Three feature flags changed the UI:
IS_NAVIGATION_MENU_ITEM_ENABLED — Sidebar no longer has a default
"People" link → navigate via URL instead
IS_COMMAND_MENU_ITEM_ENABLED — Button label is now "Create new Person"
(interpolated from object name) instead of static "Create new record"
IS_JUNCTION_RELATIONS_ENABLED — Company is now a junction relation
("Previous Companies") displayed inline, no longer a boxed
dynamic-relation-widget on the record page
## Summary
- **Settings selector**: The Settings navigation item is now rendered as
a `<button>` (via `NavigationDrawerItem` with `onClick`) instead of an
`<a>` link (with `to`). Updated `leftMenu.ts` POM and
`create-kanban-view.spec.ts` to use `getByRole('button', { name:
'Settings' })`.
- **create-record URL field**: The Linkedin field interaction was
missing an initial label click to trigger the hover portal rendering.
Added `recordFieldList.getByText('Linkedin').first().click()` before the
value click, matching the pattern used by the working Emails field.
## Test plan
- [ ] E2E `signup_invite_email.spec.ts` passes (uses
`leftMenu.goToSettings()`)
- [ ] E2E `create-kanban-view.spec.ts` passes (uses Settings click
directly)
- [ ] E2E `create-record.spec.ts` passes (Linkedin URL field
interaction)
- [ ] Existing passing E2E tests remain green
Made with [Cursor](https://cursor.com)
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/2192
This PR implements what is necessary to re-create the query that we
build on the frontend to obtain the returned object record from a
mutation, but on the backend, which was only partially implemented for
REST API.
Usually we want to have relations with only their id and label
identifier field to have lighter payloads.
In the event we only had depth 0 fields, with this PR we have all events
with depth 1 relations.
We have depth 2 for many-to-many cases, like updateOne or updateMany
result :
- Junction tables
- Activity target tables
In this PR,
- current basic E2E tests are fixed, and some were added, covering some
basic scenarios
- some tests avec been commented out, until we decide whether they are
worth fixing
The next steps are
- evaluate the flakiness of the tests. Once they've proved not to be
flaky, we should add more tests + re-write the current ones not using
aria-label (cf @lucasbordeau indication).
- We will add them back to the development flow
