Files
calendar/packages/features/bookings/lib/payment/processPaymentRefund.test.ts
T
RomitGitHubDevin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
4291a59b2c fix: add missing vi.mock() calls to prevent vitest worker shutdown flakiness (#28459)
* fix: add missing vi.mock() calls to prevent vitest worker shutdown flakiness

Add vi.mock() calls for modules that trigger background network requests
or database connections during import. These transitive imports can cause
the vitest worker RPC to shut down while pending fetch/network operations
are still in flight, resulting in flaky test failures with:
  Error: [vitest-worker]: Closing rpc while "fetch" was pending

The primary modules mocked are:
- @calcom/app-store/delegationCredential (triggers credential lookups)
- @calcom/prisma (triggers database initialization)
- @calcom/features/calendars/lib/CalendarManager (triggers calendar API calls)
- @calcom/features/auth/lib/verifyEmail (triggers email service)
- @calcom/lib/domainManager/organization (triggers domain lookups)

Co-Authored-By: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: remove conflicting empty prisma mocks from files with prismock/prismaMock setups

- Remove vi.mock('@calcom/prisma', () => ({ default: {}, prisma: {} })) from 28 files
  that already have prismock/prismaMock test doubles. Vitest hoists all vi.mock() calls
  and the last one wins, so these empty mocks were overriding the functional test doubles.
- Fix CalendarSubscriptionService.test.ts to reuse the shared mock from
  __mocks__/delegationCredential instead of creating a new unconfigured vi.fn()
- Remove DelegationCredentialRepository.test.ts empty prisma mock (different pattern)
- Remove vi.mock from inside beforeEach in intentToCreateOrg.handler.test.ts

Co-Authored-By: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: add comprehensive delegationCredential mock exports to prevent CI test failures

The vi.mock blocks for @calcom/app-store/delegationCredential were missing
exports that the code under test transitively imports (e.g.
enrichUsersWithDelegationCredentials, enrichUserWithDelegationCredentialsIncludeServiceAccountKey,
buildAllCredentials, getFirstDelegationConferencingCredentialAppLocation).

Added all exports with passthrough implementations so the booking flow
works correctly without triggering real network requests.

Co-Authored-By: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: correct credential mock return shapes to match real module API

Co-Authored-By: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: revert unintended yarn.lock changes

Co-Authored-By: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-03-17 09:55:37 +05:30

179 lines
5.3 KiB
TypeScript

import prismock from "@calcom/testing/lib/__mocks__/prisma";
import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach } from "vitest";
import { getPaymentAppData } from "@calcom/app-store/_utils/payments/getPaymentAppData";
import dayjs from "@calcom/dayjs";
import { RefundPolicy } from "@calcom/lib/payment/types";
import { handlePaymentRefund } from "./handlePaymentRefund";
import { processPaymentRefund } from "./processPaymentRefund";
vi.mock("@calcom/app-store/_utils/payments/getPaymentAppData", () => ({
getPaymentAppData: vi.fn(),
}));
vi.mock("./handlePaymentRefund", () => ({
handlePaymentRefund: vi.fn(),
}));
const mockedGetPaymentAppData = vi.mocked(getPaymentAppData);
describe("processPaymentRefund", () => {
const mockStartTime = new Date("2025-01-01T10:00:00Z");
const mockPayment = [
{
id: 1,
uid: "unique-id-1",
appId: "123",
bookingId: 456,
amount: 1000,
fee: 50,
currency: "USD",
success: true,
refunded: false,
data: {},
externalId: "ext-1234",
paymentOption: null,
},
];
const mockBooking = {
startTime: mockStartTime,
endTime: new Date("2025-01-01T11:00:00Z"),
payment: mockPayment,
eventType: {
owner: { id: 1 },
metadata: {},
},
};
const mockAppData = {
refundPolicy: RefundPolicy.DAYS,
refundCountCalendarDays: false,
refundDaysCount: 3,
};
const mockApp = {
id: "123",
slug: "stripe",
dirName: "app1",
categories: ["payment"],
keys: {},
enabled: true,
};
const mockCredential = {
id: 1,
key: "key1",
appId: "123",
userId: 1,
teamId: null,
type: "stripe_payment",
invalid: false,
};
beforeEach(async () => {
vi.clearAllMocks();
await prismock.credential.deleteMany();
await prismock.app.deleteMany();
});
it("should not process refund if no teamId or eventType owner", async () => {
await processPaymentRefund({ booking: mockBooking, teamId: null });
expect(handlePaymentRefund).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("should not process refund if no successful payment found", async () => {
const invalidBooking = { ...mockBooking, payment: [{ ...mockPayment[0], success: false }] };
await processPaymentRefund({ booking: invalidBooking, teamId: 1 });
expect(handlePaymentRefund).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("should not process refund if refund policy is NEVER", async () => {
mockedGetPaymentAppData.mockReturnValueOnce({ ...mockAppData, refundPolicy: RefundPolicy.NEVER });
await processPaymentRefund({ booking: mockBooking, teamId: 1 });
expect(handlePaymentRefund).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("should process refund if refund policy is DAYS and within refund window", async () => {
mockedGetPaymentAppData.mockReturnValueOnce(mockAppData);
await prismock.app.create({ data: mockApp });
await prismock.credential.create({ data: mockCredential });
const mockNow = dayjs(mockStartTime).subtract(8, "days").toDate();
vi.useFakeTimers();
vi.setSystemTime(mockNow);
await processPaymentRefund({ booking: mockBooking, teamId: 1 });
expect(handlePaymentRefund).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
1,
expect.objectContaining({
key: "key1",
appId: "123",
})
);
});
it("should not process refund if past the refund deadline", async () => {
mockedGetPaymentAppData.mockReturnValueOnce(mockAppData);
await prismock.app.create({ data: mockApp });
await prismock.credential.create({ data: mockCredential });
const mockNow = dayjs(mockStartTime).subtract(2, "days").toDate();
vi.useFakeTimers();
vi.setSystemTime(mockNow);
await processPaymentRefund({ booking: mockBooking, teamId: 1 });
expect(handlePaymentRefund).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("should process refund if business days are considered and before deadline", async () => {
mockedGetPaymentAppData.mockReturnValueOnce({ ...mockAppData, refundCountCalendarDays: false });
await prismock.app.create({ data: mockApp });
await prismock.credential.create({ data: mockCredential });
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/ban-ts-comment
//@ts-ignore
const mockNow = dayjs(mockStartTime).businessDaysSubtract(3).toDate();
vi.useFakeTimers();
vi.setSystemTime(mockNow);
await processPaymentRefund({ booking: mockBooking, teamId: 1 });
expect(handlePaymentRefund).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
1,
expect.objectContaining({
key: "key1",
appId: "123",
})
);
});
it("should not process refund if business days are considered and after deadline", async () => {
mockedGetPaymentAppData.mockReturnValueOnce({ ...mockAppData, refundCountCalendarDays: false });
await prismock.app.create({ data: mockApp });
await prismock.credential.create({ data: mockCredential });
const mockNow = dayjs(mockStartTime).subtract(3, "days").toDate();
vi.useFakeTimers();
vi.setSystemTime(mockNow);
await processPaymentRefund({ booking: mockBooking, teamId: 1 });
expect(handlePaymentRefund).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("should not process refund if paymentAppCredential is not found", async () => {
mockedGetPaymentAppData.mockReturnValueOnce(mockAppData);
await processPaymentRefund({ booking: mockBooking, teamId: 1 });
expect(handlePaymentRefund).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
});