context of actors,
I think that would require a big refactoring. I thought we'd have to do
it but it turns out the perf are pretty good. One thing we need to
improve is the pagination on the roles page, we'll wait for @Bonapara to
update that
resolves#14190
added refreshCoreViews() call after object creation to immediately
update core views state, ensuring new objects appear in the navigation
drawer without requiring a refresh
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: prastoin <paul@twenty.com>
This PR removes some unused props from FieldDefinition type and put some
recoil calls higher up in the hierarchy.
This PR fixes a regression on Chip introduced by
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11498, where we don't want
"Untitled" to be displayed in compact mode.
# FieldDefinition refactor
Removed `isLabelIdentifierCompact` and `labelIdentifierLink` which can
be derived directly in the chip component or computed in the record
table context.
Removed `disableTooltip` and `infoTooltipContent` because they were not
used.
Introduced `fieldMetadataItemId`, as optional for now, to have the
ability to progressively refactor the different things that could be
derived from this and `recordId`.
# Performance improvements
There's not a great deal to be gained for now on those modifications,
which specifically concern the identifier column.
Let's move forward and get rid of the past... !
Removing prefetchViewState and the prefetch view query.
Next steps:
- renaming Selectors to remove prefetch keywork
- remove old view type and coreViewToView util
- rework optimistic rendering for coreViews
This PR removes board field definitions usage in favor of record fields,
like we've already done on table with table columns.
This PR also introduces a first step in the refactoring of the
RecordIndexContext as a new way to store in-memory a normalized cache
for some states used pretty much everywhere like field metadata items or
field definition (for now but it will soon be removed).
Since most of those states do not change if we don't modify the
metadata, then we can safely store them in a context, which has the
fastest access time in React.
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Bugs found with feature flag IS_CORE_VIEW_ENABLED:
- Switching a view type does switches but does not update the option
dropdown selected menu item, we have to refresh ==> **fixed**
- Reordering a field in the option dropdown causes a bug because it
tries to update with a decimal position like 1.5 but the position field
on core views is integer ==> **fixed**
Hidding a field triggers the update, but making it visible again right
after that does not trigger the DB update, we have to refresh the app
==> **not fixed, medium bug**
Reordering core view groups in option dropdown fails ==> **fixed**
Showing / hidding core view groups fails ==> **fixed**
Creating a table group view works but if we select kanban right after it
fails ==> **fixed**
Move right / move left on kanban core view group doesn’t do anything ==>
**fixed**
Deleting a view from the view dropdown fails ==> **fixed**
Creating a view from another view does not copy the view groups ==>
**not fixed, medium bug**
Move left / right has a strange behavior, not working consistently, it
sends always the same position ==> **not fixed, medium bug**
View re-order optimistic update is broken, but the DB update works ==>
**now it's dancing not fixed, medium bug**
Next steps:
- we should re-work the optimistic behaviors of view updates but let's
clean the code first
Parallel code path to read and write core views when
IS_CORE_VIEW_ENABLED.
Migrated view key to an enum.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
On field selection, we need to retrieve the fieldMetadata to set the
filter type. Current code was using the current step filter
fieldMetdataId instead of the new one.
Also adding a special behaviour for Select filter: it behaves as
arrays/multiselect but the opearands are not the same.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
This PR introduces the usage of record fields in the manipulation of
table columns and board fields.
Since all of the actual system relies on states like tableColumns,
recordIndexFieldDefinitions and the likes, it was required to implement
temporary utils that modifies those states in parallel of the new
generic currentRecordFields, to keep a working product.
With this PR though, currentRecordFields becomes the single source of
truth that gets saved to DB, and the remaining work is just to make the
switch with this new state on all components that are plugged to
tableColumns and the like.
This will be done in another PR.
This PR prepares and simplify option dropdown for using record fields.
I had a problem while trying to use currentRecordFields directly with
ordering so I stayed with the actual column definition system.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
