- Renamed `WorkflowActionAdapter` to `ToolExecutorWorkflowAction`
- Renamed `settingPermission` table to `permissionFlag` and `setting`
column to `flag`
- Decoupled the send email logic from workflows to tools
- Add new `Tools Permission` section in FE
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
We were using a global ValidationPipe in main.ts. This is an issue as
@Controllers should return HttpExecption and @Resolvers should return
GraphqlErrors
Removing the global pipe and creating a ResolverValidationPipe able to
generate GraphqlError. We also need to handle the exception in a filter
to avoid nest to think it's unhandled and make it flow to logs
Next step:
- it would be nice to have both @UsePipes(ResolverValidationPipe) +
@UseFilters(GraphqlValidationExceptionFilter) come together. This should
be possible if we create a @GraphQLResolver annotation
In this PR we are
- (if permissionsV2 is enabled) executing permission checks at query
builder level. To do so we want to override the query builders methods
that are performing db calls (.execute(), .getMany(), ... etc.) For now
I have just overriden some of the query builders methods for the poc. To
do so I created custom query builder classes that extend typeorm's query
builder (selectQueryBuilder and updateQueryBuilder, for now and later I
will tackle softDeleteQueryBuilder, etc.).
- adding a notion of roles permissions version and roles permissions
object to datasources. We will now use one datasource per roleId and
rolePermissionVersion. Both rolesPermissionsVersion and rolesPermissions
objects are stored in redis and recomputed at role update or if queried
and found empty. Unlike for metadata version we don't need to store a
version in the db that stands for the source of truth. We also don't
need to destroy and recreate the datasource if the rolesPermissions
version changes, but only to update the value for rolesPermissions and
rolesPermissionsVersions on the existing datasource.
What this PR misses
- computing of roles permissions should take into account
objectPermissions table (for now it only looks at what's on the roles
table)
- pursue extension of query builder classes and overriding of their db
calling-methods
- what should the behaviour be for calls from twentyOrmGlobalManager
that don't have a roleId?
## Context
- Removing search* integration tests instead of fixing them because they
will be replaced by global search very soon
- Fixed billing + add missing seeds to make them work
- Fixed integration tests not using consistently the correct "test" db
- Fixed ci not running the with-db-reset configuration due to nx
configuration being used twice for different level of the command
- Enriched .env.test
- Fixed parts where exceptions were not thrown properly and not caught
by exception handler to convert to 400 when needed
- Refactored feature flag service that had 2 different implementations
in lab and admin panel + added tests
- Fixed race condition when migrations are created at the same timestamp
and doing the same type of operation, in this case object deletion could
break because table could be deleted earlier than its relations
- Fixed many integration tests that were not up to date since the CI has
been broken for a while
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charlesBochet@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue:
When attempting to toggle a public feature flag that didn't exist in the
workspace's feature flags array, the LabService threw a
FeatureFlagException with code FEATURE_FLAG_NOT_FOUND. This prevented
users from enabling public feature flags for the first time in their
workspace.
Fix:
Modified the LabService to handle non-existent public feature flags by
creating them instead of throwing an error. When the flag doesn't exist,
the service now saves a new feature flag record with the provided key
and value, associates it with the workspace, and returns the newly
created flag.
Fixes#9827
Also uncovered a conflict with `@objectType('Relation')` and
`@objectType('relation)`
I don't want to address it in this PR so I will create a followup issue
when we close this but I think there's a confusion between
Relation/RelationMetadata, it's unclear what is what
---------
Co-authored-by: Antoine Moreaux <moreaux.antoine@gmail.com>
