## Summary
Lets users choose which sub-field of a composite column to sort by —
directly from the sort chip — by clicking the sub-field label and
picking from a dropdown. Persists per view via a new nullable
\`subFieldName\` column on \`ViewSort\`.
Replaces #20438, which proposed a field-settings (admin) configuration
for the same problem. The chip-level approach is more discoverable (the
option lives where the user is looking) and per-view, so different views
on the same object can sort by different sub-fields.
### What changes for users
- **FullName columns**: previously sorted by \`firstName\` and
\`lastName\` together as a stable dual-key sort. Now the user can pick
which sub-field is primary (the other is the tie-breaker). Default
remains \`firstName\` primary, \`lastName\` tie-breaker.
- **Address columns**: previously not sortable at all (not in
\`SORTABLE_FIELD_METADATA_TYPES\`). Now sortable, with a chip dropdown
listing each enabled sub-field. Default is \`addressCity\` if enabled,
else the first enabled sub-field. Disabling a sub-field at the
field-metadata level (existing setting) removes it from the dropdown.
- **Other composite types** (Currency, Phones, Emails, Links, Actor) and
scalar fields keep their existing single-key sort behavior.
### UX
```
┌─────────────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────────────┐
│ ↑ Name · Last name ✕ │ │ ↑ Address · City ✕ │
└────────┬────────────────┘ └────────┬────────────────┘
▼ (click sub-field) ▼
┌────────────┐ ┌────────────┐
│ First name │ │ Address 1 │
│ Last name ✓│ │ Address 2 │
└────────────┘ │ City ✓│
│ State │
│ Postcode │
│ Country │
└────────────┘
```
The chip body still toggles direction on click — the \`Dropdown\`'s
internal wrapper calls \`stopPropagation\` so the sub-field click
doesn't bubble to the chip's onClick.
## What changed
**Backend:**
- \`ViewSortEntity\` — new nullable \`subFieldName: varchar\` column
- \`ViewSortDTO\`, \`CreateViewSortInput\`,
\`UpdateViewSortInputUpdates\` — new \`@Field(() => String, { nullable:
true })\`
- \`FLAT_VIEW_SORT_EDITABLE_PROPERTIES\` — \`'subFieldName'\` added so
the property flows through the update merge path
- \`ALL_ENTITY_PROPERTIES_CONFIGURATION_BY_METADATA_NAME.viewSort\` —
new \`subFieldName\` entry with \`toCompare: true\` so cache diffs
notice it
- \`fromCreateViewSortInputToFlatViewSortToCreate\` — threads
\`subFieldName\` through
- Instance command migration (\`add-sub-field-name-to-view-sort\`) —
single \`ALTER TABLE core.viewSort ADD subFieldName varchar\` / \`DROP\`
**Frontend:**
- \`RecordSort\` and \`ViewSort\` types — \`subFieldName?: string |
null\`
- \`VIEW_SORT_FRAGMENT\` — adds \`subFieldName\` so the field
round-trips
- \`mapRecordSortToViewSort\` + \`areViewSortsEqual\` — carry the new
field through, include it in the diff so the usual
\`useSaveRecordSortsToViewSorts\` create/update flow fires when it
changes
- \`useSaveRecordSortsToViewSorts\` — passes \`subFieldName\` in both
\`CreateViewSortInput\` and \`UpdateViewSortInputUpdates\`
- \`getOrderByForFieldMetadataType(field, direction, subFieldName?)\` —
new optional third arg. \`turnSortsIntoOrderBy\` threads
\`sort.subFieldName\` into it.
- \`Address\` added to \`SORTABLE_FIELD_METADATA_TYPES\`
- New helpers: \`getEnabledAddressSubFields\` (filters by the field's
\`subFields\` setting, falls back to the 6 default visible address
sub-fields), \`getDefaultSortSubFieldForAddress\`,
\`getDefaultSortSubFieldForFullName\`
- New shared types/constants: \`AllowedFullNameSubField\`,
\`ALLOWED_FULL_NAME_SUBFIELDS\`, \`DEFAULT_VISIBLE_ADDRESS_SUBFIELDS\`
- \`SortOrFilterChip\` — new \`labelSubField?: ReactNode\` slot; renders
as \` · {sub-field}\` with subdued weight after the main label
- \`EditableSortChip\` — builds options from field metadata
(\`ALLOWED_FULL_NAME_SUBFIELDS\` for FullName,
\`getEnabledAddressSubFields\` for Address), uses i18n-wrapped labels,
persists picks via \`upsertRecordSort\`
## Test plan
- [x] \`npx nx typecheck\` passes for twenty-shared, twenty-front,
twenty-server
- [x] \`oxlint --type-aware\` on all 19 frontend + 9 server changed
files: 0 errors
- [x] \`prettier --check\`: clean
- [x] 16 unit tests pass — \`getOrderByForFieldMetadataType\` covers the
new \`subFieldName\` override branch for FULL_NAME and ADDRESS;
\`getDefaultSortSubFieldForAddress\` covers the city/first-enabled
fallback path; \`getDefaultSortSubFieldForFullName\` exercises its
constant
- [ ] Manual: sort a People view by Full Name → click the chip's
sub-field label → switch between First name and Last name → reload page
→ choice is preserved
- [ ] Manual: sort a Company view by Address → confirm dropdown lists
only enabled sub-fields → disable Address \`addressCity\` in field
settings → confirm dropdown options update and runtime falls back to the
first enabled sub-field
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: claude[bot] <41898282+claude[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
The `useSaveFieldsWidgetGroups` hook was making multiple sequential API
calls per widget (create groups, delete groups, update groups, update
fields) — non-atomic, chatty, and with heavy diff computation on the
frontend.
## Backend
- **New input DTOs**: `UpsertFieldsWidgetInput` /
`UpsertFieldsWidgetGroupInput` / `UpsertFieldsWidgetFieldInput` — caller
passes the full desired state of groups + fields for a widget
- **`FieldsWidgetUpsertService`**: looks up widget → resolves `viewId`,
diffs against existing flat entity maps, builds optimistic group maps so
newly-created groups can be referenced by field updates in the same
pass, then runs creates/updates/deletes in a single
`validateBuildAndRunWorkspaceMigration` call
- **`upsertFieldsWidget` mutation** added to `ViewFieldGroupResolver`;
new `FIELDS_WIDGET_NOT_FOUND` exception code added and wired into the
GraphQL exception filter
## Frontend
- New `UPSERT_FIELDS_WIDGET` GQL document
- `useSaveFieldsWidgetGroups` replaces all per-operation calls with a
single mutation per widget, passing the full draft state — diff logic
moves entirely to the backend
```graphql
mutation UpsertFieldsWidget($input: UpsertFieldsWidgetInput!) {
upsertFieldsWidget(input: $input) {
id
name
position
isVisible
viewId
viewFields { id isVisible position ... }
}
}
```
Widget IDs are collected from both draft **and** persisted state so
widgets whose draft groups were cleared still trigger deletion of their
server-side groups.
<!-- START COPILOT ORIGINAL PROMPT -->
<details>
<summary>Original prompt</summary>
Start implementation
The user has attached the following file paths as relevant context:
- CLAUDE.md
<analysis>
[Chronological Review: The conversation began with the user requesting a
review of how updates on views are stored in the frontend of record page
layouts. The user expressed a desire to migrate heavy computations and
multiple requests from the frontend to the backend. They proposed
creating a custom upsertFieldsWidget mutation to handle updates
atomically. The conversation has focused on this migration strategy and
its implementation.]
[Intent Mapping: The user explicitly requested to "check how we store
updates on views in the frontend of record page layouts" and indicated a
need to "migrate this task to the backend" by creating a custom mutation
for atomic updates.]
[Technical Inventory: The conversation involves the following technical
concepts:
- Frontend and backend architecture for handling page layout updates.
- Custom GraphQL mutation (upsertFieldsWidget) for atomic updates.
- The file in focus is page-layout-update.service.ts, which is likely
responsible for handling updates related to page layouts in the
backend.]
[Code Archaeology: The specific file being worked on is
/Users/devessier/Web/twenty/packages/twenty-server/src/engine/metadata-modules/page-layout/services/page-layout-update.service.ts.
The user is likely looking to modify or enhance this service to
accommodate the new mutation for handling updates.]
[Progress Assessment: The user has identified the need for a backend
migration strategy but has not yet implemented any changes. The focus is
on planning the transition from frontend to backend processing.]
[Context Validation: All critical information for continuation is
captured, including the user's intent to migrate computations to the
backend and the specific file being modified.]
[Recent Commands Analysis: The last agent commands involved checking the
current file context and the user's request to summarize the
conversation. No specific tool results were generated as the focus was
on summarizing the conversation history. The agent was actively working
on summarizing the conversation when the token budget was exceeded,
which was triggered by the user's request for a summary.]
</analysis>
<summary>
1. Conversation Overview:
- Primary Objectives: The user requested to "check how we store updates
on views in the frontend of record page layouts" and expressed a desire
to "migrate this task to the backend" by creating a custom
upsertFieldsWidget mutation for atomic updates.
- Session Context: The conversation has focused on the need to shift
heavy computations from the frontend to the backend, with an emphasis on
implementing a new mutation to streamline updates.
- User Intent Evolution: The user's needs have remained consistent,
focusing on backend migration for efficiency and atomicity in updates.
2. Technical Foundation:
- Core Technology: The conversation involves a backend service likely
built with Node.js and TypeScript, as indicated by the file path.
- Framework/Library: The use of GraphQL for handling mutations is
implied through the mention of a custom mutation.
- Architectural Pattern: The user is looking to implement a
service-oriented architecture where the backend handles complex
computations instead of the frontend.
- Environment Detail: The current working file is located in a server
package of the twenty repository.
3. Codebase Status:
- File Name: page-layout-update.service.ts
- Purpose: This file is responsible for managing updates related to page
layouts in the backend.
- Current State: The user is considering modifications to implement a
new mutation for handling updates.
- Key Code Segments: Specific functions or classes have not been
detailed yet, as the focus is on planning changes.
- Dependencies: This service likely interacts with other components in
the metadata-modules related to page layouts.
4. Problem Resolution:
- Issues Encountered: The current challenge is the inefficiency of
handling updates in the frontend.
- Solutions Implemented: The proposed solution is to create a custom
mutation to handle updates atomically in the backend.
- Debugging Context: No ongoing troubleshooting efforts have been
mentioned yet.
- Lessons Learned: The need for backend processing to improve
performance has been highlighted.
5. Progress Tracking:
- Completed Tasks: No tasks have been completed yet; the user is in the
planning phase.
- Partially Complete Work: The user is preparing to implement a new
mutation for backend updates.
- Validated Outcomes: No features have been confirmed working through
testing at this stage.
6. Active Work State:
- Current Focus: The user is focused on modifying the
page-layout-update.service.ts to implement the new mutation.
- Recent Context: The last few exchanges involved discussing the
migration of update tasks from the frontend to the backend.
- Working Code: No specific code snippets have been modified yet, as the
co...
</details>
<!-- START COPILOT CODING AGENT SUFFIX -->
Created from [VS
Code](https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/copilot/copilot-coding-agent).
<!-- START COPILOT CODING AGENT TIPS -->
---
💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions,
customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context
Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more [Copilot coding agent
tips](https://gh.io/copilot-coding-agent-tips) in the docs.
---------
Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Devessier <29370468+Devessier@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Baptiste Devessier <baptiste@devessier.fr>
## Summary
Fixes#12962
- Adds a two-pass ILIKE fallback to the global search service
(`search.service.ts`)
- **Fast path**: runs the tsvector query first (uses GIN index,
sub-millisecond)
- **Fallback**: only if tsvector returns fewer results than the limit,
runs an ILIKE query on `searchVector::text` to catch cases where
PostgreSQL's `simple` text search config fails to tokenize (continuous
CJK text, etc.)
- Zero performance impact for the common case (Latin text where tsvector
works)
- Also adds `escapeForIlike` utility to properly escape `%`, `_`, `\` in
user input
### Why tsvector fails for CJK
PostgreSQL's `simple` config treats continuous CJK text as a single
lexeme:
- `to_tsvector('simple', '示例商业线索')` → `'示例商业线索':1`
- Searching `商业:*` only prefix-matches from the start, so it misses `商业`
in the middle
The ILIKE fallback catches these substring matches when the tsvector
path can't.
### What this fixes
- Global search (command menu / sidebar)
- Relation picker (single and multi-object)
- Morph relation picker
All three use `search.service.ts` under the hood.
Co-authored-by: mykh-hailo (original direction in #18021)
## Test plan
- [ ] Search `示例` with records `示例商业线索` and `示例-商业-线索` → both should
appear
- [ ] Search `商业` → both should appear (previously only the hyphenated
one did)
- [ ] Search for Latin text (e.g. `john`) → same performance, results
unchanged
- [ ] Relation picker search with CJK text → results appear
- [ ] Search input with special chars like `%` or `_` → no SQL
injection, results correct
Made with [Cursor](https://cursor.com)
---------
Co-authored-by: mykh-hailo <mykh-hailo@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
## Context
Introduces a new viewFieldGroup entity that allows grouping view fields
into sections (e.g. "General", "Additional", "Other") within a view.
The page layout fields widget needs a way to organize fields into
sections. Today, views have no concept of field grouping. This PR
introduces the viewFieldGroup entity which sits between a view and its
viewFields, enabling section-based organization.
<img width="401" height="724" alt="Layout - V2 (customize visibility)"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6376e2ab-44db-42bf-9d2c-758f56f6b548"
/>
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
- Migration command
- Check IS_FILES_FIELD_MIGRATED:false
- Check or create avatarFile field
- Fetch all people with avatarUrl
- Move (Copy/move) file in storage
- Create core.file record
- Update person record
- bonus : attachment migration : fullPath > file (same logic)
- BE logic
- Add avatarFile field on person
- FE logic
- Adapt logic to upload on/display avatarFile data
The whole imageIdentifier logic will be done later
# What this PR does
Overall naming `universal` versus `flat` is not always the most updated
and so on
Will make a big cleaning tour after I've finished the whole migration
Migrating all `view` and ( filter fields etc ) `field` `object` `index`
to the universal pattern on all `services`, `builder` and `runner`
levels
## Universal and flat optimistic tooling
`addUniversalFlatEntityToUniversalFlatEntityAndRelatedEntityMapsThroughMutationOrThrow`
and its delete counterpart maintain the consistency of
`UniversalFlatEntityMaps` when an entity is created or removed. Beyond
inserting/removing the entity from its own maps, they walk through
`ALL_UNIVERSAL_METADATA_RELATIONS` to update the **aggregator arrays**
on related parent entities — the add appends the new entity's
`universalIdentifier` to the parent's aggregator (e.g. a new viewField's
identifier gets appended to its parent view's
`viewFieldUniversalIdentifiers`), and the delete filters it out. This
keeps the maps in sync so that diff computations and relation lookups
remain accurate throughout the migration building process.
## ALL_UNIVERSAL_METADATA_RELATIONS
`ALL_UNIVERSAL_METADATA_RELATIONS` is the universal counterpart of
`ALL_METADATA_RELATIONS`. It maps each metadata entity to its
many-to-one and one-to-many relations using universal foreign keys
(`*UniversalIdentifier`) instead of database IDs (`*Id`). This allows
migration actions to reference related entities in a workspace-agnostic
way. Relations that are workspace-specific (e.g. `workspace`,
`dataSource`, `userWorkspace`) are set to `null` and skipped during
resolution.
## `workspaceMigrationCreateIdEnrichment`
Reserved to API metadata ( will be able to validate at app installation
lvl )
- Workspace migration `create` actions now carry an optional `id` (and
`fieldIdByUniversalIdentifier` for object/field actions) so that
caller-provided IDs flow through the entire build-validate-run pipeline.
- New `enrichCreateWorkspaceMigrationActionsWithIds` utility resolves
`universalIdentifier → id` mappings after the builder runs and injects
them into the migration actions before the runner persists entities.
- Runner action handlers use the provided IDs instead of generating new
UUIDs, enabling deterministic entity creation for synchronization
workflows.
## `resolveUniversalUpdateRelationIdentifiersToIds`
`resolveUniversalUpdateRelationIdentifiersToIds` converts universal
identifiers (workspace-agnostic, stable keys) in a migration update
payload into concrete database UUIDs, so the update can be applied to a
specific workspace.
It iterates over the many-to-one relations defined in
`ALL_UNIVERSAL_METADATA_RELATIONS` for the given entity type, replaces
each `*UniversalIdentifier` property with its corresponding `*Id` by
looking up the target entity in `allFlatEntityMaps`, and throws if a
non-null identifier can't be resolved.
Used by all `update` action handlers in
`transpileUniversalActionToFlatAction`, avoiding duplicated resolution
logic across handlers.
## What this PR does not
- Migrating twenty-standard declaration to universal
- Migrating all the inputs transpilers to universal
- Migrating all metadata to be fully universal ( we still need to
de-scope the type of all of them and refactor their validator very close
)
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
## Context
Removing full CRUD to RLS since we are actually using an upsert only
over the role resolver, this removes a lot of unused code (could be
re-added later but unlikely). Simplified the folder arch at the same
time
Add simple integration tests to RLS
## Summary
- Add `additionalEmails` (EMAILS type) to tsvector search expression
- Add `additionalPhones` (PHONES type) to tsvector search expression
- Add `secondaryLinks` (LINKS type) to tsvector search expression
This enables searching for people/companies by their secondary contact
information, not just primary values.
## Test plan
- [x] Unit tests for all three composite field types (16 tests passing)
- [x] Integration tests for searching by secondary email, work email,
partial domain
- [x] Integration tests for searching by additional phone numbers
- [x] Integration test for searching by secondary link URL
- [x] Lint passes
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
- Add widget validation
- Remove 'None' option for primary axis group by
- Fix error message parsing by passing the operation type in
`useMetadataErrorHandler`
## Introduction
On the side hanlded PR with a // agents on another repo
Made several iterations to fix behavior and direction
Find below auto-generated PR description
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/2037
Created generic tooling for entity circular dep checking, will be useful
for permissions validation too @Weiko
## Migrate `viewFilterGroup` entity to v2 flat architecture
### Summary
Migrates the `viewFilterGroup` entity from v1 to the v2 flat entity
architecture, following the established patterns for other v2 entities
like `viewFilter`, `view`, and `viewField`.
### Changes
**Types & Constants**
- Added `FlatViewFilterGroup` and `FlatViewFilterGroupMaps` types
- Added editable properties constant for `viewFilterGroup`
- Registered `viewFilterGroup` in `ALL_METADATA_NAME`,
`ALL_METADATA_RELATION_PROPERTIES`,
`ALL_METADATA_MANY_TO_ONE_RELATIONS`, and related constants
**Cache Service**
- Created `WorkspaceFlatViewFilterGroupMapCacheService` with proper
relation loading for `viewFilters` and `childViewFilterGroups`
- Updated `WorkspaceFlatViewMapCacheService` to load `viewFilterGroups`
relation
**Builder & Validator**
- Created `WorkspaceMigrationV2ViewFilterGroupActionsBuilderService`
- Created `FlatViewFilterGroupValidatorService` with creation, update,
and deletion validation
- Integrated validation into the orchestrator service (runs before
`viewFilter` validation)
**Action Handlers**
- Created create, update, and delete action handlers for
`viewFilterGroup`
**Service Migration**
- Rewrote `ViewFilterGroupService` to use v2 migration pattern with
`WorkspaceMigrationValidateBuildAndRunService`
- Created utility functions for transforming DTOs to flat entities
**Database Migration**
- Added migration to make `parentViewFilterGroupId` foreign key
deferrable (handles self-referential parent/child insertions)
**ViewFilter Integration**
- Added `viewFilterGroupId` validation in
`FlatViewFilterValidatorService`
- Updated `viewFilter` many-to-one relations to include
`viewFilterGroup`
**Tests**
- Added integration tests for successful creation, update, deletion, and
destruction
- Added failing test cases for non-existent entities and invalid
references
- Added failing test for `viewFilter` creation with non-existent
`viewFilterGroupId`
### Breaking Changes
None - existing API contracts are preserved.
## Description
This PR adds integration tests for the Quick Lead workflow, including a
complete end-to-end test with full workflow execution.
### Key Changes
1. **Enabled SyncDriver for integration tests** - Jobs are now processed
synchronously in tests
- Modified `create-app.ts` to use `SyncDriver` instead of `BullMQ`
- Added `MessageQueueExplorer` to discover and register workflow job
handlers
- This enables complete workflow execution in integration tests
2. **Added integration tests for Quick Lead workflow**:
- Verify workflow exists and is active
- Verify workflow version has correct structure (MANUAL trigger, FORM
step, CREATE_RECORD steps)
- Test workflow triggering creates workflow run with correct initial
state
- Test stop workflow run on a running workflow
- **Full end-to-end test**: trigger → submit form → verify Company and
Person records created
### Test Coverage
The complete end-to-end test verifies:
- Workflow triggers and is in RUNNING status (waiting on FORM step)
- Form submission with test data succeeds
- Workflow completes successfully with all steps in SUCCESS status
- Company record is created with correct name and domain
- Person record is created with correct name and email
- Records are properly cleaned up after test
### How to Run Tests
```bash
npx nx run twenty-server:test:integration -- --testPathPattern="quick-lead-workflow"
```
Or with database reset:
```bash
npx nx run twenty-server:test:integration:with-db-reset -- --testPathPattern="quick-lead-workflow"
```
# Introduction
In this pull-request we're refactoring the page layout widget
configuration entity to be containing its discriminated key simplifying
underlying code and maintainability
- Made the configuration and title non nullable
- Introduced a generic predicate for the `widgetConfigurationType`
- Upgraded command to remove `graphType` and insert new
`configurationType` to existing entries
- Migrated frontend to new type system
---------
Co-authored-by: bosiraphael <raphael.bosi@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Raphaël Bosi <71827178+bosiraphael@users.noreply.github.com>
# Introduction
Creating dedicated folders and module for both `page-layout-tab` and
`page-layout-widget`
The addition diff with deletion is due to the module being added
Should be merged once https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/16206 has
been released + command run to prod
In this PR
- Remove usage of viewGroup.fieldMetadataId, both in BE and FE states.
- But we still need to properly populate it until we fully remove
viewGroup.fieldMetadataId from db and ORM entity (upcoming 3rd PR out of
3). fieldMetadataId was removed from CoreViewGroup type and
CreateViewGroupInput and is determined BE-side based on the associated
view's mainGroupByFieldMetadataId. **I expect this means a downtime on
viewGroup creation, until both FE and BE are deployed and cache is
flushed.** This seems acceptable to me as it only regards viewGroup
creation.
- this information is replaced by view.mainGroupByFieldMetadataID
- Handle view group creation, update and deletion in the BE as a
side-effect of a view creation, update or deletion. Optimistic effects
are still used
- Add validation at view creation or update regarding
mainGroupByFieldMetadata
Left to do in 3rd PR
- Remove viewGroup.fieldMetadataId from db and ORM entity
- Restore feature allowing to update an existing grouped view's group by
field (already OK on BE side but need to rebuild FE optimistic)
changes -
- make iframe side panel to match others -- ie use SidePanelHeader for
title
- make url optional in configuration to match that of the other widgets
(allow partial saves) - render No data status when error or no url
- split widget sizes into two -- graph widget sizes and widget sizes
(graph widgets are a subset of chart widgets)
# Introduction
Initially wanted to reactive the test introduced in
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15393, that was failing because
of direct data source access removing all views ( even seeded one )
which was making the test fail
While doing so discovered a lot of issue with the rest API:
- Rest api wasn't consuming the v2 at all
- Rest api wasn't prepared to handle v2 exceptions
- Rest api did not handled unknown exceptions ( timeout )
Refactored the cleanup of each test to follow black box pattern and
avoid test leakage
### Summary
Split BAR into VERTICAL_BAR and HORIZONTAL_BAR as separate chart types.
### The Problem
Initially wanted a simple vertical/horizontal toggle for bar charts, but
ran into a GraphQL union type
constraint: union types can't have the same field name with different
nullability.
- Vertical bars need groupByFieldMetadataIdX as required (categories on
X)
- Horizontal bars need groupByFieldMetadataIdY as required (categories
on Y)
- GraphQL schema generation fails with this setup
### The Solution
Use semantic primaryAxis and secondaryAxis naming that's
orientation-agnostic:
- primaryAxisGroupByFieldMetadataId = main grouping field (e.g.,
"Company Name")
- secondaryAxisGroupByFieldMetadataId = optional secondary grouping
(e.g., "Stage")
These fields have consistent meaning regardless of orientation. The
visual mapping happens at the UI layer:
- Vertical bars: primary data renders on X-axis, secondary on Y-axis
- Horizontal bars: primary data renders on Y-axis, secondary on X-axis
Both chart types share the same DTO structure with consistent
nullability.
### What Changed
- Split GraphType.BAR → VERTICAL_BAR | HORIZONTAL_BAR
- Renamed fields: primaryAxisGroupByFieldMetadataId,
secondaryAxisGroupByFieldMetadataId (+ subfield
variants)
- useChartSettingsValues(): Maps semantic fields to setting values (no
swapping)
- getBarChartSettings(): Dynamically arranges settings panel based on
orientation
- transformGroupByDataToBarChartData(): Maps semantic fields to Nivo's
layout prop
video QA
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/479061b5-712e-4ca6-9858-95273d1f16c1
# Introduction
Adding view-group to core engine v2
Following https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15010 ( same pattern )
## What's done
- Created flat-view-group
- flat view group runner
- flat view group builder
- create view group service v2 and input transpilers
- refactor the existing view group resolver to fix standard (
BREAKING_CHANGE on graphql api update especially ) REST stays the same
- refactored the front to consume the mutations autogenerated
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1665
This PR is the first part of the creation of the Chart editor.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8b0af8ea-be41-4506-84cb-e40f5521cbf0
Done:
- Bar chart settings (except filters)
- Line chart settings (except filters)
In progress:
- Pie chart settings
- Number chart settings
- Gauge chart settings
Left to do:
- Loosen the backend validation to allow the user to save a partial
configuration, validate the graph configuration in the frontend and
display a error friendly message in the graph if the config is not
completed yet
- Implement the filter edition
- Finish the other graph types settings
## Summary
Enhanced the search resolver integration tests to comprehensively
validate bidirectional accent-insensitive search functionality. Users
can now search with or without accents and find all relevant records
regardless of how the data was originally stored.
## Changes Made
### Test Data Enhancements
- Added 2 new person IDs: `TEST_PERSON_6_ID`, `TEST_PERSON_7_ID`
- Expanded corpus from 5 to 13 records:
- 7 persons
- 2 companies
- 4 pets
- Refactored test data into single arrays with content-driven variable
naming for better maintainability
### Test Coverage Improvements
- Added 6 comprehensive bidirectional tests covering French, Spanish,
and German characters
- Validated multiple fields:
- `firstName`, `lastName`, `jobTitle`, `email`, `company name`, `pet
name`
- Cross-object search testing across Person, Company, and Pet
- Updated all ranking values to account for the enlarged test corpus (5
→ 13 records)
## Test Cases Added/Updated
- [x] should find both **"José"** and **"Jose"** when searching for
`"jose"` (bidirectional accent-insensitive)
- [x] should find both **"García"** and **"Garcia"** when searching for
`"garcia"` (bidirectional accent-insensitive)
- [x] should find both accented and non-accented **"Café"** / **"Cafe"**
records when searching for `"cafe"` (bidirectional accent-insensitive)
- [x] should find both accented and non-accented **"Naïve"** /
**"Naive"** records when searching for `"naive"` (bidirectional
accent-insensitive)
- [x] should find both **"Müller"** and **"Muller"** when searching for
`"muller"` (bidirectional accent-insensitive)
- [x] should find both **"François"** and **"Francois"** when searching
for `"francois"` (bidirectional accent-insensitive)
Created:
- Services
- Resolvers
- Controllers
- Tests for services
- Integration tests for GraphQL and Rest
Updated the Rest API playground
Added new feature flag `IS_CORE_VIEW_ENABLED`
Updated `viewFilter` `operand` and `view` `type` to be enums rather than
strings and generated migration file.
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1259
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Large PR, sorry for that. Don't hesitate to reach me to have full
context (env. 500lines for integration and unit tests)
- Add connect logic in Workspace Entity Manager
- Update QueryDeepPartialEntity type to enable dev to use connect
- Add integration test on createOne / createMany
- Add unit test to cover main utils
- Remove feature flag on connect
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1148
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1147
This PR introduces a significant enhancement to the role-based
permission system by extending it to support AI agents, enabling them to
perform database operations based on assigned permissions.
## Key Changes
### 1. Database Schema Migration
- **Table Rename**: `userWorkspaceRole` → `roleTargets` to better
reflect its expanded purpose
- **New Column**: Added `agentId` (UUID, nullable) to support AI agent
role assignments
- **Constraint Updates**:
- Made `userWorkspaceId` nullable to accommodate agent-only role
assignments
- Added check constraint `CHK_role_targets_either_agent_or_user`
ensuring either `agentId` OR `userWorkspaceId` is set (not both)
### 2. Entity & Service Layer Updates
- **RoleTargetsEntity**: Updated with new `agentId` field and constraint
validation
- **AgentRoleService**: New service for managing agent role assignments
with validation
- **AgentService**: Enhanced to include role information when retrieving
agents
- **RoleResolver**: Added GraphQL mutations for `assignRoleToAgent` and
`removeRoleFromAgent`
### 3. AI Agent CRUD Operations
- **Permission-Based Tool Generation**: AI agents now receive database
tools based on their assigned role permissions
- **Dynamic Tool Creation**: The `AgentToolService` generates CRUD tools
(`create_*`, `find_*`, `update_*`, `soft_delete_*`, `destroy_*`) for
each object based on role permissions
- **Granular Permissions**: Supports both global role permissions
(`canReadAllObjectRecords`) and object-specific permissions
(`canReadObjectRecords`)
### 4. Frontend Integration
- **Role Assignment UI**: Added hooks and components for
assigning/removing roles from agents
## Demo
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/41732267-742e-416c-b423-b687c2614c82
---------
Co-authored-by: Antoine Moreaux <moreaux.antoine@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Guillim <guillim@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charlesBochet@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Marie <51697796+ijreilly@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: martmull <martmull@hotmail.fr>
Co-authored-by: Thomas Trompette <thomas.trompette@sfr.fr>
Co-authored-by: Etienne <45695613+etiennejouan@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Baptiste Devessier <baptiste@devessier.fr>
Co-authored-by: nitin <142569587+ehconitin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Paul Rastoin <45004772+prastoin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: prastoin <paul@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Vicky Wang <157669812+vickywxng@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Vicky Wang <vw92@cornell.edu>
Co-authored-by: Raphaël Bosi <71827178+bosiraphael@users.noreply.github.com>
Fix inconsistent domain URL formats : removing the last / that was
caused by URL method
Standardize URL formatting to ensure consistent links storage and
retrieval of domain URLs across the application. Will improve the
dedpulicates in the links
Note: there is another temporary issue from google that was solved on
the 13th of june https://groups.google.com/g/adwords-api/c/tRSQMRZrJYM
but we consider this out of this scope
Fixes#12621
In this PR
- Determine object record permissions on workflows objects (workflow,
workflowVersion, workflowRun) base on settings permissions @Weiko
- Add Workflow permission guards on workflow resolvers @thomtrp . **Any
method within a resolver that has the SettingsPermission Guard is only
callable by a apiKey or a user that has the permission** (so not by
external parties).
- Add checks bypass in workflow services since 1) for actions gated by
settings permissions, the gate should be done at resolver level, so it
will have been done before the call to the service 2) some service
methods may be called by workflowTriggerController which is callable by
external parties without permissions (ex:
workflowCommonWorkspaceService.getWorkflowVersionOrFail). This is
something we may want to change in the future (still to discuss), by
removing the guard at resolver-level and relying on
shouldBypassPermissionChecks at getRepository and made in a way that we
only bypass for external parties.
- Add checks bypass for actions performed by workflows since they should
not be restricted in our current vision
- Add tests
# Fix cursor-based pagination with lexicographic ordering for composite
fields
## Bug
The existing cursor-based pagination implementation had a bug when
handling composite fields.
When paginating through results sorted by composite fields (like
`fullName` with sub-properties `firstName` and`lastName`), the WHERE
conditions generated for cursor positioning were incorrect, leading to
records being skipped.
The previous implementation was generating wrong WHERE conditions:
For example, when paginating with a cursor like `{ firstName: 'John',
lastName: 'Doe' }`, it would generate:
```sql
WHERE firstName > 'John' AND lastName > 'Doe'
```
This is incorrect because it would miss records like `{ firstName:
'John', lastName: 'Smith' }` which should be included in forward
pagination.
## Fix
Create a new util to use proper lexicographic order when sorting a
composite field.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charlesBochet@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
This PR has several objectives:
- Ignore invalid and empty links in the frontend
- Ignore empty links when creating or updating a link field in the
backend
- Throw an error when trying to create or update a link field with an
invalid link
The logic is mostly the same in the frontend and the backend: we take
the initial primaryLink and the secondaryLinks, we discard all the empty
links (with `url === '' || url === null`), and the primaryLink becomes
the first remaining link.
## Frontend
There are three parts in the frontend where we have to remove the empty
links:
- LinksDisplay
- LinksFieldInput
- isFieldValueEmpty; used in RecordInlineCell
## Backend
I put the logic in
`packages/twenty-server/src/engine/core-modules/record-transformer/services/record-input-transformer.service.ts`
as it's used by the REST API, the GraphQL API, and by Create Record and
Update Record actions in the workflows.
