ab21c7f805
* feat: Cal.diy — community-driven MIT-licensed fork of Cal.com This squashed commit contains all Cal.diy changes applied on top of calcom/cal.com main: - Rebrand Cal.com to Cal.diy across the entire codebase - Remove Enterprise Edition (EE) features, license checks, and AGPL restrictions - Switch license from AGPL-3.0 to MIT - Remove docs/ directory (migrated to Nextra at cal.diy) - Remove dead code: org tests, EE tips, platform nav, premium username, SAML/SSO, etc. - Clean up .env.example for self-hosted Cal.diy - Update Docker image references to calcom/cal.diy - Update README, CONTRIBUTING.md, and issue templates for Cal.diy community fork - Add PR welcome bot for Cal.diy contributors - Fix API v2 breaking changes oasdiff ignore entries - Replace Blacksmith CI runners with default GitHub Actions 3893 files changed, 20789 insertions(+), 411020 deletions(-) Co-Authored-By: benny@cal.com <sldisek783@gmail.com> * refactor: remove org-specific /organizations/:orgId endpoints from API v2 atoms controllers (#1701) Co-authored-by: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: revert Cal.diy Inc to Cal.com, Inc. in license files, copyright notices, and package metadata (#1702) Co-authored-by: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * rip out org related comments in api v2 --------- Co-authored-by: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2.0 KiB
2.0 KiB
title, impact, impactDescription, tags
| title | impact | impactDescription | tags |
|---|---|---|---|
| Organize Code by Domain Using Vertical Slices | CRITICAL | Dramatically improves discoverability and reduces cross-team conflicts | architecture, vertical-slices, ddd, organization |
Organize Code by Domain Using Vertical Slices
Impact: CRITICAL
Our codebase is organized by domain, not by technical layer. The packages/features directory is the heart of this architectural approach. Each folder inside represents a complete vertical slice of the application, driven by the domain it touches.
Incorrect (traditional layered architecture):
src/
controllers/
bookingController.ts
availabilityController.ts
services/
bookingService.ts
availabilityService.ts
repositories/
bookingRepository.ts
availabilityRepository.ts
This creates problems: changes to one feature require touching files scattered across multiple directories, it's hard to understand what a feature does because its code is fragmented, and teams step on each other's toes.
Correct (vertical slice architecture):
packages/features/
bookings/
services/
repositories/
components/
tests/
availability/
services/
repositories/
components/
tests/
Each feature folder is a self-contained vertical slice that includes:
- Domain logic: Core business rules and entities specific to that feature
- Application services: Use case orchestration for that domain
- Repositories: Data access specific to that feature's needs
- DTOs: Data transfer objects for crossing boundaries
- UI components: Frontend components related to this feature
- Tests: Unit, integration, and e2e tests for this feature
Benefits:
- Everything related to a feature lives in one directory
- You can understand the entire feature by exploring one directory
- Teams can work on different features without conflicts
- Features are loosely coupled and can evolve independently
Reference: Cal.diy Engineering Blog