## Summary
- Adds SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery) protection to webhook requests
by using the same secure axios adapter already used by HTTP workflow
actions
- Prevents webhooks from making requests to private/internal IP
addresses (10.x, 192.168.x, 172.16-31.x, 169.254.x, localhost)
- Adds specific error logging when a webhook fails due to SSRF
protection
## Context
The HTTP workflow tool (`HTTP_REQUEST` action) already had SSRF
protection via `HTTP_TOOL_SAFE_MODE_ENABLED`, but webhooks were using
`HttpService` directly without this protection. This inconsistency meant
users could potentially configure webhooks to probe internal
infrastructure.
### What's protected now:
| Feature | Before | After |
|---------|--------|-------|
| HTTP Workflow Action | Protected (secure adapter) | Protected (secure
adapter) |
| Webhooks | **Unprotected** | Protected (secure adapter) |
### The secure adapter validates:
1. Protocol must be `http:` or `https:`
2. DNS resolution of hostname
3. Resolved IP must not be in private ranges
## Test plan
- [ ] Configure a webhook with an external URL (e.g.,
`https://webhook.site`) - should work
- [ ] Configure a webhook with `http://localhost:3000` - should fail
with SSRF error in audit log
- [ ] Configure a webhook with `http://10.0.0.1/test` - should fail with
SSRF error in audit log
- [ ] Configure a webhook with a domain that resolves to a private IP -
should fail
## Description
This PR adds integration tests for the Quick Lead workflow, including a
complete end-to-end test with full workflow execution.
### Key Changes
1. **Enabled SyncDriver for integration tests** - Jobs are now processed
synchronously in tests
- Modified `create-app.ts` to use `SyncDriver` instead of `BullMQ`
- Added `MessageQueueExplorer` to discover and register workflow job
handlers
- This enables complete workflow execution in integration tests
2. **Added integration tests for Quick Lead workflow**:
- Verify workflow exists and is active
- Verify workflow version has correct structure (MANUAL trigger, FORM
step, CREATE_RECORD steps)
- Test workflow triggering creates workflow run with correct initial
state
- Test stop workflow run on a running workflow
- **Full end-to-end test**: trigger → submit form → verify Company and
Person records created
### Test Coverage
The complete end-to-end test verifies:
- Workflow triggers and is in RUNNING status (waiting on FORM step)
- Form submission with test data succeeds
- Workflow completes successfully with all steps in SUCCESS status
- Company record is created with correct name and domain
- Person record is created with correct name and email
- Records are properly cleaned up after test
### How to Run Tests
```bash
npx nx run twenty-server:test:integration -- --testPathPattern="quick-lead-workflow"
```
Or with database reset:
```bash
npx nx run twenty-server:test:integration:with-db-reset -- --testPathPattern="quick-lead-workflow"
```
**Before**
- any user with workpace_members permission was able to remove a user
from their workspace. This triggered the deletion of workspaceMember +
of userWorkspace, but did not delete the user (even if they had no
workspace left) nor the roleTarget (acts as junction between role and
userWorkspace) which was left with a userWorkspaceId pointing to
nothing. This is because roleTarget points to userWorkspaceId but the
foreign key constraint was not implemented
- any user could delete their own account. This triggered the deletion
of all their workspaceMembers, but not of their userWorkspace nor their
user nor the roleTarget --> we have orphaned userWorkspace, not
technically but product wise - a userWorkspace without a workspaceMember
does not make sense
So the problems are
- we have some roleTargets pointing to non-existing userWorkspaceId
(which caused https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/14608 )
- we have userWorkspaces that should not exist and that have no
workspaceMember counterpart
- it is not possible for a user to leave a workspace by themselves, they
can only leave all workspaces at once, except if they are being removed
from the workspace by another user
**Now**
- if a user has multiple workspaces, they are given the possibility to
leave one workspace while remaining in the others (we show two buttons:
Leave workspace and Delete account buttons). if a user has just one
workspace, they only see Delete account
- when a user leaves a workspace, we delete their workspaceMember,
userWorkspace and roleTarget. If they don't belong to any other
workspace we also soft-delete their user
- soft-deleted users get hard deleted after 30 days thanks to a cron
- we have two commands to clean the orphans roleTarget and userWorkspace
(TODO: query db to see how many must be run)
**Next**
- once the commands have been run, we can implement and introduce the
foreign key constraint on roleTarget
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/14608
Solves [ https://github.com/twentyhq/private-issues/issues/214 ]
**TLDR**
Add unit and integration tests to Billing. First approach to run jest
integration tests directly from VSCode.
**In order to run the unit tests:**
Run unit test using the CLI or with the jest extension directly from
VSCode.
**In order to run the integration tests:**
Ensure that your database has the billingTables. If that's not the case,
migrate the database with IS_BILLING_ENABLED set to true:
` npx nx run twenty-server:test:integration
test/integration/billing/suites/billing-controller.integration-spec.ts`
**Doing:**
- Unit test on transformSubscriptionEventToSubscriptionItem
- More tests cases in billingController integration tests.
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charlesBochet@users.noreply.github.com>
