**Before**
- any user with workpace_members permission was able to remove a user
from their workspace. This triggered the deletion of workspaceMember +
of userWorkspace, but did not delete the user (even if they had no
workspace left) nor the roleTarget (acts as junction between role and
userWorkspace) which was left with a userWorkspaceId pointing to
nothing. This is because roleTarget points to userWorkspaceId but the
foreign key constraint was not implemented
- any user could delete their own account. This triggered the deletion
of all their workspaceMembers, but not of their userWorkspace nor their
user nor the roleTarget --> we have orphaned userWorkspace, not
technically but product wise - a userWorkspace without a workspaceMember
does not make sense
So the problems are
- we have some roleTargets pointing to non-existing userWorkspaceId
(which caused https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/14608 )
- we have userWorkspaces that should not exist and that have no
workspaceMember counterpart
- it is not possible for a user to leave a workspace by themselves, they
can only leave all workspaces at once, except if they are being removed
from the workspace by another user
**Now**
- if a user has multiple workspaces, they are given the possibility to
leave one workspace while remaining in the others (we show two buttons:
Leave workspace and Delete account buttons). if a user has just one
workspace, they only see Delete account
- when a user leaves a workspace, we delete their workspaceMember,
userWorkspace and roleTarget. If they don't belong to any other
workspace we also soft-delete their user
- soft-deleted users get hard deleted after 30 days thanks to a cron
- we have two commands to clean the orphans roleTarget and userWorkspace
(TODO: query db to see how many must be run)
**Next**
- once the commands have been run, we can implement and introduce the
foreign key constraint on roleTarget
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/14608
As title
- adds decorators in twenty-sdk
- update twenty-cli load-manifest to it gets @FieldMetadata infos +
testing
- update twenty-server so it CRUD fields properly, using
universalIdentifier
- Fix UI so we can update managed objects records
- move FieldMetadata items from twenty-server to twenty-shared
Here is what the PR does:
- Surface password state in validatePasswordResetToken, returning
hasPassword so the client can tell whether a user is setting or changing
their password.
- Consume that flag throughout the front end (mock data, stories,
GraphQL types) and update the Reset/Set Password modal to swap the
heading/button label and success toast accordingly.
- After a successful password set/reset, immediately update the
logged-in user’s hasPassword flag so the Settings screen reflects the
new state without a reload.
Modal has two states now - reset password modal uses change password
state since it made intuitive sense.
<p align="center">
<img width="404" height="397" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c54cc581-1248-4395-833d-0202758e1947"
/>
</p>
<p align="center">
<img width="403" height="393" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d8a39a95-27e6-4037-86f2-1f74176002ba"
/>
</p>
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
- Allow users to choose the date granularity of the x axis and the group
by of the y axis on a bar chart
- Display those options conditionally
- Store timezones in graphs: each graph has its own timezone, defaults
to the user timezone. There will be a picker in the v2 to choose the
timezone. For now the timezone is not used by the backend, but it will
be used in filters and in group by queries.
- Store first day of the week
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/66a5d156-dd93-4ebe-8c8f-d172f93e25be
Closes [Core Issue
#1772](https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1772).
<!-- CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---
> [!NOTE]
> Introduces SSO bypass with a new permission flag and workspace-level
provider toggles, enabling permitted users to log in via
Google/Microsoft/Password when SSO-only, with backend enforcement and
frontend UI/hooks/queries.
>
> - **Backend**:
> - **Permission & Enforcement**: Add `PermissionFlagType.SSO_BYPASS`;
update `AuthService` to allow login via non-SSO providers when workspace
bypass is enabled and user has `SSO_BYPASS`.
> - **Workspace Model**: Add `isGoogleAuthBypassEnabled`,
`isMicrosoftAuthBypassEnabled`, `isPasswordAuthBypassEnabled`
(migration, entity, update input, service validation).
> - **Public API**: Extend `PublicWorkspaceDataOutput` with
`authBypassProviders`; resolver computes it; permissions defaults
include `SSO_BYPASS`.
> - **Frontend**:
> - **GraphQL/State**: Generate new types/fields; add
`authBypassProviders` to `GetPublicWorkspaceDataByDomain`; new states
`workspaceAuthBypassProvidersState`, `workspaceBypassModeState`.
> - **Auth UI/Logic**: Add `useWorkspaceBypass`; update sign-in form and
footer to offer "Bypass SSO" and use merged providers when enabled;
remove auto-redirect when single SSO.
> - **Settings**: Add Security section to toggle bypass methods per
provider; conditionally show Change Password via `useCanChangePassword`.
> - **Tests/Mocks**: Update mocks and tests to include bypass
flags/providers.
>
> <sup>Written by [Cursor
Bugbot](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot) for commit
8c393b2bad. This will update automatically
on new commits. Configure
[here](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot).</sup>
<!-- /CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Fixes - https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/15364
- Removed `activeNonSystemObjectMetadataItems` from the hook as it was
not necessary. Hook use `alphaSortedActiveNonSystemObjectMetadataItems`
now.
- Correctly check for read permissions.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
# Complete color refactoring
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1779
- Updated all colors to use Radix colors with P3 color space allowing
for brighter colors
- Created our own gray scale interpolated on Radix's scale to have the
same values for grays as the old ones in the app
- Introduced dark and light colors as well as there transparent versions
- Added many new colors from radix that can be used in the tags or in
the graphs
- Updated multiple color utilities to match new behaviors
- Changed the computation of Avatar colors to return only colors from
the theme (before it was random hsl)
These changes allow the user to use new colors in tags or charts, the
colors are brighter and with better contrast. We have a full range of
color variations from 1 to 12 where before we only had 4 adaptative
colors.
All these changes will allow us to develop custom themes for the user
soon, where users can choose their accent colors, background colors and
there contrast.
# Introduction
Please first review this PR initial base
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15358
In a nutshell refactored the frontend fetchers to display v2 errors
format smoothly
Please note that the v2 now finished the whole validation and does fail
fast anymore ( summary is hardcoded for the moment )
```json
[
{
"extensions": {
"code": "BAD_USER_INPUT",
"errors": {
"cronTrigger": [],
"databaseEventTrigger": [],
"fieldMetadata": [
{
"errors": [
{
"code": "INVALID_FIELD_INPUT",
"message": "Default value should be as quoted string",
"value": "",
},
{
"code": "INVALID_FIELD_INPUT",
"message": "Default value "" must be one of the option values",
"value": "",
},
],
"flatEntityMinimalInformation": {
"id": Any<String>,
"name": "testField",
"objectMetadataId": Any<String>,
},
"status": "fail",
"type": "create_field",
},
],
"index": [],
"objectMetadata": [],
"routeTrigger": [],
"serverlessFunction": [],
"view": [],
"viewField": [],
"viewFilter": [],
"viewGroup": [],
},
"message": "Validation failed for 0 object(s) and 0 field(s)",
"summary": {
"invalidCronTrigger": 0,
"invalidDatabaseEventTrigger": 0,
"invalidFieldMetadata": 0,
"invalidIndex": 0,
"invalidObjectMetadata": 0,
"invalidRouteTrigger": 0,
"invalidServerlessFunction": 0,
"invalidView": 0,
"invalidViewField": 0,
"invalidViewFilter": 0,
"invalidViewGroup": 0,
"totalErrors": 0,
},
"userFriendlyMessage": "Validation failed for 0 object(s) and 0 field(s)",
},
"message": "Multiple validation errors occurred while creating fields",
"name": "GraphQLError",
},
]
```
## What's done
- `usePersistView` tool ( CRUD )
- renamed `usePersistViewX` tools accordingly ( no more records or core
)
- Now catching a lot of before unhandled exceptions
- refactored each services to handle their own exception handlers and
return either the response or the error within a discriminated union
record
## Result
### Primary entity error
When performing an metadata operation on a given metadata, if validation
errors occurs we will display each of them in a toast
Here while creating an object metadata.
<img width="700" height="327" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0c33d13c-c66c-4749-af36-b253abd3449b"
/>
### Related entity error
Still while creating an object
<img width="700" height="327" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/52607788-c4e9-470c-ac8c-23437345ee5c"
/>
### Translated
<img width="700" height="327" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a7198c20-ae82-47a6-910c-761de9594672"
/>
## Conclusion
This PR is an extract of https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15331
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1776
## Notes
- Not refactor around triggers services as they're not consumed directly
by any frontend services
Adds intelligent routing system that automatically selects the best
agent for user queries based on conversation context.
### Changes:
- Added `routerModel` column to workspace table for configurable router
LLM selection
- Implemented `RouterService` with conversation history analysis and
agent matching logic
- Created router settings UI in AI Settings page with model dropdown
- Removed agent-specific thread associations - threads are now
agent-agnostic
- Added real-time routing status notification in chat UI with shimmer
effect
- Removed automatic default assistant agent creation
- Renamed GraphQL operations from agent-specific to generic (e.g.,
`agentChatThreads` → `chatThreads`)
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
Fixes [Dependabot Alert
85](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/security/dependabot/85) -
prototype pollution in lodash.
Added a shared pick helper (with unit tests) in twenty-shared and
refactored front-end/server code to import { pick } from the shared
barrel instead of lodash.pick.
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: martmull <martmull@hotmail.fr>
🎯 Merge Settings Relation and Morph Relation Forms followup
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15062
Here we fixed some little comments that could have be done earlier in
the main PR
🎯 Merge Settings Relation and Morph Relation Forms
In the settings, we unify morph and relation into a single form.
The form now automatically creates
- a `RELATION` field when 1 destination object is selected
- or a `MORPH_RELATION` field when 2+ objects are selected.
Better UI labels (showing object name for single selection, "X Objects"
for multiple), proper field editing controls on destination objects, and
capitalized field labels.
We still make sure the isMorphRelationEnabled feature flag prevents
current users from accessing this feature
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1589
Closes#14726
### Added
- `trashRetentionDays` field to workspace entity (default: 14 days)
- Automated trash cleanup using BullMQ jobs
- Daily cron (00:10 UTC) that enqueues cleanup jobs for all active
workspaces
- Per-workspace limit: 100k records deleted per day
- Calendar-based retention: records deleted on day X are cleaned up X+14
days later (at midnight UTC boundaries)
### Architecture
- **Cron (WorkspaceTrashCleanupCronJob):** Runs daily, enqueues jobs in
parallel for all workspaces
- **Job (WorkspaceTrashCleanupJob):** Processes individual workspace
cleanup
- **Service (WorkspaceTrashCleanupService):** Discovers tables with
`deletedAt`, deletes old records with quota enforcement
- **Command:** `npx nx run twenty-server:command
cron:workspace:cleanup-trash` to register the cron
### Testing
- Unit tests for service with 100% coverage of public API
- Tested quota enforcement, error handling, and edge cases
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
**Fixes #15036**
Changes:
Centered Webhook URL: The webhook URL is now properly centered within
its table cell.
Conditional Scroll Arrows: The small arrows for horizontal scrolling now
only appear when the webhook URL is longer than the width of the cell.
This prevents the arrows from being displayed for shorter URLs.
Files changed:
1.
`packages/twenty-front/src/modules/settings/developers/components/SettingsWebhooksTable.tsx`
The grid-template-columns of the StyledTableRow component was changed
from a fixed-width layout (444px 68px) to a flexible layout (1fr auto).
This allows the first column, which contains the webhook URL, to grow
and shrink dynamically based on the available space, which is crucial
for proper centering and handling of different URL lengths.
2.
`packages/twenty-front/src/modules/settings/developers/components/SettingsDevelopersWebhookTableRow.tsx`
The overflow property of the StyledUrlTableCell component was changed
from hidden to auto. This ensures that the horizontal scrollbar (the
"small arrows") is only displayed when the content of the cell (the
webhook URL) overflows the cell's width.The redundant
StyledApisFieldTableRow component was removed to simplify the code, as
its styles were being overridden by the parent component.
How to Test
1. Log in to the application.
2. Go to Settings > API & Webhooks.
4. Add a new webhook with a short URL (e.g., http://localhost:3000).
5. Expected Behavior: The URL should be centered within the table cell,
and no scroll arrows should be visible.
6. Add another webhook with a long URL.
7. Expected Behavior: The URL should be centered, and horizontal scroll
arrows should be visible, allowing you
to scroll to see the entire URL.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
## Refactor: Prepare frontend record layouts for backend-driven
configuration
This PR simplifies and prepares the frontend record layout system for
eventual migration to backend-driven layouts, aligning the architecture
with the existing PageLayout system used for dashboards.
### Key Changes
**Architecture Improvements:**
- Created unified LayoutRenderingContext that works for both record
pages (with targetRecord) and dashboards (standalone)
- Replaced prop drilling with context-based data flow - cards access
targetRecord and isInRightDrawer via context hooks
- Introduced useTargetRecord() helper hook that provides type-safe
access to the current record
- Created generic CardRenderer component that handles configuration
injection and context guards uniformly
**Configuration System:**
- Converted all tab icons from React components to JSON-serializable
strings (e.g., Icon: IconCheckbox → icon: 'IconCheckbox')
- Added configuration field to cards, matching the widget configuration
pattern on the backend
- Created CardConfiguration types system similar to WidgetConfiguration
on the backend
- Moved widget-specific props (like showDuplicatesSection) into
configuration objects
**Code Organization:**
- Extracted visibility evaluation logic into reusable
evaluateTabVisibility() utility
- Organized layouts into dedicated files (one per object:
base-record-layout.ts, company-record-layout.ts, etc.)
- Renamed components to match their purpose: Notes → NotesCard,
Attachments → FilesCard, etc.
- Consolidated card rendering from registry object to direct
getCardComponent() function
**API Alignment:**
- Made ifNoReadPermissionObject an explicit part of TabVisibilityConfig
(follows if* naming convention)
- Removed redundant targetObjectNameSingular from tab-level (now derived
from visibility config)
- Card API now mirrors Widget API (both use type, configuration,
accessed via context)
## Problem
With Twenty usage growing, we are facing challenges on server side to
respond to the demand. The current bottleneck we are facing is server
CPU.
While investigating CPU performances, we figured out that loading all
relation fields was the biggest issue.
### About graphql query response size
**Example:** on `People Index` Table page:
we query: `person.company` and we query **all non relation fields** on
company relation field.
`{ person { company { id, name, domainName, employees, address ... } }`
However we only need **company.id, company.name and company.domainName**
to be able to render the Company Chip in the company column (RELATION)
in the table.
`{ person { company { id, name, domainName } }`
We initially assumed that the querying all non relation fields was not
an issue because it was not adding additional load on database (which is
also partially true: if a field is containing a huge json this will add
load on postgres as data needs to be transfered)
This assumption is wrong on CPU side:
- when loading one to many relations (company.people), this quickly ads
up and we end up with response of 20kB quite quickly, even without
adding any custom field on person.
- even when loading a many to one relation, if the user is storing big
data in a given field (note.body for instance, or workflowRun.state),
this starts also being an issue.
- Worst case scenario are starting to happen: on a production workspace
with 20 active workflows. Loading workflow table while displaying
workflow runs commands (20 workflows x 60 workflowRuns x
workflowRun.state which is a big JSON) result in a response of... 125MB.
### Why is it an issue?
When yoga (graphql engine) parses a response to send it back in server
response, it's using `JSON.parse `(or stringify depending on the case).
Parsing data is CPU instensive (as you need to validate, transform) and
this is more or less `O(n)`.
This means returning 125MB is very intense on the CPU and will likely
use 100% of the CPU for ~1sec in our production servers.
NodeJs (nodeV8) is single threaded. It's able to process multiple
requests in parallel but to do that, it will cut them in "microTasks"
and process each microTasks (that can belong to different requests) one
after the other. Exactly like a single threaded CPU would allocate some
time to a process and then to the next one, etc.
This means that this big response request will actually block the other
request.
As a result, all requests are slow and our infrastructure is multi
tenant so some customers are impacting others.
This is even a bigger issue when our health checks start to fail and
containers are starting being considered as unhealthy and killed by the
orchestrator
## How to fix this
1. On Front end side, we should only query what we need. In this PR, I'm
forcing the relations to only query: `id`, `labelIdentifier`,
`imageIdentifier`
2. (later) as we are API first, we also need to do something to protect
the servers from this side too. To do that, Graphql APIs can associate a
cost to each graphql field (maybe 1 for a test fixed, 2 for a JSON
field, 10 for relations, etc...) and we can throttle based on that.
## Changes in this PR
It's mainly about refactor the tooling to generate `RecordGqlFields`
(`generateDepthOneGqlFields`). this tooling is used to generate the list
of fields we want to query. Most of the time we want to query a record
with one level of nesting.
1) Refactor to remove duplicate code => `generateDepthOne` become
`generateDepth` and can handle both `depth = 0 | 1`
2) Introduce `generateDepthRecordGqlFieldsFromFields.ts` which is the
base and can give you a list of gqlFields based on FieldMetadataItems
3) Introduce `generateDepthRecordGqlFieldsFromObject` which is a
shortcut for an object
4) Introduce `generateDepthRecordGqlFieldsFromRecords` which is the
intersection between `generateDepthRecordGqlFieldsFromObject` and a
given record (useful for cache tooling)
5) Replace all usages + introduce a hook
`useGenerateDepthRecordGqlFieldsFromObject` to ease usage
## Summary
1. This change introduces the ability to limit how many values a
multi-value field can contain (for example: maximum number of emails,
phone numbers, links, or array items).
2. It centralizes the limit as a shared constant and type, validates
settings on the server, updates front-end types and components to
consume the setting, and adds a small settings UI so workspace admins
can change the limit per field.
3. Default behavior is preserved: if no max is configured, the existing
default (10) is used.
## **Fixes Issue:** [#14740
](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/14740)
## Manual Test Screenshot
<img width="383" height="451" alt="Screenshot 2025-10-08 002413"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a7704af6-10ef-4d10-b8c9-a9eeca03bfd9"
/>
### Values in fields
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7f59c4f7-3aca-4f83-8c04-3d44988316e3
Let me know if any changes are needed
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
fix:Ability to add a new option for a multi-select on the fly
Issues:#13877
---------
Co-authored-by: ehconitin <nitinkoche03@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
## Context
Add routes to migration V2
- Resolvers
- Service v2
- Builder
- Validator
- Action runner
Next PR: Add to twenty-cli to sync routes with serverless
- add serverlessFunction schema in twenty-cli
- add trigger schema in twenty-cli
- update serverless function code save and get
- sync serverless function
Following https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/14762
In this PR
- moved logic around any field filter formatting to twenty-shared
- added any field filter to the filters applied to groupBy when viewId
is defined
- added integration test
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1560
If viewId is defined in a groupBy query, we want to apply all filters of
the view to the query.
This required to move a lot of code from twenty-front to twenty-shared
to convert the filters as stored in the db into graphql filters,
applying the right combinations between filters etc., which was
previously only done in the FE.
This PR does not handle any field filters, it will be done in a later pr
