Files
calendar/packages/features/tasker
Hariom BalharaGitHubDevin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
f1011ddd08 chore: Improves the core booking audit architecture by adding new capabilities and simplifying the existing interfaces. (#25872)
* feat(booking-audit): extract core audit system changes from PR 25125

This PR extracts core audit infrastructure changes without integration changes:

1. New action services introduced:
   - SeatBookedAuditActionService
   - SeatRescheduledAuditActionService

2. Simplification of ActionService interface:
   - Streamlined IAuditActionService interface
   - Reduced TypeScript burden with cleaner type definitions

3. ActionSource support:
   - Added BookingAuditSource enum (API_V1, API_V2, WEBAPP, WEBHOOK, UNKNOWN)
   - Added source and operationId fields to BookingAudit model

4. New AuditAction types:
   - SEAT_BOOKED
   - SEAT_RESCHEDULED
   - APP actor type

5. New BookingAuditAccessService:
   - Permission-based access control for audit logs
   - Added readTeamAuditLogs and readOrgAuditLogs permissions

6. Fixes in the logs viewer flow:
   - Enhanced BookingAuditViewerService with improved filtering
   - Local AttendeeRepository for actor enrichment

Changes are contained within packages/features/booking-audit with minimal
outside changes (permission registry only).

Co-Authored-By: hariom@cal.com <hariombalhara@gmail.com>

* refactor(booking-audit): streamline action handling and enhance localization

- Replaced action icon retrieval with a mapping object for improved clarity and performance.
- Introduced constants for actor role labels to simplify role retrieval.
- Added new localization strings for audit log permission errors and organization requirements.
- Updated various service and repository interfaces to enhance type safety and clarity.
- Removed deprecated architecture documentation and adjusted related imports for consistency.

These changes aim to improve code maintainability and user experience in the booking audit system.

* fix(booking-audit): enhance actor role localization and operation ID tracking

- Updated actor role labels in the booking logs view to use lowercase for consistency.
- Improved localization by wrapping actor role display in a translation function.
- Added operationId field to audit logs for better correlation of actions across multiple bookings.
- Enhanced BookingAuditViewerService to include operationId in enriched audit logs.
- Updated integration tests to verify consistent operationId across related audit logs.

These changes aim to improve localization accuracy and facilitate better tracking of user actions in the booking audit system.

* feat: integrate credential repository and enhance app actor handling

- Added CredentialRepository to manage app credentials, including a method to find credentials by ID.
- Updated BookingAudit system to support app actors identified by credential ID, improving actor attribution and audit clarity.
- Introduced a new utility function to map app slugs to display names, enhancing the user experience in audit logs.
- Modified relevant interfaces and types to accommodate the new credential handling and app actor structure.
- Enhanced BookingAuditViewerService to display app names based on credentials, ensuring accurate representation in audit logs.

---------

Co-authored-by: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-12-18 12:46:24 +00:00
..
2024-04-18 11:56:25 -07:00
2024-04-18 11:56:25 -07:00
2024-04-18 11:56:25 -07:00

Tasker

Tasker: "One who performs a task, as a day-laborer."

Task: "A function to be performed; an objective."

What is it?

Introduces a new pattern called Tasker which may be switched out in the future for other third party services.

Also introduces a base InternalTasker which doesn't require third party dependencies and should work out of the box (by configuring a proper cron).

Why is this needed?

The Tasker pattern is needed to streamline the execution of non-critical tasks in an application, providing a structured approach to task scheduling, execution, retrying, and cancellation. Here's why it's necessary:

  1. Offloading non-critical tasks: There are tasks that don't need to be executed immediately on the main thread, such as sending emails, generating reports, or performing periodic maintenance tasks. Offloading these tasks to a separate queue or thread improves the responsiveness and efficiency of the main application.

  2. Retry mechanism: Not all tasks succeed on the first attempt due to errors or external dependencies. This pattern incorporates a retry mechanism, which allows failed tasks to be retried automatically for a specified number of attempts. This improves the robustness of the system by handling temporary failures gracefully.

  3. Scheduled task execution: Some tasks need to be executed at a specific time or after a certain delay. The Tasker pattern facilitates scheduling tasks for future execution, ensuring they are performed at the designated time without manual intervention.

  4. Task cancellation: Occasionally, it's necessary to cancel a scheduled task due to changing requirements or user actions. The Tasker pattern supports task cancellation, enabling previously scheduled tasks to be revoked or removed from the queue before execution.

  5. Flexible implementation: The Tasker pattern allows for flexibility in implementation by providing a base structure (InternalTasker) that can be extended or replaced with third-party services (TriggerDevTasker, AwsSqsTasker, etc.). This modularity ensures that the task execution mechanism can be adapted to suit different application requirements or environments.

Overall, the Tasker pattern enhances the reliability, performance, and maintainability by managing non-critical tasks in a systematic and efficient manner. It abstracts away the complexities of task execution, allowing developers to focus on core application logic while ensuring timely and reliable execution of background tasks.

How does it work?

Since the Tasker is a pattern on itself, it will depend on the actual implementation. For example, a TriggerDevTasker will work very differently from an AwsSqsTasker.

For simplicity sake will explain how the InternalTasker works:

  • Instead of running a non-critical task you schedule using the tasker:

    const examplePayload = { example: "payload" };
    - await sendWebhook(examplePayload);
    + await tasker.create("sendWebhook", JSON.stringify(examplePayload));
    
  • This will create a new task to be run on the next processing of the task queue.

  • Then on the next cron run it will be picked up and executed:

    // /app/api/tasks/cron/route.ts
    import { TaskProcessor } from "@calcom/features/tasker/task-processor";
    
    export async function GET() {
      // authenticate the call...
      const processor = new TaskProcessor();
      await processor.processQueue();
      return Response.json({ success: true });
    }
    
  • By default, the cron will run each minute and will pick the next 100 tasks to be executed.

  • If the tasks succeeds, it will be marked as suceededAt: new Date(). If if fails, the attempts prop will increase by 1 and will be retried on the next cron run.

  • If attempts reaches maxAttemps, it will be considered a failed and won't be retried again.

  • By default, tasks will be attempted up to 3 times. This can be overridden when creating a task.

  • From here we can either keep a record of executed tasks, or we can setup another cron to cleanup all successful and failed tasks:

    // /app/api/tasks/cleanup/route.ts
    import { TaskProcessor } from "@calcom/features/tasker/task-processor";
    
    export async function GET() {
      // authenticate the call...
      const processor = new TaskProcessor();
      await processor.cleanup();
      return Response.json({ success: true });
    }
    
  • This will delete all failed and successful tasks.

  • A task is just a simple function receives a payload:

    type TaskHandler = (payload: string) => Promise<void>;
    

How to contribute?

You can contribute by either expanding the InternalTasker or creating new Taskers. To see how to add new Taskers, see the tasker-factory.ts file.

You can also take some inspiration by looking into previous attempts to add various Message Queue pull requests: