* fix: add missing vi.mock() calls to prevent vitest worker shutdown flakiness
Add vi.mock() calls for modules that trigger background network requests
or database connections during import. These transitive imports can cause
the vitest worker RPC to shut down while pending fetch/network operations
are still in flight, resulting in flaky test failures with:
Error: [vitest-worker]: Closing rpc while "fetch" was pending
The primary modules mocked are:
- @calcom/app-store/delegationCredential (triggers credential lookups)
- @calcom/prisma (triggers database initialization)
- @calcom/features/calendars/lib/CalendarManager (triggers calendar API calls)
- @calcom/features/auth/lib/verifyEmail (triggers email service)
- @calcom/lib/domainManager/organization (triggers domain lookups)
Co-Authored-By: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix: remove conflicting empty prisma mocks from files with prismock/prismaMock setups
- Remove vi.mock('@calcom/prisma', () => ({ default: {}, prisma: {} })) from 28 files
that already have prismock/prismaMock test doubles. Vitest hoists all vi.mock() calls
and the last one wins, so these empty mocks were overriding the functional test doubles.
- Fix CalendarSubscriptionService.test.ts to reuse the shared mock from
__mocks__/delegationCredential instead of creating a new unconfigured vi.fn()
- Remove DelegationCredentialRepository.test.ts empty prisma mock (different pattern)
- Remove vi.mock from inside beforeEach in intentToCreateOrg.handler.test.ts
Co-Authored-By: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix: add comprehensive delegationCredential mock exports to prevent CI test failures
The vi.mock blocks for @calcom/app-store/delegationCredential were missing
exports that the code under test transitively imports (e.g.
enrichUsersWithDelegationCredentials, enrichUserWithDelegationCredentialsIncludeServiceAccountKey,
buildAllCredentials, getFirstDelegationConferencingCredentialAppLocation).
Added all exports with passthrough implementations so the booking flow
works correctly without triggering real network requests.
Co-Authored-By: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix: correct credential mock return shapes to match real module API
Co-Authored-By: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix: revert unintended yarn.lock changes
Co-Authored-By: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
157 lines
5.1 KiB
TypeScript
157 lines
5.1 KiB
TypeScript
import prismaMock from "@calcom/testing/lib/__mocks__/prismaMock";
|
|
import type { Schedule } from "@calcom/prisma/client";
|
|
import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
|
|
import type { TrpcSessionUser } from "../../../../types";
|
|
import { getAllSchedulesByUserIdHandler } from "./getAllSchedulesByUserId.handler";
|
|
|
|
const DEFAULT_SCHEDULE_ID = 1;
|
|
|
|
vi.mock("@calcom/lib/hasEditPermissionForUser", () => ({
|
|
hasReadPermissionsForUserId: vi.fn(),
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
vi.mock("@calcom/features/schedules/repositories/ScheduleRepository", () => ({
|
|
ScheduleRepository: vi.fn().mockImplementation(function () {
|
|
return {
|
|
getDefaultScheduleId: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(DEFAULT_SCHEDULE_ID),
|
|
};
|
|
}),
|
|
}));
|
|
import { hasReadPermissionsForUserId } from "@calcom/lib/hasEditPermissionForUser";
|
|
|
|
const mockHasReadPermissions = vi.mocked(hasReadPermissionsForUserId);
|
|
|
|
describe("getAllSchedulesByUserIdHandler", () => {
|
|
const createMockUser = (id: number): NonNullable<TrpcSessionUser> =>
|
|
({
|
|
id,
|
|
username: `user-${id}`,
|
|
email: `user-${id}@example.com`,
|
|
}) as NonNullable<TrpcSessionUser>;
|
|
|
|
const createMockSchedule = (overrides: Partial<Schedule> = {}): Partial<Schedule> => ({
|
|
id: 1,
|
|
userId: 10,
|
|
name: "Working Hours",
|
|
...overrides,
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
vi.clearAllMocks();
|
|
prismaMock.schedule.findMany.mockReset();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe("authorization", () => {
|
|
it("returns schedules when user is the owner", async () => {
|
|
const ownerId = 10;
|
|
const user = createMockUser(ownerId);
|
|
const mockSchedules = [createMockSchedule({ userId: ownerId })];
|
|
|
|
mockHasReadPermissions.mockResolvedValue(false);
|
|
prismaMock.schedule.findMany.mockResolvedValue(mockSchedules as Schedule[]);
|
|
|
|
const result = await getAllSchedulesByUserIdHandler({
|
|
ctx: { user },
|
|
input: { userId: ownerId },
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(result.schedules).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(result.schedules[0]).toMatchObject({
|
|
id: 1,
|
|
userId: ownerId,
|
|
name: "Working Hours",
|
|
readOnly: false,
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("returns schedules when user is part of the same team", async () => {
|
|
const scheduleOwnerId = 10;
|
|
const teamMemberId = 20;
|
|
const user = createMockUser(teamMemberId);
|
|
const mockSchedules = [createMockSchedule({ userId: scheduleOwnerId })];
|
|
|
|
mockHasReadPermissions.mockResolvedValue(true);
|
|
prismaMock.schedule.findMany.mockResolvedValue(mockSchedules as Schedule[]);
|
|
|
|
const result = await getAllSchedulesByUserIdHandler({
|
|
ctx: { user },
|
|
input: { userId: scheduleOwnerId },
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(mockHasReadPermissions).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
|
|
memberId: scheduleOwnerId,
|
|
userId: teamMemberId,
|
|
});
|
|
expect(result.schedules).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(result.schedules[0].readOnly).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("throws UNAUTHORIZED when user is not owner and not part of team", async () => {
|
|
const scheduleOwnerId = 10;
|
|
const unauthorizedUserId = 999;
|
|
const user = createMockUser(unauthorizedUserId);
|
|
|
|
mockHasReadPermissions.mockResolvedValue(false);
|
|
|
|
await expect(
|
|
getAllSchedulesByUserIdHandler({
|
|
ctx: { user },
|
|
input: { userId: scheduleOwnerId },
|
|
})
|
|
).rejects.toMatchObject({
|
|
code: "UNAUTHORIZED",
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(mockHasReadPermissions).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
|
|
memberId: scheduleOwnerId,
|
|
userId: unauthorizedUserId,
|
|
});
|
|
expect(prismaMock.schedule.findMany).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe("schedule retrieval", () => {
|
|
it("marks exactly one schedule as default", async () => {
|
|
const ownerId = 10;
|
|
const user = createMockUser(ownerId);
|
|
const mockSchedules = [
|
|
createMockSchedule({ id: DEFAULT_SCHEDULE_ID, userId: ownerId }),
|
|
createMockSchedule({ id: 2, userId: ownerId, name: "Evening Hours" }),
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
mockHasReadPermissions.mockResolvedValue(false);
|
|
prismaMock.schedule.findMany.mockResolvedValue(mockSchedules as Schedule[]);
|
|
|
|
const result = await getAllSchedulesByUserIdHandler({
|
|
ctx: { user },
|
|
input: { userId: ownerId },
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const defaultSchedules = result.schedules.filter((s) => s.isDefault);
|
|
expect(defaultSchedules).toHaveLength(1);
|
|
expect(defaultSchedules[0].id).toBe(DEFAULT_SCHEDULE_ID);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("returns multiple schedules for user", async () => {
|
|
const ownerId = 10;
|
|
const user = createMockUser(ownerId);
|
|
const mockSchedules = [
|
|
createMockSchedule({ id: 1, userId: ownerId, name: "Morning" }),
|
|
createMockSchedule({ id: 2, userId: ownerId, name: "Afternoon" }),
|
|
createMockSchedule({ id: 3, userId: ownerId, name: "Evening" }),
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
mockHasReadPermissions.mockResolvedValue(false);
|
|
prismaMock.schedule.findMany.mockResolvedValue(mockSchedules as Schedule[]);
|
|
|
|
const result = await getAllSchedulesByUserIdHandler({
|
|
ctx: { user },
|
|
input: { userId: ownerId },
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(result.schedules).toHaveLength(3);
|
|
expect(result.schedules.map((s) => s.name)).toEqual(["Morning", "Afternoon", "Evening"]);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
});
|