[QRQC_2] No implicitAny in twenty-server (#12075)

# Introduction
Following https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/12068
Related with https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/975

We're enabling `noImplicitAny` handled few use case manually, added a
`ts-expect-error` to the others, we should plan to handle them in the
future

packages/twenty-server/src/engine/core-modules/message-queue/drivers/interfaces/message-queue-driver.interface.ts

@@ -14,11 +14,13 @@ export interface MessageQueueDriver {
     data: T,
     options?: QueueJobOptions,
   ): Promise<void>;
+  // @ts-expect-error legacy noImplicitAny
   work<T extends MessageQueueJobData>(
     queueName: MessageQueue,
     handler: ({ data, id }: { data: T; id: string }) => Promise<void> | void,
     options?: MessageQueueWorkerOptions,
   );
+  // @ts-expect-error legacy noImplicitAny
   addCron<T extends MessageQueueJobData | undefined>({
     queueName,
     jobName,
@@ -32,6 +34,7 @@ export interface MessageQueueDriver {
     options: QueueCronJobOptions;
     jobId?: string;
   });
+  // @ts-expect-error legacy noImplicitAny
   removeCron({
     queueName,
     jobName,

packages/twenty-server/src/engine/core-modules/message-queue/message-queue.explorer.ts

@@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ export class MessageQueueExplorer implements OnModuleInit {
     const filteredProcessMethodNames = processMethodNames.filter(
       (processMethodName) => {
         const metadata = this.metadataAccessor.getProcessMetadata(
+          // @ts-expect-error legacy noImplicitAny
           instance[processMethodName],
         );
 
@@ -203,6 +204,7 @@ export class MessageQueueExplorer implements OnModuleInit {
   ) {
     for (const processMethodName of processMethodNames) {
       try {
+        // @ts-expect-error legacy noImplicitAny
         await instance[processMethodName].call(instance, job.data);
       } catch (err) {
         if (!shouldFilterException(err)) {