On field selection, we need to retrieve the fieldMetadata to set the
filter type. Current code was using the current step filter
fieldMetdataId instead of the new one.
Also adding a special behaviour for Select filter: it behaves as
arrays/multiselect but the opearands are not the same.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
In this PR
1. Fix delete and soft-delete repository methods for repositories where
permission checks are NOT bypassed: they need to have a selection of
columns to return by default. To match what we did for insert I set it
to `'*'` by default. But I feel this may be bug prone as developers will
not necessarily think to fill the right values in. Maybe we should
change the api to use selectable fields by default. @charlesBochet
2. Add field permission seeds and enable field permission feature flag
in dev
- handle missing composite fields
- refacto filter action to be more reliable
Remaining improvements:
- filter out some field types
- improve relations
- Renamed `WorkflowActionAdapter` to `ToolExecutorWorkflowAction`
- Renamed `settingPermission` table to `permissionFlag` and `setting`
column to `flag`
- Decoupled the send email logic from workflows to tools
- Add new `Tools Permission` section in FE
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
- add fieldMetadataId to step output schema
- use it to display FormFieldInput in Filter input
- few fixes for a few fields
Next step:
- Handle composite fields
- Design review
- Added a generic HTTP request tool, allowing agents and workflows to
make HTTP requests to external APIs with configurable method, headers,
and body.
- Decoupled HTTP request workflow nodes from workflow-specific types and
factories, introducing a generic tool interface.
- Updated agent system prompts to include explicit guidance for the HTTP
request tool, including when and how to use it, and how to communicate
limitations.
### Demo
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/129bc445-a277-4a19-95ab-09f890f8f051
## Context
Add an eventEmitter instance to twenty datasources so we can emit DB
events.
Add input and output formatting to twenty orm (formatData, formatResult)
Those 2 elements simplified existing logic when we interact with the
ORM, input will be formatted by the ORM so we can directly use
field-like structure instead of column-like. The output will be
formatted, for builder queries it will be in `result.generatedMaps`
where `result.raw` preserves the previous column-like structure.
Important change: We now have an authContext that we can pass when we
get a repository, this will be used for the different events emitted in
the ORM. We also removed the caching for repositories as it was not
scaling well and not necessary imho
Note: An upcoming PR should handle the onDelete: cascade behavior where
we send DESTROY events in cascade when there is an onDelete: CASCADE on
the FK.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
This PR does not produce any functional changes for our users. It
prepares the branches for workflows by:
- decommissioning `output` and `context` fields or `workflowRun` records
and use newly created `state` field from front-end and back-end
- use `stepStatus` computed by `back-end` in `front-end`
- add utils and types in `twenty-shared/workflow` (not completed, a
follow-up is scheduled
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1211)
- add concurrency to `workflowQueue` message queue to avoid weird branch
execution when using forms in workflow branches
- add a WithLock decorator for better dev experience of
`CacheLockService.withLock` usage
Here is an example of such a workflow running (front branch display is
not yet done that's why it looks ugly) ->
https://discord.com/channels/1130383047699738754/1258024460238192691/1392897615171158098
Instead of initializing model at start time we do it at run time to be
able to swap model provider more easily.
Also introduce a third driver for openai-compatible providers, which
among other allows for local models with Ollama
Step operand will more or less be the same as view filter operand.
This PR:
- moves `ViewFilterOperand` to twenty-shared
- use it as step operand
- check what operand should be available based on the selected field
type in filter action
- rewrite the function that evaluates filters so it uses
ViewFilterOperand instead
ViewFilterOperand may be renamed in a future PR.
I rebuilt the advanced filters used in views and workflow search for a
specific filter step.
Components structure remains the same, using `stepFilterGroups` and
`stepFilters`. But those filters are directly sent to backend.
Also re-using the same kind of states we use for advanced filters to
share the current filters used. And a context to share what's coming
from workflow props (function to update step settings and readonly)
⚠️ this PR only focusses on the content of the step. There is still a
lot to do on the filter icon behavior in the workflow
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8a6a76f0-11fa-444a-82b9-71fc96b18af4
This PR is purely technical, it does produces any functional change to
the user
- add Lock mecanism to run steps concurrently
- update `workflow-executor.workspace-service.ts` to handle multi branch
workflow execution
- stop passing `context` through steps, it causes race condition issue
- refactor a little bit
- simplify `workflow-run.workspace-service.ts` to prepare `output` and
`context` removal
- move workflowRun status computing from `run-workflow.job.ts` to
`workflow-executor.workspace-service.ts`
## NOTA BENE
When a code step depends of 2 parents like in this config (see image
below)
If the form is submitted before the "Code - 2s" step succeed, the branch
merge "Form" step is launched twice.
- once because form is submission Succeed resumes the workflow in an
asynchronous job
- the second time is when the asynchronous job is launched when "Code -
2s" is succeeded
- the merge "Form" step makes the workflow waiting for response to
trigger the resume in another job
- during that time, the first resume job is launched, running the merge
"Form" step again
This issue only occurs with branch workflows. It will be solved by
checking if the currentStepToExecute is already in a SUCCESS state or
not
<img width="505" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b73839a1-16fe-45e1-a0d9-3efa26ab4f8b"
/>
Currently, when a server query or mutation from the front-end fails, the
error message defined server-side is displayed in a snackbar in the
front-end.
These error messages usually contain technical details that don't belong
to the user interface, such as "ObjectMetadataCollection not found" or
"invalid ENUM value for ...".
**BE**
In addition to the original error message that is still needed (for the
request response, debugging, sentry monitoring etc.), we add a
`displayedErrorMessage` that will be used in the snackbars. It's only
relevant to add it for the messages that will reach the FE (ie. not in
jobs or in rest api for instance) and if it can help the user sort out /
fix things (ie. we do add displayedErrorMessage for "Cannot create
multiple draft versions for the same workflow" or "Cannot delete
[field], please update the label identifier field first", but not
"Object metadata does not exist"), even if in practice in the FE users
should not be able to perform an action that will not work (ie should
not be able to save creation of multiple draft versions of the same
workflows).
**FE**
To ease the usage we replaced enqueueSnackBar with enqueueErrorSnackBar
and enqueueSuccessSnackBar with an api that only requires to pass on the
error.
If no displayedErrorMessage is specified then the default error message
is `An error occured.`
This PR does not produce any functional change
First step of the workflow branch feature
- add gather `workflowRun.output` and `workflowRun.context` into one
column `workflowRun.runContext`
- add a command to fill `runContext` from `output` and `context` in
existing records
- maintain `runContext` up to date during workflow runs
Previous logic was using the previous step output and filtering items
that were passing filters.
What we actually want is:
- send filters, right operand being always a step output key, left
operand being either a key, either a value
- resolve those filter variables
- apply the filters to decide whether the condition is passed or not
This PR introduces a significant enhancement to the role-based
permission system by extending it to support AI agents, enabling them to
perform database operations based on assigned permissions.
## Key Changes
### 1. Database Schema Migration
- **Table Rename**: `userWorkspaceRole` → `roleTargets` to better
reflect its expanded purpose
- **New Column**: Added `agentId` (UUID, nullable) to support AI agent
role assignments
- **Constraint Updates**:
- Made `userWorkspaceId` nullable to accommodate agent-only role
assignments
- Added check constraint `CHK_role_targets_either_agent_or_user`
ensuring either `agentId` OR `userWorkspaceId` is set (not both)
### 2. Entity & Service Layer Updates
- **RoleTargetsEntity**: Updated with new `agentId` field and constraint
validation
- **AgentRoleService**: New service for managing agent role assignments
with validation
- **AgentService**: Enhanced to include role information when retrieving
agents
- **RoleResolver**: Added GraphQL mutations for `assignRoleToAgent` and
`removeRoleFromAgent`
### 3. AI Agent CRUD Operations
- **Permission-Based Tool Generation**: AI agents now receive database
tools based on their assigned role permissions
- **Dynamic Tool Creation**: The `AgentToolService` generates CRUD tools
(`create_*`, `find_*`, `update_*`, `soft_delete_*`, `destroy_*`) for
each object based on role permissions
- **Granular Permissions**: Supports both global role permissions
(`canReadAllObjectRecords`) and object-specific permissions
(`canReadObjectRecords`)
### 4. Frontend Integration
- **Role Assignment UI**: Added hooks and components for
assigning/removing roles from agents
## Demo
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/41732267-742e-416c-b423-b687c2614c82
---------
Co-authored-by: Antoine Moreaux <moreaux.antoine@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Guillim <guillim@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charlesBochet@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Marie <51697796+ijreilly@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: martmull <martmull@hotmail.fr>
Co-authored-by: Thomas Trompette <thomas.trompette@sfr.fr>
Co-authored-by: Etienne <45695613+etiennejouan@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Baptiste Devessier <baptiste@devessier.fr>
Co-authored-by: nitin <142569587+ehconitin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Paul Rastoin <45004772+prastoin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: prastoin <paul@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Vicky Wang <157669812+vickywxng@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Vicky Wang <vw92@cornell.edu>
Co-authored-by: Raphaël Bosi <71827178+bosiraphael@users.noreply.github.com>
In this PR:
## Improve recompute metadata cache performance. We are aiming for
~100ms
Deleting relationMetadata table and FKs pointing on it
Fetching indexMetadata and indexFieldMetadata in a separate query as
typeorm is suboptimizing
## Remove caching lock
As recomputing the metadata cache is lighter, we try to stop preventing
multiple concurrent computations. This also simplifies interfaces
## Introduce self recovery mecanisms to recompute cache automatically if
corrupted
Aka getFreshObjectMetadataMaps
## custom object resolver performance improvement: 1sec to 200ms
Double check queries and indexes used while creating a custom object
Remove the queries to db to use the cached objectMetadataMap
## reduce objectMetadataMaps to 500kb
<img width="222" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2370dc80-49b6-4b63-8d5e-30c5ebdaa062"
/>
We used to stored 3 fieldMetadataMaps (byId, byName, byJoinColumnName).
While this is great for devXP, this is not great for performances.
Using the same mecanisme as for objectMetadataMap: we only keep byIdMap
and introduce two otherMaps to idByName, idByJoinColumnName to make the
bridge
## Add dataloader on IndexMetadata (aka indexMetadataList in the API)
## Improve field resolver performances too
## Deprecate ClientConfig
In this PR
- Determine object record permissions on workflows objects (workflow,
workflowVersion, workflowRun) base on settings permissions @Weiko
- Add Workflow permission guards on workflow resolvers @thomtrp . **Any
method within a resolver that has the SettingsPermission Guard is only
callable by a apiKey or a user that has the permission** (so not by
external parties).
- Add checks bypass in workflow services since 1) for actions gated by
settings permissions, the gate should be done at resolver level, so it
will have been done before the call to the service 2) some service
methods may be called by workflowTriggerController which is callable by
external parties without permissions (ex:
workflowCommonWorkspaceService.getWorkflowVersionOrFail). This is
something we may want to change in the future (still to discuss), by
removing the guard at resolver-level and relying on
shouldBypassPermissionChecks at getRepository and made in a way that we
only bypass for external parties.
- Add checks bypass for actions performed by workflows since they should
not be restricted in our current vision
- Add tests
# What
Fully deprecate old relations because we have one bug tied to it and it
make the codebase complex
# How I've made this PR:
1. remove metadata datasource (we only keep 'core') => this was causing
extra complexity in the refactor + flaky reset
2. merge dev and demo datasets => as I needed to update the tests which
is very painful, I don't want to do it twice
3. remove all code tied to RELATION_METADATA /
relation-metadata.resolver, or anything tied to the old relation system
4. Remove ONE_TO_ONE and MANY_TO_MANY that are not supported
5. fix impacts on the different areas : see functional testing below
# Functional testing
## Functional testing from the front-end:
1. Database Reset ✅
2. Sign In ✅
3. Workspace sign-up ✅
5. Browsing table / kanban / show ✅
6. Assigning a record in a one to many / in a many to one ✅
7. Deleting a record involved in a relation ✅ => broken but not tied to
this PR
8. "Add new" from relation picker ✅ => broken but not tied to this PR
9. Creating a Task / Note, Updating a Task / Note relations, Deleting a
Task / Note (from table, show page, right drawer) ✅ => broken but not
tied to this PR
10. creating a relation from settings (custom / standard x oneToMany /
manyToOne) ✅
11. updating a relation from settings should not be possible ✅
12. deleting a relation from settings (custom / standard x oneToMany /
manyToOne) ✅
13. Make sure timeline activity still work (relation were involved
there), espacially with Task / Note => to be double checked ✅ => Cannot
convert undefined or null to object
14. Workspace deletion / User deletion ✅
15. CSV Import should keep working ✅
16. Permissions: I have tested without permissions V2 as it's still hard
to test v2 work and it's not in prod yet ✅
17. Workflows global test ✅
## From the API:
1. Review open-api documentation (REST) ✅
2. Make sure REST Api are still able to fetch relations ==> won't do, we
have a coupling Get/Update/Create there, this requires refactoring
3. Make sure REST Api is still able to update / remove relation => won't
do same
## Automated tests
1. lint + typescript ✅
2. front unit tests: ✅
3. server unit tests 2 ✅
4. front stories: ✅
5. server integration: ✅
6. chromatic check : expected 0
7. e2e check : expected no more that current failures
## Remove // Todos
1. All are captured by functional tests above, nothing additional to do
## (Un)related regressions
1. Table loading state is not working anymore, we see the empty state
before table content
2. Filtering by Creator Tim Ap return empty results
3. Not possible to add Tasks / Notes / Files from show page
# Result
## New seeds that can be easily extended
<img width="1920" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d290d130-2a5f-44e6-b419-7e42a89eec4b"
/>
## -5k lines of code
## No more 'metadata' dataSource (we only have 'core)
## No more relationMetadata (I haven't drop the table yet it's not
referenced in the code anymore)
## We are ready to fix the 6 months lag between current API results and
our mocked tests
## No more bug on relation creation / deletion
---------
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
First PR to add filters to send records. Lot of work left, but I want to
split. I mainly want to validate the architecture there.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/63375a75-ba88-49df-8c12-5e3e58de5342
TODO in next PRs:
- fix design
- make filters reliable. Some composite fields are not implemented and
some fields like datetime do not work well
- improve typing
# Introduction
Added a no-explicit-any rule to the twenty-server, not applicable to
tests and integration tests folder
Related to https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/975
Discussed with Charles
## In case of conflicts
Until this is approved I won't rebased and handle conflict, just need to
drop two latest commits and re run the scripts etc
## Legacy
We decided not to handle the existing lint error occurrences and
programmatically ignored them through a disable next line rule comment
## Open question
We might wanna activate the
[no-explicit-any](https://typescript-eslint.io/rules/no-explicit-any/)
`ignoreRestArgs` for our use case ?
```
ignoreRestArgs?: boolean;
```
---------
Co-authored-by: etiennejouan <jouan.etienne@gmail.com>
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/12040
When fields are deleted but still used in workflows we do not update
create record action settings.
It breaks all following workflow execution and the user cannot update
the settings anymore.
This PR fixes the bug by filtering on existing fields.
Next step will be to clean settings on field deletion. Adding it to fast
follows.
Also lowering throttle limit because some infinite loops are not
catched.
This is a first PR to remove old relation logic
Next steps:
- remove relationMetadata from cache
- remove relationMetadata table content and structure
- refactor relationDefinition to leverage field.settings instead
- enrich response so the record is available in the step output. Today
this is available in the schema but only the id is set
- make the full record picker clickable instead of the arrow only
<img width="467" alt="Capture d’écran 2025-04-30 à 16 08 04"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/db74b9a6-7f1d-4e54-bf06-9be3d67ee398"
/>
- add next step id on step
- backfill next step id on step, except for the last one
- backfill flow for workflow run, when it exists
---------
Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
We do not manage rich text properly in workflows. This is because API
has a layer called transformer service. Looks a bit as a duplicate of
format data, but this api layer was already there for position anyway.
Using it in workflow record actions.
I hope at some point we merged formatData util and transformer.
