Files
calendar/agents/rules/data-repository-pattern.md
Benny JooGitHubDevin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
ab21c7f805 refactor: Cal.diy (#28903)
* feat: Cal.diy — community-driven MIT-licensed fork of Cal.com

This squashed commit contains all Cal.diy changes applied on top of calcom/cal.com main:

- Rebrand Cal.com to Cal.diy across the entire codebase
- Remove Enterprise Edition (EE) features, license checks, and AGPL restrictions
- Switch license from AGPL-3.0 to MIT
- Remove docs/ directory (migrated to Nextra at cal.diy)
- Remove dead code: org tests, EE tips, platform nav, premium username, SAML/SSO, etc.
- Clean up .env.example for self-hosted Cal.diy
- Update Docker image references to calcom/cal.diy
- Update README, CONTRIBUTING.md, and issue templates for Cal.diy community fork
- Add PR welcome bot for Cal.diy contributors
- Fix API v2 breaking changes oasdiff ignore entries
- Replace Blacksmith CI runners with default GitHub Actions

3893 files changed, 20789 insertions(+), 411020 deletions(-)

Co-Authored-By: [email protected] <[email protected]>

* refactor: remove org-specific /organizations/:orgId endpoints from API v2 atoms controllers (#1701)

Co-authored-by: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: revert Cal.diy Inc to Cal.com, Inc. in license files, copyright notices, and package metadata (#1702)

Co-authored-by: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* rip out org related comments in api v2

---------

Co-authored-by: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-04-15 09:52:36 -03:00

2.0 KiB

title, impact, impactDescription, tags
title impact impactDescription tags
Isolate Technology Choices Behind Repositories CRITICAL Enables technology changes without codebase-wide refactors data, repository, prisma, orm, isolation

Isolate Technology Choices Behind Repositories

Impact: CRITICAL

Technology choices must not seep through the application. The Prisma problem illustrates this perfectly: we currently have references to Prisma scattered across hundreds of files. This creates massive coupling and makes technology changes prohibitively expensive.

Incorrect (Prisma leaking throughout codebase):

// In a service file
import { prisma } from "@calcom/prisma";

async function getBooking(id: number) {
  // Direct Prisma usage in service
  return prisma.booking.findFirst({
    where: { id },
    include: { user: true }
  });
}

Correct (Repository abstraction):

// In repository file
import { prisma } from "@calcom/prisma";

export class BookingRepository {
  async findById(id: number): Promise<BookingDTO | null> {
    const booking = await prisma.booking.findFirst({
      where: { id },
      select: { id: true, title: true, userId: true }
    });
    return booking ? this.toDTO(booking) : null;
  }
}

// In service file - no Prisma knowledge
import { BookingRepository } from "./repositories/BookingRepository";

async function getBooking(id: number) {
  return this.bookingRepository.findById(id);
}

The standard:

  • All database access must go through Repository classes
  • Repositories are the only code that knows about Prisma (or any other ORM)
  • No business logic should be in repositories
  • Repositories are injected via Dependency Injection containers

Benefits: If we ever switch from Prisma to Drizzle or another ORM, the only changes required are:

  • Repository implementations
  • DI container wiring for new repositories
  • Nothing else in the codebase should care or change

Reference: Cal.diy Engineering Blog