addressing >
There are two patterns to avoid:
Creating functions that return JSX like renderThing() -> this was taken
already addressed in https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10011
Making a hook that "stores" all the logic of a component - > this PR is
addressing this particular pattern
In essence, handlers should remain in the component and be connected to
their events.
And everything in a handler can be abstracted into its dedicated hook.
For example:
const { myReactiveState } =
useRecoilValue(myReactiveStateComponentState);
const { removeThingFromOtherThing } = useRemoveThingFromOtherThing();
const handleClick = () => {
if (isDefined(myReactiveState)) {
removeThingFromOtherThing();
}
}
Broadly speaking, this is how you can split large components into
several sub-hooks.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
# Folders
Adding the possibility to synchronize messages form more than one
microsoft folder (think "inbox" or "sent items")
It will keep the current way for gmail.
- step 1 : implement a first version of full message & partial message ✅
- step 2 : implement retro-compatibility which includes the command to
run the migration to backfill microsoft synccursor from messageChannelt
o messageFolders
Context :
We want to implement some counters to monitor server health. First
counters will track : messageChannel sync status during job execution
and invalid captcha.
How :
Counters are stored in cache and grouped by one-minute windows.
Controllers are created for each metric, aggregating counter over a
five-minutes window.
Endpoints are public and will be queried by Prometheus.
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/55
More progress on translations:
- Migrate from translations.io to crowdin
- Optimize performance and robustness
- Set workspaceMember/user locale upon signup
- Update discard draft icon
- Pin `Remove from favorites` action
- Update workflow action labels to add clarity
Note: this is a small PR, the number of modified lines is due to the
translations
Adding SettingsPermissionsGuard to execute permission check.
The guard is added directly in resolver, either at resolver level (ex:
roles) or resolver-endpoint level (ex: metadata). this can be challenged
!
# Introduction
Disabled backfilling position process on single record update
It might be a too global solution ? feels a bit too easy tbh
Please let me know, could not think of other side-effects
close [#9925](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/9925)
# Content
- Introduce the `workspaceUrls` property. It contains two
sub-properties: `customUrl, subdomainUrl`. These endpoints are used to
access the workspace. Even if the `workspaceUrls` is invalid for
multiple reasons, the `subdomainUrl` remains valid.
- Introduce `ResolveField` workspaceEndpoints to avoid unnecessary URL
computation on the frontend part.
- Add a `forceSubdomainUrl` to avoid custom URL using a query parameter
In this PR, we are implementing the updateRole endpoint with the
following rules
1. A user can only update a member's role if they have the permission (=
the admin role)
2. Admin role can't be unassigned if there are no other admin in the
workspace
3. (For now) as members can only have one role for now, when they are
assigned a new role, they are first unassigned the other role (if any)
4. (For now) removing a member's admin role = leaving the member with no
role = calling updateRole with a null roleId
