Adds intelligent routing system that automatically selects the best
agent for user queries based on conversation context.
### Changes:
- Added `routerModel` column to workspace table for configurable router
LLM selection
- Implemented `RouterService` with conversation history analysis and
agent matching logic
- Created router settings UI in AI Settings page with model dropdown
- Removed agent-specific thread associations - threads are now
agent-agnostic
- Added real-time routing status notification in chat UI with shimmer
effect
- Removed automatic default assistant agent creation
- Renamed GraphQL operations from agent-specific to generic (e.g.,
`agentChatThreads` → `chatThreads`)
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
- Use aggregate operations in the widget configuration instead of
extended aggregate operations
- Use aggregate operation from generated graphql in the frontend
## Context
The _expected response body_ does not use monaco-editor, so enabling
`formatOnPaste `as mentioned in this
[comment](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/13506#issuecomment-3188746787)
didn't fix the issue below. However, the `TextVariableEditor` uses
tiptap editor which has a `handlePaste` option that we can use to format
JSON.
- Issue https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/13506
## Implementation:
1. Insert the clipboard text at the current selection.
2. Retrieve the full editor content, parse it as JSON and stringify it
with indentation.
3. Re-use the method that transforms the text into `JSONContent`.
4. Replace the root node with the newly formatted `JSONContent`.
5. Update the cursor position based on the type of pasted text.
6. Apply the transaction with `view.dispatch()`
Note: If parsing fails (invalid JSON), the input will fall back to a
normal paste.
## test
Loom:
https://www.loom.com/share/f2e84d078662481f9f9f71fc98b772a1?sid=a649c4e9-8c55-4cbe-b031-7aba60af0e05
## What I've Implemented
I've added tooltips that show the original action type when you hover
over workflow step icons in the side panel. Now even if you rename an
action to something custom, you can still see what type of action it
actually is by hovering over the icon.
## The Problem This Solves
Before this change, once you renamed a workflow action (like changing
"Create Record" to "Add New Customer"), there was no way to tell what
the original action type was. This made it really confusing when
collaborating with others or when coming back to your own workflows
after some time - you couldn't tell if an action was a "Create Record"
or "Update Record" or something else.
## What Changed
Updated action type labels: Instead of showing just "Action" for all
record operations, the system now shows specific types like "Create
Record", "Update Record", "Delete Record", etc.
Added hover tooltips: When you hover over the action icons in the
workflow side panel, a tooltip appears showing the original action type,
even if you've renamed the step title.
## Before vs After
Before: All actions showed "Action" in the side panel, making it
impossible to distinguish between different types after renaming.
After: Each action shows its specific type in tooltips, so you always
know what you're working with.
This should make workflow management much clearer, especially when
multiple people are collaborating on the same workflow!
Resolves#14878
## Demo Video
See it in action:
https://www.loom.com/share/c0e0ec24e4524d0685b841e9ceb011d0?t=65&sid=dc05e58a-8869-4969-aa67-9772242fe697
---------
Co-authored-by: Thomas Trompette <thomas.trompette@sfr.fr>
Fixes [Dependabot Alert
85](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/security/dependabot/85) -
prototype pollution in lodash.
Added a shared pick helper (with unit tests) in twenty-shared and
refactored front-end/server code to import { pick } from the shared
barrel instead of lodash.pick.
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: martmull <martmull@hotmail.fr>
# Migrate Attachment Author to CreatedBy Field
**Twill Task**: https://twill.ai/twentyhq/ENG/tasks/7
## Summary
This PR implements a migration to transition the `Attachment` object
from using an `author` relation field to using the standard `createdBy`
field, addressing issue
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1594.
## Changes
- **Added migration command**
(`1-8-migrate-attachment-author-to-created-by.command.ts`):
- Migrates existing attachment data to use `createdBy` instead of
`author`
- Ensures data integrity during the transition to the standard field
pattern
- **Updated Attachment workspace entity**:
- Added `createdBy` relation field to the `Attachment` standard object
- Registered new field ID in `standard-field-ids.ts` constants
- **Integrated migration into upgrade pipeline**:
- Added migration module for version 1.8
- Registered in the main upgrade version command module
This change aligns the `Attachment` object with Twenty's standard field
conventions by using the built-in `createdBy` field instead of a custom
`author` field.
---
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1594
---------
Co-authored-by: Twill <agent@twill.ai>
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
Step 1 towards fixing issue #14976
Refactored WorkflowSendEmailBody to FormAdvancedTextFieldInput For its
reusability across application
- `useEmailEditor` is transformed to `useAdvancedTextEditor`: A
reuseable hook for managing the text editor state and functionality.
- `WorkflowSendEmailBody` is transformed to
`FormAdvancedTextFieldEditor`: A wrapper component for the advanced text
editor.
- `WorkflowSendEmailBody` is transformed to
`FormAdvancedTextFieldInput`: A component integrating the advanced text
editor into forms.
- `ImageBubbleMenu`, `LinkBubbleMenu`, and `TextBubbleMenu`: Contextual
menus for image, link, and text formatting options. are moved to
ui/components for access in FormAdvancedTextFieldInput
Additionally, the email action workflow component was updated to utilize
the new reuseable text editor, enhancing the user experience for
composing emails.
This update also includes storybook entries for the new components to
facilitate testing and documentation.
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
This PR fixes two bugs :
- Data loading not working between 60 and 120 records on an object
- Table not refreshing when creating a record in an empty table.
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/15196
## Overview
This PR fixes instances where `height` properties were incorrectly
defined multiple times within the same styled component definitions
across the codebase.
## Problem
Several styled components had duplicate `height` CSS properties where
the exact same property was declared twice in the same selector, causing
confusion and reducing code maintainability. The second declaration
would override the first, making the first one dead code.
## Changes
Fixed 4 files across the codebase:
### Duplicate `height: 100%` Removed
**StyledShowPageRightContainer** in twenty-front:
- `PageLayoutRendererContent.tsx`
- `ShowPageSubContainer.tsx`
- `PageLayoutRecordPageRenderer.tsx`
Each had `height: 100%` declared twice in the same component definition
(strict duplicates).
### Duplicate `height` with Different Values Removed
**StyledCommandKey** in twenty-ui:
- `MenuItemHotKeys.tsx` - Had both `height: ${({ theme }) =>
theme.spacing(5)}` and `height: 18px` declared. Removed the first
declaration as the second was overriding it.
## Testing
- ✅ ESLint checks pass
- ✅ TypeScript compilation successful
- ✅ CodeQL security analysis - no issues
- ✅ Comprehensive codebase scan confirms no remaining strict height
duplicates
## Impact
- **Visual Changes**: None - purely cleanup refactoring
- **Performance**: No runtime impact
- **Breaking Changes**: None
- **Code Quality**: Improved CSS maintainability by removing dead code
---
**Total:** 4 files modified, 5 lines removed
Created from VS Code via the <a
href="https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=GitHub.vscode-pull-request-github">GitHub
Pull Request</a> extension.
<!-- START COPILOT CODING AGENT SUFFIX -->
<details>
<summary>Original prompt</summary>
> Hi! It seems that a few styled components in the #codebase are defined
with duplicate `height: 100%`, like in
#file:PageLayoutRendererContent.tsx:27-36.
>
> Your job is to find all the places where we defined `height: 100%`
incorrectly several times and to keep only one `height` property.
</details>
Created from VS Code via the [GitHub Pull
Request](https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=GitHub.vscode-pull-request-github)
extension.
<!-- START COPILOT CODING AGENT TIPS -->
---
💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions,
customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context
Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more [Copilot coding agent
tips](https://gh.io/copilot-coding-agent-tips) in the docs.
---------
Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Devessier <29370468+Devessier@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Baptiste Devessier <baptiste@devessier.fr>
This PR fixes advanced filters classic in view bar which crashes after
the recent refactor on chart advanced filters.
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
This fixes#15156
Issue:
Restore and Destroy buttons not appearing in action menu for deleted
records until the record detail view is opened.
Cause:
The record index/table view queries only fetched fields that were
visible as table columns
The [deletedAt] field (along with [createdAt] and [updatedAt]) was not
included in these queries since it's not a visible column
The action menu logic checks [selectedRecord?.deletedAt] to determine if
a record is deleted and which actions to display
Without the [deletedAt] field in the record store, the action menu
couldn't detect deleted records
Opening the detailed view would fetch all fields (including
[deletedAt]), which is why the buttons would appear afterward
Solution
Modified [useRecordsFieldVisibleGqlFields] to always include the
standard fields ([createdAt], [updatedAt], [deletedAt]) in record index
queries, regardless of column visibility. This ensures the action menu
can immediately detect deleted records
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
## Summary
Clean up and consolidate formatting configuration across the monorepo.
## Changes
### 1. Remove Redundant Configs
- ❌ Delete `packages/twenty-server/.prettierrc` (had invalid
`brakeBeforeElse` typo)
- ❌ Delete `packages/twenty-zapier/.prettierrc`
- ✅ Use root `.prettierrc` only (Prettier searches up directory tree
automatically)
### 2. Improve Root Prettier Config
- Change `endOfLine: 'auto'` → `'lf'` for consistent Unix line endings
across all OSes
### 3. Enhance VSCode Settings
- `files.eol: 'auto'` → `'\\n'` (consistent with Prettier)
- Add `files.insertFinalNewline: true` (explicit editor behavior)
- Add `files.trimTrailingWhitespace: true` (cleaner files)
### 4. Add `.gitattributes`
- Enforce LF line endings at Git level
- Prevents `core.autocrlf` from converting based on contributor's OS
- Mark patch files as binary (they have mixed line endings by design)
- Explicitly define binary file types
### 5. Fix Line Endings
- Convert 3 selectable-list state files from CRLF → LF
- These were the only source files with Windows line endings
## Why These Changes Matter
**Before:**
- 3 different Prettier configs (inconsistent, one had typo)
- Mixed CRLF/LF depending on contributor's OS
- No Git-level enforcement
**After:**
- Single source of truth for formatting
- All files use LF (Unix standard)
- Git enforces line endings regardless of OS
- Prettier warning about invalid option removed
## Result
- ✅ Single `.prettierrc` config
- ✅ Consistent LF line endings enforced by Git
- ✅ Better VSCode defaults
- ✅ No more CRLF files sneaking in from Windows contributors
# Implement "Tidy Up" Action for Workflow Diagram
**Task Link:** https://twill.ai/twentyhq/ENG/tasks/6
## Summary
This PR adds a "Tidy Up" action to the workflow diagram interface,
allowing users to automatically organize and clean up the layout of
workflow nodes and connections.
## Changes Made
- **Added new workflow action**: Created
`TidyUpWorkflowSingleRecordAction` component to provide a UI action for
tidying up workflow diagrams
- **Refactored tidy-up logic**: Extracted core tidy-up functionality
into a reusable `useTidyUp` hook, separating layout logic from workflow
version persistence
- **Updated action menu configuration**: Integrated the new tidy-up
action into `WorkflowActionsConfig` with proper permissions and keyboard
shortcuts
- **Enhanced right-click menu**: Updated
`WorkflowDiagramRightClickCommandMenu` to use the refactored tidy-up
hook
- **Improved hook architecture**: Simplified `useTidyUpWorkflowVersion`
to delegate layout calculations to the new `useTidyUp` hook
## Key Features
- Users can now trigger workflow diagram tidy-up from the action menu
- Consistent tidy-up behavior across both right-click menu and action
menu interfaces
- Better separation of concerns between layout calculation and data
persistence
<details>
<summary>📸 Screenshots</summary>
Playwright test screenshots captured during development:
### command-menu-with-tidy-up-workflow.png
### tidy-up-workflow-command-menu.png
### tidy-up-workflow-error-toast.png
</details>
---------
Co-authored-by: Twill <agent@twill.ai>
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Thomas Trompette <thomas.trompette@sfr.fr>
This PR connects the chart filters settings page to the backend.
Both for persisting the filters in the chart's configuration and also
for querying with those filters.
I made sure that the filters configuration is reset in the draft if we
change the data source object.
🎯 Merge Settings Relation and Morph Relation Forms followup
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15062
Here we fixed some little comments that could have be done earlier in
the main PR
🎯 Merge Settings Relation and Morph Relation Forms
In the settings, we unify morph and relation into a single form.
The form now automatically creates
- a `RELATION` field when 1 destination object is selected
- or a `MORPH_RELATION` field when 2+ objects are selected.
Better UI labels (showing object name for single selection, "X Objects"
for multiple), proper field editing controls on destination objects, and
capitalized field labels.
We still make sure the isMorphRelationEnabled feature flag prevents
current users from accessing this feature
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1589
