This PR is purely technical, it does produces any functional change to
the user
- add Lock mecanism to run steps concurrently
- update `workflow-executor.workspace-service.ts` to handle multi branch
workflow execution
- stop passing `context` through steps, it causes race condition issue
- refactor a little bit
- simplify `workflow-run.workspace-service.ts` to prepare `output` and
`context` removal
- move workflowRun status computing from `run-workflow.job.ts` to
`workflow-executor.workspace-service.ts`
## NOTA BENE
When a code step depends of 2 parents like in this config (see image
below)
If the form is submitted before the "Code - 2s" step succeed, the branch
merge "Form" step is launched twice.
- once because form is submission Succeed resumes the workflow in an
asynchronous job
- the second time is when the asynchronous job is launched when "Code -
2s" is succeeded
- the merge "Form" step makes the workflow waiting for response to
trigger the resume in another job
- during that time, the first resume job is launched, running the merge
"Form" step again
This issue only occurs with branch workflows. It will be solved by
checking if the currentStepToExecute is already in a SUCCESS state or
not
<img width="505" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b73839a1-16fe-45e1-a0d9-3efa26ab4f8b"
/>
Currently, when a server query or mutation from the front-end fails, the
error message defined server-side is displayed in a snackbar in the
front-end.
These error messages usually contain technical details that don't belong
to the user interface, such as "ObjectMetadataCollection not found" or
"invalid ENUM value for ...".
**BE**
In addition to the original error message that is still needed (for the
request response, debugging, sentry monitoring etc.), we add a
`displayedErrorMessage` that will be used in the snackbars. It's only
relevant to add it for the messages that will reach the FE (ie. not in
jobs or in rest api for instance) and if it can help the user sort out /
fix things (ie. we do add displayedErrorMessage for "Cannot create
multiple draft versions for the same workflow" or "Cannot delete
[field], please update the label identifier field first", but not
"Object metadata does not exist"), even if in practice in the FE users
should not be able to perform an action that will not work (ie should
not be able to save creation of multiple draft versions of the same
workflows).
**FE**
To ease the usage we replaced enqueueSnackBar with enqueueErrorSnackBar
and enqueueSuccessSnackBar with an api that only requires to pass on the
error.
If no displayedErrorMessage is specified then the default error message
is `An error occured.`
When we use a record field in a form, record relations are displayed as
available variables in following step.
But those are actually empty at execution.
When choosing the record in the form and submitting, we enrich the
record id with the full record before starting the workflow again. But
we were not adding the relations to that enrichment.
This PR does not produce any functional change
First step of the workflow branch feature
- add gather `workflowRun.output` and `workflowRun.context` into one
column `workflowRun.runContext`
- add a command to fill `runContext` from `output` and `context` in
existing records
- maintain `runContext` up to date during workflow runs
Previous logic was using the previous step output and filtering items
that were passing filters.
What we actually want is:
- send filters, right operand being always a step output key, left
operand being either a key, either a value
- resolve those filter variables
- apply the filters to decide whether the condition is passed or not
In this PR:
## Improve recompute metadata cache performance. We are aiming for
~100ms
Deleting relationMetadata table and FKs pointing on it
Fetching indexMetadata and indexFieldMetadata in a separate query as
typeorm is suboptimizing
## Remove caching lock
As recomputing the metadata cache is lighter, we try to stop preventing
multiple concurrent computations. This also simplifies interfaces
## Introduce self recovery mecanisms to recompute cache automatically if
corrupted
Aka getFreshObjectMetadataMaps
## custom object resolver performance improvement: 1sec to 200ms
Double check queries and indexes used while creating a custom object
Remove the queries to db to use the cached objectMetadataMap
## reduce objectMetadataMaps to 500kb
<img width="222" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2370dc80-49b6-4b63-8d5e-30c5ebdaa062"
/>
We used to stored 3 fieldMetadataMaps (byId, byName, byJoinColumnName).
While this is great for devXP, this is not great for performances.
Using the same mecanisme as for objectMetadataMap: we only keep byIdMap
and introduce two otherMaps to idByName, idByJoinColumnName to make the
bridge
## Add dataloader on IndexMetadata (aka indexMetadataList in the API)
## Improve field resolver performances too
## Deprecate ClientConfig
In this PR
1. fix workflow step creation by adding forgotten
`shouldBypassPermissionChecks` in WorkflowVersionStepWorkspaceService
2. clarify the rule for twentyORMGlobalManager: do not add unnecessary
`shouldBypassPermissionChecks` for system objects (there are no
object-records permission checks on system objects, they are dealt with
at resolver level)
In this PR
- Determine object record permissions on workflows objects (workflow,
workflowVersion, workflowRun) base on settings permissions @Weiko
- Add Workflow permission guards on workflow resolvers @thomtrp . **Any
method within a resolver that has the SettingsPermission Guard is only
callable by a apiKey or a user that has the permission** (so not by
external parties).
- Add checks bypass in workflow services since 1) for actions gated by
settings permissions, the gate should be done at resolver level, so it
will have been done before the call to the service 2) some service
methods may be called by workflowTriggerController which is callable by
external parties without permissions (ex:
workflowCommonWorkspaceService.getWorkflowVersionOrFail). This is
something we may want to change in the future (still to discuss), by
removing the guard at resolver-level and relying on
shouldBypassPermissionChecks at getRepository and made in a way that we
only bypass for external parties.
- Add checks bypass for actions performed by workflows since they should
not be restricted in our current vision
- Add tests
# What
Fully deprecate old relations because we have one bug tied to it and it
make the codebase complex
# How I've made this PR:
1. remove metadata datasource (we only keep 'core') => this was causing
extra complexity in the refactor + flaky reset
2. merge dev and demo datasets => as I needed to update the tests which
is very painful, I don't want to do it twice
3. remove all code tied to RELATION_METADATA /
relation-metadata.resolver, or anything tied to the old relation system
4. Remove ONE_TO_ONE and MANY_TO_MANY that are not supported
5. fix impacts on the different areas : see functional testing below
# Functional testing
## Functional testing from the front-end:
1. Database Reset ✅
2. Sign In ✅
3. Workspace sign-up ✅
5. Browsing table / kanban / show ✅
6. Assigning a record in a one to many / in a many to one ✅
7. Deleting a record involved in a relation ✅ => broken but not tied to
this PR
8. "Add new" from relation picker ✅ => broken but not tied to this PR
9. Creating a Task / Note, Updating a Task / Note relations, Deleting a
Task / Note (from table, show page, right drawer) ✅ => broken but not
tied to this PR
10. creating a relation from settings (custom / standard x oneToMany /
manyToOne) ✅
11. updating a relation from settings should not be possible ✅
12. deleting a relation from settings (custom / standard x oneToMany /
manyToOne) ✅
13. Make sure timeline activity still work (relation were involved
there), espacially with Task / Note => to be double checked ✅ => Cannot
convert undefined or null to object
14. Workspace deletion / User deletion ✅
15. CSV Import should keep working ✅
16. Permissions: I have tested without permissions V2 as it's still hard
to test v2 work and it's not in prod yet ✅
17. Workflows global test ✅
## From the API:
1. Review open-api documentation (REST) ✅
2. Make sure REST Api are still able to fetch relations ==> won't do, we
have a coupling Get/Update/Create there, this requires refactoring
3. Make sure REST Api is still able to update / remove relation => won't
do same
## Automated tests
1. lint + typescript ✅
2. front unit tests: ✅
3. server unit tests 2 ✅
4. front stories: ✅
5. server integration: ✅
6. chromatic check : expected 0
7. e2e check : expected no more that current failures
## Remove // Todos
1. All are captured by functional tests above, nothing additional to do
## (Un)related regressions
1. Table loading state is not working anymore, we see the empty state
before table content
2. Filtering by Creator Tim Ap return empty results
3. Not possible to add Tasks / Notes / Files from show page
# Result
## New seeds that can be easily extended
<img width="1920" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d290d130-2a5f-44e6-b419-7e42a89eec4b"
/>
## -5k lines of code
## No more 'metadata' dataSource (we only have 'core)
## No more relationMetadata (I haven't drop the table yet it's not
referenced in the code anymore)
## We are ready to fix the 6 months lag between current API results and
our mocked tests
## No more bug on relation creation / deletion
---------
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
For database event triggers, we remove the before / after logic. We go
directly with the properties
<img width="211" alt="Capture d’écran 2025-05-27 à 11 40 36"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a05bd3c1-104b-477b-be52-d56846ce7e63"
/>
To achieve this without changing the shape of events, we need to handle
keys using dots, such:
```
'properties.after.name': {
icon: 'IconBuildingSkyscraper',
type: FieldMetadataType.TEXT,
label: 'Name',
value: 'My text',
isLeaf: true,
},
```
This PR:
- adds logic to handle the case where the key has dot included
- adds tests
# Introduction
Added a no-explicit-any rule to the twenty-server, not applicable to
tests and integration tests folder
Related to https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/975
Discussed with Charles
## In case of conflicts
Until this is approved I won't rebased and handle conflict, just need to
drop two latest commits and re run the scripts etc
## Legacy
We decided not to handle the existing lint error occurrences and
programmatically ignored them through a disable next line rule comment
## Open question
We might wanna activate the
[no-explicit-any](https://typescript-eslint.io/rules/no-explicit-any/)
`ignoreRestArgs` for our use case ?
```
ignoreRestArgs?: boolean;
```
---------
Co-authored-by: etiennejouan <jouan.etienne@gmail.com>
- enrich response so the record is available in the step output. Today
this is available in the schema but only the id is set
- make the full record picker clickable instead of the arrow only
<img width="467" alt="Capture d’écran 2025-04-30 à 16 08 04"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/db74b9a6-7f1d-4e54-bf06-9be3d67ee398"
/>
When inserting a new step between step 1 et step 2, then step 1 should
have the new step as next step id, add stop having step 2.
When deleting a step, we link the parent and next steps together. It may
change in the future
- Add position during workflow version / creation. It will allow to have
the versions and runs ordered
- Block the creation from generated api for versions. We use workflow
post hooks or create from draft
2025-04-01 15:29:54 +02:00
Thomas TrompetteGitHubgreptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Currently, when filling the form, values are not saved in the action
settings. This is an issue because we do not see the response in the
node settings, only in the output of the step.
This PR:
- adds a new endpoint to update a step in the run flow output
- updates this flow when a step is updated
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2e74a010-a0d2-4b87-bd1f-1c91f7ca6b60
---------
Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
# Introduction
In this PR we've migrated `twenty-shared` from a `vite` app
[libary-mode](https://vite.dev/guide/build#library-mode) to a
[preconstruct](https://preconstruct.tools/) "atomic" application ( in
the future would like to introduce preconstruct to handle of all our
atomic dependencies such as `twenty-emails` `twenty-ui` etc it will be
integrated at the monorepo's root directly, would be to invasive in the
first, starting incremental via `twenty-shared`)
For more information regarding the motivations please refer to nor:
- https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/587
-
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/281#issuecomment-2630949682
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/589
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/590
## How to test
In order to ease the review this PR will ship all the codegen at the
very end, the actual meaning full diff is `+2,411 −114`
In order to migrate existing dependent packages to `twenty-shared` multi
barrel new arch you need to run in local:
```sh
yarn tsx packages/twenty-shared/scripts/migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport.ts && \
npx nx run-many -t lint --fix -p twenty-front twenty-ui twenty-server twenty-emails twenty-shared twenty-zapier
```
Note that `migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport` is idempotent, it's atm
included in the PR but should not be merged. ( such as codegen will be
added before merging this script will be removed )
## Misc
- related opened issue preconstruct
https://github.com/preconstruct/preconstruct/issues/617
## Closed related PR
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11028
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10993
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10960
## Upcoming enhancement: ( in others dedicated PRs )
- 1/ refactor generate barrel to export atomic module instead of `*`
- 2/ generate barrel own package with several files and tests
- 3/ Migration twenty-ui the same way
- 4/ Use `preconstruct` at monorepo global level
## Conclusion
As always any suggestions are welcomed !
- create a form filler component
- send the response on submit
- put back a field name. We need it for the step output
- validate a form is well set before activation
TODO:
- we need to refresh to see the form submitted. We need to discuss about
a strategy
- the response is not saved in the step settings. We need a new endpoint
to update workflow run step
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0f34a6cd-ed8c-4d9a-a1d4-51455cc83443
# Introduction
While running https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10960 scripts
discovers few issues:
- Invalid named folder `pre-hooks.ts`
- Mock consuming outbound imported module resulting in consumed before
initialization
- add name to form field metadata
- extract field generation from object record schema
- use field generation to generate field from metadata
- add tests
We are starting to put too many services in common folder. Version and
step building should be separated into different services and go to the
builder folder. Today builder folder only manage schema.
We should:
- keep services responsible for only one action
- keep modules based on the actual action these provide rather than
having common module
This PR:
- creates a service for workflow version builder
- moves version and step builders to workflow builder folder rather than
commun
- creates separated folders for schema, version and steps
No logic has been added. Only modules created and functions moved.
# Introduction
Avoid having multiple `isDefined` definition across our pacakges
Also avoid importing `isDefined` from `twenty-ui` which exposes a huge
barrel for a such little util function
## In a nutshell
Removed own `isDefined.ts` definition from `twenty-ui` `twenty-front`
and `twenty-server` to move it to `twenty-shared`.
Updated imports for each packages, and added explicit dependencies to
`twenty-shared` if not already in place
Related PR https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/9941
Having a global record crud action adds complex logic.
We decided to split those actions. I only kept a common folder / module
in backend.
⚠️ this may break existing workflows if these were using previous
actions!
