* feat: Cal.diy — community-driven MIT-licensed fork of Cal.com This squashed commit contains all Cal.diy changes applied on top of calcom/cal.com main: - Rebrand Cal.com to Cal.diy across the entire codebase - Remove Enterprise Edition (EE) features, license checks, and AGPL restrictions - Switch license from AGPL-3.0 to MIT - Remove docs/ directory (migrated to Nextra at cal.diy) - Remove dead code: org tests, EE tips, platform nav, premium username, SAML/SSO, etc. - Clean up .env.example for self-hosted Cal.diy - Update Docker image references to calcom/cal.diy - Update README, CONTRIBUTING.md, and issue templates for Cal.diy community fork - Add PR welcome bot for Cal.diy contributors - Fix API v2 breaking changes oasdiff ignore entries - Replace Blacksmith CI runners with default GitHub Actions 3893 files changed, 20789 insertions(+), 411020 deletions(-) Co-Authored-By: [email protected] <[email protected]> * refactor: remove org-specific /organizations/:orgId endpoints from API v2 atoms controllers (#1701) Co-authored-by: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: revert Cal.diy Inc to Cal.com, Inc. in license files, copyright notices, and package metadata (#1702) Co-authored-by: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * rip out org related comments in api v2 --------- Co-authored-by: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2.0 KiB
2.0 KiB
title, impact, impactDescription, tags
| title | impact | impactDescription | tags |
|---|---|---|---|
| Isolate Technology Choices Behind Repositories | CRITICAL | Enables technology changes without codebase-wide refactors | data, repository, prisma, orm, isolation |
Isolate Technology Choices Behind Repositories
Impact: CRITICAL
Technology choices must not seep through the application. The Prisma problem illustrates this perfectly: we currently have references to Prisma scattered across hundreds of files. This creates massive coupling and makes technology changes prohibitively expensive.
Incorrect (Prisma leaking throughout codebase):
// In a service file
import { prisma } from "@calcom/prisma";
async function getBooking(id: number) {
// Direct Prisma usage in service
return prisma.booking.findFirst({
where: { id },
include: { user: true }
});
}
Correct (Repository abstraction):
// In repository file
import { prisma } from "@calcom/prisma";
export class BookingRepository {
async findById(id: number): Promise<BookingDTO | null> {
const booking = await prisma.booking.findFirst({
where: { id },
select: { id: true, title: true, userId: true }
});
return booking ? this.toDTO(booking) : null;
}
}
// In service file - no Prisma knowledge
import { BookingRepository } from "./repositories/BookingRepository";
async function getBooking(id: number) {
return this.bookingRepository.findById(id);
}
The standard:
- All database access must go through Repository classes
- Repositories are the only code that knows about Prisma (or any other ORM)
- No business logic should be in repositories
- Repositories are injected via Dependency Injection containers
Benefits: If we ever switch from Prisma to Drizzle or another ORM, the only changes required are:
- Repository implementations
- DI container wiring for new repositories
- Nothing else in the codebase should care or change
Reference: Cal.diy Engineering Blog